Research corpusScalingBLC-STUDY-0404
Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals
ERC 2612, Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals. Arguably one of the main reasons for the success of EIP-20 tokens lies in the interplay between approve and transferFrom, which allows for tokens to not only be transferred between externally owned accounts (EOA), but to be used in other contracts under application specific conditions by abstracting away msg.sender as the defining mechanism for token access control.
- Official external source only
- Design paper
- Official source
Record
- Authors
- Martin Lundfall
- Date
- 2020
- Publisher
- Martin Lundfall
- Version
- Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.
- Document ID
- BLC-STUDY-0404
- DOI
- None recorded
- Last reviewed
- 1 October 2026
- Licence
- No licence recorded. Rights status under review.
No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.
Direct answer
ERC 2612, Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals. Arguably one of the main reasons for the success of EIP-20 tokens lies in the interplay between approve and transferFrom, which allows for tokens to not only be transferred between externally owned accounts (EOA), but to be used in other contracts under application specific conditions by abstracting away msg.sender as the defining mechanism for token access control.
Where to read
- Official source — ERC 2612
- Blockchain Lab study, the canonical readingOriginal commentary. Not a transcription of the paper.
Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
Full text
Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.
What changed
Status in the source: Final. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification.
Relationships
- Canonical readingERC 2612 study
- Related paperEIP-4844
- Related paperPlasma
- Related paperArbitrum
Cite this record
These citations point at the source document. They are not a licence to copy it.
Author–date
Lundfall, M. (2020). Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals. Martin Lundfall. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2612
BibTeX
@techreport{erc26122020,
title = {Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals},
author = {Martin Lundfall},
year = {2020},
institution = {Martin Lundfall},
url = {https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2612},
note = {Rights status: Official external source only. Blockchain Lab record: https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2612}
}RIS
TY - RPRT TI - Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals AU - Martin Lundfall PY - 2020 PB - Martin Lundfall UR - https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2612 N1 - Rights status: Official external source only ER -
CSL-JSON
[
{
"type": "report",
"id": "BLC-STUDY-0404",
"title": "Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals",
"author": [
{
"literal": "Martin Lundfall"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2020
]
]
},
"publisher": "Martin Lundfall",
"URL": "https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2612",
"note": "Rights status: Official external source only. Not a licence to republish the paper."
}
]Rights record
- Source status
- Official source
- Use status
- Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
- Rights
- Official external source only
- Training and retrieval
- Not permitted from this site. There is no rights-cleared full text to retrieve or to train on.
