Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Transaction data gas cost reduction |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | EIP 2028, Transaction data gas cost reduction. We propose to reduce the gas cost of Calldata (GTXDATANONZERO) from its current value of 68 gas per byte to 16 gas per byte, to be backed by mathematical modeling and empirical estimates. |
| Who may write | Alexey Akhunov , Eli Ben Sasson , Tom Brand , Louis Guthmann , Avihu Levy |
| What is settled | We propose to reduce the gas cost of Calldata (GTXDATANONZERO) from its current value of 68 gas per byte to 16 gas per byte, to be backed by mathematical modeling and empirical estimates. |
| Load-bearing assumption | A gas or opcode change is not a throughput benchmark. It is a relative price and a validity rule. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status in the source: Final. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification. |
| Rights | Official external source only |