{"corpus":"Blockchain Lab Research Corpus","licence":null,"note":"Metadata only. Paper text is not included. Attribute Blockchain Lab if you republish this catalogue. The catalogue is not a licence to the papers.","count":1792,"papers":[{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0001","slug":"bitcoin","title":"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System","authors":"Satoshi Nakamoto","year":2008,"date_label":"31 October 2008, the date of the cryptography mailing-list post. The PDF fetched from bitcoin.org does not print that date on the first page.","publisher":"Satoshi Nakamoto","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Digital cash","topics":["Digital cash","Proof of work","Double spend"],"source_url":"https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf","source_label":"bitcoin.org","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/bitcoin.pdf","sha256":"b1674191a88ec5cdd733e4240a81803105dc412d6c6708d53ab94fc248f4f553","sha256_note":"SHA-256 of the PDF fetched from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf on 1 October 2026 (184,292 bytes). This is not a hash of the historic library file at /pdf/bitcoin.pdf. That file is not stored in this build and was not byte-compared.","version":"File served by bitcoin.org on 1 October 2026","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Official source, and a historic library path","use_status":"Download from the publisher. The legacy path remains. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence notice on the first page of the file fetched from bitcoin.org. Not marked public domain.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper proposes that a public chain of hash-linked blocks, and a race to spend computation, can order electronic-cash payments without a bank in the middle.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0002","slug":"ethereum","title":"Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2014,"date_label":"Circulating white paper, 2014. Drafts exist from late 2013. This record follows the historic library file, not the living HTML on ethereum.org.","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Contracts","topics":["Smart contracts","General-purpose chain"],"source_url":"https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/","source_label":"ethereum.org white paper (current HTML, not the historic PDF)","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library PDF of Buterin's white paper. The publisher's current page is HTML and has moved on.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Publisher's current page, plus a historic library path","use_status":"Read the publisher's page or the legacy PDF. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Buterin's white paper argues that a chain can do more than move a native coin. It can run programs whose results land in shared state.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0003","slug":"ouroboros","title":"Ouroboros: A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol","authors":"Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell, Bernardo David, Roman Oliynykov","year":2017,"date_label":"IACR ePrint 2016/889. A proceedings version followed. This record is the ePrint, not a later Cardano paper.","publisher":"IACR ePrint","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Proof of stake","Slot leaders"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/889.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2016/889","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"ePrint 2016/889. Praos, Genesis, and later network software are other documents.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. Read the PDF at IACR.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Ouroboros elects slot leaders from stake and states the security argument in a synchronous model. Cardano is a later network. A staking rate is not part of the paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ouroboros","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0004","slug":"lightning","title":"The Bitcoin Lightning Network: Scalable Off-Chain Instant Payments","authors":"Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja","year":2016,"date_label":"2016 draft. Cite the PDF you opened. Versions of this paper differ.","publisher":"Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Payment channels","Bitcoin"],"source_url":"https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf","source_label":"lightning.network paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"PDF linked from lightning.network. Not a specification of today's channel implementations.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. Read the PDF at the publisher.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Lightning is a payment channel on Bitcoin. The base chain is the court when a party cheats or leaves, not the till for every payment.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lightning","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lightning","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lightning","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0005","slug":"interledger","title":"A Protocol for Interledger Payments","authors":"Stefan Thomas and Evan Schwartz","year":2015,"date_label":"2015, as the Interledger Foundation dates the protocol's creation. The PDF's first page, as checked for this record, does not print a full citation date.","publisher":"Stefan Thomas and Evan Schwartz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Cross-ledger payments","Escrow","Connectors"],"source_url":"https://interledger.org/documents/interledger.pdf","source_label":"interledger.org PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/interledger.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The white paper. ILPv4 and later RFCs are other documents.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Official PDF, and a historic library path","use_status":"Download from the publisher. The legacy path remains. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper proposes payments that cross ledgers by escrow, through connectors, without one blockchain ordering every transfer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/interledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/interledger","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0006","slug":"maker-dai","title":"The Dai Stablecoin System","authors":"MakerDAO","year":2017,"date_label":"2017, as cited by the study. Later multi-collateral systems are other documents.","publisher":"MakerDAO","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Collateralised stable value","Vaults"],"source_url":"https://makerdao.com/whitepaper/","source_label":"MakerDAO white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The 2017 Dai design in the study's citation. Not a description of a later module.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2017 paper describes Dai as a liability minted against overcollateralised vaults, kept near a dollar target by a fee, an auction, and an emergency stop.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/maker-dai","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/maker-dai","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/maker-dai","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0007","slug":"terra-money","title":"Terra Money: Stability and Adoption","authors":"Do Kwon","year":2019,"date_label":"2019. The study names Do Kwon. Other names appear on some circulating copies and are not added here until reconciled.","publisher":"Terra","paper_type":"Failure case","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Stable value","Seigniorage"],"source_url":"https://agora.terra.money/","source_label":"Terra research archive, as cited by the study","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The 2019 design paper. Not a description of any later chain that reused the name.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. Not a design to copy.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2019 paper proposes fiat-pegged tokens stabilised by an arbitrage against a second, volatile token. This library keeps it as a failure case, not as a blueprint.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/terra-money","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/terra-money","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/terra-money","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0008","slug":"chainlink","title":"Chainlink: A Decentralized Oracle Network","authors":"Steve Ellis, Ari Juels, Sergey Nazarov","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Chainlink","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Oracles","Off-chain data"],"source_url":"https://chain.link/whitepaper","source_label":"Chainlink white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The 2017 oracle-network paper. A single operator feed is a narrower object.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper describes independent nodes that fetch a fact from outside a chain, aggregate it, and deliver a signed result, with a reputation and penalty story around the nodes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainlink","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainlink","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainlink","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0009","slug":"filecoin-2017","title":"Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network","authors":"Protocol Labs","year":2017,"date_label":"July 2017","publisher":"Protocol Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage market","Proof of replication"],"source_url":"https://www.filecoin.io/assets/documents/filecoin.pdf","source_label":"Filecoin 2017 paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"July 2017 paper. The historic filecoin.pdf is an earlier sketch and a different record.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The July 2017 paper specifies a storage market and a retrieval market. Miners are supposed to prove they still hold a replica, and to keep proving it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/filecoin-2017","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/filecoin-2017","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/filecoin-2017","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0010","slug":"corda","title":"Corda: An Introduction","authors":"Richard Gendal Brown, James Carlyle, Ian Grigg, Mike Hearn","year":2016,"date_label":"August 2016","publisher":"R3","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Institutional ledger","topics":["Permissioned ledger","Known parties"],"source_url":"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308636477_Corda_An_Introduction","source_label":"ResearchGate record of the August 2016 introduction","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/corda-introductory-whitepaper-final.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"August 2016 introduction. R3 says the 2018 platform paper supersedes it.","doi":"10.13140/RG.2.2.30487.37284","rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Published record, and a historic library path","use_status":"Read the publisher's record. The legacy path remains. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"ResearchGate marks the upload as possibly subject to copyright. No redistribution licence is recorded.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The introduction argues for a ledger of deals between identified institutions, where the parties to a deal hold the data, rather than a global broadcast of every transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/corda","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/corda","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0001","slug":"ethereum-yellow-paper","title":"Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger (EIP-150 revision)","authors":"Gavin Wood","year":2016,"date_label":"EIP-150 revision, which is how the historic library names the file. The living yellow paper has moved on.","publisher":"Gavin Wood","paper_type":"Protocol specification","category":"Contracts","topics":["Ethereum","Specification"],"source_url":"https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf","source_label":"Current yellow paper (later document)","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/paper2.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file described as the EIP-150 revision. Not byte-compared with the living yellow paper.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path. The current yellow paper is a later file.","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Do not treat the current yellow paper as this file.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The historic library holds Wood's yellow paper at the EIP-150 revision, as a specification of the ledger rather than Buterin's white paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum-yellow-paper","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum-yellow-paper","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0002","slug":"ripple-consensus","title":"The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm","authors":"David Schwartz, Noah Youngs, and Arthur Britto","year":2014,"date_label":"2014, as commonly cited for this title. Not re-read from the file bytes in this build.","publisher":"Ripple","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus","Known validators"],"source_url":"https://ripple.com/files/ripple_consensus_whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Commonly cited publisher PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/ripple_consensus_whitepaper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file. Not byte-compared with the publisher URL.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path, plus a commonly cited publisher URL","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The library holds the Ripple consensus paper: agreement among servers that choose which other servers they listen to, rather than a race to spend hash power.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ripple-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ripple-consensus","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0003","slug":"stellar-consensus","title":"The Stellar Consensus Protocol: A Federated Model for Internet-level Consensus","authors":"David Mazières","year":2015,"date_label":"2015, as commonly cited. The library index truncates the title; the full title is used here. Bytes were not re-opened.","publisher":"Stellar Development Foundation","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Federated consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.stellar.org/papers/stellar-consensus-protocol.pdf","source_label":"stellar.org paper","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/stellar-consensus-protocol.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file. Not byte-compared with the publisher PDF.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path, plus the publisher's paper page","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Mazières's paper gives a federated way to reach agreement: each node picks quorum slices, and safety depends on how those slices intersect.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stellar-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stellar-consensus","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0004","slug":"pegged-sidechains","title":"Enabling Blockchain Innovations with Pegged Sidechains","authors":"Back et al.","year":2014,"date_label":"2014, as commonly cited for this title. Not re-read from the file bytes in this build.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Sidechains","Bitcoin"],"source_url":"https://blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf","source_label":"Commonly cited PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/sidechains1.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file sidechains1.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The library holds the pegged-sidechains paper associated with Adam Back and co-authors: a chain beside Bitcoin, with a two-way peg so coins can move across and back.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pegged-sidechains","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pegged-sidechains","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0005","slug":"tether","title":"Tether: Fiat currencies on the Bitcoin blockchain","authors":"Not named in this record","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. A publication year was not verified from the bytes in this build.","publisher":"Tether","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Stable value","Issued token"],"source_url":"https://tether.to/","source_label":"Publisher site. Not a claim that this URL is the historic PDF.","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Tether-White-Paper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file Tether-White-Paper.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. This page does not describe reserves.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The historic library files a Tether paper whose index line is fiat currencies on the Bitcoin blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tether","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tether","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0006","slug":"dash","title":"Dash: A Privacy-Centric Cryptocurrency","authors":"Duffield and Diaz","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Year not re-verified from the bytes.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Digital cash","topics":["Masternodes","Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/dashpay/dash/wiki/Whitepaper","source_label":"Project white paper page","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/dashpay/dash","editorial_line":"The library holds a Dash paper by Duffield and Diaz. The index describes a Bitcoin-derived coin with a masternode layer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dash","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0007","slug":"peercoin","title":"PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake","authors":"King and Nadal","year":2012,"date_label":"2012, as commonly cited for this title. Not re-read from the file bytes in this build.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Proof of stake"],"source_url":"https://www.peercoin.net/assets/paper/peercoin-paper.pdf","source_label":"peercoin.net PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/peercoin-paper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"King and Nadal's paper is an early proof-of-stake design sitting beside proof of work. The library already names them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/peercoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/peercoin","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0008","slug":"iota-tangle","title":"The Tangle","authors":"Serguei Popov","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Year not re-verified from the bytes in this build.","publisher":"The author","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["DAG"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.09186","source_label":"A later arXiv note exists; it is not asserted to be this file","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/tangle.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file tangle.pdf. Not byte-compared with arXiv.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. The arXiv link is a related public copy and may be a different version.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The library holds Popov's Tangle paper: a directed graph of transactions that approve earlier ones, instead of a single chain of blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/iota-tangle","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/iota-tangle","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0009","slug":"filecoin-2014","title":"Filecoin: A Cryptocurrency Operated File Storage Network","authors":"Not named in this record","year":2014,"date_label":"Described in this library as a 2014 sketch, earlier than the July 2017 paper.","publisher":"Not named in this record","paper_type":"Earlier sketch","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage"],"source_url":"https://www.filecoin.io/assets/documents/filecoin.pdf","source_label":"2017 paper, which this file is not","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/filecoin.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic filecoin.pdf. Distinct from the July 2017 Protocol Labs paper.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path only","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Do not cite it as the 2017 paper.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The historic library's filecoin.pdf is an earlier sketch. The title in the old index is a cryptocurrency-operated file storage network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/filecoin-2014","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/filecoin-2014","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0010","slug":"gnosis","title":"Gnosis","authors":"Not named in this record","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Authors and year were not re-verified from the bytes.","publisher":"Gnosis","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Markets","topics":["Prediction markets"],"source_url":"https://gnosis.io/","source_label":"Publisher site, not asserted to host this exact file","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/gnosis_whitepaper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file gnosis_whitepaper.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Metadata only beyond the index line.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The historic library holds a Gnosis white paper. The library note calls it a prediction-market paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gnosis","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gnosis","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0011","slug":"sia","title":"Sia: Simple Decentralized Storage","authors":"Vorick and Champine","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Year not re-verified from the bytes.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage"],"source_url":"https://sia.tech/sia.pdf","source_label":"Publisher PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/whitepaper3.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file whitepaper3.pdf. Not byte-compared with the publisher PDF.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The library holds the Sia storage paper by Vorick and Champine. The index subtitle is simple decentralised storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sia","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sia","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0012","slug":"storj","title":"Storj: A Peer-to-Peer Cloud Storage Network","authors":"Wilkinson et al.","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. The full author list and year were not re-verified.","publisher":"Storj","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage"],"source_url":"https://www.storj.io/storj.pdf","source_label":"Publisher PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/storj.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file storj.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The library holds a Storj paper, indexed as a peer-to-peer cloud storage network, by Wilkinson and co-authors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/storj","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/storj","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0013","slug":"kadena-2016","title":"Kadena: The first scalable, high performance private blockchain","authors":"Not named in this record","year":2016,"date_label":"August 2016, from the historic filename. Authors were not re-read.","publisher":"Kadena","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Consensus","topics":["Private chain"],"source_url":"https://kadena.com/","source_label":"Publisher site, not asserted to be this file","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Kadena-ConsensusWhitePaper-Aug2016.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"August 2016 private-chain note. Not Chainweb.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Do not cite it as Chainweb.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The historic library holds an August 2016 Kadena note. This library already says it is a private-chain document, not Chainweb.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kadena-2016","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kadena-2016","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0001","slug":"cryptonote","title":"CryptoNote v 2.0","authors":"Nicolas van Saberhagen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Nicolas van Saberhagen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"cryptonote.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The public design paper behind unlinkable payments. Monero adopted the construction and then replaced pieces of it. The historic library only has a third-party review of CryptoNote, not this document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cryptonote","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cryptonote","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cryptonote","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0002","slug":"zerocoin","title":"Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin","authors":"Ian Miers, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Aviel D. Rubin","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Ian Miers, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Aviel D. Rubin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://zerocoin.org/media/pdf/ZerocoinOakland.pdf","source_label":"Zerocoin Oakland paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A 2013 proposal to add an anonymity layer on top of Bitcoin by burning a coin into a commitment and later redeeming a different coin with a zero-knowledge proof of membership.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zerocoin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocoin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0003","slug":"zerocash","title":"Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Eran Tromer, Madars Virza","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Eran Tromer, Madars Virza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-extended-20140518.pdf","source_label":"Zerocash extended paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2014 paper that showed how a payment ledger can hide sender, receiver and amount, while still letting the network check that coins were not created or double-spent. Zcash is an implementation of this line of work, not a co-author of the paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zerocash","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocash","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0004","slug":"ring-confidential-transactions","title":"Ring Confidential Transactions","authors":"Shen Noether","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Shen Noether","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2015/1098","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The research note Monero used to hide amounts, not just the signer. It extends ring signatures so a spender can prove a balance inside a ring without publishing the values.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ring-confidential-transactions","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ring-confidential-transactions","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ring-confidential-transactions","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0005","slug":"mimblewimble","title":"Mimblewimble","authors":"Tom Elvis Jedusor","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Tom Elvis Jedusor","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/mimblewimble.txt","source_label":"Original Mimblewimble note","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A short 2016 note on a ledger that stores confidential transactions and can delete spent history. Grin and Beam are later implementations. The note itself is the primary text.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mimblewimble","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/mimblewimble","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mimblewimble","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0007","slug":"algorand","title":"ALGORAND: The Efficient and Democratic Ledger","authors":"Silvio Micali","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Silvio Micali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.01341","source_label":"arXiv:1607.01341","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Micali's ledger design: a proof-of-stake protocol that elects a small, unpredictable committee to certify each block, and replaces participants so a corruptor cannot find them in time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/algorand","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0008","slug":"avalanche","title":"Snowflake to Avalanche: A Novel Metastable Consensus Protocol Family","authors":"Team Rocket; later with Maofan Yin, Kevin Sekniqi, Robbert van Renesse and Emin Gün Sirer","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Team Rocket; later with Maofan Yin, Kevin Sekniqi, Robbert van Renesse and Emin Gün Sirer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.avalabs.org/whitepapers","source_label":"Ava Labs white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A family of consensus protocols that sample the network repeatedly and tip toward one outcome. The 2018 note was pseudonymous. A later write-up adds named co-authors. Avalanche the network is an implementation, not the sample itself.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/avalanche","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/avalanche","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/avalanche","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0009","slug":"solana","title":"Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain","authors":"Anatoly Yakovenko","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Anatoly Yakovenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://solana.com/solana-whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"solana.com white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Yakovenko's design note for a ledger that encodes the passage of time as a verifiable hash chain, called Proof of History, so that validators spend less effort agreeing on order.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/solana","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/solana","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/solana","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0010","slug":"tendermint","title":"Tendermint: Consensus without Mining","authors":"Jae Kwon","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Jae Kwon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint","source_label":"Tendermint repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint","editorial_line":"A practical Byzantine-fault-tolerant state machine for a known validator set, with instant finality on commit. It became the consensus engine under Cosmos SDK chains. The 2014 note is the origin, not the current CometBFT specification.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tendermint","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tendermint","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tendermint","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0011","slug":"tezos","title":"Tezos — a self-amending crypto-ledger","authors":"L.M. Goodman","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"L.M. Goodman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://tezos.com/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"tezos.com white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Goodman's proposal for a ledger whose protocol can be amended by a defined on-ledger process, with stakeholders who bake blocks and who may delegate.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tezos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tezos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tezos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0012","slug":"hashgraph","title":"The Swirlds Hashgraph Consensus Algorithm: Fair, Fast, Byzantine Fault Tolerance","authors":"Leemon Baird","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Leemon Baird","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.swirlds.com/downloads/SWIRLDS-TR-2016-01.pdf","source_label":"Swirlds TR-2016-01","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Baird's technical report on hashgraph: gossip about gossip, a virtual vote computed from the graph, and a fairness claim about the order of transactions. Hedera is the later public network that uses the algorithm under a governing council.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashgraph","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hashgraph","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashgraph","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0013","slug":"nano","title":"Nano: A Feeless Distributed Cryptocurrency Network","authors":"Colin LeMahieu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Colin LeMahieu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.nano.org/whitepaper/english/","source_label":"Nano white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"LeMahieu's design, first published as RaiBlocks: each account has its own chain, and the account holder is the only one who can append to it. Value moves by a send block on one chain and a receive block on another.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nano","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nano","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nano","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0014","slug":"zilliqa","title":"The ZILLIQA Technical Whitepaper","authors":"The Zilliqa Team","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"The Zilliqa Team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.zilliqa.com/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Zilliqa technical white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A 2017 design for a sharded chain: a directory service that assigns nodes, shards that process transactions in parallel, and a language proposal aimed at safe-by-construction contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zilliqa","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zilliqa","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zilliqa","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0015","slug":"harmony","title":"Harmony Technical Whitepaper","authors":"Stephen Tse and the Harmony team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Stephen Tse and the Harmony team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://harmony.one/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"harmony.one white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A sharded proof-of-stake design that combines a BFT-style consensus inside shards with a randomness scheme for assigning validators, aimed at keeping a single shard from being captured.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/harmony","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/harmony","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/harmony","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0016","slug":"elrond","title":"Elrond: A Highly Scalable Public Blockchain via Adaptive State Sharding","authors":"The Elrond team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"The Elrond team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://multiversx.com/","source_label":"MultiversX (formerly Elrond)","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2019 Elrond paper on adaptive state sharding: shards that hold state, a metachain that notarises results, and a secure proof-of-stake selection of validators. The network later rebranded as MultiversX. The paper remains the design document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/elrond","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/elrond","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/elrond","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0017","slug":"near","title":"The NEAR White Paper","authors":"The NEAR team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"The NEAR team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://near.org/papers/the-official-near-white-paper/","source_label":"NEAR white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"NEAR's public design paper: a sharded proof-of-stake chain with a single account model, nightshade-style data availability across chunks, and a stated intent that hiding the shards from application authors is part of the product.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/near","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/near","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/near","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0018","slug":"aptos","title":"The Aptos Blockchain: Safe, Scalable, and Upgradeable Web3 Infrastructure","authors":"Aptos Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Aptos Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://aptosfoundation.org/whitepaper/aptos-whitepaper_en.pdf","source_label":"Aptos white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Aptos Labs' 2022 paper for a Move-based chain that pipelines dissemination, ordering, execution and certification, and that treats protocol upgrades as a first-class feature rather than a hard-fork event.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aptos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aptos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aptos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0019","slug":"sui","title":"The Sui Smart Contracts Platform","authors":"The Mysten Labs Team","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"The Mysten Labs Team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.sui.io/paper/sui.pdf","source_label":"Sui platform paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Mysten Labs' platform paper. Assets are Move objects. Operations on objects owned by a single address can finish by consistent broadcast among validators. Shared objects go through consensus. The split is the design.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sui","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sui","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sui","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0020","slug":"diem","title":"The Diem Blockchain","authors":"Diem Association engineering group","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Diem Association engineering group","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://developers.diem.com/docs/technical-papers/the-diem-blockchain-paper/","source_label":"Diem technical paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The technical paper for the Libra, later Diem, payment chain: a permissioned BFT ledger, a Move language for resources, and a reserve-backed currency proposal. The project was wound down in 2022. The paper still matters because Move, and the account model Aptos and Sui started from, was specified here.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/diem","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/diem","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/diem","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0021","slug":"mina","title":"Coda: Decentralized Cryptocurrency at Scale","authors":"Joseph Bonneau, Izaak Meckler, Vanishree Rao, Evan Shapiro","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Joseph Bonneau, Izaak Meckler, Vanishree Rao, Evan Shapiro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/352.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2020/352","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Coda paper, later the Mina protocol: a chain whose certificate is a constant-size succinct proof, so a client can check the state without replaying history. The project renamed from Coda to Mina. The paper keeps the original name.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mina","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/mina","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mina","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0022","slug":"ton","title":"The Open Network","authors":"Nikolai Durov","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Nikolai Durov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://ton.org/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"ton.org white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Durov's design for a multi-chain system of account-chains gathered into shardchains, with a masterchain that records the others. It began as Telegram's network design and continued as The Open Network after Telegram stepped away from the original launch.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ton","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ton","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ton","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0023","slug":"chainweb","title":"Chainweb: A Proof-of-Work Parallel-Chain Architecture for Massive Throughput","authors":"Will Martino, Monica Quaintance, Stuart Popejoy","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Will Martino, Monica Quaintance, Stuart Popejoy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://kadena.io/whitepapers","source_label":"Kadena white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Kadena's public parallel-chain design. Many proof-of-work chains advance together, and each block commits to peer-chain headers, so a confirmation is a braid rather than a single chain. This is not the 2016 private-chain note already in the historic library.