Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Privacy pools: association-set proofs for compliant withdrawals |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | The privacy-pools paper proposes that a withdrawal prove membership in an association set that has excluded known bad deposits, so privacy and a blocklist are both explicit. |
| Who may write | Vitalik Buterin, Jacob Illum, Fabian Schär, Ameen Soleimani and others |
| What is settled | Users deposit into a pool. A withdrawal proves the note is in a chosen association set, not merely in the whole pool. |
| Load-bearing assumption | This note does not say any regulator has accepted the construction. |
| What this library says afterwards | A reading of the project's public design document. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not an offer. |
| Rights | Official external source only |