Skip to content

LibraryCredit and stable value2022Design paperCorpus record

Tokenized Vault Standard

ERC-4626. Joey Santoro, t11s, Jet Jadeja, Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Señor Doggo.

A tokenised vault has deposit, mint, withdraw and redeem, and a defined conversion between the asset and the share. The share is an ERC-20.

A reading of the public document. Not a copy of it, and not a claim about a later network that reused the name.

A protocol that accepts 'any yield token' should say whether it requires this interface, and what it does when convertToAssets moves suddenly.
Evidence
Primary paper
Re-measured
No
Assumptions
3
Records linked
5

Code

Source, repository, and what is actually hosted

  • EIP-4626https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4626
  • The source URL is not a GitHub repository. No code remote is invented.
  • Full text is not mirrored. Public availability is not a licence to copy the file onto this site.
  • Add to a reading list

01 Claim ledger

What the paper is allowed to say

Each row is a sentence already in the study. The status is the same on every row: a model claim, not a live measurement.

  1. Claim 01 · Paper model

    The defect

    Every lending pool invented its own share token. Integrators guessed how to deposit and how shares convert.

  2. Claim 02 · Paper model

    The rule

    A tokenised vault has deposit, mint, withdraw and redeem, and a defined conversion between the asset and the share. The share is an ERC-20.

  3. Claim 03 · Paper model

    How it is put together

    Assets go in. Shares come out. The conversion functions are the interface. Yield is whatever increases assets per share. The standard does not promise yield.

  4. Claim 04 · Paper model

    Where the claim stops

    The standard does not make a vault solvent.

02 Three cuts

Observation, model, falsifier

A desk does not stop at the summary. Each claim is cut three ways, using only this study's own assumptions and checks. Nothing here is a new figure.

  1. 01 The defect

    Observation

    What the study says

    Every lending pool invented its own share token. Integrators guessed how to deposit and how shares convert.

    Model

    What has to hold

    The standard does not make a vault solvent.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What does one share redeem for, and who computes it?

  2. 02 The rule

    Observation

    What the study says

    A tokenised vault has deposit, mint, withdraw and redeem, and a defined conversion between the asset and the share. The share is an ERC-20.

    Model

    What has to hold

    The standard does not make a vault solvent.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What does one share redeem for, and who computes it?

  3. 03 How it is put together

    Observation

    What the study says

    Assets go in. Shares come out. The conversion functions are the interface. Yield is whatever increases assets per share. The standard does not promise yield.

    Model

    What has to hold

    A malicious vault can implement the interface and still steal assets. The interface is not an audit.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What does one share redeem for, and who computes it?

  4. 04 Where the claim stops

    Observation

    What the study says

    The standard does not make a vault solvent.

    Model

    What has to hold

    The standard does not make a vault solvent.

    Falsifier

    What would retire it

    What does one share redeem for, and who computes it?

03 Sequence

One action, as an operating tape

  1. 01Deposit assets, receive shares.
  2. 02Redeem shares, receive assets.
  3. 03An integrator reads convertToAssets rather than assuming a 1:1 peg.
  4. 04What does one share redeem for, and who computes it?

04 Load-bearing

The argument, and where a pitch drops it

  1. Why it is still on the desk

    The cut

    A protocol that accepts 'any yield token' should say whether it requires this interface, and what it does when convertToAssets moves suddenly.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    A malicious vault can implement the interface and still steal assets. The interface is not an audit.

  2. After the text

    The cut

    Yearn, Morpho vaults and many lending wrappers adopted it. The strategy behind the share is still a separate document.

    Why it carries weight

    If this cut is skipped, the paper's name is being used without the mechanism that makes the name mean anything.

    Where it is dropped

    It does not define the strategy.

05 Register

What has to be true

  • Model · Not re-measured

    The standard does not make a vault solvent.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    It does not define the strategy.

  • Model · Not re-measured

    A malicious vault can implement the interface and still steal assets. The interface is not an audit.

06 Divergence

What happened after the paper

Yearn, Morpho vaults and many lending wrappers adopted it. The strategy behind the share is still a separate document.

A later client, parameter set, or reward formula is a different object. Cite this paper for the mechanism. Cite a primary release for the network. This desk has not re-run the proof.

07 Pre-mortem

What to check before you use the idea

  1. 0 of 3 marked on this browser. A mark is a reading note, not a pass, a rating, or a recommendation.

08 Anatomy

The paper, in the order a builder needs

The problem it names

Every lending pool invented its own share token. Integrators guessed how to deposit and how shares convert.

What the design proposes

  • Assets go in. Shares come out.
  • The conversion functions are the interface.
  • Yield is whatever increases assets per share. The standard does not promise yield.

How the mechanism is specified

  • Deposit assets, receive shares.
  • Redeem shares, receive assets.
  • An integrator reads convertToAssets rather than assuming a 1:1 peg.

What this page does not treat as proven

  • The standard does not make a vault solvent.
  • It does not define the strategy.
  • A malicious vault can implement the interface and still steal assets. The interface is not an audit.

Why the desk still reads it

A protocol that accepts 'any yield token' should say whether it requires this interface, and what it does when convertToAssets moves suddenly.

09 Lexicon

Terms, opened into the record

Share
The ERC-20 that represents a claim on the vault's assets.
Asset
The token the vault custodies.

10 Repository

Every linked record on this page

Underlined words open a page that already exists: a concept, a protocol profile, a failure record, or another paper. If a word is not underlined, this desk does not have a record for it.

This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.

Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.