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainweb","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainweb","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainweb","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0024","slug":"eosio","title":"EOS.IO Technical White Paper","authors":"Daniel Larimer and block.one","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Daniel Larimer and block.one","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/master/TechnicalWhitePaper.md","source_label":"EOS.IO technical white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation","editorial_line":"The 2018 technical paper for EOSIO: delegated proof of stake, named block producers, and an operating-system metaphor for accounts, permissions and resource allocation. It is a design document. It is not a description of later governance fights around any one chain that used the software.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eosio","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eosio","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eosio","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0025","slug":"dfinity","title":"DFINITY Consensus System","authors":"Timo Hanke, Mahnush Movahedi, Dominic Williams","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Timo Hanke, Mahnush Movahedi, Dominic Williams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://internetcomputer.org/whitepapers","source_label":"Internet Computer white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The DFINITY consensus overview: a randomness beacon, a ranking of block proposers, and notarisation so that a chain can come to agreement quickly among a large set. The Internet Computer is the later network built by the DFINITY foundation on this line of research.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dfinity","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dfinity","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dfinity","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0026","slug":"polkadot","title":"Polkadot: Vision for a heterogeneous multi-chain framework","authors":"Gavin Wood","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Gavin Wood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/w3f/polkadot-white-paper","source_label":"Web3 Foundation white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/w3f/polkadot-white-paper","editorial_line":"Wood's 2016 vision paper: a relay chain that provides shared security and a queue of cross-chain messages, with parachains that keep their own state transition. It is a vision paper. The live protocol has a specification of its own.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polkadot","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/polkadot","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polkadot","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0027","slug":"cosmos","title":"Cosmos: A Network of Distributed Ledgers","authors":"Jae Kwon and Ethan Buchman","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jae Kwon and Ethan Buchman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/blob/master/WHITEPAPER.md","source_label":"Cosmos white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos","editorial_line":"The Cosmos paper: independent zones running a BFT consensus, connected by a hub, speaking a packet protocol that later became IBC. Unlike Polkadot's shared-security vision, zones here are sovereign. They choose their own validator sets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cosmos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cosmos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cosmos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0029","slug":"plasma","title":"Plasma: Scalable Autonomous Smart Contracts","authors":"Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://plasma.io/plasma.pdf","source_label":"plasma.io paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A 2017 construction for trees of child chains whose state commitments are posted to a parent chain, with exits so a user can leave if the child operator misbehaves. It is an ancestor of later rollup and validium designs, not a synonym for them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plasma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plasma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plasma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0030","slug":"arbitrum","title":"Arbitrum: Scalable, private smart contracts","authors":"Harry Kalodner, Steven Goldfeder, Xiaoqi Chen, S. Matthew Weinberg, Edward W. Felten","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Harry Kalodner, Steven Goldfeder, Xiaoqi Chen, S. Matthew Weinberg, Edward W. Felten","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-kalodner.pdf","source_label":"USENIX Security 2018","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2018 USENIX paper on Arbitrum: a verifier that checks a manager's execution of a virtual machine by bisecting disputes, instead of re-executing every instruction. Offchain Labs' later Nitro stack is a descendant, not this paper line for line.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arbitrum","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/arbitrum","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arbitrum","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0031","slug":"starks","title":"Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh, Michael Riabzev","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh, Michael Riabzev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/046.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2018/046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The STARK paper: proofs of computational integrity that are succinct, do not need a trusted setup, and are argued to resist quantum attackers on the underlying hashes. StarkWare's later systems, including StarkEx and Starknet, are built on this proof system. They are not identical to it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/starks","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/starks","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/starks","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0032","slug":"lazyledger","title":"LazyLedger: A Distributed Data Availability Ledger With Client-Side Smart Contracts","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bassam","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Mustafa Al-Bassam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.09274","source_label":"arXiv:1905.09274","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Al-Bassam's LazyLedger paper, the research origin of Celestia. The base layer orders and makes data available. It does not execute application transitions. Clients check availability with sampling, and applications execute on their own.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lazyledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lazyledger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lazyledger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0033","slug":"eigenlayer","title":"EigenLayer: The Restaking Collective","authors":"Eigen Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Eigen Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.eigenlayer.xyz/eigenlayer/overview/whitepaper","source_label":"EigenLayer white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Eigen Labs' design for letting Ethereum stakers opt in to additional slashing conditions, so new services can rent economic security instead of bootstrapping a new token set from zero.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eigenlayer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eigenlayer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eigenlayer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0034","slug":"matic","title":"Matic Network white paper","authors":"Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, Anurag Arjun","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, Anurag Arjun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/maticnetwork/whitepaper","source_label":"Matic white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/maticnetwork/whitepaper","editorial_line":"The 2019 Matic paper for a Plasma-inspired sidechain with a proof-of-stake checkpoint layer posting to Ethereum. Polygon is the later organisation and product family. This page is about the 2019 document, not about every subsequent Polygon stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/matic","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/matic","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/matic","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0035","slug":"uniswap-v2","title":"Uniswap v2 Core","authors":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Dan Robinson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Dan Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://uniswap.org/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Uniswap v2 core paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2020 core paper for Uniswap v2: a constant-product automated market maker, with arbitrary ERC-20 pairs, price accumulators, and a flash-swap callback. It is the clearest short specification of the pool that much of later DeFi either forked or assumed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0036","slug":"uniswap-v3","title":"Uniswap v3 Core","authors":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Moody Salem, River Keefer, Dan Robinson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Moody Salem, River Keefer, Dan Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf","source_label":"Uniswap v3 core paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2021 paper that replaces the uniform reserve curve with concentrated liquidity. A provider chooses a price range. Inside the range their capital acts like a constant-product pool. Outside it, their position is entirely in one asset.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v3","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v3","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v3","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0037","slug":"curve-stableswap","title":"StableSwap — efficient mechanism for Stablecoin liquidity","authors":"Michael Egorov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Michael Egorov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://curve.fi/files/stableswap-paper.pdf","source_label":"StableSwap paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Egorov's 2019 invariant for pools of assets that should trade near parity. The curve is flat around the peg, where most stablecoin trades happen, and bends toward a constant-product tail when the pool is pushed off parity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stableswap","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/curve-stableswap","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stableswap","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0038","slug":"balancer","title":"Balancer: A non-custodial portfolio manager, liquidity provider, and price sensor","authors":"Fernando Martinelli and Nikolai Mushegian","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Fernando Martinelli and Nikolai Mushegian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://balancer.fi/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Balancer white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Balancer paper generalises the two-asset constant-product pool to a weighted basket of several tokens. Traders rebalance the basket. Liquidity providers define target weights. The pool is both an index and a market.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/balancer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/balancer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/balancer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0039","slug":"zero-x","title":"0x: An open protocol for decentralized exchange on the Ethereum blockchain","authors":"Will Warren and Amir Bandeali","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Will Warren and Amir Bandeali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/0xProject/whitepaper/blob/master/0x_white_paper.pdf","source_label":"0x white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/0xProject/whitepaper","editorial_line":"The 2017 0x paper: off-chain signed orders, on-chain settlement, and relayers who host order books without taking custody. It is the reference design for 'the book is off-chain, the swap is on-chain'.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zero-x","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zero-x","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zero-x","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0040","slug":"bancor","title":"Bancor Protocol: Continuous Liquidity and Asynchronous Price Discovery for Tokens through their Smart Contracts","authors":"Eyal Hertzog, Guy Benartzi, Galia Benartzi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Eyal Hertzog, Guy Benartzi, Galia Benartzi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://bancor.network/","source_label":"Bancor protocol","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2017 Bancor paper on smart tokens that hold reserves of other tokens and quote a continuous price from a reserve ratio. It is an early automated-liquidity design, distinct from Uniswap's later constant-product pools.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bancor","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bancor","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bancor","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0041","slug":"thorchain","title":"THORChain: a decentralised liquidity protocol","authors":"The THORChain team","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"The THORChain team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/thorchain/Resources/tree/master/Whitepapers","source_label":"THORChain white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/thorchain/Resources","editorial_line":"THORChain's design for continuous liquidity pools that cross native chains. Nodes bond capital, observe external chains, and sign outbound transactions as a threshold set. It is a liquidity network, not a wrapped-asset bridge run by a single custodian.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thorchain","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/thorchain","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thorchain","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0042","slug":"compound","title":"Compound: The Money Market Protocol","authors":"Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://compound.finance/documents/Compound.Whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Compound white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2019 Compound paper: pooled lending markets where suppliers earn a floating rate and borrowers post collateral. Interest rates are a function of utilisation, set in the protocol rather than negotiated bilaterally.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compound","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/compound","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compound","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0043","slug":"aave","title":"Aave Protocol white paper","authors":"Aave","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Aave","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/aave/aave-protocol/blob/master/docs/Aave_Protocol_Whitepaper_v1_0.pdf","source_label":"Aave protocol white paper v1","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/aave/aave-protocol","editorial_line":"Aave's v1 protocol paper: pooled lending with stable and variable rates, and loan features such as rate switching and uncollateralised flash loans inside a single transaction. It sits in the same family as Compound, with a different rate and product surface.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aave","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aave","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aave","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0047","slug":"the-graph","title":"The Graph: a decentralised query protocol for blockchains","authors":"Yaniv Tal, Brandon Ramirez and the Graph team","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Yaniv Tal, Brandon Ramirez and the Graph team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/graphprotocol/research","source_label":"Graph research papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/graphprotocol/research","editorial_line":"The Graph's protocol paper for indexing chain data. Indexers stake on serving a subgraph. Curators signal which subgraphs matter. Consumers pay for queries. The problem is read access, not consensus.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/the-graph","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/the-graph","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/the-graph","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0048","slug":"augur","title":"Augur: a Decentralized Oracle and Prediction Market Platform","authors":"Jack Peterson, Joseph Krug, Micah Zoltu, Austin K. Williams, Stephanie Alexander","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jack Peterson, Joseph Krug, Micah Zoltu, Austin K. Williams, Stephanie Alexander","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://augur.net/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Augur white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Augur paper: prediction markets whose outcomes are reported by token holders, with a dispute ladder that can escalate a contested result. It is both a market design and an oracle design. The historic library already holds Gnosis. Augur is the other canonical public prediction-market paper and was not in that set.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/augur","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/augur","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/augur","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0049","slug":"ocean","title":"Ocean Protocol: A Decentralized Substrate for AI Data and Services","authors":"Trent McConaghy and the Ocean Protocol team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Trent McConaghy and the Ocean Protocol team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://oceanprotocol.com/tech-whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Ocean technical white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Ocean's technical paper for publishing, pricing and consuming data services with on-chain access control and off-chain storage. The data does not sit inside the chain. The permission and the payment do.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ocean","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ocean","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ocean","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0050","slug":"bittensor","title":"Bittensor: A Peer-to-Peer Intelligence Market","authors":"Yuma Rao","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Yuma Rao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://www.bittensor.com/whitepaper","source_label":"Bittensor white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Rao's paper for a market in which machine-learning models score each other. Peers rank neighbours, ranks accumulate on a ledger, and an incentive mechanism is specified to resist a naive cartel of mutual high scores. It is a design for pricing intelligence as a commodity, not a benchmark of any particular model.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bittensor","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bittensor","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bittensor","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0051","slug":"singularitynet","title":"SingularityNET: A Decentralized, Open Market and Network for AIs","authors":"Ben Goertzel and the SingularityNET team","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Ben Goertzel and the SingularityNET team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://public.singularitynet.io/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"SingularityNET white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Goertzel's 2017 proposal for a marketplace where AI services discover, call and pay each other. The paper is broad on purpose: discovery, reputation, inter-agent calls and a tokenised payment rail, sketched as one network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/singularitynet","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/singularitynet","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/singularitynet","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0053","slug":"arweave","title":"Arweave yellow paper","authors":"Sam Williams and the Arweave team","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Sam Williams and the Arweave team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://www.arweave.org/yellow-paper.pdf","source_label":"Arweave yellow paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Arweave's protocol paper for permanent storage: miners store a recall block drawn from the history, an endowment is supposed to prepay storage, and the dataset is content-addressed. The yellow paper is the technical document. Marketing pages are not a substitute.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arweave","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/arweave","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arweave","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0054","slug":"helium","title":"Helium: A Decentralized Wireless Network","authors":"Amir Haleem, Andrew Allen, Andrew Thompson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Amir Haleem, Andrew Allen, Andrew Thompson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://whitepaper.helium.com/","source_label":"Helium white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Helium paper for a wireless network built from independently owned hotspots. Coverage is the commodity. Proof-of-coverage is the paper's way of checking that a radio is where it says it is and that it can be heard. Later changes of purpose and token are not this document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/helium","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/helium","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/helium","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0055","slug":"golem","title":"The Golem Project: crowdfunding white paper","authors":"Golem Factory","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Golem Factory","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://golem.network/doc/Golemwhitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Golem white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Golem Factory's 2016 paper for a marketplace of spare computer power. Requestors split tasks. Providers run them. A reputation and payment layer is supposed to make the exchange work without a single render farm. The paper is explicit that it was also a crowdfunding document. This page uses the technical design and ignores the sale.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/golem","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/golem","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/golem","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0056","slug":"livepeer","title":"Livepeer: a decentralised live video streaming network","authors":"Doug Petkanics and Eric Tang","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Doug Petkanics and Eric Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/livepeer/wiki/blob/master/WHITEPAPER.md","source_label":"Livepeer white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/livepeer/wiki","editorial_line":"Petkanics and Tang's design for live video transcoding as a protocol job. Broadcasters send a stream. Transcoders stake and compete to encode the renditions viewers actually need. It is a specific media market, which is why it is more concrete than a general 'decentralised compute' essay.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/livepeer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/livepeer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/livepeer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0057","slug":"basic-attention-token","title":"Basic Attention Token: Blockchain Based Digital Advertising","authors":"Brave Software","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Brave Software","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://basicattentiontoken.org/BasicAttentionTokenWhitePaper-4.pdf","source_label":"BAT white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Brave's 2018 paper for an advertising unit that pays publishers and users from a measured attention event inside the browser, rather than from a chain of third-party trackers. The browser is load-bearing. The token is the unit of account in the paper's payment flow.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/basic-attention-token","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/basic-attention-token","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/basic-attention-token","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0058","slug":"enigma","title":"Enigma: Decentralized Computation Platform with Guaranteed Privacy","authors":"Guy Zyskind, Oz Nathan, Alex Pentland","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Guy Zyskind, Oz Nathan, Alex Pentland","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://enigma.co/enigma_full.pdf","source_label":"Enigma paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The 2015 Enigma paper from MIT: private contracts executed over secret-shared data, so nodes compute without seeing the raw inputs. Secret Network is a later project in this lineage, using different machinery. This page is about the Enigma paper, which the historic library does not hold.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/enigma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/enigma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/enigma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0059","slug":"ekiden","title":"Ekiden: A Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contracts","authors":"Raymond Cheng, Fan Zhang, Jernej Kos, Ari Juels, Andrew Miller, Dawn Song and collaborators","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Raymond Cheng, Fan Zhang, Jernej Kos, Ari Juels, Andrew Miller, Dawn Song and collaborators","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.05141","source_label":"arXiv:1804.05141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Ekiden paper: smart contracts that execute inside trusted hardware, with the ledger checking attestations rather than re-executing the private code. Oasis Network is the later production system in this line. The paper is the academic statement of the approach.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ekiden","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ekiden","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ekiden","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0060","slug":"pbft","title":"Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance","authors":"Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov","year":1999,"date_label":"1999","publisher":"Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"http://pmg.csail.mit.edu/papers/osdi99.pdf","source_label":"OSDI 1999","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1999 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper that made a Byzantine quorum practical: a known set of replicas, three phases, and a view change when the leader is useless. Tendermint and HotStuff inherit the shape. Open membership is a different problem.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pbft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pbft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pbft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0061","slug":"bitcoin-ng","title":"Bitcoin-NG: A Scalable Blockchain Protocol","authors":"Ittay Eyal, Adem Ercan Gencer, Emin Gün Sirer and Robbert van Renesse","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Ittay Eyal, Adem Ercan Gencer, Emin Gün Sirer and Robbert van Renesse","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02037","source_label":"arXiv:1510.02037","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Separate the rare proof-of-work election from the frequent publication of transactions. Key blocks choose a leader. That leader's microblocks carry the transactions until the next key block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ng","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-ng","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ng","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0062","slug":"ghost","title":"Secure High-Rate Transaction Processing in Bitcoin","authors":"Yonatan Sompolinsky and Aviv Zohar","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Yonatan Sompolinsky and Aviv Zohar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/881","source_label":"ePrint 2013/881","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"At high block rates the longest chain throws away too much honest work. GHOST follows the heaviest subtree, so blocks off the main tip still count for the fork choice.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ghost","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ghost","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ghost","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0063","slug":"phantom","title":"PHANTOM and GHOSTDAG","authors":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Shai Wyborski and Aviv Zohar","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Shai Wyborski and Aviv Zohar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/104","source_label":"ePrint 2018/104","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A blockDAG protocol that still ends in one linear order. Honest blocks cluster. The parameter k is how wide that cluster may be. Kaspa is a later network in this line, not the paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/phantom","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/phantom","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/phantom","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0064","slug":"spectre","title":"SPECTRE: A Fast and Scalable Cryptocurrency Protocol","authors":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Yoad Lewenberg and Aviv Zohar","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Yoad Lewenberg and Aviv Zohar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1159","source_label":"ePrint 2016/1159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Blocks form a DAG and vote pairwise on which of two blocks came first. In the common case that vote settles quickly. The paper does not promise a total order of every pair, which is why it is a poor fit for general contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spectre","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spectre","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spectre","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0065","slug":"casper-ffg","title":"Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget","authors":"Vitalik Buterin and Virgil Griffith","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin and Virgil Griffith","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437","source_label":"arXiv:1710.09437","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A finality overlay. Validators cast two rounds of votes so that a chain of checkpoints becomes justified and then final. Equivocation can be slashed. The gadget does not, by itself, propose blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/casper-ffg","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/casper-ffg","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/casper-ffg","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0066","slug":"hotstuff","title":"HotStuff: BFT Consensus in the Lens of Blockchain","authors":"Maofan Yin, Dahlia Malkhi, Michael K. Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta and Ittai Abraham","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Maofan Yin, Dahlia Malkhi, Michael K. Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta and Ittai Abraham","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05069","source_label":"arXiv:1803.05069","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A three-phase BFT protocol whose communication is linear in the number of replicas, because a leader collects a threshold signature instead of everyone talking to everyone. Diem used a variant. The paper is not that network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hotstuff","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hotstuff","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hotstuff","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0067","slug":"honeybadger","title":"The Honey Badger of BFT Protocols","authors":"Andrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi and Dawn Song","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Andrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi and Dawn Song","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/199","source_label":"ePrint 2016/199","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"An asynchronous atomic broadcast. It does not wait for a timeout to make progress, and threshold encryption stops a leader from reading a batch and then dropping the transactions it dislikes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/honeybadger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/honeybadger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/honeybadger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0068","slug":"narwhal-tusk","title":"Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensus","authors":"George Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino and Alexander Spiegelman","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"George Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino and Alexander Spiegelman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11827","source_label":"arXiv:2105.11827","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Split the mempool from the consensus. Narwhal is a DAG of certified batches. Tusk picks a leader inside that DAG. Later Sui consensus descends from this split. The paper is not a Sui status report.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/narwhal-tusk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/narwhal-tusk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/narwhal-tusk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0069","slug":"snow-white","title":"Snow White: Robustly Reconfigurable Consensus","authors":"Phil Daian, Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Phil Daian, Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/919","source_label":"ePrint 2016/919","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A proof-of-stake design in the sleepy model: honest nodes may be offline, and the set of stakeholders can change. It is an academic predecessor, not Cardano and not Ethereum.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/snow-white","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/snow-white","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/snow-white","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0070","slug":"thunderella","title":"Thunderella: Blockchains with Optimistic Instant Confirmation","authors":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/454","source_label":"ePrint 2017/454","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A fast path and a slow path. If a large supermajority is honest and an accelerator proposes quickly, transactions confirm at network speed. If not, the protocol falls back to an underlying chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thunderella","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/thunderella","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thunderella","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0071","slug":"confidential-transactions","title":"Confidential Transactions","authors":"Gregory Maxwell","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Gregory Maxwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://elementsproject.org/features/confidential-transactions","source_label":"Elements Project","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Hide the amounts on a Bitcoin-style transaction with Pedersen commitments, and use range proofs so a commitment cannot stand for a negative number. The graph of who paid whom stays visible.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/confidential-transactions","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/confidential-transactions","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/confidential-transactions","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0072","slug":"bulletproofs","title":"Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More","authors":"Benedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra, Pieter Wuille and Greg Maxwell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Benedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra, Pieter Wuille and Greg Maxwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1066","source_label":"ePrint 2017/1066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Range proofs whose size grows logarithmically, with no trusted setup. They made confidential amounts practical to verify. They are not, by themselves, a private payment system.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bulletproofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0073","slug":"groth16","title":"On the Size of Pairing-based Non-interactive Arguments","authors":"Jens Groth","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jens Groth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/260","source_label":"ePrint 2016/260","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A pairing-based argument in three group elements. The proofs are tiny and cheap to verify. Each circuit needs its own setup, and a leaked setup can forge proofs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/groth16","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/groth16","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/groth16","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0074","slug":"plonk","title":"PLONK: Permutations over Lagrange-bases for Oecumenical Noninteractive arguments of Knowledge","authors":"Ariel Gabizon, Zachary J. Williamson and Oana Ciobotaru","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Ariel Gabizon, Zachary J. Williamson and Oana Ciobotaru","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/953","source_label":"ePrint 2019/953","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A SNARK with a universal and updatable structured reference string. One setup can serve many circuits. The proofs are larger than Groth16, and there is still a setup.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plonk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0075","slug":"halo","title":"Halo: Recursive Proof Composition without a Trusted Setup","authors":"Sean Bowe, Jack Grigg and Daira Hopwood","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Sean Bowe, Jack Grigg and Daira Hopwood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1021","source_label":"ePrint 2019/1021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Recursion for inner-product arguments, without a structured setup. A proof can attest that another proof was checked. That is how a chain can fold a long history into one object. Halo 2 is a later system.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/halo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/halo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/halo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0076","slug":"zexe","title":"Zexe: Enabling Decentralized Private Computation","authors":"Sean Bowe, Alessandro Chiesa, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Pratyush Mishra and Howard Wu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Sean Bowe, Alessandro Chiesa, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Pratyush Mishra and Howard Wu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/962","source_label":"ePrint 2018/962","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A model for private computation over records. Each record has a birth predicate and a death predicate. A transaction proves that some records died and others were born, without showing which, or showing the data.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zexe","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zexe","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zexe","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0077","slug":"fraud-and-da","title":"Fraud and Data Availability Proofs","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino and Vitalik Buterin","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino and Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09044","source_label":"arXiv:1809.09044","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Light clients can refuse a block if a fraud proof shows it is invalid, but only if the block's data was actually published. The paper shows how erasure coding and sampling let clients check publication without downloading everything.