Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Well-Known Format for Required Actions |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | A desk note on ERC 5568 (Well-Known Format for Required Actions). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it. |
| Who may write | Gavin John |
| What is settled | The file's own opening line says: This ERC introduces a minimalistic machine-readable (binary) format to signal to wallets that an action needs to be taken by the user using a well-known function and revert reason. |
| Load-bearing assumption | Status Review is not evidence that any node you run has shipped the change. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status on the file: Review. A reading of the public text, not a client release note. |
| Rights | Licensed for redistribution |