Research corpusConsensusBLC-STUDY-0148
Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process
No deterministic protocol does all three. Any protocol that is always safe has an execution that never decides.
- Official external source only
- Design paper
- Official source
Record
- Authors
- Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson
- Date
- 1985
- Publisher
- Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson
- Version
- Source cited by the 1985 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.
- Document ID
- BLC-STUDY-0148
- DOI
- None recorded
- Last reviewed
- 1 October 2026
- Licence
- No licence recorded. Rights status under review.
No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.
Direct answer
No deterministic protocol does all three. Any protocol that is always safe has an execution that never decides.
Where to read
- Official source — Journal of the ACM
- Blockchain Lab study, the canonical readingOriginal commentary. Not a transcription of the paper.
Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
Full text
Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.
What changed
A reading of the public document. Not a copy of it, and not a claim about a later network that reused the name.
Relationships
- Canonical readingFLP study
- Related paperPaxos
- Related paperPartial Synchrony
Cite this record
These citations point at the source document. They are not a licence to copy it.
Author–date
Fischer, M. J., Lynch, N. A., & Paterson, M. S. (1985). Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process. Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson. https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm85.pdf
BibTeX
@techreport{flp1985,
title = {Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process},
author = {Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson},
year = {1985},
institution = {Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson},
url = {https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm85.pdf},
note = {Rights status: Official external source only. Blockchain Lab record: https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flp}
}RIS
TY - RPRT TI - Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process AU - Michael J. Fischer AU - Nancy A. Lynch AU - Michael S. Paterson PY - 1985 PB - Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson UR - https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm85.pdf N1 - Rights status: Official external source only ER -
CSL-JSON
[
{
"type": "report",
"id": "BLC-STUDY-0148",
"title": "Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process",
"author": [
{
"literal": "Michael J. Fischer"
},
{
"literal": "Nancy A. Lynch"
},
{
"literal": "Michael S. Paterson"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
1985
]
]
},
"publisher": "Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson",
"URL": "https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm85.pdf",
"note": "Rights status: Official external source only. Not a licence to republish the paper."
}
]Rights record
- Source status
- Official source
- Use status
- Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
- Rights
- Official external source only
- Training and retrieval
- Not permitted from this site. There is no rights-cleared full text to retrieve or to train on.