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fraud-and-da","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fraud-and-da","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fraud-and-da","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0078","slug":"truebit","title":"A scalable verification solution for blockchains","authors":"Jason Teutsch and Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jason Teutsch and Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~teutsch/papers/truebit.pdf","source_label":"TrueBit white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Pay a solver to run a heavy computation off-chain, and pay a verifier only when they find a lie. An interactive game narrows the lie to one step. A jackpot is there so verifiers show up even when solvers are usually honest.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/truebit","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/truebit","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/truebit","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0079","slug":"kzg","title":"Constant-Size Commitments to Polynomials and Their Applications","authors":"Aniket Kate, Gregory M. Zaverucha and Ian Goldberg","year":2010,"date_label":"2010","publisher":"Aniket Kate, Gregory M. Zaverucha and Ian Goldberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://www.iacr.org/archive/asiacrypt2010/6477178/6477178.pdf","source_label":"ASIACRYPT 2010","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2010 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Commit to a polynomial and later open it at a point, in constant size, with a pairing. The commitment is binding if the setup's trapdoor stays secret. Modern data-availability schemes use this as a brick. The paper is older than those schemes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kzg","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kzg","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kzg","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0080","slug":"proofs-of-space","title":"Proofs of Space","authors":"Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Vladimir Kolmogorov and Krzysztof Pietrzak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Vladimir Kolmogorov and Krzysztof Pietrzak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/796","source_label":"ePrint 2013/796","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A proof that a machine reserved storage, not that it burned energy on a puzzle. The verifier checks a small challenge. Chia is a later system that pairs this idea with a verifiable delay. The paper is not Chia.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/proofs-of-space","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/proofs-of-space","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/proofs-of-space","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0081","slug":"vdf","title":"Verifiable Delay Functions","authors":"Dan Boneh, Joseph Bonneau, Benedikt Bünz and Ben Fisch","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Boneh, Joseph Bonneau, Benedikt Bünz and Ben Fisch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/601","source_label":"ePrint 2018/601","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A function that forces a wait. Evaluating it takes a set number of sequential steps. Checking the result is quick, and the output is unique. Parallel machines do not make the wait much shorter.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/vdf","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/vdf","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/vdf","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0082","slug":"atomic-swaps","title":"Atomic Cross-Chain Swaps","authors":"Maurice Herlihy","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Maurice Herlihy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09515","source_label":"arXiv:1801.09515","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A swap across ledgers where either every transfer completes or none does, using hash locks and time locks. There is no custodian in the paper. A party can still walk away and leave the other waiting.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/atomic-swaps","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/atomic-swaps","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/atomic-swaps","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0083","slug":"sprites","title":"Sprites and State Channels","authors":"Andrew Miller, Iddo Bentov, Sandeep Bakshi, Ranjit Kumaresan and Patrick McCorry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Andrew Miller, Iddo Bentov, Sandeep Bakshi, Ranjit Kumaresan and Patrick McCorry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05812","source_label":"arXiv:1702.05812","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"State channels whose disputes do not have to hop one channel at a time. A global preimage manager lets a payment resolve in constant time on-chain. Lightning did not adopt this design as its production path.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sprites","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sprites","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sprites","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0084","slug":"ibc","title":"The Interblockchain Communication Protocol","authors":"Christopher Goes and the Cosmos IBC specification","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Christopher Goes and the Cosmos IBC specification","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/cosmos/ibc","source_label":"Cosmos IBC specification","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/cosmos/ibc","editorial_line":"Two chains verify each other with light clients. A relayer carries packets and proofs. The relayer is not trusted to tell the truth. It is trusted to bother showing up. Security is the security of both chains.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ibc","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ibc","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ibc","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0085","slug":"flash-boys-2","title":"Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges","authors":"Philip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li, Xueyuan Zhao, Iddo Bentov, Lorenz Breidenbach and Ari Juels","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Philip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li, Xueyuan Zhao, Iddo Bentov, Lorenz Breidenbach and Ari Juels","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05234","source_label":"arXiv:1904.05234","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A measurement paper. Miners and bots reorder and insert transactions around DEX trades. The authors name miner-extractable value and show priority gas auctions. It is not a trading manual, and it is not a claim that any strategy here is available or profitable now.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-boys-2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flash-boys-2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-boys-2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0086","slug":"uniswap-v4","title":"Uniswap v4 Core","authors":"Hayden Adams and the Uniswap v4 authors","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Hayden Adams and the Uniswap v4 authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-core/blob/main/docs/whitepaper-v4.pdf","source_label":"Uniswap v4 core whitepaper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-core","editorial_line":"One contract holds many pools. Hooks are code that runs before and after swaps and liquidity changes. Flash accounting settles balances at the end of a lock. A hook can change the rules v3 users took for granted.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v4","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v4","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v4","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0087","slug":"twamm","title":"The Time-Weighted Average Market Maker","authors":"Dave White and Dan Robinson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Dave White and Dan Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://www.paradigm.xyz/2021/07/twamm","source_label":"Paradigm, 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Execute a large order as if it were split into infinitely many tiny trades across an interval, without paying gas for each piece. Settlement is lazy. This is an order schedule, not a price oracle, despite the nearby acronym TWAP.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/twamm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/twamm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/twamm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0088","slug":"liquity","title":"Liquity: Decentralized Borrowing","authors":"Robert Lauko and Rick Pardoe","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Robert Lauko and Rick Pardoe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/liquity/dev/blob/main/papers/Liquity-Whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Liquity whitepaper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/liquity/dev","editorial_line":"Borrow a stable-value token against ether, with a one-time fee instead of an interest rate. Troves are liquidated into a stability pool. Redemptions let the token be swapped for the collateral of the weakest trove. The paper does not promise a peg.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/liquity","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/liquity","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/liquity","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0089","slug":"eip-4337","title":"Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat, Kristof Gazso and Tjaden Hess","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat, Kristof Gazso and Tjaden Hess","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337","source_label":"EIP-4337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Smart-contract accounts that propose UserOperations, bundled by a separate mempool, without a change to Ethereum's consensus. Paymasters can sponsor gas. The validation rule lives in the account, which is the point and the risk.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0090","slug":"gasper","title":"Combining GHOST and Casper","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Diego Hernandez, Thor Kamphefner, Khiem Pham, Zhi Qiao, Danny Ryan, Juhyeok Sin, Ying Wang and Yan X. Zhang","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Diego Hernandez, Thor Kamphefner, Khiem Pham, Zhi Qiao, Danny Ryan, Juhyeok Sin, Ying Wang and Yan X. Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03052","source_label":"arXiv:2003.03052","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"An idealised proof-of-stake protocol that pairs a GHOST-style fork choice with Casper FFG finality. The paper is the design argument for Ethereum's beacon chain, not a status report on a later client or a later outage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gasper","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gasper","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gasper","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0091","slug":"prism","title":"Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical Limits","authors":"Vivek Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Vivek Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08092","source_label":"arXiv:1810.08092","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Bitcoin uses one chain for three jobs: proposing transactions, voting on history, and ordering the result. Prism splits those jobs onto separate block trees so throughput can approach network capacity while confirmation tracks propagation delay.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/prism","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/prism","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/prism","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0092","slug":"streamlet","title":"Streamlet: Textbook Streamlined Blockchains","authors":"Benjamin Y. Chan and Elaine Shi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Benjamin Y. Chan and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/088","source_label":"ePrint 2020/088","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A deliberately small consensus protocol: epochs, a leader, a vote, and a rule that three adjacent certified blocks on the same chain become final. The point is to show how little machinery the last few years of BFT designs actually need.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/streamlet","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/streamlet","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/streamlet","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0093","slug":"fruitchains","title":"FruitChains: A Fair Blockchain","authors":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/916","source_label":"ePrint 2016/916","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Nakamoto consensus can pay a minority coalition more than its share of hash power, which is the selfish-mining observation. FruitChains records transactions in 'fruit' that hang off the chain, and pays out over a window so honest hash power gets roughly honest rewards.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fruitchains","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fruitchains","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fruitchains","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0094","slug":"dag-rider","title":"All You Need is DAG","authors":"Idit Keidar, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Oded Naor and Alexander Spiegelman","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Idit Keidar, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Oded Naor and Alexander Spiegelman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08325","source_label":"arXiv:2102.08325","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Replicas reliably broadcast proposals into a round-structured DAG. Once the DAG is local, each replica can read a total order off it without another round of consensus messages. The paper is the asynchronous, optimally resilient version of that idea.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dag-rider","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dag-rider","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dag-rider","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0095","slug":"bullshark","title":"Bullshark: DAG BFT Protocols Made Practical","authors":"Alexander Spiegelman, Neil Giridharan, Alberto Sonnino and Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alexander Spiegelman, Neil Giridharan, Alberto Sonnino and Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05677","source_label":"arXiv:2201.05677","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"DAG-Rider is built for asynchrony and pays for it on the common path. Bullshark keeps a DAG and a local commit rule, but adds a fast path for when the network is timely. The paper also writes down a simpler partially synchronous version.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bullshark","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bullshark","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bullshark","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0096","slug":"eip-1559","title":"Fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Eric Conner, Rick Dudley, Matthew Slipper, Ian Norden and Abdelhamid Bakhta","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Eric Conner, Rick Dudley, Matthew Slipper, Ian Norden and Abdelhamid Bakhta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1559","source_label":"EIP-1559","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Replace a first-price auction for inclusion with a protocol-quoted base fee that moves with demand, plus a tip to the producer. The base fee is burned. The EIP is a fee-market rule, not a promise that fees will be low.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1559","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1559","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1559","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0097","slug":"fee-mechanism","title":"Transaction Fee Mechanism Design","authors":"Tim Roughgarden","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Tim Roughgarden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00854","source_label":"arXiv:2012.00854","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A mechanism-design reading of blockchain fees. Roughgarden separates what users pay, what miners keep, and what gets burned, and asks which combinations are incentive-compatible for myopic miners. EIP-1559 is the running example, not a price forecast.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fee-mechanism","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fee-mechanism","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fee-mechanism","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0098","slug":"eip-4844","title":"Shard Blob Transactions","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Diederik Loerakker, George Kadianakis, Matt Garnett, Mofi Taiwo and Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Diederik Loerakker, George Kadianakis, Matt Garnett, Mofi Taiwo and Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4844","source_label":"EIP-4844","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A new transaction type carries a blob: a large chunk of data that consensus nodes hold briefly and that the execution layer cannot read byte by byte. Rollups are the intended user. The blob is not cheap forever, and it is not the rollup's proof.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4844","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4844","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4844","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0099","slug":"bitvm","title":"BitVM: Compute Anything on Bitcoin","authors":"Robin Linus","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Robin Linus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bitvm.org/bitvm.pdf","source_label":"bitvm.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A way to dispute an arbitrary computation between two Bitcoin parties using hashlocks, timelocks and large Taproot trees, without a new opcode. Honest execution stays off-chain. A false claim can be challenged on-chain. It is not a global virtual machine.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitvm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitvm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitvm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0100","slug":"cairo","title":"Cairo – a Turing-complete STARK-friendly CPU architecture","authors":"Lior Goldberg, Shahar Papini and Michael Riabzev","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Lior Goldberg, Shahar Papini and Michael Riabzev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1063","source_label":"ePrint 2021/1063","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A CPU whose every instruction was chosen so that a STARK can prove 'this program ran'. You write a program instead of a new set of polynomial equations for each statement. The paper is the machine, not a network's throughput.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cairo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cairo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cairo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0101","slug":"nova","title":"Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes","authors":"Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370","source_label":"ePrint 2021/370","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Incrementally verifiable computation without putting a SNARK inside a SNARK. A folding scheme compresses two instances of a computation into one instance of the same size. Repeating that fold is the recursion. The paper is about prover cost, not about a chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nova","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nova","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nova","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0102","slug":"marlin","title":"Marlin: Preprocessing zkSNARKs with Universal and Updatable SRS","authors":"Alessandro Chiesa, Yuncong Hu, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra, Noah Vesely and Nicholas Ward","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alessandro Chiesa, Yuncong Hu, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra, Noah Vesely and Nicholas Ward","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1047","source_label":"ePrint 2019/1047","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A preprocessing zkSNARK whose structured reference string is universal and can be updated, rather than baked for one circuit in a ceremony that must be trusted forever. The paper improves on Sonic's costs. It is still a SNARK, with a setup.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/marlin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/marlin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/marlin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0103","slug":"frost","title":"FROST: Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold Signatures","authors":"Chelsea Komlo and Ian Goldberg","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Chelsea Komlo and Ian Goldberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/852","source_label":"ePrint 2020/852","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A threshold Schnorr signature: any t of n signers can produce one ordinary-looking signature, and fewer than t cannot. The signing protocol is two rounds, or one if nonces were prepared earlier. The paper is the scheme, not a custody vendor.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/frost","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/frost","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/frost","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0104","slug":"musig2","title":"MuSig2: Simple Two-Round Schnorr Multi-Signatures","authors":"Jonas Nick, Tim Ruffing and Yannick Seurin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jonas Nick, Tim Ruffing and Yannick Seurin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1261","source_label":"ePrint 2020/1261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"n signers, all of them, produce one Schnorr signature that verifies under one aggregated key. Two rounds, and concurrent sessions are in the security claim. This is n-of-n, not a threshold. It is the multi-signature Bitcoin-style schemes reached for.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/musig2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/musig2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/musig2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0105","slug":"taproot","title":"BIP 341: Taproot: SegWit version 1 spending rules","authors":"Pieter Wuille, Jonas Nick and Anthony Towns","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille, Jonas Nick and Anthony Towns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 341","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/taproot.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/taproot.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A Bitcoin spend that can look like a single key, while still hiding a tree of alternative scripts until one of them is used. Schnorr signatures and the key-path spend are the mechanism. Amounts stay public. This is not a privacy coin.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/taproot","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/taproot","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/taproot","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0106","slug":"curve-cryptoswap","title":"Automatic market-making with dynamic peg","authors":"Michael Egorov","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Michael Egorov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://classic.curve.finance/files/crypto-pools-paper.pdf","source_label":"Curve Finance, 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Stableswap concentrates liquidity around a fixed price of one. This paper moves that concentration so it can follow a moving price between volatile assets. The pool reprices itself from its own trades. It does not know the outside world except through those trades.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-cryptoswap","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/curve-cryptoswap","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-cryptoswap","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0107","slug":"curve-stablecoin","title":"Curve stablecoin design","authors":"Michael Egorov","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Michael Egorov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.curve.finance/pdf/whitepapers/whitepaper_curve_stablecoin.pdf","source_label":"Curve Finance, 2022","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A stablecoin lent against volatile collateral, where liquidation is a continuous trade into a special pool rather than a one-shot auction. The paper calls that pool LLAMMA. A peg keeper and a monetary-policy rate sit beside it. Simulations in the paper are not a promise about later losses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stablecoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/curve-stablecoin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stablecoin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0108","slug":"uma","title":"UMA Data Verification Mechanism: Adding Economic Guarantees to Blockchain Oracles","authors":"UMA","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"UMA","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/UMAprotocol/whitepaper/blob/master/UMA-DVM-oracle-whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"UMA DVM draft v0.2, 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/UMAprotocol/whitepaper","editorial_line":"An oracle that does not answer every question in real time. It prices the cost of bribing the token holders who would resolve a dispute, and it asks contract designers to keep the profit of a lie below that cost. The draft is an economic argument, not a feed you can read as truth.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0109","slug":"perun","title":"Perun: Virtual Payment Hubs over Cryptocurrencies","authors":"Stefan Dziembowski, Lisa Eckey, Sebastian Faust and Daniel Malinowski","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Stefan Dziembowski, Lisa Eckey, Sebastian Faust and Daniel Malinowski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/635","source_label":"ePrint 2017/635","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Lightning routes each payment through the intermediaries. Perun asks those intermediaries to set up a virtual channel and then step out of the individual payments. The paper gives the construction for one hub, on a chain that can run the contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perun","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/perun","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perun","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0110","slug":"semaphore","title":"Semaphore: Zero-Knowledge Signaling on Ethereum","authors":"Kobi Gurkan, Koh Wei Jie and Barry Whitehat","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kobi Gurkan, Koh Wei Jie and Barry Whitehat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://semaphore.pse.dev/whitepaper-v1.pdf","source_label":"Semaphore proposal, 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A member of a group proves they are some member, and posts a signal, without showing which member. A nullifier stops the same member signalling twice in the same context. The 2020 proposal is a base layer for voting and similar uses. It is not itself a mixer, and later versions changed the circuits.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/semaphore","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/semaphore","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/semaphore","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0111","slug":"ouroboros-genesis","title":"Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic Availability","authors":"Christian Badertscher, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell and Vassilis Zikas","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christian Badertscher, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell and Vassilis Zikas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/378","source_label":"ePrint 2018/378","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Genesis gives a way to join late, when honest stake may be dynamic, without a checkpoint the protocol itself cannot justify.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-genesis","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ouroboros-genesis","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-genesis","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0112","slug":"stake-bleeding","title":"Stake-Bleeding Attacks on Proof-of-Stake Blockchains","authors":"Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/248","source_label":"ePrint 2018/248","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper shows a long-range style attack in which past stake keeps producing an alternative history unless the protocol makes that history obviously stale.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stake-bleeding","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stake-bleeding","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stake-bleeding","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0113","slug":"bitcoin-async","title":"Analysis of the Blockchain Protocol in Asynchronous Networks","authors":"Rafael Pass, Lior Seeman and abhi shelat","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Rafael Pass, Lior Seeman and abhi shelat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/454","source_label":"ePrint 2016/454","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper analyses Nakamoto consensus when the delay bound is not a clean round, and states how confirmation has to grow with that delay.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-async","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-async","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-async","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0114","slug":"omniledger","title":"OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding","authors":"Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ewa Syta and Bryan Ford","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ewa Syta and Bryan Ford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/406","source_label":"ePrint 2017/406","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"OmniLedger reassigns validators to shards, uses a bias-resistant randomness beacon, and atomically commits cross-shard transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/omniledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/omniledger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/omniledger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0115","slug":"rapidchain","title":"RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full Sharding","authors":"Mahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi and Mariana Raykova","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Mahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi and Mariana Raykova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/460","source_label":"ePrint 2018/460","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"RapidChain shards the ledger completely and uses a committee protocol that tolerates a smaller honest fraction inside a committee than a classical open network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rapidchain","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/rapidchain","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rapidchain","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0116","slug":"compact-multisignatures","title":"Compact Multi-Signatures for Smaller Blockchains","authors":"Dan Boneh, Manu Drijvers and Gregory Neven","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Boneh, Manu Drijvers and Gregory Neven","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/483","source_label":"ePrint 2018/483","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper gives a BLS multi-signature that stays compact and blocks the rogue-key attack with a proof of possession of each key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compact-multisignatures","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/compact-multisignatures","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compact-multisignatures","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0117","slug":"zether","title":"Zether: Towards Privacy in a Smart Contract World","authors":"Benedikt Bünz, Shashank Agrawal, Mahdi Zamani and Dan Boneh","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Benedikt Bünz, Shashank Agrawal, Mahdi Zamani and Dan Boneh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/191","source_label":"ePrint 2019/191","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Zether is a contract for confidential transfers and confidential anonymous transfers, with balances as commitments and a proof that the spend is well formed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zether","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zether","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zether","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0118","slug":"bootle-ipa","title":"Efficient Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Arithmetic Circuits in the Discrete Log Setting","authors":"Jonathan Bootle, Andrea Cerulli, Pyrros Chaidos, Jens Groth and Christophe Petit","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jonathan Bootle, Andrea Cerulli, Pyrros Chaidos, Jens Groth and Christophe Petit","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/263","source_label":"ePrint 2016/263","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper compresses an inner-product argument so a circuit proof can be logarithmic without a trusted setup, in the discrete-log model.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bootle-ipa","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bootle-ipa","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bootle-ipa","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0119","slug":"aurora","title":"Aurora: Transparent Succinct Arguments for R1CS","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Michael Riabzev, Nicholas Spooner, Madars Virza and Nicholas P. Ward","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Michael Riabzev, Nicholas Spooner, Madars Virza and Nicholas P. Ward","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/828","source_label":"ePrint 2018/828","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Aurora proves rank-one constraint systems with a transparent setup, using a FRI-style proximity test rather than a pairing.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aurora","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aurora","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aurora","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0120","slug":"spartan","title":"Spartan: Efficient and General-Purpose zkSNARKs without Trusted Setup","authors":"Srinath Setty","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Srinath Setty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/550","source_label":"ePrint 2019/550","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Spartan encodes the circuit as a sparse matrix and uses a polynomial commitment so the prover's work tracks the number of constraints more tightly than a dense encoding.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spartan","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spartan","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spartan","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0121","slug":"hyperplonk","title":"HyperPlonk: Plonk with Linear-Time Prover and High-Degree Custom Gates","authors":"Binyi Chen, Benedikt Bünz, Dan Boneh and Zhenfei Zhang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Binyi Chen, Benedikt Bünz, Dan Boneh and Zhenfei Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1355","source_label":"ePrint 2022/1355","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"HyperPlonk replaces that transform with a sumcheck so the prover is linear in the number of gates, and it allows higher-degree custom gates.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperplonk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hyperplonk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperplonk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0122","slug":"supernova","title":"SuperNova: Proving Universal Machine Executions without Universal Circuits","authors":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1758","source_label":"ePrint 2022/1758","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"SuperNova folds a universal machine by switching among circuits without a universal circuit that contains every instruction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/supernova","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/supernova","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/supernova","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0123","slug":"hypernova","title":"HyperNova: Recursive Arguments for Customizable Constraint Systems","authors":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573","source_label":"ePrint 2023/573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"HyperNova generalises folding to customisable constraint systems so a recursive proof can follow the arithmetisation the circuit actually uses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hypernova","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hypernova","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hypernova","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0124","slug":"crypsinous","title":"Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-Stake","authors":"Thomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss and Vassilis Zikas","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Thomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss and Vassilis Zikas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1132","source_label":"ePrint 2018/1132","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Crypsinous combines a stake lottery with a private transaction ledger so the leader proof and the transfers do not reveal the stake and the amounts in the way a public chain does.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/crypsinous","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/crypsinous","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/crypsinous","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0125","slug":"powers-of-tau","title":"Scalable Multi-party Computation for zk-SNARK Parameters","authors":"Sean Bowe, Ariel Gabizon and Ian Miers","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Sean Bowe, Ariel Gabizon and Ian Miers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1050","source_label":"ePrint 2017/1050","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Powers of Tau is a multi-party computation that builds the structured reference string so that if one participant deletes their randomness, the trapdoor is gone.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/powers-of-tau","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/powers-of-tau","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/powers-of-tau","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0126","slug":"algorand-vault","title":"Vault: Fast Bootstrapping for the Algorand Cryptocurrency","authors":"Derek Leung, Adam Suhl, Yossi Gilad and Nickolai Zeldovich","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Derek Leung, Adam Suhl, Yossi Gilad and Nickolai Zeldovich","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/269","source_label":"ePrint 2018/269","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Vault compresses Algorand's state and the proofs a client needs so a bootstrapping node does not replay the entire history.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand-vault","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/algorand-vault","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand-vault","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0127","slug":"stubborn-mining","title":"Stubborn Mining: Generalizing Selfish Mining and Combining with an Eclipse Attack","authors":"Kartik Nayak, Srijan Kumar, Andrew Miller and Elaine Shi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Kartik Nayak, Srijan Kumar, Andrew Miller and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/796","source_label":"ePrint 2015/796","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper generalises the withholding strategies and shows they compose with an eclipse attack that starves a node of honest blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stubborn-mining","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stubborn-mining","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stubborn-mining","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0128","slug":"pow-measurement","title":"On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains","authors":"Arthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis, Hubert Ritzdorf and Srdjan Capkun","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Arthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis, Hubert Ritzdorf and Srdjan Capkun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/555","source_label":"ePrint 2016/555","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper builds a quantitative model of stale blocks, double-spends and selfish mining across proof-of-work parameters.