Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | BIP 119, CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY. A new opcode, OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY, to be activated as a change to the semantics of OP_NOP4. |
| Who may write | Jeremy Rubin |
| What is settled | A new opcode, OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY, to be activated as a change to the semantics of OP_NOP4. |
| Load-bearing assumption | A soft fork does not bind a node that never upgrades. It binds the nodes that enforce the new rejection. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status in the source: Draft. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification. |
| Rights | Official external source only |