Skip to content

LibraryData and agents2022Design paperCorpus record

eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData

EIP 4938. Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Gary Rong.

EIP 4938, eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData. The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.

Status in the source: Final. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification.

eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData is worth reading for the rule it actually adds: The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.

The five-minute read

The rule

The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.

What was already failing

An interface that is only a name in a repository will be re-implemented differently by every team, which is how shared contracts break.

What the number does not mean

The source marks this final. That is a statement about the text, not a promise that every wallet or node has shipped it.

What a builder should be able to point at

An implementation either constrains request_id, hash_0, B_32 or it is a different design.

One action, walked through

  1. Open EIP 4938 and read the status line before the examples.
  2. Write down the rule in one sentence. A fair version of that sentence is: The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.
  3. Name the object that changes: request_id, hash_0, B_32.
  4. Ask what an old client, an old contract, or an offline counterparty does. If the document is silent, the silence is part of the design.

The argument, unpacked

What the text is allowed to settle

Ethereum Improvement Proposal 4938 can settle the shape of eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData. It cannot settle whether a later client, a later fork, or a later wallet still does this.

What this page will not pretend

There is no benchmark, no adoption number, and no claim that the mechanism is safe outside the assumptions written in the source.

What has to be true

  • You are implementing EIP 4938 at the status the text itself states: Final.
  • The object that has to change is request_id, hash_0, B_32. A neighbouring document with a similar name is not this one.
  • Status in the header is not adoption.

What happened after the paper

The source marks this final. That is a statement about the text, not a promise that every wallet or node has shipped it. Later documents can narrow, replace, or ignore this one. Cite the number you mean.

What to check before you use the idea

  • What must an implementation of eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData accept, and what may it ignore?
  • Is this consensus, peer policy, or an application interface?
  • Which names does the text pin down: request_id, hash_0, B_32?

Terms

EIP 4938
The public text titled eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData.
Final
The document's own label for how finished the text is. It is not a market fact.

The problem the paper names

An interface that is only a name in a repository will be re-implemented differently by every team, which is how shared contracts break.

What the design proposes

  • The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.
  • The GetNodeData request retrieves a set of trie nodes or contract code from the state trie by hash.
  • We propose to remove the GetNodeData and NodeData messages from the wire protocol.

How the mechanism is specified

  • Taken from the specification, the next constraint is: The GetNodeData request retrieves a set of trie nodes or contract code from the state trie by hash.
  • Locate request_id, hash_0, B_32 in EIP 4938 and apply it to one transaction or call.
  • Then check the failure the class of rule always has: a node that did not upgrade, a reverted call, a replayed signature, or a peer that does not speak the message.

What this page does not treat as proven

  • This document does not set a fee, a valuation, or a security proof.
  • Status in the header is not adoption.
  • The source marks this final. That is a statement about the text, not a promise that every wallet or node has shipped it.

Why a venture studio still reads it

Use EIP 4938 when a pitch says 'eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData' without saying whether the rule is consensus, policy, or an interface. The number is the citation. The pitch is not.

This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.

Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.