Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Demystifying Incentives in the Consensus Computer |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | If checking a block is expensive and the chance it is invalid is small, the equilibrium is not to check. The paper names that gap the verifier's dilemma. |
| Who may write | Loi Luu, Jason Teutsch, Raghav Kulkarni and Prateek Saxena |
| What is settled | Mining reward and verification cost are different clocks. |
| Load-bearing assumption | The paper is about Ethereum-style execution in 2015, not a current gas schedule. |
| What this library says afterwards | A reading of the public document. Not a copy of it, and not a claim about a later network that reused the name. |
| Rights | Official external source only |