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pow-measurement","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pow-measurement","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pow-measurement","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0129","slug":"dumbo","title":"Dumbo: Faster Asynchronous BFT Protocols","authors":"Bingyong Guo, Zhenliang Lu, Qiang Tang, Jing Xu and Zhenfeng Zhang","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Bingyong Guo, Zhenliang Lu, Qiang Tang, Jing Xu and Zhenfeng Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/841","source_label":"ePrint 2020/841","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Dumbo reduces the cost of the asynchronous path by improving the reliable broadcast and the binary agreement that HoneyBadger-style protocols stack together.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dumbo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dumbo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dumbo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0130","slug":"sok-bitcoin","title":"Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies","authors":"Joseph Bonneau, Andrew Miller, Jeremy Clark, Arvind Narayanan, Joshua A. Kroll and Edward W. Felten","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Joseph Bonneau, Andrew Miller, Jeremy Clark, Arvind Narayanan, Joshua A. Kroll and Edward W. Felten","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/261","source_label":"ePrint 2015/261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"This systematisation names the stability and consensus questions, the client problems, and the open research problems as of its date. It is a map, not a new protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sok-bitcoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sok-bitcoin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sok-bitcoin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0131","slug":"spacemint","title":"SpaceMint: A Cryptocurrency Based on Proofs of Space","authors":"Sunoo Park, Albert Kwon, Georg Fuchsbauer, Peter Gaži, Joël Alwen and Krzysztof Pietrzak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Sunoo Park, Albert Kwon, Georg Fuchsbauer, Peter Gaži, Joël Alwen and Krzysztof Pietrzak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/528","source_label":"ePrint 2015/528","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"SpaceMint elects a leader from plots of stored data. The quality of the stored answer, not a hash grind at block time, decides who may extend the chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spacemint","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spacemint","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spacemint","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0132","slug":"bitcoin-beacon","title":"On Bitcoin as a Public Randomness Source","authors":"Joseph Bonneau, Jeremy Clark and Steven Goldfeder","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Joseph Bonneau, Jeremy Clark and Steven Goldfeder","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1015","source_label":"ePrint 2015/1015","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper asks when a proof-of-work block hash is a safe public beacon, and how a miner can bias it by withholding or grinding.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-beacon","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-beacon","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-beacon","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0133","slug":"bitcoin-ledger","title":"Bitcoin as a Transaction Ledger: A Composable Treatment","authors":"Christian Badertscher, Ueli Maurer, Daniel Tschudi and Vassilis Zikas","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Badertscher, Ueli Maurer, Daniel Tschudi and Vassilis Zikas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/149","source_label":"ePrint 2017/149","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper gives a composable ledger functionality and shows that a bitcoin-like protocol realises it under stated assumptions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-ledger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ledger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0134","slug":"ohie","title":"OHIE: Blockchain Scaling Made Simple","authors":"Haifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolić, Ruomu Hou, Prateek Saxena and Joseph Bonneau","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Haifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolić, Ruomu Hou, Prateek Saxena and Joseph Bonneau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12628","source_label":"arXiv:1811.12628","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Run many parallel Nakamoto chains. A block is assigned to a chain by its hash. The safety argument stays close to bitcoin's, and the throughput is the sum.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ohie","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ohie","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ohie","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0135","slug":"chainspace","title":"Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts Platform","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn and George Danezis","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn and George Danezis","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03778","source_label":"arXiv:1708.03778","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Chainspace shards objects, and a transaction names the objects it will read and write so the shards involved can run a distributed commit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainspace","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainspace","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainspace","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0136","slug":"shoal","title":"Shoal: Improving DAG-BFT Latency and Robustness","authors":"Alexander Spiegelman, Balaji Arun, Rati Gelashvili and Zekun Li","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alexander Spiegelman, Balaji Arun, Rati Gelashvili and Zekun Li","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03058","source_label":"arXiv:2306.03058","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Shoal pipelines the DAG so a block can commit faster in the good case, and it uses a reputation idea so slow leaders stop dominating the schedule.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shoal","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/shoal","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shoal","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0137","slug":"mysticeti","title":"Mysticeti: Reaching the Limits of Latency with Uncertified DAGs","authors":"Kushal Babel, Andrey Chursin, George Danezis, Anastasios Kichidis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Arun Koshy, Alberto Sonnino and Mingwei Tian","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Kushal Babel, Andrey Chursin, George Danezis, Anastasios Kichidis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Arun Koshy, Alberto Sonnino and Mingwei Tian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14821","source_label":"arXiv:2310.14821","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Mysticeti commits from an uncertified DAG: blocks are signed by their authors and the commit rule does not require a certificate first.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mysticeti","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/mysticeti","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mysticeti","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0138","slug":"cordial-miners","title":"Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality","authors":"Idit Keidar, Oded Naor, Ouri Poupko and Ehud Shapiro","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Idit Keidar, Oded Naor, Ouri Poupko and Ehud Shapiro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09174","source_label":"arXiv:2205.09174","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Cordial Miners build a DAG with a simple cordial rule for including other miners' blocks, aiming at responsiveness without the certificate tax of the earlier DAG BFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cordial-miners","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cordial-miners","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cordial-miners","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0139","slug":"hashcash","title":"Hashcash: A Denial of Service Counter-Measure","authors":"Adam Back","year":2002,"date_label":"2002","publisher":"Adam Back","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf","source_label":"hashcash.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2002 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The client finds a partial hash collision. The server checks it cheaply. The stamp is the cost.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashcash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hashcash","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashcash","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0140","slug":"b-money","title":"b-money","authors":"Wei Dai","year":1998,"date_label":"1998","publisher":"Wei Dai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt","source_label":"weidai.com","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1998 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Participants broadcast contract offers. Money is created by solving a computational problem, and a collective bookkeeping system tracks balances. A second variant uses a subset of servers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/b-money","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/b-money","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/b-money","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0141","slug":"lamport-clocks","title":"Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System","authors":"Leslie Lamport","year":1978,"date_label":"1978","publisher":"Leslie Lamport","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/time-clocks.pdf","source_label":"Lamport","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1978 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Lamport clocks number events so that if A happened before B, A's number is smaller. The converse is not true. That one direction is the whole idea.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lamport-clocks","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lamport-clocks","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lamport-clocks","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0142","slug":"bitcoin-nakamoto","title":"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System","authors":"Satoshi Nakamoto","year":2008,"date_label":"2008","publisher":"Satoshi Nakamoto","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf","source_label":"bitcoin.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2008 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Publish every spend to a peer network. Let proof-of-work order the history. The longest chain of work is the ledger honest nodes extend. The first spend of a coin in that chain is the one that counts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-nakamoto","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-nakamoto","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-nakamoto","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0143","slug":"paxos","title":"The Part-Time Parliament","authors":"Leslie Lamport","year":1998,"date_label":"1998","publisher":"Leslie Lamport","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/lamport-paxos.pdf","source_label":"Lamport","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1998 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A value is chosen only when a majority has accepted it in some ballot, and every higher ballot must honour a value that majority might already have chosen.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/paxos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0144","slug":"paxos-made-simple","title":"Paxos Made Simple","authors":"Leslie Lamport","year":2001,"date_label":"2001","publisher":"Leslie Lamport","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf","source_label":"Lamport","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2001 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The same two-phase majority protocol, written as pseudocode: prepare, accept, and learn.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos-made-simple","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/paxos-made-simple","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos-made-simple","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0145","slug":"raft","title":"In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm","authors":"Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://raft.github.io/raft.pdf","source_label":"Raft paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A strong leader accepts entries, replicates them in order, and commits only when a majority of the current term has stored them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/raft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0146","slug":"byzantine-generals","title":"The Byzantine Generals Problem","authors":"Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak and Marshall Pease","year":1982,"date_label":"1982","publisher":"Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak and Marshall Pease","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/byz.pdf","source_label":"Lamport, Shostak, Pease","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1982 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"With oral messages, more than two thirds must be loyal. With signed messages, any number of traitors can be tolerated if a loyal commander is heard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/byzantine-generals","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/byzantine-generals","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/byzantine-generals","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0147","slug":"partial-synchrony","title":"Consensus in the Presence of Partial Synchrony","authors":"Cynthia Dwork, Nancy Lynch and Larry Stockmeyer","year":1988,"date_label":"1988","publisher":"Cynthia Dwork, Nancy Lynch and Larry Stockmeyer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm88.pdf","source_label":"Journal of the ACM","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1988 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Safety can hold with no timing assumption. Liveness can wait for a period, after some unknown instant, when messages arrive within a bound.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/partial-synchrony","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/partial-synchrony","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/partial-synchrony","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0148","slug":"flp","title":"Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process","authors":"Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson","year":1985,"date_label":"1985","publisher":"Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm85.pdf","source_label":"Journal of the ACM","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1985 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"No deterministic protocol does all three. Any protocol that is always safe has an execution that never decides.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flp","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flp","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flp","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0149","slug":"bitcoin-backbone","title":"The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol","authors":"Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias and Nikos Leonardos","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias and Nikos Leonardos","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/765","source_label":"ePrint 2014/765","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Common prefix, chain quality and chain growth, under a synchronous network and an honest majority of hash power.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-backbone","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-backbone","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-backbone","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0150","slug":"sleepy-consensus","title":"The Sleepy Model of Consensus","authors":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/918","source_label":"ePrint 2016/918","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Only awake nodes participate. A public randomness beacon picks a leader from the awake stake. Sleeping nodes do not have to be online to keep their stake safe.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sleepy-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sleepy-consensus","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sleepy-consensus","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0151","slug":"ouroboros-praos","title":"Ouroboros Praos: An Adaptively-Secure, Semi-synchronous Proof-of-Stake Protocol","authors":"Bernardo David, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Bernardo David, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/573","source_label":"ePrint 2017/573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Praos hides who the slot leader is until they speak, and it tolerates a semi-synchronous delay, so an adaptive adversary cannot target the leader in advance.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-praos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ouroboros-praos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-praos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0152","slug":"selfish-mining","title":"Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable","authors":"Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.0243","source_label":"arXiv:1311.0243","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A miner who withholds blocks and releases them to waste honest work can earn more than their share, even below 50 percent, under the paper's propagation assumptions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/selfish-mining","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/selfish-mining","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/selfish-mining","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0153","slug":"eclipse-attacks","title":"Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin's Peer-to-Peer Network","authors":"Ethan Heilman, Alison Kendler, Aviv Zohar and Sharon Goldberg","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Ethan Heilman, Alison Kendler, Aviv Zohar and Sharon Goldberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/263","source_label":"ePrint 2015/263","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Fill a node's peer table with attacker addresses so every connection the node opens lands on the attacker. The node can then be fed a private view of blocks and transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eclipse-attacks","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eclipse-attacks","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eclipse-attacks","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0154","slug":"flexible-paxos","title":"Flexible Paxos: Quorum Intersection Revisited","authors":"Heidi Howard, Dahlia Malkhi and Alexander Spiegelman","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Heidi Howard, Dahlia Malkhi and Alexander Spiegelman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.06696","source_label":"arXiv:1608.06696","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Only quorums from different phases have to intersect. A phase-1 quorum and a phase-2 quorum must overlap. Two phase-2 quorums need not.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flexible-paxos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flexible-paxos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flexible-paxos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0155","slug":"epaxos","title":"There Is More Consensus in Egalitarian Parliaments","authors":"Iulian Moraru, David G. Andersen and Michael Kaminsky","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Iulian Moraru, David G. Andersen and Michael Kaminsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.pdl.cmu.edu/PDL-FTP/associated/CMU-PDL-13-109.pdf","source_label":"CMU PDL","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Any replica can propose. Commands that do not conflict commit in one round. Commands that conflict take a second round that records the dependency.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/epaxos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/epaxos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/epaxos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0156","slug":"conflux","title":"Scaling Nakamoto Consensus to Thousands of Transactions per Second","authors":"Chenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Wei Xu, Fan Long and Andrew Chi-Chih Yao","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Chenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Wei Xu, Fan Long and Andrew Chi-Chih Yao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.03870","source_label":"arXiv:1805.03870","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Keep every block in a directed acyclic graph. A pivot chain picks a total order. Honest blocks that lost the race still contribute security and transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/conflux","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/conflux","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/conflux","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0157","slug":"jolteon-ditto","title":"Jolteon and Ditto: Network-Adaptive Efficient Consensus with Asynchronous Fallback","authors":"Rati Gelashvili, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander Spiegelman and Zhuolun Xiang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Rati Gelashvili, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander Spiegelman and Zhuolun Xiang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.10362","source_label":"arXiv:2106.10362","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Jolteon takes two rounds in the happy path. Ditto keeps that path and falls back to an asynchronous protocol when the network or the leader misbehaves.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jolteon-ditto","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/jolteon-ditto","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jolteon-ditto","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0158","slug":"sbft","title":"SBFT: A Scalable and Decentralized Trust Infrastructure for Blockchains","authors":"Guy Golan Gueta, Ittai Abraham, Shelly Grossman, Dahlia Malkhi, Benny Pinkas, Michael K. Reiter, Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi, Orr Tamir and Alin Tomescu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Guy Golan Gueta, Ittai Abraham, Shelly Grossman, Dahlia Malkhi, Benny Pinkas, Michael K. Reiter, Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi, Orr Tamir and Alin Tomescu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.01626","source_label":"arXiv:1804.01626","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Collectors aggregate signatures into one proof. A client and the replicas see a constant number of messages rather than a quadratic flood, under the paper's collector assumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sbft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sbft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sbft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0159","slug":"zyzzyva","title":"Zyzzyva: Speculative Byzantine Fault Tolerance","authors":"Ramakrishna Kotla, Lorenzo Alvisi, Mike Dahlin, Allen Clement and Edmund Wong","year":2007,"date_label":"2007","publisher":"Ramakrishna Kotla, Lorenzo Alvisi, Mike Dahlin, Allen Clement and Edmund Wong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~lorenzo/papers/kotla07zyzzyva.pdf","source_label":"SOSP 2007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2007 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Replicas execute the leader's request speculatively and reply. If every replica agrees, the client is done. A disagreement starts a slower path that looks more like PBFT.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zyzzyva","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zyzzyva","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zyzzyva","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0160","slug":"weak-subjectivity","title":"Proof of Stake: How I Learned to Love Weak Subjectivity","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/11/25/proof-stake-learned-love-weak-subjectivity","source_label":"Ethereum blog, 2014","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A node that has been offline longer than a known window must take a recent checkpoint from a source it already trusts. Inside the window, the protocol can defend itself.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/weak-subjectivity","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/weak-subjectivity","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/weak-subjectivity","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0161","slug":"raft-membership","title":"Consensus: Bridging Theory and Practice","authors":"Diego Ongaro","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Diego Ongaro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ongardie/dissertation","source_label":"Ongaro dissertation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/ongardie/dissertation","editorial_line":"Membership changes one server at a time, or through joint consensus, so there is never a moment when two disjoint majorities can both commit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft-membership","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/raft-membership","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft-membership","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0162","slug":"bitcoin-network","title":"Information Propagation in the Bitcoin Network","authors":"Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.gsd.inesc-id.pt/~ler/docencia/rcs1314/papers/P2P2013_041.pdf","source_label":"IEEE P2P 2013","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Measure how Bitcoin announcements travel. The median time and the long tail are what set a safe block interval.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0163","slug":"verifier-dilemma","title":"Demystifying Incentives in the Consensus Computer","authors":"Loi Luu, Jason Teutsch, Raghav Kulkarni and Prateek Saxena","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Loi Luu, Jason Teutsch, Raghav Kulkarni and Prateek Saxena","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/702","source_label":"ePrint 2015/702","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"If checking a block is expensive and the chance it is invalid is small, the equilibrium is not to check. The paper names that gap the verifier's dilemma.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verifier-dilemma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/verifier-dilemma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verifier-dilemma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0164","slug":"merged-mining","title":"Merged Mining: Curse or Cure?","authors":"Aljosha Judmayer, Alexei Zamyatin, Nicholas Stifter, Artemios G. Voyiatzis and Edgar Weippl","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Aljosha Judmayer, Alexei Zamyatin, Nicholas Stifter, Artemios G. Voyiatzis and Edgar Weippl","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/791","source_label":"ePrint 2017/791","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Merged mining lets the same proof of work stamp a child chain. Security is not transferred for free: the parent miners may not validate the child, and an attack on the child can be cheap in attention even when hash power is large.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/merged-mining","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/merged-mining","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/merged-mining","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0165","slug":"ni-pos","title":"Cryptocurrencies without Proof of Work","authors":"Iddo Bentov, Ariel Gabizon and Alex Mizrahi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Iddo Bentov, Ariel Gabizon and Alex Mizrahi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.5694","source_label":"arXiv:1406.5694","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The paper studies stake-based chain selection and the cost of signing every fork. It is one of the early formal attempts to replace work with a scarce key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ni-pos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ni-pos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ni-pos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0166","slug":"bulletproofs-range","title":"Confidential Assets","authors":"Andrew Poelstra, Adam Back, Mark Friedenbach, Gregory Maxwell and Pieter Wuille","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Andrew Poelstra, Adam Back, Mark Friedenbach, Gregory Maxwell and Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://blockstream.com/bitcoin17-final41.pdf","source_label":"Blockstream Bitcoin 2017 paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Confidential assets put an asset tag beside a Pedersen commitment so a transaction can balance in several assets without publishing which output is which asset or how much.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs-range","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bulletproofs-range","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs-range","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0167","slug":"dandelion","title":"Dandelion: Redesigning the Bitcoin Network for Anonymity","authors":"Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.04439","source_label":"arXiv:1701.04439","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Forward the transaction along a line, in a stem phase, and only then broadcast it, in a fluff phase, so the first flood is not centred on the sender.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dandelion","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dandelion","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dandelion","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0168","slug":"zksnark-pinocchio","title":"Pinocchio: Nearly Practical Verifiable Computation","authors":"Bryan Parno, Jon Howell, Craig Gentry and Mariana Raykova","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Bryan Parno, Jon Howell, Craig Gentry and Mariana Raykova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/279","source_label":"ePrint 2013/279","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Compile the program to a quadratic arithmetic program and prove it was satisfied. Verification is a small number of pairings, independent of the program's length, after a trusted setup.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zksnark-pinocchio","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zksnark-pinocchio","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zksnark-pinocchio","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0169","slug":"plonk-universal","title":"Sonic: Zero-Knowledge SNARKs from Linear-Size Universal and Updatable Structured Reference Strings","authors":"Mary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss and Sarah Meiklejohn","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Mary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss and Sarah Meiklejohn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/099","source_label":"ePrint 2019/099","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Sonic uses a structured reference string that is universal: one setup can serve many circuits, and it can be updated so the toxic waste is harder to keep.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk-universal","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plonk-universal","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk-universal","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0170","slug":"stark-fri","title":"Fast Reed-Solomon Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh and Michael Riabzev","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh and Michael Riabzev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2017/134/","source_label":"ECCC 2017/134","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"FRI is the proximity test: fold the polynomial in rounds until a constant remains, and sample enough points that a cheating polynomial is caught.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stark-fri","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stark-fri","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stark-fri","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0171","slug":"optimism-fault-proofs","title":"The Fault Proof System","authors":"Optimism","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Optimism","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://specs.optimism.io/fault-proof/index.html","source_label":"OP fault-proof spec","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A dispute walks a single instruction of a state transition on a parent chain, so anyone who can post a bond can force the on-chain step that decides a bad proposal.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/optimism-fault-proofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/optimism-fault-proofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/optimism-fault-proofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0172","slug":"sovereign-rollup","title":"Rollups as Sovereign Chains","authors":"Celestia Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Celestia Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://celestia.org/learn/sovereign-rollups/an-introduction/","source_label":"Celestia learn","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Publish transaction data to a data-availability layer. Let the rollup's own nodes interpret it. Fraud or validity proofs are checked by those nodes, not by an Ethereum bridge, unless someone adds one.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sovereign-rollup","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sovereign-rollup","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sovereign-rollup","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0173","slug":"validium","title":"Validium and the Data-Availability Spectrum","authors":"StarkWare","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"StarkWare","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://medium.com/starkware/volition-and-the-emerging-data-availability-spectrum-87e8bfa09bb","source_label":"StarkWare, 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Validium proves execution and keeps the data off the parent chain, with a committee or another store. Volition lets a user choose, per state, whether the data sits on the parent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/validium","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/validium","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/validium","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0174","slug":"based-rollups","title":"Based Rollups","authors":"Justin Drake","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/based-rollups-superpowers-from-l1-sequencing/15016","source_label":"ethresear.ch","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A based rollup lets the parent's proposers order the rollup's transactions. There is no separate sequencer to bribe or to wait for.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/based-rollups","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/based-rollups","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/based-rollups","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0175","slug":"shared-sequencing","title":"The Espresso Sequencer","authors":"Espresso Systems","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Espresso Systems","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://hackmd.io/@EspressoSystems/EspressoSequencer","source_label":"Espresso note","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A shared sequencer orders transactions for many rollups. Each rollup still executes its own state. The sequencer sells order, not execution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shared-sequencing","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/shared-sequencing","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shared-sequencing","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0176","slug":"payment-channels","title":"Bitcoin Payment Channels","authors":"Mike Hearn and Jeremy Spilman","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Mike Hearn and Jeremy Spilman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Payment_channels","source_label":"Bitcoin wiki, early design","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Two parties lock coins in a shared output and exchange updated transactions that are not broadcast. Only the last state, or a dispute, hits the chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/payment-channels","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/payment-channels","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/payment-channels","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0177","slug":"eltoo","title":"eltoo: A Simplified Update Mechanism for Lightning","authors":"Christian Decker, Rusty Russell and Olaoluwa Osuntokun","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christian Decker, Rusty Russell and Olaoluwa Osuntokun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://blockstream.com/eltoo.pdf","source_label":"Blockstream, 2018","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Eltoo replaces penalties with a sequence of state numbers. A later state can spend an earlier one. Nothing is confiscated. The latest number wins if it is published in time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eltoo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eltoo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eltoo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0178","slug":"channel-factories","title":"Scalable Funding of Bitcoin Micropayment Channel Networks","authors":"Conrad Burchert, Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Conrad Burchert, Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://tik-old.ee.ethz.ch/file/a20a865ce40d40c8f942cf206a7cba96/Scalable_Funding_Of_Blockchain_Micropayment_Networks%20(1).pdf","source_label":"Burchert, Decker, Wattenhofer","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A factory is a shared on-chain output that several parties can use to allocate many channels off-chain, so the chain sees the factory and not every channel.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/channel-factories","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/channel-factories","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/channel-factories","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0179","slug":"discreet-log-contracts","title":"Discreet Log Contracts","authors":"Thaddeus Dryja","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Thaddeus Dryja","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://adiabat.github.io/dlc.pdf","source_label":"Dryja, 2017","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The oracle publishes a signature on an outcome. Parties use adaptor signatures so the signature that settles the contract also reveals the oracle's secret, without the oracle knowing which contract it served.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/discreet-log-contracts","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/discreet-log-contracts","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/discreet-log-contracts","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0180","slug":"cfmm","title":"Improved Price Oracles: Constant Function Market Makers","authors":"Guillermo Angeris and Tarun Chitra","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Guillermo Angeris and Tarun Chitra","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.10001","source_label":"arXiv:2003.10001","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A constant-function market maker defines a set of reserves that must stay on a curve. Prices and oracle quality fall out of that curve and of the path traders take.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cfmm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cfmm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cfmm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0181","slug":"yield-space","title":"The Yield Protocol: On-Chain Lending With Interest Rate Discovery","authors":"Allan Niemerg, Dan Robinson and Lev Livnev","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Allan Niemerg, Dan Robinson and Lev Livnev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://yield.is/YieldSpace.pdf","source_label":"Yield protocol paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Yield Space is an invariant between a target asset and a zero-coupon token. The price of the zero-coupon token implies a rate, and the curve is built so that rate behaves like a rate rather than like a spot commodity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/yield-space","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/yield-space","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/yield-space","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0182","slug":"morpho-blue","title":"Morpho Blue: Permissionless Lending","authors":"Morpho Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Morpho Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/morpho-org/morpho-blue/blob/main/README.md","source_label":"Morpho Blue","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/morpho-org/morpho-blue","editorial_line":"Morpho Blue isolates a market to one loan asset, one collateral asset, one oracle, one LLTV and one rate model. Risk does not cross markets inside the core.