Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | On Bitcoin as a Public Randomness Source |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | The paper asks when a proof-of-work block hash is a safe public beacon, and how a miner can bias it by withholding or grinding. |
| Who may write | Joseph Bonneau, Jeremy Clark and Steven Goldfeder |
| What is settled | A beacon that a miner can reject by discarding a block is not uniform. |
| Load-bearing assumption | The paper does not bless a particular gambling contract. |
| What this library says afterwards | A reading of the public paper. Not a copy, not a benchmark, and not a claim about any later network. |
| Rights | Official external source only |