Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | addrv2 message |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | BIP 155, addrv2 message. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 RFC 2119] . |
| Who may write | Wladimir J. van der Laan |
| What is settled | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 RFC 2119] . |
| Load-bearing assumption | A peer protocol is not a consensus rule. A peer can disconnect. A block is still valid or not on its own. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status in the source: Deployed. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification. |
| Rights | Official external source only |