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/morpho-blue","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/morpho-blue","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/morpho-blue","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0183","slug":"erc-4626","title":"Tokenized Vault Standard","authors":"Joey Santoro, t11s, Jet Jadeja, Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Señor Doggo","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Joey Santoro, t11s, Jet Jadeja, Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Señor Doggo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4626","source_label":"EIP-4626","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A tokenised vault has deposit, mint, withdraw and redeem, and a defined conversion between the asset and the share. The share is an ERC-20.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4626","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4626","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4626","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0184","slug":"flash-loans","title":"ERC-3156: Flash Loans","authors":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3156","source_label":"EIP-3156","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A flash lender sends assets to a receiver and requires that the same transaction returns them, plus a fee. If it does not, the transaction reverts. There is no default in the credit sense, because there is no time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-loans","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flash-loans","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-loans","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0185","slug":"uniswap-v1","title":"Uniswap v1","authors":"Hayden Adams","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Hayden Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://hackmd.io/@HaydenAdams/HJ9jLsfTz","source_label":"Uniswap v1","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A pool holds ETH and one ERC-20. The product of the reserves is constant. Anyone can trade against the pool or add both assets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0186","slug":"gmx-v1","title":"GMX: A Decentralised Perpetual Exchange","authors":"GMX","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"GMX","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.gmx.io/docs/intro","source_label":"GMX docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"GMX v1 pools liquidity provider assets into a vault that takes the other side of leveraged trades. Prices come from an oracle. Traders pay fees to the pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gmx-v1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gmx-v1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gmx-v1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0187","slug":"perps-everlasting","title":"Everlasting Options","authors":"Dave White and Sam Bankman-Fried","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Dave White and Sam Bankman-Fried","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://www.paradigm.xyz/2021/05/everlasting-options","source_label":"Paradigm, 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"An everlasting option is funded so that holding it approximates a rolling option position. The funding payment, not an expiry, keeps the price near the claim.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perps-everlasting","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/perps-everlasting","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perps-everlasting","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0188","slug":"ipfs","title":"IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System","authors":"Juan Benet","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Juan Benet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://ipfs.tech/ipfs/QmR7GSQM93Cx5eAg6a6yRzNde1FQv7uL6X1o4k7zrJa3LX/ipfs.draft3.pdf","source_label":"IPFS draft","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Name a file by its hash. Retrieve it from any peer who has the bytes. Version history is a graph of hashes, not a folder on one machine.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ipfs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ipfs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ipfs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0189","slug":"kademlia","title":"Kademlia: A Peer-to-peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric","authors":"Petar Maymounkov and David Mazières","year":2002,"date_label":"2002","publisher":"Petar Maymounkov and David Mazières","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/~petar/papers/maymounkov-kademlia-lncs.pdf","source_label":"Maymounkov and Mazières","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2002 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Nodes have identifiers. Distance is XOR. Each node keeps contacts in buckets by distance, and a lookup walks toward the target in logarithmic steps.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kademlia","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kademlia","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kademlia","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0190","slug":"verkle","title":"Verkle Trees","authors":"John Kuszmaul","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"John Kuszmaul","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://math.mit.edu/research/highschool/primes/materials/2018/Kuszmaul.pdf","source_label":"Kuszmaul","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Verkle trees use vector commitments so a proof of many leaves shares one commitment path. The proof is shorter, at the cost of a polynomial-commitment assumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verkle","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/verkle","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verkle","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0191","slug":"w3c-did","title":"Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0","authors":"W3C","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"W3C","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/","source_label":"W3C Recommendation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A DID is an identifier whose document, including keys, can be resolved by a method. The method says where the document lives. The standard does not pick one blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-did","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/w3c-did","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-did","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0192","slug":"w3c-vc","title":"Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0","authors":"W3C","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"W3C","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/","source_label":"W3C Recommendation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"An issuer signs a set of claims about a subject. A holder later presents those claims, or a derivation, to a verifier. The verifier checks the issuer's signature, not a central account.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-vc","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/w3c-vc","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-vc","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0193","slug":"bbs-signatures","title":"BBS+ Signatures and Selective Disclosure","authors":"Jan Camenisch, Manu Drijvers and Anja Lehmann","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jan Camenisch, Manu Drijvers and Anja Lehmann","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/663","source_label":"ePrint 2016/663","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A BBS-family signature can be proved in zero knowledge so a holder reveals only some messages and produces an unlinkable presentation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bbs-signatures","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bbs-signatures","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bbs-signatures","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0194","slug":"eip-7702","title":"Set Code for EOAs","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs and Matt Garnett","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs and Matt Garnett","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7702","source_label":"EIP-7702","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A transaction can temporarily, for the transaction's authority, delegate an externally owned account's code to a contract. The key still signs. The code that runs can batch, sponsor, or limit what the key may do.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7702","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7702","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7702","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0195","slug":"bip32","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 32","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip32.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip32.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A master secret derives a tree of child keys. A parent public key can derive child public keys on non-hardened paths, so a server can issue addresses without the private key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip32","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip32","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip32","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0196","slug":"bip39","title":"Mnemonic Code for Generating Deterministic Keys","authors":"Marek Palatinus, Pavol Rusnak, Aaron Voisine and Sean Bowe","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Marek Palatinus, Pavol Rusnak, Aaron Voisine and Sean Bowe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 39","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip39.md under MIT. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"MIT","licence_label":"MIT","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip39.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under MIT. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"Encode entropy as a word list with a checksum, then stretch the words with a passphrase into a seed. The words are the backup. The passphrase is an extra secret, often empty.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip39","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip39","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip39","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0197","slug":"bip44","title":"Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Marek Palatinus and Pavol Rusnak","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Marek Palatinus and Pavol Rusnak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0044.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 44","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A path is purpose, coin type, account, change, and index. Accounts are separated so one seed can hold many identities without mixing their change.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip44","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip44","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip44","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0198","slug":"bip141","title":"Segregated Witness","authors":"Eric Lombrozo, Johnson Lau and Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo, Johnson Lau and Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip141.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip141.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"Move witness data outside the input script. The transaction id that contracts depend on no longer covers the witness. A new weight limit counts witness bytes less than base bytes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip141","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip141","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip141","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0199","slug":"bip174","title":"Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions","authors":"Andrew Chow","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Andrew Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 174","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip174.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip174.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A PSBT is a standard container for a transaction, the inputs' previous outputs, and the partial signatures. Roles are creator, updater, signer, combiner, finaliser and extractor.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip174","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip174","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip174","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0200","slug":"bip324","title":"Version 2 P2P Encrypted Transport Protocol","authors":"Dhruv Mehta, Tim Ruffing, Jonas Schnelli and Pieter Wuille","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Dhruv Mehta, Tim Ruffing, Jonas Schnelli and Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0324.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 324","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip324.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip324.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A v2 connection does an Elligator-style handshake and then encrypts the byte stream, so a passive observer cannot read the messages or easily identify the protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip324","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip324","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip324","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0201","slug":"erc20","title":"Token Standard","authors":"Fabian Vogelsteller and Vitalik Buterin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Fabian Vogelsteller and Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20","source_label":"EIP-20","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A token contract exposes total supply, balance, transfer, and allowances. Wallets and exchanges can integrate one interface.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc20","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc20","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc20","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0202","slug":"erc721","title":"Non-Fungible Token Standard","authors":"William Entriken, Dieter Shirley, Jacob Evans and Nastassia Sachs","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"William Entriken, Dieter Shirley, Jacob Evans and Nastassia Sachs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721","source_label":"EIP-721","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Each token id has an owner. Transfer moves that id. An optional metadata URI points at a description. The standard does not say the description is true, or that the object exists off-chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc721","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc721","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc721","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0203","slug":"erc1155","title":"Multi Token Standard","authors":"Witek Radomski, Andrew Cooke, Philippe Castonguay, James Therien, Eric Binet and Ronan Sandford","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Witek Radomski, Andrew Cooke, Philippe Castonguay, James Therien, Eric Binet and Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1155","source_label":"EIP-1155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"One contract holds many ids. Each id can be fungible or not, by how many copies exist. A batch transfer moves several ids in one call. A receiver hook tries to stop tokens being sent to contracts that cannot hold them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc1155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc1155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc1155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0204","slug":"bip-8","title":"Version bits with lock-in by height","authors":"Shaolin Fry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaolin Fry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/8","source_label":"BIP 8","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 8, Version bits with lock-in by height. This document specifies an alternative to [[bip-0009.mediawiki|BIP9]] that corrects for a number of perceived mistakes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-8","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-8","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-8","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0205","slug":"bip-9","title":"Version bits with timeout and delay","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/9","source_label":"BIP 9","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 9, Version bits with timeout and delay. This document specifies a proposed change to the semantics of the 'version' field in Bitcoin blocks, allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called \"soft forks\") to be deployed in parallel.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-9","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-9","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-9","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0206","slug":"bip-11","title":"M-of-N Standard Transactions","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/11","source_label":"BIP 11","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 11, M-of-N Standard Transactions. M-of-N-signatures required transactions as a new 'standard' transaction type.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-11","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-11","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-11","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0207","slug":"bip-13","title":"Address Format for pay-to-script-hash","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/13","source_label":"BIP 13","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 13, Address Format for pay-to-script-hash. A new type of Bitcoin address to support arbitrarily complex transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-13","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-13","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-13","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0208","slug":"bip-16","title":"Pay to Script Hash","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/16","source_label":"BIP 16","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 16, Pay to Script Hash. A new \"standard\" transaction type for the Bitcoin scripting system, and defines additional validation rules that apply only to the new transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-16","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-16","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-16","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0209","slug":"bip-18","title":"hashScriptCheck","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/18","source_label":"BIP 18","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 18, hashScriptCheck. This BIP modifies the basic format of transaction inputs and outputs, replacing the current scriptSig and scriptPubKey (scripts executed to validate a transaction) with new contents: dataSig, scriptCheck, and hashScriptCheck.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-18","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-18","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-18","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0210","slug":"bip-22","title":"getblocktemplate - Fundamentals","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/22","source_label":"BIP 22","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 22, getblocktemplate - Fundamentals. A new JSON-RPC method for \"smart\" Bitcoin miners and proxies.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-22","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-22","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-22","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0211","slug":"bip-23","title":"getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/23","source_label":"BIP 23","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 23, getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining. Extensions to the getblocktemplate JSON-RPC call to enhance pooled mining.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-23","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-23","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-23","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0212","slug":"bip-30","title":"Duplicate transactions","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/30","source_label":"BIP 30","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 30, Duplicate transactions. This document gives a specification for dealing with duplicate transactions in the block chain, in an attempt to solve certain problems the reference implementation has with them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-30","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-30","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-30","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0213","slug":"bip-31","title":"Pong message","authors":"Mike Hearn","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Mike Hearn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/31","source_label":"BIP 31","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 31, Pong message. This document describes a trivial protocol extension that makes it easier for clients to detect dead peer connections.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-31","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-31","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-31","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0214","slug":"bip-34","title":"Block v2, Height in Coinbase","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/34","source_label":"BIP 34","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 34, Block v2, Height in Coinbase. Bitcoin blocks and transactions are versioned binary structures.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-34","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-34","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-34","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0215","slug":"bip-35","title":"mempool message","authors":"Jeff Garzik","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Jeff Garzik","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/35","source_label":"BIP 35","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 35, mempool message. Make a network node's transaction memory pool accessible via a new \"mempool\" message.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-35","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-35","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-35","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0216","slug":"bip-37","title":"Connection Bloom filtering","authors":"Mike Hearn","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Mike Hearn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/37","source_label":"BIP 37","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 37, Connection Bloom filtering. New support to the peer-to-peer protocol that allows peers to reduce the amount of transaction data they are sent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-37","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-37","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-37","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0217","slug":"bip-38","title":"Passphrase-protected private key","authors":"Mike Caldwell","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Mike Caldwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/38","source_label":"BIP 38","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 38, Passphrase-protected private key. A method is proposed for encrypting and encoding a passphrase-protected Bitcoin private key record in the form of a 58-character Base58Check-encoded printable string.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-38","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-38","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-38","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0218","slug":"bip-42","title":"A finite monetary supply for Bitcoin","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/42","source_label":"BIP 42","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 42, A finite monetary supply for Bitcoin. Although it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-42","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-42","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-42","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0219","slug":"bip-43","title":"Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Marek Palatinus","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Marek Palatinus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/43","source_label":"BIP 43","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 43, Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets. A \"Purpose Field\" for use in deterministic wallets based on algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-43","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-43","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-43","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0220","slug":"bip-45","title":"Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets","authors":"Manuel Araoz","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Manuel Araoz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/45","source_label":"BIP 45","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 45, Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets. A structure for hierarchical deterministic P2SH multi-party multi-signature wallets (HDPM wallets from now on) based on the algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on) and purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-45","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-45","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-45","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0221","slug":"bip-47","title":"Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Justus Ranvier","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Justus Ranvier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/47","source_label":"BIP 47","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 47, Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets. A technique for creating a payment code which can be publicly advertised and associated with a real-life identity without creating the loss of security or privacy inherent to P2PKH address reuse.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-47","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-47","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-47","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0222","slug":"bip-48","title":"Multi-Script Hierarchy for Multi-Sig Wallets","authors":"Fontaine","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Fontaine","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/48","source_label":"BIP 48","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 48, Multi-Script Hierarchy for Multi-Sig Wallets. A logical hierarchy for deterministic multi-sig wallets based on an algorithm described in BIP-0067 (BIP67 from now on), BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on), purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on), and multi-account hierarchy described in BIP-0044 (BIP44 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-48","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-48","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-48","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0223","slug":"bip-49","title":"Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts","authors":"Daniel Weigl","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Daniel Weigl","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/49","source_label":"BIP 49","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 49, Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts. The derivation scheme for HD wallets using the P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH ([[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP 141]]) serialization format for segregated witness transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-49","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-49","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-49","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0224","slug":"bip-61","title":"Reject P2P message","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/61","source_label":"BIP 61","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 61, Reject P2P message. A new message type for the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-61","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-61","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-61","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0225","slug":"bip-65","title":"OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY","authors":"Peter Todd","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Peter Todd","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/65","source_label":"BIP 65","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 65, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. A new opcode (OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY) for the Bitcoin scripting system that allows a transaction output to be made unspendable until some point in the future.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-65","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-65","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-65","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0226","slug":"bip-66","title":"Strict DER signatures","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/66","source_label":"BIP 66","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 66, Strict DER signatures. This document specifies proposed changes to the Bitcoin transaction validity rules to restrict signatures to strict DER encoding.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-66","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-66","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-66","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0227","slug":"bip-67","title":"Deterministic Pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses through public key sorting","authors":"Thomas Kerin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Thomas Kerin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/67","source_label":"BIP 67","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 67, Deterministic Pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses through public key sorting. A method to deterministically generate multi-signature pay-to-script-hash transaction scripts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-67","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-67","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-67","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0228","slug":"bip-68","title":"Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/68","source_label":"BIP 68","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 68, Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers. Relative lock-time (RLT) consensus-enforced semantics of the sequence number field to enable a signed transaction input to remain invalid for a defined period of time after confirmation of its corresponding outpoint.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-68","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-68","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-68","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0229","slug":"bip-69","title":"Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs","authors":"Kristov Atlas","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Kristov Atlas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/69","source_label":"BIP 69","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 69, Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs. Currently there is no standard for bitcoin wallet clients when ordering transaction inputs and outputs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-69","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-69","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-69","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0230","slug":"bip-70","title":"Payment Protocol","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/70","source_label":"BIP 70","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 70, Payment Protocol. A protocol for communication between a merchant and their customer, enabling both a better customer experience and better security against man-in-the-middle attacks on the payment process.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-70","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-70","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-70","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0231","slug":"bip-71","title":"Payment Protocol MIME types","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/71","source_label":"BIP 71","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 71, Payment Protocol MIME types. A MIME (RFC 2046) Media Type for Bitcoin payment request messages.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-71","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-71","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-71","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0232","slug":"bip-72","title":"bitcoin: uri extensions for Payment Protocol","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/72","source_label":"BIP 72","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 72, bitcoin: uri extensions for Payment Protocol. An extension to the bitcoin: URI scheme (BIP 21) to support the payment protocol (BIP 70).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-72","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-72","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-72","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0233","slug":"bip-73","title":"Use \"Accept\" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request URLs","authors":"Stephen Pair","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Stephen Pair","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/73","source_label":"BIP 73","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 73, Use \"Accept\" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request URLs. An enhancement to the payment protocol ([[bip-0070.mediawiki|BIP 70]]) that addresses the need for short URLs when scanning from QR codes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-73","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-73","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-73","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0234","slug":"bip-75","title":"Out of Band Address Exchange using Payment Protocol Encryption","authors":"Justin Newton","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Justin Newton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/75","source_label":"BIP 75","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 75, Out of Band Address Exchange using Payment Protocol Encryption. This BIP is an extension to BIP 70 that provides two enhancements to the existing Payment Protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-75","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-75","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-75","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0235","slug":"bip-84","title":"Derivation scheme for P2WPKH based accounts","authors":"Pavol Rusnak","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Pavol Rusnak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/84","source_label":"BIP 84","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 84, Derivation scheme for P2WPKH based accounts. The derivation scheme for HD wallets using the P2WPKH ([[bip-0173.mediawiki|BIP 173]]) serialization format for segregated witness transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-84","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-84","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-84","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0236","slug":"bip-85","title":"Deterministic Entropy From BIP32 Keychains","authors":"Ethan Kosakovsky","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ethan Kosakovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/85","source_label":"BIP 85","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 85, Deterministic Entropy From BIP32 Keychains. ''\"One Seed to rule them all,'' ''One Key to find them,'' ''One Path to bring them all,'' ''And in cryptography bind them.\"'' It is not possible to maintain one single (mnemonic) seed backup for all keychains used across various wallets because there are a variety of incompatible standards.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-85","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-85","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-85","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0237","slug":"bip-86","title":"Key Derivation for Single Key P2TR Outputs","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/86","source_label":"BIP 86","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 86, Key Derivation for Single Key P2TR Outputs. This document suggests a derivation scheme for HD wallets whose keys are involved in single key P2TR ([[bip-0341.mediawiki|BIP 341]]) outputs as the Taproot internal key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-86","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-86","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-86","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0238","slug":"bip-87","title":"Hierarchy for Deterministic Multisig Wallets","authors":"Robert Spigler","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Robert Spigler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/87","source_label":"BIP 87","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 87, Hierarchy for Deterministic Multisig Wallets. A sane hierarchy for deterministic multisig wallets based on an algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on), purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on), and multi-account hierarchy described in BIP-0044 (BIP44 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-87","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-87","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-87","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0239","slug":"bip-88","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Path Templates","authors":"Dmitry Petukhov","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Dmitry Petukhov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/88","source_label":"BIP 88","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 88, Hierarchical Deterministic Path Templates. This document describes a format for the representation of the templates that specify the constraints that can be imposed on BIP32 derivation paths.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-88","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-88","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-88","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0240","slug":"bip-89","title":"Chain Code Delegation","authors":"Jesse Posner","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jesse Posner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/89","source_label":"BIP 89","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 89, Chain Code Delegation. Chain Code Delegation (CCD) is a method for multi-signature wallets in which a privileged participant withholds BIP32 chain codes from one or more non-privileged participants, and supplies per-input scalar tweaks at signing time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-89","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-89","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-89","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0241","slug":"bip-90","title":"Buried Deployments","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/90","source_label":"BIP 90","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 90, Buried Deployments. Prior soft forks (BIP 34, BIP 65, and BIP 66) were activated via miner signaling in block version numbers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-90","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-90","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-90","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0242","slug":"bip-91","title":"Reduced threshold Segwit MASF","authors":"James Hilliard","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"James Hilliard","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/91","source_label":"BIP 91","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 91, Reduced threshold Segwit MASF. This document specifies a method to activate the existing BIP9 segwit deployment with a majority hashpower less than 95%.