Skip to content

LibraryConsensus2025Design paperCorpus record

MonadBFT and deferred execution

Monad. Monad.

Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.

A reading of the project's public design document. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not an offer.

Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.
Evidence
Primary paper
Re-measured
No
Assumptions
3
Records linked
6

01 Claim ledger

What the paper is allowed to say

Each row is a sentence already in the study. The status is the same on every row: a model claim, not a live measurement.

  1. Claim 01 · Paper model

    The defect

    High throughput claims that do not say what is agreed before execution are not yet a consensus design.

  2. Claim 02 · Paper model

    The proposal

    Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.

  3. Claim 03 · Paper model

    The mechanism

    Leaders propose an order. Finality, in the docs, is about that order, not about a price.

  4. Claim 04 · Paper model

    The bound

    This note does not quote transactions per second or a validator count.

02 Three cuts

Observation, model, falsifier

A desk does not stop at the summary. Each claim is cut three ways, using only this study's own assumptions and checks. Nothing here is a new figure.

  1. 01 The defect

    Observation

    What the study says

    High throughput claims that do not say what is agreed before execution are not yet a consensus design.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Monad's own architecture pages. A later client release can change a parameter without changing this paragraph.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    How does a light client learn the execution result?

  2. 02 The proposal

    Observation

    What the study says

    Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Monad's own architecture pages. A later client release can change a parameter without changing this paragraph.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What do validators sign: an order, a state root, or both?

  3. 03 The mechanism

    Observation

    What the study says

    Leaders propose an order. Finality, in the docs, is about that order, not about a price.

    Model

    What has to hold

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What do validators sign: an order, a state root, or both?

  4. 04 The bound

    Observation

    What the study says

    This note does not quote transactions per second or a validator count.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Monad's own architecture pages. A later client release can change a parameter without changing this paragraph.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What do validators sign: an order, a state root, or both?

03 Sequence

One action, as an operating tape

  1. 01Leaders propose an order. Finality, in the docs, is about that order, not about a price.
  2. 02Deferred execution means the execution result is not what the vote finished. A client that needs the result still has to execute or obtain a proof of execution.
  3. 03Parallel execution is a claim about the virtual machine's dependency analysis. It is a different claim from BFT safety.

04 Load-bearing

The argument, and where a pitch drops it

  1. What the name has to mean

    The cut

    Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    This note does not quote transactions per second or a validator count.

  2. What actually moves

    The cut

    Deferred execution means the execution result is not what the vote finished. A client that needs the result still has to execute or obtain a proof of execution.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    Deferred execution changes when a user can treat a receipt as final. The docs have to be read for that delay, not guessed.

  3. What a later deployment may change

    The cut

    Parallel execution is a claim about the virtual machine's dependency analysis. It is a different claim from BFT safety.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    Deferred execution changes when a user can treat a receipt as final. The docs have to be read for that delay, not guessed.

05 Register

What has to be true

  • Model · Not re-measured

    You are reading Monad's own architecture pages. A later client release can change a parameter without changing this paragraph.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    The document is the one at the source URL. A marketing page with the same brand is not this text.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

06 Divergence

What happened after the paper

Deferred execution changes when a user can treat a receipt as final. The docs have to be read for that delay, not guessed.

A later client, parameter set, or reward formula is a different object. Cite this paper for the mechanism. Cite a primary release for the network. This desk has not re-run the proof.

07 Pre-mortem

What to check before you use the idea

  1. 0 of 3 marked on this browser. A mark is a reading note, not a pass, a rating, or a recommendation.

08 Anatomy

The paper, in the order a builder needs

The problem it names

High throughput claims that do not say what is agreed before execution are not yet a consensus design.

What the design proposes

  • Leaders propose an order. Finality, in the docs, is about that order, not about a price.
  • Deferred execution means the execution result is not what the vote finished. A client that needs the result still has to execute or obtain a proof of execution.
  • Parallel execution is a claim about the virtual machine's dependency analysis. It is a different claim from BFT safety.

How the mechanism is specified

  • Leaders propose an order. Finality, in the docs, is about that order, not about a price.
  • Deferred execution means the execution result is not what the vote finished. A client that needs the result still has to execute or obtain a proof of execution.
  • Parallel execution is a claim about the virtual machine's dependency analysis. It is a different claim from BFT safety.

What this page does not treat as proven

  • This note does not quote transactions per second or a validator count.
  • A testnet parameter is not the proof.
  • Deferred execution changes when a user can treat a receipt as final. The docs have to be read for that delay, not guessed.

Why the desk still reads it

Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.

09 Lexicon

Terms, opened into the record

Deferred execution
Consensus finishes an order before the state that order produces is required.
MonadBFT
The consensus protocol named in the Monad docs. It is not Tendermint by synonym.

10 Repository

Every linked record on this page

Underlined words open a page that already exists: a concept, a protocol profile, a failure record, or another paper. If a word is not underlined, this desk does not have a record for it.

This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.

Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.