Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Reduction in refunds |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | EIP 3529, Reduction in refunds. Remove gas refunds for SELFDESTRUCT, and reduce gas refunds for SSTORE to a lower level where the refunds are still substantial, but they are no longer high enough for current "exploits" of the refund mechanism to be viable. |
| Who may write | Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende |
| What is settled | Remove gas refunds for SELFDESTRUCT, and reduce gas refunds for SSTORE to a lower level where the refunds are still substantial, but they are no longer high enough for current "exploits" of the refund mechanism to be viable. |
| Load-bearing assumption | A gas or opcode change is not a throughput benchmark. It is a relative price and a validity rule. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status in the source: Final. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification. |
| Rights | Official external source only |