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-91","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-91","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-91","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0243","slug":"bip-94","title":"Testnet 4","authors":"Fabian Jahr","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Fabian Jahr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/94","source_label":"BIP 94","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 94, Testnet 4. A new test network with the goal to replace Testnet 3.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-94","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-94","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-94","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0244","slug":"bip-111","title":"NODE_BLOOM service bit","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/111","source_label":"BIP 111","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 111, NODE_BLOOM service bit. This BIP extends BIP 37, Connection Bloom filtering, by defining a service bit to allow peers to advertise that they support bloom filters explicitly.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-111","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-111","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-111","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0245","slug":"bip-112","title":"CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY","authors":"BtcDrak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"BtcDrak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/112","source_label":"BIP 112","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 112, CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY. A new opcode (CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY) for the Bitcoin scripting system that in combination with BIP 68 allows execution pathways of a script to be restricted based on the age of the output being spent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-112","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-112","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-112","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0246","slug":"bip-113","title":"Median time-past as endpoint for lock-time calculations","authors":"Thomas Kerin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Thomas Kerin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/113","source_label":"BIP 113","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 113, Median time-past as endpoint for lock-time calculations. This BIP is a proposal to redefine the semantics used in determining a time-locked transaction's eligibility for inclusion in a block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-113","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-113","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-113","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0247","slug":"bip-123","title":"BIP Classification","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/123","source_label":"BIP 123","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 123, BIP Classification. This document describes a classification scheme for BIPs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-123","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-123","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-123","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0248","slug":"bip-125","title":"Opt-in Full Replace-by-Fee Signaling","authors":"David A. Harding","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"David A. Harding","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/125","source_label":"BIP 125","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 125, Opt-in Full Replace-by-Fee Signaling. Many nodes today will not replace any transaction in their mempool with another transaction that spends the same inputs, making it difficult for spenders to adjust their previously-sent transactions to deal with unexpected confirmation delays or to perform other useful replacements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-125","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-125","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-125","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0249","slug":"bip-127","title":"Simple Proof-of-Reserves Transactions","authors":"Steven Roose","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Steven Roose","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/127","source_label":"BIP 127","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 127, Simple Proof-of-Reserves Transactions. A simple way to construct proof-of-reserves transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-127","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-127","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-127","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0250","slug":"bip-130","title":"sendheaders message","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/130","source_label":"BIP 130","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 130, sendheaders message. Add a new message, \"sendheaders\", which indicates that a node prefers to receive new block announcements via a \"headers\" message rather than an \"inv\".","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-130","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-130","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-130","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0251","slug":"bip-133","title":"feefilter message","authors":"Alex Morcos","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Alex Morcos","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/133","source_label":"BIP 133","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 133, feefilter message. Add a new message, \"feefilter\", which serves to instruct peers not to send \"inv\"'s to the node for transactions with fees below the specified fee rate.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-133","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-133","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-133","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0252","slug":"bip-137","title":"Signatures of Messages using Private Keys","authors":"Christopher Gilliard","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Christopher Gilliard","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/137","source_label":"BIP 137","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 137, Signatures of Messages using Private Keys. This document describes a signature format for signing messages with Bitcoin private keys.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-137","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-137","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-137","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0253","slug":"bip-143","title":"Transaction Signature Verification for Version 0 Witness Program","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/143","source_label":"BIP 143","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 143, Transaction Signature Verification for Version 0 Witness Program. This proposal defines a new transaction digest algorithm for signature verification in version 0 witness program, in order to minimize redundant data hashing in verification, and to cover the input value by the signature.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-143","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-143","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-143","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0254","slug":"bip-144","title":"Segregated Witness (Peer Services)","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/144","source_label":"BIP 144","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 144, Segregated Witness (Peer Services). New messages and serialization formats for propagation of transactions and blocks committing to segregated witness structures.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-144","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-144","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-144","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0255","slug":"bip-145","title":"getblocktemplate Updates for Segregated Witness","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/145","source_label":"BIP 145","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 145, getblocktemplate Updates for Segregated Witness. Modifications to the getblocktemplate JSON-RPC call ([[bip-0022.mediawiki|BIP 22]]) to support segregated witness as defined by [[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP 141]].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-145","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-145","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-145","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0256","slug":"bip-147","title":"Dealing with dummy stack element malleability","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/147","source_label":"BIP 147","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 147, Dealing with dummy stack element malleability. This document specifies proposed changes to the Bitcoin transaction validity rules to fix a malleability vector in the extra stack element consumed by OP_CHECKMULTISIG and OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-147","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-147","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-147","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0257","slug":"bip-148","title":"Mandatory activation of segwit deployment","authors":"Shaolin Fry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaolin Fry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/148","source_label":"BIP 148","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 148, Mandatory activation of segwit deployment. This document specifies a BIP16 like soft fork flag day activation of the segregated witness BIP9 deployment known as \"segwit\".","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-148","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-148","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-148","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0258","slug":"bip-152","title":"Compact Block Relay","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/152","source_label":"BIP 152","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 152, Compact Block Relay. Compact blocks on the wire as a way to save bandwidth for nodes on the P2P network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-152","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-152","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-152","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0259","slug":"bip-155","title":"addrv2 message","authors":"Wladimir J. van der Laan","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Wladimir J. van der Laan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/155","source_label":"BIP 155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 155, addrv2 message. The key words \"MUST\", \"MUST NOT\", \"REQUIRED\", \"SHALL\", \"SHALL NOT\", \"SHOULD\", \"SHOULD NOT\", \"RECOMMENDED\", \"MAY\", and \"OPTIONAL\" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 RFC 2119] .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0260","slug":"bip-157","title":"Client Side Block Filtering","authors":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/157","source_label":"BIP 157","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 157, Client Side Block Filtering. A new light client protocol in Bitcoin that improves upon currently available options.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-157","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-157","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-157","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0261","slug":"bip-158","title":"Compact Block Filters for Light Clients","authors":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/158","source_label":"BIP 158","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 158, Compact Block Filters for Light Clients. A structure for compact filters on block data, for use in the BIP 157 light client protocol bip-0157.mediawiki .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-158","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-158","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-158","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0262","slug":"bip-159","title":"NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED service bit","authors":"Jonas Schnelli","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jonas Schnelli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/159","source_label":"BIP 159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 159, NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED service bit. Define a service bit that allows pruned peers to signal their limited services.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-159","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-159","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-159","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0263","slug":"bip-173","title":"Base32 address format for native v0-16 witness outputs","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/173","source_label":"BIP 173","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 173, Base32 address format for native v0-16 witness outputs. We first describe the general checksummed base32 '''Why use base32 at all?''' The lack of mixed case makes it more efficient to read out loud or to put into QR codes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-173","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-173","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-173","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0264","slug":"bip-176","title":"Bits Denomination","authors":"Jimmy Song","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jimmy Song","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/176","source_label":"BIP 176","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 176, Bits Denomination. Bits is presented here as the standard term for 100 (one hundred) satoshis or 1/1,000,000 (one one-millionth) of a bitcoin.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-176","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-176","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-176","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0265","slug":"bip-179","title":"Name for payment recipient identifiers","authors":"Emil Engler","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Emil Engler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/179","source_label":"BIP 179","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 179, Name for payment recipient identifiers. A new term for 'address' Bitcoin addresses are intended to be only used '''once''' and you should generate a new one for every new incoming payment.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-179","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-179","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-179","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0266","slug":"bip-321","title":"URI Scheme","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/321","source_label":"BIP 321","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 321, URI Scheme. A URI scheme for describing Bitcoin payment instructions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-321","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-321","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-321","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0267","slug":"bip-322","title":"Generic Signed Message Format","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/322","source_label":"BIP 322","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 322, Generic Signed Message Format. A standard for interoperable signed messages based on the Bitcoin Script format, either for proving availability of funds, or for committing to a message as the intended recipient of funds sent to the invoice address.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-322","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-322","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-322","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0268","slug":"bip-325","title":"Signet","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/325","source_label":"BIP 325","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 325, Signet. A new type of test network where signatures are used in addition to proof of work for block progress, enabling much better coordination and robustness (be reliably unreliable), for persistent, longer-term testing scenarios involving multiple independent parties.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-325","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-325","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-325","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0269","slug":"bip-328","title":"Derivation Scheme for MuSig2 Aggregate Keys","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/328","source_label":"BIP 328","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 328, Derivation Scheme for MuSig2 Aggregate Keys. This document specifies how BIP 32 extended public keys can be constructed from a BIP 327 MuSig2 aggregate public key and how such keys should be used for key derivation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-328","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-328","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-328","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0270","slug":"bip-339","title":"WTXID-based transaction relay","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/339","source_label":"BIP 339","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 339, WTXID-based transaction relay. Two changes to the p2p protocol to support transaction relay based on the BIP 141 wtxid of a transaction, rather than its txid.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-339","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-339","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-339","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0271","slug":"bip-342","title":"Validation of Taproot Scripts","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/342","source_label":"BIP 342","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 342, Validation of Taproot Scripts. The rules below only apply when validating a transaction input for which all of the conditions below are true: The transaction input is a '''segregated witness spend''' (i.e., the scriptPubKey contains a witness program as defined in [[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP141]]).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-342","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-342","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-342","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0272","slug":"bip-347","title":"OP_CAT in Tapscript","authors":"Ethan Heilman","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ethan Heilman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/347","source_label":"BIP 347","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 347, OP_CAT in Tapscript. OP_CAT as a tapscript opcode which allows the concatenation of two values on the stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-347","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-347","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-347","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0273","slug":"bip-350","title":"Bech32m format for v1+ witness addresses","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/350","source_label":"BIP 350","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 350, Bech32m format for v1+ witness addresses. We first specify the new checksum algorithm, and then document how it should be used for future Bitcoin addresses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-350","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-350","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-350","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0274","slug":"bip-352","title":"Silent Payments","authors":"josibake","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"josibake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/352","source_label":"BIP 352","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 352, Silent Payments. We use the following functions and conventions: ''outpoint'' (36 bytes): the COutPoint of an input (32-byte txid, least significant byte first || 4-byte vout, least significant byte first) '''Why are outpoints little-endian?''' Despite using big endian throughout the rest of the BIP, outpoints are sorted and hashed matching their transaction serialization, which is little-endian.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-352","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-352","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-352","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0275","slug":"bip-353","title":"DNS Payment Instructions","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/353","source_label":"BIP 353","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 353, DNS Payment Instructions. A standard format for encoding [[bip-0021.mediawiki|BIP 21]] URI schemes in DNS TXT records.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-353","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-353","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-353","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0276","slug":"bip-370","title":"PSBT Version 2","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/370","source_label":"BIP 370","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 370, PSBT Version 2. PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-370","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-370","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-370","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0277","slug":"bip-371","title":"Taproot Fields for PSBT","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/371","source_label":"BIP 371","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 371, Taproot Fields for PSBT. The new per-input types are defined as follows: {| ! Name ! ! ! Description ! ! Description ! Versions Requiring Inclusion ! Versions Requiring Exclusion ! Versions Allowing Inclusion |- | Taproot Key Spend Signature | PSBT_IN_TAP_KEY_SIG = 0x13 | None | No key data '''Why is there no key data for PSBT_IN_TAP_KEY_SIG '''The signature in a key path spend corresponds directly with the pubkey provided in the output script.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-371","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-371","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-371","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0278","slug":"bip-373","title":"MuSig2 PSBT Fields","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/373","source_label":"BIP 373","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 373, MuSig2 PSBT Fields. The new per-input types are defined as follows: {| ! Name ! ! ! ! Versions Requiring Inclusion ! Versions Requiring Exclusion ! Versions Allowing Inclusion |- | rowspan=\"2\"|MuSig2 Participant Public Keys | rowspan=\"2\"| PSBT_IN_MUSIG2_PARTICIPANT_PUBKEYS = 0x1a | | | rowspan=\"2\"| | rowspan=\"2\"| | rowspan=\"2\"| 0, 2 |- | The MuSig2 aggregate public key (compressed) '''Why the compressed aggregate public key instead of x-only?''' [[bip-0032.mediawiki|BIP 32]] public keys can be derived from a [[bip-0327.mediawiki|BIP 327]] MuSig2 aggregate public key (see: [[bip-0328.mediawiki|BIP 328]]).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-373","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-373","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-373","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0279","slug":"bip-380","title":"Output Script Descriptors General Operation","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/380","source_label":"BIP 380","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 380, Output Script Descriptors General Operation. Output Script Descriptors are a simple language which can be used to describe collections of output scripts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-380","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-380","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-380","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0280","slug":"bip-381","title":"Non-Segwit Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/381","source_label":"BIP 381","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 381, Non-Segwit Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies pk() , pkh() , and sh() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-381","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-381","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-381","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0281","slug":"bip-382","title":"Segwit Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/382","source_label":"BIP 382","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 382, Segwit Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies wpkh() , and wsh() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-382","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-382","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-382","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0282","slug":"bip-383","title":"Multisig Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/383","source_label":"BIP 383","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 383, Multisig Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies multi() , and sortedmulti() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-383","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-383","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-383","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0283","slug":"bip-384","title":"combo() Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/384","source_label":"BIP 384","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 384, combo() Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies combo() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-384","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-384","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-384","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0284","slug":"bip-385","title":"raw() and addr() Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/385","source_label":"BIP 385","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 385, raw() and addr() Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies raw() and addr() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-385","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-385","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-385","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0285","slug":"bip-386","title":"tr() Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/386","source_label":"BIP 386","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 386, tr() Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies tr() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-386","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-386","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-386","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0286","slug":"bip-387","title":"Tapscript Multisig Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/387","source_label":"BIP 387","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 387, Tapscript Multisig Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies multi_a() and sortedmulti_a() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-387","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-387","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-387","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0287","slug":"bip-388","title":"Wallet Policies for Descriptor Wallets","authors":"Salvatore Ingala","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Salvatore Ingala","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/388","source_label":"BIP 388","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 388, Wallet Policies for Descriptor Wallets. Software wallets and hardware signing devices typically partition funds into separate \"accounts\".","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-388","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-388","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-388","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0288","slug":"eip-140","title":"REVERT instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Nikolai Mushegian","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Nikolai Mushegian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-140","source_label":"EIP 140","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 140, REVERT instruction. The REVERT instruction provides a way to stop execution and revert state changes, without consuming all provided gas and with the ability to return a reason.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-140","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-140","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-140","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0289","slug":"eip-141","title":"Designated invalid EVM instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-141","source_label":"EIP 141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 141, Designated invalid EVM instruction. An instruction is designated to remain as an invalid instruction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-141","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-141","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-141","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0290","slug":"eip-145","title":"Bitwise shifting instructions in EVM","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-145","source_label":"EIP 145","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 145, Bitwise shifting instructions in EVM. Native bitwise shifting instructions are introduced, which are more efficient processing wise on the host and are cheaper to use by a contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-145","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-145","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-145","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0291","slug":"eip-152","title":"Add BLAKE2 compression function `F` precompile","authors":"Tjaden Hess , Matt Luongo , Piotr Dyraga , James Hancock","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Tjaden Hess , Matt Luongo , Piotr Dyraga , James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-152","source_label":"EIP 152","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 152, Add BLAKE2 compression function `F` precompile. This EIP will enable the BLAKE2b hash function and other higher-round 64-bit BLAKE2 variants to run cheaply on the EVM, allowing easier interoperability between Ethereum and Zcash as well as other Equihash-based PoW coins.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-152","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-152","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-152","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0292","slug":"eip-196","title":"Precompiled contracts for addition and scalar multiplication on the elliptic curve alt_bn128","authors":"Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-196","source_label":"EIP 196","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 196, Precompiled contracts for addition and scalar multiplication on the elliptic curve alt_bn128. Precompiled contracts for elliptic curve operations are required in order to perform zkSNARK verification within the block gas limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-196","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-196","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-196","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0293","slug":"eip-197","title":"Precompiled contracts for optimal ate pairing check on the elliptic curve alt_bn128","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-197","source_label":"EIP 197","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 197, Precompiled contracts for optimal ate pairing check on the elliptic curve alt_bn128. Precompiled contracts for elliptic curve pairing operations are required in order to perform zkSNARK verification within the block gas limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-197","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-197","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-197","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0294","slug":"eip-211","title":"New opcodes: RETURNDATASIZE and RETURNDATACOPY","authors":"Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211","source_label":"EIP 211","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 211, New opcodes: RETURNDATASIZE and RETURNDATACOPY. A mechanism to allow returning arbitrary-length data inside the EVM has been requested for quite a while now.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-211","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-211","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-211","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0295","slug":"eip-214","title":"New opcode STATICCALL","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-214","source_label":"EIP 214","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 214, New opcode STATICCALL. To increase smart contract security, this proposal adds a new opcode that can be used to call another contract (or itself) while disallowing any modifications to the state during the call (and its subcalls, if present).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-214","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-214","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-214","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0296","slug":"eip-225","title":"Clique proof-of-authority consensus protocol","authors":"Péter Szilágyi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-225","source_label":"EIP 225","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 225, Clique proof-of-authority consensus protocol. Clique is a proof-of-authority consensus protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-225","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-225","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-225","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0297","slug":"eip-234","title":"Add `blockHash` to JSON-RPC filter options.","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-234","source_label":"EIP 234","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 234, Add `blockHash` to JSON-RPC filter options.. Add an option to JSON-RPC filter options (used by eth_newFilter and eth_getLogs) that allows specifying the block hash that should be included in the results.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-234","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-234","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-234","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0298","slug":"eip-627","title":"Whisper Specification","authors":"Vlad Gluhovsky","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vlad Gluhovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-627","source_label":"EIP 627","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 627, Whisper Specification. The format of Whisper messages within the ÐΞVp2p Wire Protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-627","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-627","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-627","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0299","slug":"eip-658","title":"Embedding transaction status code in receipts","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-658","source_label":"EIP 658","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 658, Embedding transaction status code in receipts. This EIP replaces the intermediate state root field of the receipt with a status code indicating if the top-level call succeeded or failed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-658","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-658","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-658","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0300","slug":"eip-684","title":"Revert creation in case of collision","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Renan Rodrigues de Souza","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Renan Rodrigues de Souza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-684","source_label":"EIP 684","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 684, Revert creation in case of collision. This EIP causes contract creation to throw an error when attempted at an address with pre-existing code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-684","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-684","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-684","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0301","slug":"eip-695","title":"Create `eth_chainId` method for JSON-RPC","authors":"Isaac Ardis , Wei Tang , Fan Torchz , Erik Marks","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Isaac Ardis , Wei Tang , Fan Torchz , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-695","source_label":"EIP 695","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 695, Create `eth_chainId` method for JSON-RPC. Include eth_chainId method in eth_-namespaced JSON-RPC methods.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-695","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-695","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-695","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0302","slug":"eip-706","title":"DEVp2p snappy compression","authors":"Péter Szilágyi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-706","source_label":"EIP 706","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 706, DEVp2p snappy compression. The base networking protocol (DEVp2p) used by Ethereum currently does not employ any form of compression.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-706","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-706","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-706","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0303","slug":"eip-712","title":"Typed structured data hashing and signing","authors":"Remco Bloemen , Leonid Logvinov , Jacob Evans","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Remco Bloemen , Leonid Logvinov , Jacob Evans","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-712","source_label":"EIP 712","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 712, Typed structured data hashing and signing. This is a standard for hashing and signing of typed structured data as opposed to just bytestrings.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-712","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-712","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-712","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0304","slug":"eip-747","title":"wallet_watchAsset RPC Method","authors":"Dan Finlay , Esteban Mino , Gavin John","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Finlay , Esteban Mino , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-747","source_label":"EIP 747","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 747, wallet_watchAsset RPC Method. This EIP standardizes a new wallet-scoped RPC method, wallet_watchAsset, to allow a client to suggest a token for the user's wallet to track.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-747","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-747","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-747","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0305","slug":"eip-1052","title":"EXTCODEHASH opcode","authors":"Nick Johnson , Paweł Bylica","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Johnson , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1052","source_label":"EIP 1052","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1052, EXTCODEHASH opcode. A new opcode, which returns the keccak256 hash of a contract's code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1052","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1052","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1052","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0306","slug":"eip-1108","title":"Reduce alt_bn128 precompile gas costs","authors":"Antonio Salazar Cardozo , Zachary Williamson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Antonio Salazar Cardozo , Zachary Williamson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1108","source_label":"EIP 1108","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1108, Reduce alt_bn128 precompile gas costs. The elliptic curve arithmetic precompiles are currently overpriced.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1108","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1108","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1108","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0307","slug":"eip-1153","title":"Transient storage opcodes","authors":"Alexey Akhunov , Moody Salem","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov , Moody Salem","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1153","source_label":"EIP 1153","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1153, Transient storage opcodes. This proposal introduces transient storage opcodes, which manipulate state that behaves identically to storage, except that transient storage is discarded after every transaction, and TSTORE is not subject to the gas stipend check as defined in EIP-2200.