Skip to content

LibraryConsensus2020Design paperCorpus record

Ethereum proof-of-stake consensus specifications

Ethereum consensus specs. Ethereum consensus-spec contributors.

The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.

A reading of the project's public design document. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not an offer.

The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.
Evidence
Primary paper
Re-measured
No
Assumptions
3
Records linked
7

01 Claim ledger

What the paper is allowed to say

Each row is a sentence already in the study. The status is the same on every row: a model claim, not a live measurement.

  1. Claim 01 · Paper model

    The defect

    A blog post about the Merge is not the spec. A client that disagrees with this repository is either wrong or running a fork.

  2. Claim 02 · Paper model

    The proposal

    The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.

  3. Claim 03 · Paper model

    The mechanism

    The beacon state, the fork-choice rule, and the validator custody duties are specified separately and have to be cited by their document.

  4. Claim 04 · Paper model

    The bound

    This note does not restate the state-transition function.

02 Three cuts

Observation, model, falsifier

A desk does not stop at the summary. Each claim is cut three ways, using only this study's own assumptions and checks. Nothing here is a new figure.

  1. 01 The defect

    Observation

    What the study says

    A blog post about the Merge is not the spec. A client that disagrees with this repository is either wrong or running a fork.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading ethereum/consensus-specs. The Gasper paper is the companion study, not a replacement.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    Is the client you run tracking this commit, or a fork?

  2. 02 The proposal

    Observation

    What the study says

    The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading ethereum/consensus-specs. The Gasper paper is the companion study, not a replacement.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    Does the rule live in the fork choice or in the state transition?

  3. 03 The mechanism

    Observation

    What the study says

    The beacon state, the fork-choice rule, and the validator custody duties are specified separately and have to be cited by their document.

    Model

    What has to hold

    The document is the one at the source URL. A marketing page with the same brand is not this text.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    Does the rule live in the fork choice or in the state transition?

  4. 04 The bound

    Observation

    What the study says

    This note does not restate the state-transition function.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading ethereum/consensus-specs. The Gasper paper is the companion study, not a replacement.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    Does the rule live in the fork choice or in the state transition?

03 Sequence

One action, as an operating tape

  1. 01The beacon state, the fork-choice rule, and the validator custody duties are specified separately and have to be cited by their document.
  2. 02A later upgrade folder in the repository can supersede an earlier one. The folder you opened is the version.
  3. 03This repository does not set the price of ether and does not define rollup bridges.

04 Load-bearing

The argument, and where a pitch drops it

  1. What the name has to mean

    The cut

    The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    Gasper, the paper, remains a separate study.

  2. What actually moves

    The cut

    A later upgrade folder in the repository can supersede an earlier one. The folder you opened is the version.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    A later client, parameter or reward formula is a different object from this paragraph.

  3. What a later deployment may change

    The cut

    This repository does not set the price of ether and does not define rollup bridges.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    A later client, parameter or reward formula is a different object from this paragraph.

05 Register

What has to be true

  • Model · Not re-measured

    You are reading ethereum/consensus-specs. The Gasper paper is the companion study, not a replacement.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    The document is the one at the source URL. A marketing page with the same brand is not this text.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

06 Divergence

What happened after the paper

A client's release notes are not the spec, though they may claim to track it.

A later client, parameter set, or reward formula is a different object. Cite this paper for the mechanism. Cite a primary release for the network. This desk has not re-run the proof.

07 Pre-mortem

What to check before you use the idea

  1. 0 of 3 marked on this browser. A mark is a reading note, not a pass, a rating, or a recommendation.

08 Anatomy

The paper, in the order a builder needs

The problem it names

A blog post about the Merge is not the spec. A client that disagrees with this repository is either wrong or running a fork.

What the design proposes

  • The beacon state, the fork-choice rule, and the validator custody duties are specified separately and have to be cited by their document.
  • A later upgrade folder in the repository can supersede an earlier one. The folder you opened is the version.
  • This repository does not set the price of ether and does not define rollup bridges.

How the mechanism is specified

  • The beacon state, the fork-choice rule, and the validator custody duties are specified separately and have to be cited by their document.
  • A later upgrade folder in the repository can supersede an earlier one. The folder you opened is the version.
  • This repository does not set the price of ether and does not define rollup bridges.

What this page does not treat as proven

  • This note does not restate the state-transition function.
  • Gasper, the paper, remains a separate study.
  • A client's release notes are not the spec, though they may claim to track it.

Why the desk still reads it

The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.

09 Lexicon

Terms, opened into the record

Beacon state
The consensus state the specifications define. It is not a rollup state.
Fork choice
The rule that picks the head. It is not the same document as the state transition.

10 Repository

Every linked record on this page

Underlined words open a page that already exists: a concept, a protocol profile, a failure record, or another paper. If a word is not underlined, this desk does not have a record for it.

This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.

Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.