Skip to content

LibraryCredit and stable value2024Design paperCorpus record

Liquity V2: user-set rates and batched liquidations

Liquity V2. Liquity.

Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.

A reading of the project's public design document. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not an offer.

Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.
Evidence
Primary paper
Re-measured
No
Assumptions
3
Records linked
3

01 Claim ledger

What the paper is allowed to say

Each row is a sentence already in the study. The status is the same on every row: a model claim, not a live measurement.

  1. Claim 01 · Paper model

    The defect

    The original Liquity study is the first system. V2's rate market is a different mechanism. Do not describe it as the same CDP with a new coat of paint.

  2. Claim 02 · Paper model

    The proposal

    Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.

  3. Claim 03 · Paper model

    The mechanism

    A trove or position has a collateral and a debt. The user-set rate determines how the position is treated when someone redeems.

  4. Claim 04 · Paper model

    The bound

    No minimum collateral ratio is copied here. It lives in the deployment.

02 Three cuts

Observation, model, falsifier

A desk does not stop at the summary. Each claim is cut three ways, using only this study's own assumptions and checks. Nothing here is a new figure.

  1. 01 The defect

    Observation

    What the study says

    The original Liquity study is the first system. V2's rate market is a different mechanism. Do not describe it as the same CDP with a new coat of paint.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Liquity's V2 technical docs. The v1 paper is a different study.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What does a low user-set rate expose the position to?

  2. 02 The proposal

    Observation

    What the study says

    Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Liquity's V2 technical docs. The v1 paper is a different study.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What does a low user-set rate expose the position to?

  3. 03 The mechanism

    Observation

    What the study says

    A trove or position has a collateral and a debt. The user-set rate determines how the position is treated when someone redeems.

    Model

    What has to hold

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    Who receives the collateral when a position is redeemed against?

  4. 04 The bound

    Observation

    What the study says

    No minimum collateral ratio is copied here. It lives in the deployment.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Liquity's V2 technical docs. The v1 paper is a different study.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What collateral does the document allow?

03 Sequence

One action, as an operating tape

  1. 01A trove or position has a collateral and a debt. The user-set rate determines how the position is treated when someone redeems.
  2. 02Redemption pays debt holders from the lowest-rate positions first, if that is the rule on the page you opened. That ordering is the design.
  3. 03Liquidation is still a collateral rule. A user-set rate does not stop a collateral crash.

04 Load-bearing

The argument, and where a pitch drops it

  1. What the name has to mean

    The cut

    Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    This is not Liquity v1. The study of v1 stays separate.

  2. What actually moves

    The cut

    Redemption pays debt holders from the lowest-rate positions first, if that is the rule on the page you opened. That ordering is the design.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    A later client, parameter or reward formula is a different object from this paragraph.

  3. What a later deployment may change

    The cut

    Liquidation is still a collateral rule. A user-set rate does not stop a collateral crash.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    No minimum collateral ratio is copied here. It lives in the deployment.

05 Register

What has to be true

  • Model · Not re-measured

    You are reading Liquity's V2 technical docs. The v1 paper is a different study.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    The document is the one at the source URL. A marketing page with the same brand is not this text.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

06 Divergence

What happened after the paper

A peg is not promised by this note.

A later client, parameter set, or reward formula is a different object. Cite this paper for the mechanism. Cite a primary release for the network. This desk has not re-run the proof.

07 Pre-mortem

What to check before you use the idea

  1. 0 of 3 marked on this browser. A mark is a reading note, not a pass, a rating, or a recommendation.

08 Anatomy

The paper, in the order a builder needs

The problem it names

The original Liquity study is the first system. V2's rate market is a different mechanism. Do not describe it as the same CDP with a new coat of paint.

What the design proposes

  • A trove or position has a collateral and a debt. The user-set rate determines how the position is treated when someone redeems.
  • Redemption pays debt holders from the lowest-rate positions first, if that is the rule on the page you opened. That ordering is the design.
  • Liquidation is still a collateral rule. A user-set rate does not stop a collateral crash.

How the mechanism is specified

  • A trove or position has a collateral and a debt. The user-set rate determines how the position is treated when someone redeems.
  • Redemption pays debt holders from the lowest-rate positions first, if that is the rule on the page you opened. That ordering is the design.
  • Liquidation is still a collateral rule. A user-set rate does not stop a collateral crash.

What this page does not treat as proven

  • No minimum collateral ratio is copied here. It lives in the deployment.
  • This is not Liquity v1. The study of v1 stays separate.
  • A peg is not promised by this note.

Why the desk still reads it

Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.

09 Lexicon

Terms, opened into the record

User-set rate
An interest rate the borrower chooses, which also orders them for redemption.
Redemption
A direct swap of the debt token for collateral through the protocol's ordering, not a market trade.

10 Repository

Every linked record on this page

Underlined words open a page that already exists: a concept, a protocol profile, a failure record, or another paper. If a word is not underlined, this desk does not have a record for it.

This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.

Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.