Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Tornado Cash: a fixed-denomination mixer proved by a succinct argument |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | The tornado-core repository publishes a mixer: a deposit of a fixed denomination is a commitment, and a withdrawal proves knowledge of some unused commitment without saying which. |
| Who may write | Tornado Cash developers |
| What is settled | The commitment goes into a tree. The withdrawal reveals a nullifier and a proof of membership. The denomination is fixed so amounts do not distinguish deposits. |
| Load-bearing assumption | This note states no volume and no anonymity-set size. |
| What this library says afterwards | A reading of the project's public design document. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not an offer. |
| Rights | Official external source only |