Skip to content

LibraryCredit and stable value2023Design paperCorpus record

Sanctum: a liquidity layer for Solana stake tokens

Sanctum. Sanctum.

Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.

A reading of the project's public design document. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not an offer.

Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.
Evidence
Primary paper
Re-measured
No
Assumptions
3
Records linked
3

01 Claim ledger

What the paper is allowed to say

Each row is a sentence already in the study. The status is the same on every row: a model claim, not a live measurement.

  1. Claim 01 · Paper model

    The defect

    A router for stake tokens does not make them SOL. It makes an exit path that depends on the router's inventory.

  2. Claim 02 · Paper model

    The proposal

    Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.

  3. Claim 03 · Paper model

    The mechanism

    An infinity pool or the docs' equivalent holds SOL against a basket of stake tokens. The basket is the inventory risk.

  4. Claim 04 · Paper model

    The bound

    No premium and no inventory figure is stated here.

02 Three cuts

Observation, model, falsifier

A desk does not stop at the summary. Each claim is cut three ways, using only this study's own assumptions and checks. Nothing here is a new figure.

  1. 01 The defect

    Observation

    What the study says

    A router for stake tokens does not make them SOL. It makes an exit path that depends on the router's inventory.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Sanctum's docs. Each listed stake pool has its own design.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What happens if the inventory is all stake tokens and no SOL?

  2. 02 The proposal

    Observation

    What the study says

    Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Sanctum's docs. Each listed stake pool has its own design.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What happens if the inventory is all stake tokens and no SOL?

  3. 03 The mechanism

    Observation

    What the study says

    An infinity pool or the docs' equivalent holds SOL against a basket of stake tokens. The basket is the inventory risk.

    Model

    What has to hold

    You are reading Sanctum's docs. Each listed stake pool has its own design.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What happens if the inventory is all stake tokens and no SOL?

  4. 04 The bound

    Observation

    What the study says

    No premium and no inventory figure is stated here.

    Model

    What has to hold

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What inventory stands behind an instant exit?

03 Sequence

One action, as an operating tape

  1. 01An infinity pool or the docs' equivalent holds SOL against a basket of stake tokens. The basket is the inventory risk.
  2. 02A swap out of a stake token is someone else taking the deactivation delay. The price of that convenience is the design.
  3. 03The underlying stake pools remain separate protocols with separate validator risk.

04 Load-bearing

The argument, and where a pitch drops it

  1. What the name has to mean

    The cut

    Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    This does not remove Solana's deactivation rule for a token that is unstaked the slow way.

  2. What actually moves

    The cut

    A swap out of a stake token is someone else taking the deactivation delay. The price of that convenience is the design.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    This does not remove Solana's deactivation rule for a token that is unstaked the slow way.

  3. What a later deployment may change

    The cut

    The underlying stake pools remain separate protocols with separate validator risk.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    This is not Marinade. Marinade is one stake pool. This is a layer across them.

05 Register

What has to be true

  • Stake and threshold · Not re-measured

    You are reading Sanctum's docs. Each listed stake pool has its own design.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    The document is the one at the source URL. A marketing page with the same brand is not this text.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    No price, supply, yield, or adoption figure is added by this desk.

06 Divergence

What happened after the paper

This is not Marinade. Marinade is one stake pool. This is a layer across them.

A later client, parameter set, or reward formula is a different object. Cite this paper for the mechanism. Cite a primary release for the network. This desk has not re-run the proof.

07 Pre-mortem

What to check before you use the idea

  1. 0 of 3 marked on this browser. A mark is a reading note, not a pass, a rating, or a recommendation.

08 Anatomy

The paper, in the order a builder needs

The problem it names

A router for stake tokens does not make them SOL. It makes an exit path that depends on the router's inventory.

What the design proposes

  • An infinity pool or the docs' equivalent holds SOL against a basket of stake tokens. The basket is the inventory risk.
  • A swap out of a stake token is someone else taking the deactivation delay. The price of that convenience is the design.
  • The underlying stake pools remain separate protocols with separate validator risk.

How the mechanism is specified

  • An infinity pool or the docs' equivalent holds SOL against a basket of stake tokens. The basket is the inventory risk.
  • A swap out of a stake token is someone else taking the deactivation delay. The price of that convenience is the design.
  • The underlying stake pools remain separate protocols with separate validator risk.

What this page does not treat as proven

  • No premium and no inventory figure is stated here.
  • This does not remove Solana's deactivation rule for a token that is unstaked the slow way.
  • This is not Marinade. Marinade is one stake pool. This is a layer across them.

Why the desk still reads it

Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.

09 Lexicon

Terms, opened into the record

Stake-pool token
A claim on a delegated SOL pool. Not SOL.
Instant exit
A swap against inventory, rather than a protocol deactivation.

10 Repository

Every linked record on this page

Underlined words open a page that already exists: a concept, a protocol profile, a failure record, or another paper. If a word is not underlined, this desk does not have a record for it.

Concepts

Protocols

This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.

Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.