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1153","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1153","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1153","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0308","slug":"eip-1193","title":"Ethereum Provider JavaScript API","authors":"Fabian Vogelsteller , Ryan Ghods , Victor Maia , Marc Garreau , Erik Marks","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Fabian Vogelsteller , Ryan Ghods , Victor Maia , Marc Garreau , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1193","source_label":"EIP 1193","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1193, Ethereum Provider JavaScript API. A common convention in the Ethereum web application (\"dapp\") ecosystem is for key management software (\"wallets\") to expose their API via a JavaScript object in the web page.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1193","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1193","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1193","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0309","slug":"eip-1283","title":"Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1283","source_label":"EIP 1283","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1283, Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps. Net gas metering changes for SSTORE opcode, enabling new usages for contract storage, and reducing excessive gas costs where it doesn't match how most implementations work.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1283","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1283","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1283","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0310","slug":"eip-1344","title":"ChainID opcode","authors":"Richard Meissner , Bryant Eisenbach","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Richard Meissner , Bryant Eisenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1344","source_label":"EIP 1344","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1344, ChainID opcode. An opcode that returns the current chain's EIP-155 unique identifier.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1344","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1344","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1344","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0311","slug":"eip-1884","title":"Repricing for trie-size-dependent opcodes","authors":"Martin Holst Swende","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884","source_label":"EIP 1884","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1884, Repricing for trie-size-dependent opcodes. Repricing certain opcodes, to obtain a good balance between gas expenditure and resource consumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1884","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1884","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1884","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0312","slug":"eip-1898","title":"Add `blockHash` to defaultBlock methods","authors":"Charles Cooper","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1898","source_label":"EIP 1898","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 1898, Add `blockHash` to defaultBlock methods. For JSON-RPC methods which currently accept a default block parameter, additionally allow the parameter to be a block hash.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1898","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1898","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1898","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0313","slug":"eip-2028","title":"Transaction data gas cost reduction","authors":"Alexey Akhunov , Eli Ben Sasson , Tom Brand , Louis Guthmann , Avihu Levy","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov , Eli Ben Sasson , Tom Brand , Louis Guthmann , Avihu Levy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2028","source_label":"EIP 2028","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2028, Transaction data gas cost reduction. We propose to reduce the gas cost of Calldata (GTXDATANONZERO) from its current value of 68 gas per byte to 16 gas per byte, to be backed by mathematical modeling and empirical estimates.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2028","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2028","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2028","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0314","slug":"eip-2124","title":"Fork identifier for chain compatibility checks","authors":"Péter Szilágyi , Felix Lange","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2124","source_label":"EIP 2124","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2124, Fork identifier for chain compatibility checks. Currently nodes in the Ethereum network try to find each other by establishing random connections to remote machines \"looking\" like an Ethereum node (public networks, private networks, test networks, etc), hoping that they found a useful peer (same genesis, same forks).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2124","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2124","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2124","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0315","slug":"eip-2159","title":"Common Prometheus Metrics Names for Clients","authors":"Adrian Sutton","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Adrian Sutton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2159","source_label":"EIP 2159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2159, Common Prometheus Metrics Names for Clients. Standardized names of common metrics for Ethereum clients to use with Prometheus, a widely used monitoring and alerting solution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2159","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2159","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2159","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0316","slug":"eip-2200","title":"Structured Definitions for Net Gas Metering","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2200","source_label":"EIP 2200","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2200, Structured Definitions for Net Gas Metering. It's a combined version of [EIP-1283] and [EIP-1706], with a structured definition so as to make it interoperable with other gas changes such as [EIP-1884].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2200","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2200","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2200","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0317","slug":"eip-2228","title":"Canonicalize the name of network ID 1 and chain ID 1","authors":"William Entriken","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2228","source_label":"EIP 2228","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2228, Canonicalize the name of network ID 1 and chain ID 1. The Ethereum network with network ID 1 and chain ID 1 is named Ethereum Mainnet.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2228","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2228","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2228","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0318","slug":"eip-2255","title":"Wallet Permissions System","authors":"Dan Finlay , Erik Marks , Gavin John","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Dan Finlay , Erik Marks , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2255","source_label":"EIP 2255","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2255, Wallet Permissions System. Two new wallet-namespaced RPC endpoints, wallet_getPermissions and wallet_requestPermissions, providing a standard interface for requesting and checking permissions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2255","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2255","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2255","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0319","slug":"eip-2364","title":"eth/64: forkid-extended protocol handshake","authors":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Tim Beiko","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2364","source_label":"EIP 2364","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2364, eth/64: forkid-extended protocol handshake. The inclusion of the forkid, originally defined in (EIP-2124), as a new field in the Ethereum wire protocol (eth) handshake.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2364","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2364","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2364","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0320","slug":"eip-2464","title":"eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals","authors":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Gary Rong , Tim Beiko","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Gary Rong , Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2464","source_label":"EIP 2464","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2464, eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals. Three additional message types into the eth protocol (releasing a new version, eth/65): NewPooledTransactionHashes (0x08) to announce a set of transactions without their content; GetPooledTransactions (0x09) to request a batch of transactions by their announced hash; and PooledTransactions (0x0a) to reply to a transaction request.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2464","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2464","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2464","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0321","slug":"eip-2481","title":"eth/66 request identifier","authors":"Christoph Burgdorf","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Christoph Burgdorf","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2481","source_label":"EIP 2481","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2481, eth/66 request identifier. The eth protocol defines various request and response commands that are used to exchange data between Ethereum nodes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2481","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2481","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2481","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0322","slug":"eip-2537","title":"Precompile for BLS12-381 curve operations","authors":"Alex Vlasov , Kelly Olson , Alex Stokes , Antonio Sanso","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Vlasov , Kelly Olson , Alex Stokes , Antonio Sanso","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2537","source_label":"EIP 2537","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2537, Precompile for BLS12-381 curve operations. Add functionality to efficiently perform operations over the BLS12-381 curve, including those for BLS signature verification.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2537","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2537","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2537","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0323","slug":"eip-2565","title":"ModExp Gas Cost","authors":"Kelly Olson , Sean Gulley , Simon Peffers , Justin Drake , Dankrad Feist","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kelly Olson , Sean Gulley , Simon Peffers , Justin Drake , Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2565","source_label":"EIP 2565","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2565, ModExp Gas Cost. Defines the gas cost of the ModExp (0x00..05) precompile.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2565","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2565","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2565","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0324","slug":"eip-2681","title":"Limit account nonce to 2^64-1","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2681","source_label":"EIP 2681","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2681, Limit account nonce to 2^64-1. Account nonces are currently specified to be arbitrarily long unsigned integers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2681","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2681","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2681","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0325","slug":"eip-2696","title":"JavaScript `request` method RPC transport","authors":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2696","source_label":"EIP 2696","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2696, JavaScript `request` method RPC transport. A standard for remote procedure calls between an Ethereum Provider and an Ethereum Client when both are able to interface with each other via a shared JavaScript object.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2696","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2696","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2696","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0326","slug":"eip-2700","title":"JavaScript Provider Event Emitter","authors":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2700","source_label":"EIP 2700","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2700, JavaScript Provider Event Emitter. A standard mechanism for JavaScript Ethereum Providers to notify clients about chain state changes when both are able to interface with each other via a shared JavaScript object.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2700","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2700","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2700","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0327","slug":"eip-2718","title":"Typed Transaction Envelope","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2718","source_label":"EIP 2718","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2718, Typed Transaction Envelope. TransactionType || TransactionPayload is a valid transaction and TransactionType || ReceiptPayload is a valid transaction receipt where TransactionType identifies the format of the transaction and Payload is the transaction/receipt contents, which are defined in future EIPs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2718","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2718","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2718","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0328","slug":"eip-2929","title":"Gas cost increases for state access opcodes","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2929","source_label":"EIP 2929","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2929, Gas cost increases for state access opcodes. Increases gas cost for SLOAD, CALL, BALANCE, EXT and SELFDESTRUCT when used for the first time in a transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2929","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2929","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2929","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0329","slug":"eip-2930","title":"Optional access lists","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2930","source_label":"EIP 2930","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2930, Optional access lists. Adds a transaction type which contains an access list, a list of addresses and storage keys that the transaction plans to access.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2930","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2930","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2930","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0330","slug":"eip-2935","title":"Serve historical block hashes from state","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Tomasz Stanczak , Guillaume Ballet , Gajinder Singh , Tanishq Jasoria , Ignacio Hagopian , Jochem Brouwer , Sina Mahmoodi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Tomasz Stanczak , Guillaume Ballet , Gajinder Singh , Tanishq Jasoria , Ignacio Hagopian , Jochem Brouwer , Sina Mahmoodi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2935","source_label":"EIP 2935","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2935, Serve historical block hashes from state. Store last HISTORY_SERVE_WINDOW historical block hashes in the storage of a system contract as part of the block processing logic.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2935","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2935","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2935","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0331","slug":"eip-2976","title":"Typed Transactions over Gossip","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2976","source_label":"EIP 2976","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2976, Typed Transactions over Gossip. Typed Transactions can be sent over devp2p as TransactionType || TransactionPayload.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2976","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2976","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2976","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0332","slug":"eip-2982","title":"Serenity Phase 0","authors":"Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2982","source_label":"EIP 2982","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2982, Serenity Phase 0. Phase 0 of Serenity (eth2), a multi-phased upgrade to the consensus mechanism for Ethereum mainnet.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2982","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2982","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2982","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0333","slug":"eip-3198","title":"BASEFEE opcode","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta , Vitalik Buterin","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3198","source_label":"EIP 3198","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3198, BASEFEE opcode. Adds an opcode that gives the EVM access to the block's base fee.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3198","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3198","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3198","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0334","slug":"eip-3529","title":"Reduction in refunds","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3529","source_label":"EIP 3529","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3529, Reduction in refunds. Remove gas refunds for SELFDESTRUCT, and reduce gas refunds for SSTORE to a lower level where the refunds are still substantial, but they are no longer high enough for current \"exploits\" of the refund mechanism to be viable.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3529","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3529","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3529","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0335","slug":"eip-3541","title":"Reject new contract code starting with the 0xEF byte","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica , Andrei Maiboroda , Alexey Akhunov , Christian Reitwiessner , Martin Swende","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica , Andrei Maiboroda , Alexey Akhunov , Christian Reitwiessner , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3541","source_label":"EIP 3541","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3541, Reject new contract code starting with the 0xEF byte. Disallow new code starting with the 0xEF byte to be deployed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3541","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3541","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3541","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0336","slug":"eip-3607","title":"Reject transactions from senders with deployed code","authors":"Dankrad Feist , Dmitry Khovratovich , Marius van der Wijden","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Dankrad Feist , Dmitry Khovratovich , Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3607","source_label":"EIP 3607","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3607, Reject transactions from senders with deployed code. Ethereum addresses are currently only 160 bits long.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3607","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3607","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3607","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0337","slug":"eip-3651","title":"Warm COINBASE","authors":"William Morriss","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3651","source_label":"EIP 3651","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3651, Warm COINBASE. The COINBASE address shall be warm at the start of transaction execution, in accordance with the actual cost of reading that account.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3651","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3651","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3651","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0338","slug":"eip-3675","title":"Upgrade consensus to Proof-of-Stake","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3675","source_label":"EIP 3675","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3675, Upgrade consensus to Proof-of-Stake. This EIP deprecates Proof-of-Work (PoW) and supersedes it with the new Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism (PoS) driven by the beacon chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3675","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3675","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3675","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0339","slug":"eip-3855","title":"PUSH0 instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Hugo De la cruz , Paweł Bylica","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Hugo De la cruz , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3855","source_label":"EIP 3855","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3855, PUSH0 instruction. Introduce the PUSH0 (0x5f) instruction, which pushes the constant value 0 onto the stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3855","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3855","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3855","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0340","slug":"eip-3860","title":"Limit and meter initcode","authors":"Martin Holst Swende , Paweł Bylica , Alex Beregszaszi , Andrei Maiboroda","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende , Paweł Bylica , Alex Beregszaszi , Andrei Maiboroda","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3860","source_label":"EIP 3860","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3860, Limit and meter initcode. We extend EIP-170 by introducing a maximum size limit for initcode (MAX_INITCODE_SIZE = 2 MAX_CODE_SIZE = 49152).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3860","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3860","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3860","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0341","slug":"eip-4399","title":"Supplant DIFFICULTY opcode with PREVRANDAO","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4399","source_label":"EIP 4399","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 4399, Supplant DIFFICULTY opcode with PREVRANDAO. This EIP supplants the semantics of the return value of existing DIFFICULTY (0x44) opcode and renames the opcode to PREVRANDAO (0x44).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4399","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4399","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4399","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0342","slug":"eip-4736","title":"Consensus Layer Withdrawal Protection","authors":"Benjamin Chodroff , Jim McDonald","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Benjamin Chodroff , Jim McDonald","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4736","source_label":"EIP 4736","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 4736, Consensus Layer Withdrawal Protection. If a consensus layer mnemonic phrase is compromised, it is impossible for the consensus layer network to differentiate the legitimate holder of the key from an illegitimate holder.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4736","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4736","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4736","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0343","slug":"eip-4788","title":"Beacon block root in the EVM","authors":"Alex Stokes , Ansgar Dietrichs , Danny Ryan , Martin Holst Swende , lightclient","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Stokes , Ansgar Dietrichs , Danny Ryan , Martin Holst Swende , lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4788","source_label":"EIP 4788","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 4788, Beacon block root in the EVM. Commit to the hash tree root of each beacon chain block in the corresponding execution payload header.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4788","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4788","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4788","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0344","slug":"eip-4881","title":"Deposit Contract Snapshot Interface","authors":"Mark Mackey","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Mark Mackey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4881","source_label":"EIP 4881","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 4881, Deposit Contract Snapshot Interface. A standard format for transmitting the deposit contract Merkle tree in a compressed form during weak subjectivity sync.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4881","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4881","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4881","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0345","slug":"eip-4895","title":"Beacon chain push withdrawals as operations","authors":"Alex Stokes , Danny Ryan","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Stokes , Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4895","source_label":"EIP 4895","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 4895, Beacon chain push withdrawals as operations. Introduce a system-level \"operation\" to support validator withdrawals that are \"pushed\" from the beacon chain to the EVM.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4895","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4895","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4895","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0346","slug":"eip-4938","title":"eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData","authors":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Gary Rong","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Gary Rong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4938","source_label":"EIP 4938","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 4938, eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData. The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4938","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4938","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4938","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0347","slug":"eip-5656","title":"MCOPY - Memory copying instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paul Dworzanski , Jared Wasinger , Casey Detrio , Pawel Bylica , Charles Cooper","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paul Dworzanski , Jared Wasinger , Casey Detrio , Pawel Bylica , Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5656","source_label":"EIP 5656","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 5656, MCOPY - Memory copying instruction. Provide an efficient EVM instruction for copying memory areas.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5656","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5656","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5656","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0348","slug":"eip-5749","title":"The 'window.evmproviders' object","authors":"Kosala Hemachandra","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Kosala Hemachandra","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5749","source_label":"EIP 5749","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 5749, The 'window.evmproviders' object. A Javascript Ethereum Provider interface injection that will allow for the interoperability of multiple browser wallets at the same time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5749","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5749","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5749","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0349","slug":"eip-5792","title":"Wallet Call API","authors":"Moody Salem , Lukas Rosario , Wilson Cusack , Dror Tirosh , Jake Moxey , Derek Rein , Alex Forshtat , Sam Wilson , Borislav Itskov , Joao Tavares , Adam Fuller , Philip Liao , bumblefudge","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Moody Salem , Lukas Rosario , Wilson Cusack , Dror Tirosh , Jake Moxey , Derek Rein , Alex Forshtat , Sam Wilson , Borislav Itskov , Joao Tavares , Adam Fuller , Philip Liao , bumblefudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5792","source_label":"EIP 5792","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 5792, Wallet Call API. Defines new JSON-RPC methods which enable apps to ask a wallet to process a batch of onchain write calls and to check on the status of those calls.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5792","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5792","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5792","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0350","slug":"eip-5793","title":"eth/68 - Add tx type to tx announcement","authors":"Marius van der Wijden","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5793","source_label":"EIP 5793","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 5793, eth/68 - Add tx type to tx announcement. The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5793","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5793","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5793","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0351","slug":"eip-6110","title":"Supply validator deposits on chain","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Peter Davies","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Peter Davies","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6110","source_label":"EIP 6110","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 6110, Supply validator deposits on chain. Appends validator deposits to the Execution Layer block structure.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6110","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6110","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6110","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0352","slug":"eip-6122","title":"Forkid checks based on timestamps","authors":"Marius van der Wijden","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6122","source_label":"EIP 6122","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 6122, Forkid checks based on timestamps. EIP-2124 proposed a way of identifying nodes on the p2p network based on their chain configuration via the forkid parameter.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6122","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6122","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6122","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0353","slug":"eip-6780","title":"SELFDESTRUCT only in same transaction","authors":"Guillaume Ballet , Vitalik Buterin , Dankrad Feist","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet , Vitalik Buterin , Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6780","source_label":"EIP 6780","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 6780, SELFDESTRUCT only in same transaction. This EIP changes the functionality of the SELFDESTRUCT opcode.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6780","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6780","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6780","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0354","slug":"eip-6916","title":"Automatically Reset Testnet","authors":"Mário Havel , pk910 , Rémy Roy , Holly Atkinson , Tereza Burianova","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mário Havel , pk910 , Rémy Roy , Holly Atkinson , Tereza Burianova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6916","source_label":"EIP 6916","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 6916, Automatically Reset Testnet. A specification for an automatically reset testnet, a novel approach to testnets that can be implemented within Ethereum clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6916","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6916","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6916","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0355","slug":"eip-6953","title":"Network Upgrade Activation Triggers","authors":"Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6953","source_label":"EIP 6953","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 6953, Network Upgrade Activation Triggers. This EIP outlines the various network upgrade activation triggers used on Ethereum over time, from the proof-of-work era to the first post-merge network upgrade, Shanghai/Capella, across both the execution and consensus layers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6953","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6953","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6953","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0356","slug":"eip-6963","title":"Multi Injected Provider Discovery","authors":"Pedro Gomes , Kosala Hemachandra , Richard Moore , Gregory Markou , Kyle Den Hartog , Glitch , Jake Moxey , Pierre Bertet , Darryl Yeo , Yaroslav Sergievsky","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Pedro Gomes , Kosala Hemachandra , Richard Moore , Gregory Markou , Kyle Den Hartog , Glitch , Jake Moxey , Pierre Bertet , Darryl Yeo , Yaroslav Sergievsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6963","source_label":"EIP 6963","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 6963, Multi Injected Provider Discovery. An alternative discovery mechanism to window.ethereum for EIP-1193 providers which supports discovering multiple injected Wallet Providers in a web page using Javascript's window events.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6963","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6963","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6963","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0357","slug":"eip-7002","title":"Execution layer triggerable withdrawals","authors":"Danny Ryan , Mikhail Kalinin , Ansgar Dietrichs , Hsiao-Wei Wang , lightclient , Felix Lange","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Danny Ryan , Mikhail Kalinin , Ansgar Dietrichs , Hsiao-Wei Wang , lightclient , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7002","source_label":"EIP 7002","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7002, Execution layer triggerable withdrawals. Adds a new mechanism to allow validators to trigger withdrawals and exits from their execution layer (0x01) withdrawal credentials.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7002","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7002","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7002","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0358","slug":"eip-7044","title":"Perpetually Valid Signed Voluntary Exits","authors":"Lion","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Lion","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7044","source_label":"EIP 7044","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7044, Perpetually Valid Signed Voluntary Exits. Lock validator voluntary exit signature domain on Capella for perpetual validity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7044","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7044","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7044","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0359","slug":"eip-7045","title":"Increase max attestation inclusion slot","authors":"Danny Ryan","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7045","source_label":"EIP 7045","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7045, Increase max attestation inclusion slot. Increases max attestation inclusion slot from attestation.slot + SLOTS_PER_EPOCH to the last slot of epoch N+1 where N is the epoch containing the attestation slot.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7045","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7045","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7045","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0360","slug":"eip-7251","title":"Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE","authors":"mike , Francesco , dapplion , Mikhail , Aditya , Justin , lightclient , Felix Lange","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"mike , Francesco , dapplion , Mikhail , Aditya , Justin , lightclient , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7251","source_label":"EIP 7251","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7251, Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE. Increases the constant MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE, while keeping the minimum staking balance 32 ETH.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7251","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7251","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7251","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0361","slug":"eip-7514","title":"Add Max Epoch Churn Limit","authors":"dapplion , Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"dapplion , Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7514","source_label":"EIP 7514","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7514, Add Max Epoch Churn Limit. Update the maximum validator growth rate from an exponential to a linear increase by capping the epoch churn limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7514","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7514","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7514","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0362","slug":"eip-7516","title":"BLOBBASEFEE instruction","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7516","source_label":"EIP 7516","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7516, BLOBBASEFEE instruction. Add a BLOBBASEFEE (0x4a) instruction that returns the value of the blob base-fee of the current block it is executing in.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7516","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7516","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7516","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0363","slug":"eip-7549","title":"Move committee index outside Attestation","authors":"dapplion , Mikhail Kalinin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"dapplion , Mikhail Kalinin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7549","source_label":"EIP 7549","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7549, Move committee index outside Attestation. Move the committee's index field outside of the signed Attestation message to allow aggregation of equal consensus votes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7549","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7549","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7549","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0364","slug":"eip-7594","title":"PeerDAS - Peer Data Availability Sampling","authors":"Danny Ryan , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D'Amato , Hsiao-Wei Wang , Alex Stokes","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Danny Ryan , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D'Amato , Hsiao-Wei Wang , Alex Stokes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7594","source_label":"EIP 7594","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7594, PeerDAS - Peer Data Availability Sampling. PeerDAS (Peer Data Availability Sampling) is a networking protocol that allows nodes to perform data availability sampling (DAS) to ensure that blob data has been made available while downloading only a subset of the data.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7594","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7594","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7594","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0365","slug":"eip-7623","title":"Increase calldata cost","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7623","source_label":"EIP 7623","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7623, Increase calldata cost. The current calldata pricing permits EL payloads of up to 7.15 MB, while the average size is much smaller at around 100 KB.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7623","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7623","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7623","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0366","slug":"eip-7642","title":"eth/69 - history expiry and simpler receipts","authors":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Ahmad Bitar","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Ahmad Bitar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7642","source_label":"EIP 7642","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7642, eth/69 - history expiry and simpler receipts. This EIP modifies the 'eth' p2p protocol to announce the historical block range served by the node.