Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensus |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | Split the mempool from the consensus. Narwhal is a DAG of certified batches. Tusk picks a leader inside that DAG. Later Sui consensus descends from this split. The paper is not a Sui status report. |
| Who may write | George Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino and Alexander Spiegelman |
| What is settled | Each validator publishes batches that reference earlier batches, and collects a certificate. |
| Load-bearing assumption | A certificate proves availability to the quorum that signed. It does not prove every full node has the bytes yet. |
| What this library says afterwards | Bullshark, Mysticeti, and production Sui changed the commit rule. Do not describe them as this PDF. |
| Rights | Official external source only |