LibraryData and agents2026Design paperCorpus record
24 nVersion bits for general purpose use
BIP 323. Matt Corallo.
BIP 323, 24 nVersion bits for general purpose use. 24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.
Status in the source: Draft. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification.
24 nVersion bits for general purpose use is worth reading for the rule it actually adds: 24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.
The five-minute read
The rule
24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.
What was already failing
An interface that is only a name in a repository will be re-implemented differently by every team, which is how shared contracts break.
What the number does not mean
The source marks this draft. It is not a live consensus rule just because it has a number.
What a builder should be able to point at
An implementation either constrains BIP8, BIP9 or it is a different design.
One action, walked through
- Open BIP 323 and read the status line before the examples.
- Write down the rule in one sentence. A fair version of that sentence is: 24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.
- Name the object that changes: BIP8, BIP9.
- Ask what an old client, an old contract, or an offline counterparty does. If the document is silent, the silence is part of the design.
The argument, unpacked
What the text is allowed to settle
Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 323 can settle the shape of 24 nVersion bits for general purpose use. It cannot settle whether a later client, a later fork, or a later wallet still does this.
What this page will not pretend
There is no benchmark, no adoption number, and no claim that the mechanism is safe outside the assumptions written in the source.
What has to be true
- You are implementing BIP 323 at the status the text itself states: Draft.
- The object that has to change is BIP8, BIP9. A neighbouring document with a similar name is not this one.
- Status in the header is not adoption.
What happened after the paper
The source marks this draft. It is not a live consensus rule just because it has a number. Later documents can narrow, replace, or ignore this one. Cite the number you mean.
What to check before you use the idea
- What must an implementation of 24 nVersion bits for general purpose use accept, and what may it ignore?
- Is this consensus, peer policy, or an application interface?
- Which names does the text pin down: BIP8, BIP9?
Terms
- BIP 323
- The public text titled 24 nVersion bits for general purpose use.
- Draft
- The document's own label for how finished the text is. It is not a market fact.
The problem the paper names
An interface that is only a name in a repository will be re-implemented differently by every team, which is how shared contracts break.
What the design proposes
- 24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.
- BIP 320 defined 16 bits of nVersion as nonce space for additional nonce space.
- It turns out that this isn't enough, as some devices have started using 7 bits from nTime for extra nonce space (see https://github.com/stratum-mining/sv2-spec/discussions/187).
How the mechanism is specified
- Taken from the specification, the next constraint is: BIP 320 defined 16 bits of nVersion as nonce space for additional nonce space.
- Locate BIP8, BIP9 in BIP 323 and apply it to one transaction or call.
- Then check the failure the class of rule always has: a node that did not upgrade, a reverted call, a replayed signature, or a peer that does not speak the message.
What this page does not treat as proven
- This document does not set a fee, a valuation, or a security proof.
- Status in the header is not adoption.
- The source marks this draft. It is not a live consensus rule just because it has a number.
Why a venture studio still reads it
Use BIP 323 when a pitch says '24 nVersion bits for general purpose use' without saying whether the rule is consensus, policy, or an interface. The number is the citation. The pitch is not.
This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.
Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.
