Research corpusScalingBLC-STUDY-0562
Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation
EIP 7732, Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation. This EIP fundamentally changes the way an Ethereum block is validated by decoupling the execution validation from the consensus validation both logically as well as temporally.
- Official external source only
- Design paper
- Official source
Record
- Authors
- Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao
- Date
- 2024
- Publisher
- Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao
- Version
- Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.
- Document ID
- BLC-STUDY-0562
- DOI
- None recorded
- Last reviewed
- 1 October 2026
- Licence
- No licence recorded. Rights status under review.
No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.
Direct answer
EIP 7732, Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation. This EIP fundamentally changes the way an Ethereum block is validated by decoupling the execution validation from the consensus validation both logically as well as temporally.
Where to read
- Official source — EIP 7732
- Blockchain Lab study, the canonical readingOriginal commentary. Not a transcription of the paper.
Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
Full text
Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.
What changed
Status in the source: Review. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification.
Relationships
- Canonical readingEIP 7732 study
- Related paperEIP-4844
- Related paperPlasma
- Related paperArbitrum
Cite this record
These citations point at the source document. They are not a licence to copy it.
Author–date
D'Amato, F., Flaig, N., Monnot, B., Neuder, M., Potuz, Traglia, J., & Tsao, T. (2024). Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation. Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7732
BibTeX
@techreport{eip77322024,
title = {Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation},
author = {Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao},
year = {2024},
institution = {Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao},
url = {https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7732},
note = {Rights status: Official external source only. Blockchain Lab record: https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7732}
}RIS
TY - RPRT TI - Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation AU - Francesco D'Amato AU - Nico Flaig AU - Barnabé Monnot AU - Michael Neuder AU - Potuz AU - Justin Traglia AU - Terence Tsao PY - 2024 PB - Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao UR - https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7732 N1 - Rights status: Official external source only ER -
CSL-JSON
[
{
"type": "report",
"id": "BLC-STUDY-0562",
"title": "Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation",
"author": [
{
"literal": "Francesco D'Amato"
},
{
"literal": "Nico Flaig"
},
{
"literal": "Barnabé Monnot"
},
{
"literal": "Michael Neuder"
},
{
"literal": "Potuz"
},
{
"literal": "Justin Traglia"
},
{
"literal": "Terence Tsao"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2024
]
]
},
"publisher": "Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao",
"URL": "https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7732",
"note": "Rights status: Official external source only. Not a licence to republish the paper."
}
]Rights record
- Source status
- Official source
- Use status
- Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
- Rights
- Official external source only
- Training and retrieval
- Not permitted from this site. There is no rights-cleared full text to retrieve or to train on.
