Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Merged Mining: Curse or Cure? |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | Merged mining lets the same proof of work stamp a child chain. Security is not transferred for free: the parent miners may not validate the child, and an attack on the child can be cheap in attention even when hash power is large. |
| Who may write | Aljosha Judmayer, Alexei Zamyatin, Nicholas Stifter, Artemios G. Voyiatzis and Edgar Weippl |
| What is settled | The parent proof does not mean the parent miners executed the child. |
| Load-bearing assumption | The paper is not a ban on merged mining. |
| What this library says afterwards | A reading of the public document. Not a copy of it, and not a claim about a later network that reused the name. |
| Rights | Official external source only |