whitepaperData and agents2018
Augur: a Decentralized Oracle and Prediction Market Platform
Augur. Jack Peterson, Joseph Krug, Micah Zoltu, Austin K. Williams, Stephanie Alexander.
The Augur paper: prediction markets whose outcomes are reported by token holders, with a dispute ladder that can escalate a contested result. It is both a market design and an oracle design. The historic library already holds Gnosis. Augur is the other canonical public prediction-market paper and was not in that set.
The problem the paper names
A prediction market is only as honest as the oracle that says what happened. If a single reporter can settle the market, the market prices the reporter. Augur's paper spreads reporting across holders and makes a false report contestable by people who post a bond.
What the design proposes
- Markets define an outcome space and a resolution time.
- Reporters stake on an outcome. Disputers can escalate by staking more, up a ladder the paper specifies.
- Forking the reporting universe is the final backstop the paper is willing to name.
How the mechanism is specified
- The economic claim is that a liar must outbid everyone who prefers a true resolution, at each rung.
- Market prices are then a public estimate conditional on that oracle actually working.
- A forked universe is a social and technical event. The paper treats it as part of security, not as an embarrassment.
What this page does not treat as proven
- A prediction market can be illegal to offer in a given jurisdiction. The paper is not legal advice and this page is not an invitation to list markets.
- Thin dispute markets fail closed or fail captured. The ladder only helps if someone climbs it.
- Later Augur versions changed mechanics. Cite the version.
Why a venture studio still reads it
The pattern we care about is escalatable truth: a reported fact that a named bond can challenge, with a last resort that is explicit. That pattern shows up in oracles, in governance, and in agent mandates. Augur writes it down.
This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.