Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | hashScriptCheck |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | BIP 18, hashScriptCheck. This BIP modifies the basic format of transaction inputs and outputs, replacing the current scriptSig and scriptPubKey (scripts executed to validate a transaction) with new contents: dataSig, scriptCheck, and hashScriptCheck. |
| Who may write | Luke Dashjr |
| What is settled | This BIP modifies the basic format of transaction inputs and outputs, replacing the current scriptSig and scriptPubKey (scripts executed to validate a transaction) with new contents: dataSig, scriptCheck, and hashScriptCheck. |
| Load-bearing assumption | A soft fork does not bind a node that never upgrades. It binds the nodes that enforce the new rejection. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status in the source: Complete. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification. |
| Rights | Official external source only |