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7642","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7642","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7642","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0367","slug":"eip-7685","title":"General purpose execution layer requests","authors":"lightclient , Felix Lange","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lightclient , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7685","source_label":"EIP 7685","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7685, General purpose execution layer requests. This proposal defines a general purpose framework for storing contract-triggered requests.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7685","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7685","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7685","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0368","slug":"eip-7691","title":"Blob throughput increase","authors":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Sam Calder-Mason , Andrew Davis , Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Sam Calder-Mason , Andrew Davis , Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7691","source_label":"EIP 7691","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7691, Blob throughput increase. Increases the number of blobs in a block to provide more scale to Ethereum via L2 solution that rely on L1 data capacity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7691","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7691","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7691","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0369","slug":"eip-7823","title":"Set upper bounds for MODEXP","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Radoslaw Zagorowicz","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Radoslaw Zagorowicz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7823","source_label":"EIP 7823","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7823, Set upper bounds for MODEXP. Introduce an upper bound on the inputs of the MODEXP precompile.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7823","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7823","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7823","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0370","slug":"eip-7825","title":"Transaction Gas Limit Cap","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo , Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo , Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7825","source_label":"EIP 7825","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7825, Transaction Gas Limit Cap. This proposal introduces a protocol-level cap on the maximum gas usage per transaction to 16,777,216 (2^24) gas.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7825","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7825","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7825","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0371","slug":"eip-7840","title":"Add blob schedule to EL config files","authors":"lightclient","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7840","source_label":"EIP 7840","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7840, Add blob schedule to EL config files. Add a new object to client configuration files blobSchedule which lists the target blob count per block and max blob count per block for each fork.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7840","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7840","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7840","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0372","slug":"eip-7870","title":"Hardware and Bandwidth Recommendations","authors":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Kevaundray Wedderburn , Josh Rudolf , Dankrad Feist , Justin Traglia , Ignacio Hagopian , George Kadianakis , Fredrik Svantes , Carl Beekhuizen , Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Kevaundray Wedderburn , Josh Rudolf , Dankrad Feist , Justin Traglia , Ignacio Hagopian , George Kadianakis , Fredrik Svantes , Carl Beekhuizen , Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7870","source_label":"EIP 7870","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7870, Hardware and Bandwidth Recommendations. This proposal specifies hardware and bandwidth recommendations for different types of Ethereum nodes: - Full nodes: Nodes that follow the tip of the chain without necessarily proposing blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7870","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7870","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7870","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0373","slug":"eip-7883","title":"ModExp Gas Cost Increase","authors":"Marcin Sobczak , Marek Moraczyński , Marcos Maceo","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marcin Sobczak , Marek Moraczyński , Marcos Maceo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7883","source_label":"EIP 7883","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7883, ModExp Gas Cost Increase. This EIP is modifying the ModExp precompile pricing algorithm introduced in EIP-2565.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7883","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7883","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7883","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0374","slug":"eip-7892","title":"Blob Parameter Only Hardforks","authors":"Mark Mackey , Raúl Kripalani","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mark Mackey , Raúl Kripalani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7892","source_label":"EIP 7892","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7892, Blob Parameter Only Hardforks. Blob Parameter Only (BPO) Hardforks, a lightweight mechanism for incrementally scaling Ethereum’s blob capacity through targeted hard forks that modify only blob-related parameters: target, max, and baseFeeUpdateFraction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7892","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7892","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7892","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0375","slug":"eip-7910","title":"eth_config JSON-RPC Method","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7910","source_label":"EIP 7910","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7910, eth_config JSON-RPC Method. This document describes an RPC method that provides node-relevant configuration data for the current, next, and last known forks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7910","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7910","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7910","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0376","slug":"eip-7917","title":"Deterministic proposer lookahead","authors":"Lin Oshitani , Justin Drake","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Lin Oshitani , Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7917","source_label":"EIP 7917","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7917, Deterministic proposer lookahead. At the start of each epoch, pre-calculate and store in the beacon_state a deterministic proposer_lookahead for the next MIN_SEED_LOOKAHEAD + 1 epochs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7917","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7917","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7917","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0377","slug":"eip-7918","title":"Blob base fee bounded by execution cost","authors":"Anders Elowsson , Ben Adams , Francesco D'Amato","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson , Ben Adams , Francesco D'Amato","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7918","source_label":"EIP 7918","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7918, Blob base fee bounded by execution cost. This EIP assigns a reserve price BLOB_BASE_COST base_fee_per_gas to blobs by introducing an if-clause in calc_excess_blob_gas().","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7918","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7918","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7918","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0378","slug":"eip-7934","title":"RLP Execution Block Size Limit","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams , Storm Slivkoff","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams , Storm Slivkoff","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7934","source_label":"EIP 7934","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7934, RLP Execution Block Size Limit. This proposal introduces a protocol-level cap on the maximum RLP-encoded execution block size to 10 megabytes (MiB), which includes a margin of 2 MiB to account for beacon block sizes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7934","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7934","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7934","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0379","slug":"eip-7935","title":"Set default gas limit to 60M","authors":"Sophia Gold , Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Carl Beekhuizen , Ansgar Dietrichs , Dankrad Feist , Alex Stokes , Josh Rudolph , Giulio Rebuffo , Storm Slivkoff , Kamil Chodoła","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sophia Gold , Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Carl Beekhuizen , Ansgar Dietrichs , Dankrad Feist , Alex Stokes , Josh Rudolph , Giulio Rebuffo , Storm Slivkoff , Kamil Chodoła","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7935","source_label":"EIP 7935","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7935, Set default gas limit to 60M. This should be significantly increased to 60M by the time Fusaka is released by execution layer clients updating their default configurations.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7935","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7935","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7935","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0380","slug":"eip-7939","title":"Count leading zeros (CLZ) opcode","authors":"Vectorized , Georgios Konstantopoulos , Jochem Brouwer , Ben Adams , Giulio Rebuffo","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Vectorized , Georgios Konstantopoulos , Jochem Brouwer , Ben Adams , Giulio Rebuffo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7939","source_label":"EIP 7939","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7939, Count leading zeros (CLZ) opcode. Introduce a new opcode, CLZ(x), which pops x from the stack and pushes the number of leading zero bits in x to the stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7939","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7939","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7939","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0381","slug":"eip-7951","title":"Precompile for secp256r1 Curve Support","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen , Ulaş Erdoğan , Doğan Alpaslan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen , Ulaş Erdoğan , Doğan Alpaslan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7951","source_label":"EIP 7951","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7951, Precompile for secp256r1 Curve Support. Add functionality to efficiently perform ECDSA signature verification over the secp256r1 elliptic curve (also known as P-256 or prime256v1).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7951","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7951","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7951","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0382","slug":"erc-162","title":"Initial ENS Hash Registrar","authors":"Maurelian, Nick Johnson , Alex Van de Sande","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Maurelian, Nick Johnson , Alex Van de Sande","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-162","source_label":"ERC 162","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 162, Initial ENS Hash Registrar. The implementation, as deployed to the main ethereum network on 2017-05-04, of a registrar contract to govern the allocation of names in the Ethereum Name Service (ENS).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-162","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-162","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-162","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0383","slug":"erc-165","title":"Standard Interface Detection","authors":"Christian Reitwießner , Nick Johnson , Fabian Vogelsteller , Jordi Baylina , Konrad Feldmeier , William Entriken","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christian Reitwießner , Nick Johnson , Fabian Vogelsteller , Jordi Baylina , Konrad Feldmeier , William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-165","source_label":"ERC 165","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 165, Standard Interface Detection. Creates a standard method to publish and detect what interfaces a smart contract implements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-165","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-165","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-165","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0384","slug":"erc-173","title":"Contract Ownership Standard","authors":"Nick Mudge , Dan Finlay","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Mudge , Dan Finlay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-173","source_label":"ERC 173","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 173, Contract Ownership Standard. This specification defines standard functions for owning or controlling a contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-173","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-173","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-173","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0385","slug":"erc-191","title":"Signed Data Standard","authors":"Martin Holst Swende , Nick Johnson","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende , Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-191","source_label":"ERC 191","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 191, Signed Data Standard. We propose the following format for signed_data 0x19 .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-191","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-191","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-191","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0386","slug":"erc-223","title":"Token with transaction handling model","authors":"Dexaran","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Dexaran","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-223","source_label":"ERC 223","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 223, Token with transaction handling model. The following describes an interface and logic for fungible tokens that supports a tokenReceived callback to notify contract recipients when tokens are received.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-223","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-223","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-223","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0387","slug":"erc-600","title":"Ethereum purpose allocation for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-600","source_label":"ERC 600","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 600, Ethereum purpose allocation for Deterministic Wallets. A logical hierarchy for deterministic wallets based on BIP32, the purpose scheme defined in BIP43 and this proposed change to BIP43.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-600","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-600","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-600","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0388","slug":"erc-601","title":"Ethereum hierarchy for deterministic wallets","authors":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-601","source_label":"ERC 601","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 601, Ethereum hierarchy for deterministic wallets. A logical hierarchy for deterministic wallets based on BIP32, the purpose scheme defined in BIP43 and eip-draft-ethereum-purpose.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-601","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-601","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-601","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0389","slug":"erc-681","title":"URL Format for Transaction Requests","authors":"Daniel A. Nagy","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Daniel A. Nagy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-681","source_label":"ERC 681","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 681, URL Format for Transaction Requests. A standard way of representing various transactions, especially payment requests in ether and ERC-20 tokens as URLs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-681","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-681","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-681","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0390","slug":"erc-777","title":"Token Standard","authors":"Jacques Dafflon , Jordi Baylina , Thomas Shababi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jacques Dafflon , Jordi Baylina , Thomas Shababi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-777","source_label":"ERC 777","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 777, Token Standard. Standard interfaces and behaviors for token contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-777","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-777","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-777","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0391","slug":"erc-820","title":"Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract","authors":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-820","source_label":"ERC 820","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 820, Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract. This standard defines a universal registry smart contract where any address (contract or regular account) can register which interface it supports and which smart contract is responsible for its implementation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-820","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-820","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-820","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0392","slug":"erc-1046","title":"tokenURI Interoperability","authors":"Tommy Nicholas , Matt Russo , John Zettler , Matt Condon , Gavin John","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Tommy Nicholas , Matt Russo , John Zettler , Matt Condon , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1046","source_label":"ERC 1046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1046, tokenURI Interoperability. ERC-721 introduced a tokenURI function for non-fungible tokens to handle miscellaneous metadata such as: - thumbnail image - title - description - special asset properties - etc.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1046","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1046","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1046","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0393","slug":"erc-1167","title":"Minimal Proxy Contract","authors":"Peter Murray , Nate Welch , Joe Messerman","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Peter Murray , Nate Welch , Joe Messerman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1167","source_label":"ERC 1167","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1167, Minimal Proxy Contract. To simply and cheaply clone contract functionality in an immutable way, this standard specifies a minimal bytecode implementation that delegates all calls to a known, fixed address.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1167","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1167","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1167","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0394","slug":"erc-1271","title":"Standard Signature Validation Method for Contracts","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Matt Condon , Philippe Castonguay , Amir Bandeali , Jorge Izquierdo , Bertrand Masius","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Matt Condon , Philippe Castonguay , Amir Bandeali , Jorge Izquierdo , Bertrand Masius","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1271","source_label":"ERC 1271","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1271, Standard Signature Validation Method for Contracts. Externally Owned Accounts (EOA) can sign messages with their associated private keys, but currently contracts cannot.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1271","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1271","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1271","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0395","slug":"erc-1328","title":"WalletConnect URI Format","authors":"ligi , Pedro Gomes","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"ligi , Pedro Gomes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1328","source_label":"ERC 1328","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1328, WalletConnect URI Format. This standard defines how the data to connect some application and a wallet can be encoded with a URI.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1328","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1328","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1328","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0396","slug":"erc-1363","title":"Payable Token","authors":"Vittorio Minacori","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Vittorio Minacori","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1363","source_label":"ERC 1363","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1363, Payable Token. Defines a token interface for ERC-20 tokens that supports executing recipient code after transfer or transferFrom, or spender code after approve.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1363","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1363","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1363","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0397","slug":"erc-1450","title":"RTA-Controlled Security Token","authors":"Howard Marks , Devender Gollapally , Joe Mathews , Jordan Jahja , John Shiple , David Zhang","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Howard Marks , Devender Gollapally , Joe Mathews , Jordan Jahja , John Shiple , David Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1450","source_label":"ERC 1450","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1450, RTA-Controlled Security Token. ERC-1450 facilitates the recording of ownership and transfer of securities sold in compliance with Securities Act Regulations CF, D, and A.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1450","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1450","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1450","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0398","slug":"erc-1820","title":"Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract","authors":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1820","source_label":"ERC 1820","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1820, Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract. This standard defines a universal registry smart contract where any address (contract or regular account) can register which interface it supports and which smart contract is responsible for its implementation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1820","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1820","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1820","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0399","slug":"erc-1967","title":"Proxy Storage Slots","authors":"Santiago Palladino , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Santiago Palladino , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1967","source_label":"ERC 1967","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 1967, Proxy Storage Slots. Delegating proxy contracts are widely used for both upgradeability and gas savings.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1967","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1967","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1967","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0400","slug":"erc-2098","title":"Compact Signature Representation","authors":"Richard Moore , Nick Johnson","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Richard Moore , Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2098","source_label":"ERC 2098","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2098, Compact Signature Representation. The secp256k1 curve permits the computation of the public key of signed digest when coupled with a signature, which is used implicitly to establish the origin of a transaction from an Externally Owned Account as well as on-chain in EVM contracts for example, in meta-transactions and multi-sig contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2098","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2098","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2098","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0401","slug":"erc-2135","title":"Consumable Interface (Tickets, etc)","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2135","source_label":"ERC 2135","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2135, Consumable Interface (Tickets, etc). An interface to mark a digital asset as \"consumable\" and to react to its \"consumption.\" Digital assets sometimes need to be consumed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2135","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2135","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2135","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0402","slug":"erc-2309","title":"ERC-721 Consecutive Transfer Extension","authors":"Sean Papanikolas","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Sean Papanikolas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2309","source_label":"ERC 2309","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2309, ERC-721 Consecutive Transfer Extension. A standardized event emitted when creating/transferring one, or many non-fungible tokens using consecutive token identifiers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2309","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2309","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2309","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0403","slug":"erc-2535","title":"Diamonds, Multi-Facet Proxy","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2535","source_label":"ERC 2535","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2535, Diamonds, Multi-Facet Proxy. This proposal standardizes diamonds, which are modular smart contract systems that can be upgraded/extended after deployment, and have virtually no size limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2535","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2535","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2535","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0404","slug":"erc-2612","title":"Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals","authors":"Martin Lundfall","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Martin Lundfall","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2612","source_label":"ERC 2612","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2612, Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals. Arguably one of the main reasons for the success of EIP-20 tokens lies in the interplay between approve and transferFrom, which allows for tokens to not only be transferred between externally owned accounts (EOA), but to be used in other contracts under application specific conditions by abstracting away msg.sender as the defining mechanism for token access control.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2612","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2612","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2612","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0405","slug":"erc-2678","title":"Revised Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard (EthPM v3)","authors":"g. nicholas d’andrea , Piper Merriam , Nick Gheorghita , Christian Reitwiessner , Ben Hauser , Bryant Eisenbach","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"g. nicholas d’andrea , Piper Merriam , Nick Gheorghita , Christian Reitwiessner , Ben Hauser , Bryant Eisenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2678","source_label":"ERC 2678","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2678, Revised Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard (EthPM v3). A data format describing a smart contract software package.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2678","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2678","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2678","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0406","slug":"erc-2771","title":"Secure Protocol for Native Meta Transactions","authors":"Ronan Sandford , Liraz Siri , Dror Tirosh , Yoav Weiss , Alex Forshtat , Hadrien Croubois , Sachin Tomar , Patrick McCorry , Nicolas Venturo , Fabian Vogelsteller , Gavin John","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ronan Sandford , Liraz Siri , Dror Tirosh , Yoav Weiss , Alex Forshtat , Hadrien Croubois , Sachin Tomar , Patrick McCorry , Nicolas Venturo , Fabian Vogelsteller , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2771","source_label":"ERC 2771","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2771, Secure Protocol for Native Meta Transactions. A contract-level protocol for Recipient contracts to accept meta-transactions through trusted Forwarder contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2771","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2771","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2771","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0407","slug":"erc-2981","title":"NFT Royalty Standard","authors":"Zach Burks , James Morgan , Blaine Malone , James Seibel","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Zach Burks , James Morgan , Blaine Malone , James Seibel","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2981","source_label":"ERC 2981","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 2981, NFT Royalty Standard. A standardized way to retrieve royalty payment information for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) to enable universal support for royalty payments across all NFT marketplaces and ecosystem participants.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2981","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2981","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2981","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0408","slug":"erc-3448","title":"MetaProxy Standard","authors":"pinkiebell","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"pinkiebell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3448","source_label":"ERC 3448","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 3448, MetaProxy Standard. By standardizing on a known minimal bytecode proxy implementation with support for immutable metadata, this standard allows users and third party tools (e.g.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3448","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3448","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3448","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0409","slug":"erc-3475","title":"Abstract Storage Bonds","authors":"Yu Liu , Varun Deshpande , Cedric Ngakam , Dhruv Malik , Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou , Toufic Batrice","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Yu Liu , Varun Deshpande , Cedric Ngakam , Dhruv Malik , Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou , Toufic Batrice","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3475","source_label":"ERC 3475","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 3475, Abstract Storage Bonds. The creation of tokenized obligations with abstract on-chain metadata storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3475","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3475","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3475","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0410","slug":"erc-3525","title":"Semi-Fungible Token","authors":"Will Wang , Mike Meng , Yi Cai , Ryan Chow , Zhongxin Wu , AlvisDu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Will Wang , Mike Meng , Yi Cai , Ryan Chow , Zhongxin Wu , AlvisDu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3525","source_label":"ERC 3525","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 3525, Semi-Fungible Token. The set of smart contract interfaces described in this document defines an ERC-721 compatible token standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3525","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3525","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3525","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0411","slug":"erc-3643","title":"T-REX - Token for Regulated EXchanges","authors":"Joachim Lebrun , Tony Malghem , Kevin Thizy , Luc Falempin , Adam Boudjemaa","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Joachim Lebrun , Tony Malghem , Kevin Thizy , Luc Falempin , Adam Boudjemaa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3643","source_label":"ERC 3643","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 3643, T-REX - Token for Regulated EXchanges. The T-REX token is an institutional grade security token standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3643","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3643","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3643","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0412","slug":"erc-3668","title":"CCIP Read—Secure offchain data retrieval","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668","source_label":"ERC 3668","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 3668, CCIP Read—Secure offchain data retrieval. Contracts wishing to support lookup of data from external sources may, instead of returning the data directly, revert using OffchainLookup(address sender, string[] urls, bytes callData, bytes4 callbackFunction, bytes extraData).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3668","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3668","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3668","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0413","slug":"erc-4337","title":"Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Yoav Weiss , Dror Tirosh , Shahaf Nacson , Alex Forshtat , Kristof Gazso , Tjaden Hess","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Yoav Weiss , Dror Tirosh , Shahaf Nacson , Alex Forshtat , Kristof Gazso , Tjaden Hess","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337","source_label":"ERC 4337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4337, Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool. Historically, users could interact with Ethereum only by sending transactions from special accounts controlled by private keys, with transaction validation entirely enforced by fixed protocol rules.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0414","slug":"erc-4361","title":"Sign-In with Ethereum","authors":"Wayne Chang , Gregory Rocco , Brantly Millegan , Nick Johnson , Oliver Terbu","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Wayne Chang , Gregory Rocco , Brantly Millegan , Nick Johnson , Oliver Terbu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4361","source_label":"ERC 4361","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4361, Sign-In with Ethereum. Sign-In with Ethereum describes how Ethereum accounts authenticate with off-chain services by signing a standard message format parameterized by scope, session details, and security mechanisms (e.g., a nonce).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4361","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4361","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4361","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0415","slug":"erc-4400","title":"EIP-721 Consumable Extension","authors":"Daniel Ivanov , George Spasov","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Daniel Ivanov , George Spasov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4400","source_label":"ERC 4400","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4400, EIP-721 Consumable Extension. This specification defines standard functions outlining a consumer role for instance(s) of EIP-721.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4400","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4400","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4400","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0416","slug":"erc-4519","title":"Non-Fungible Tokens Tied to Physical Assets","authors":"Javier Arcenegui , Rosario Arjona , Roberto Román , Iluminada Baturone","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Javier Arcenegui , Rosario Arjona , Roberto Román , Iluminada Baturone","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4519","source_label":"ERC 4519","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4519, Non-Fungible Tokens Tied to Physical Assets. This EIP standardizes an interface for non-fungible tokens representing physical assets, such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4519","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4519","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4519","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0417","slug":"erc-4804","title":"Web3 URL to EVM Call Message Translation","authors":"Qi Zhou , Chao Pi , Sam Wilson","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Qi Zhou , Chao Pi , Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4804","source_label":"ERC 4804","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4804, Web3 URL to EVM Call Message Translation. This standard translates an RFC 2396 URI like web3://uniswap.eth/ to an EVM message such as: EVMMessage { To: 0xaabbccddee....","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4804","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4804","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4804","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0418","slug":"erc-4834","title":"Hierarchical Domains","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4834","source_label":"ERC 4834","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4834, Hierarchical Domains. This is a standard for generic name resolution with arbitrarily complex access control and resolution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4834","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4834","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4834","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0419","slug":"erc-4906","title":"EIP-721 Metadata Update Extension","authors":"Anders , Lance , Shrug , Nathan","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders , Lance , Shrug , Nathan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4906","source_label":"ERC 4906","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4906, EIP-721 Metadata Update Extension. Many EIP-721 contracts emit an event when one of its tokens' metadata are changed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4906","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4906","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4906","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0420","slug":"erc-4907","title":"Rental NFT, an Extension of EIP-721","authors":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4907","source_label":"ERC 4907","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4907, Rental NFT, an Extension of EIP-721. It proposes an additional role (user) which can be granted to addresses, and a time where the role is automatically revoked (expires).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4907","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4907","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4907","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0421","slug":"erc-4910","title":"Royalty Bearing NFTs","authors":"Andreas Freund","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Andreas Freund","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4910","source_label":"ERC 4910","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4910, Royalty Bearing NFTs. The proposal directly connects NFTs and royalties in a smart contract architecture extending the ERC-721 standard, with the aim of precluding central authorities from manipulating or circumventing payments to those who are legally entitled to them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4910","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4910","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4910","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0422","slug":"erc-4955","title":"Vendor Metadata Extension for NFTs","authors":"Ignacio Mazzara","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ignacio Mazzara","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4955","source_label":"ERC 4955","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 4955, Vendor Metadata Extension for NFTs. This EIP standardizes a schema for NFTs metadata to add new field namespaces to the JSON schema for EIP-721 and EIP-1155 NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4955","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4955","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4955","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0423","slug":"erc-5006","title":"Rental NFT, NFT User Extension","authors":"Lance , Anders , Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Lance , Anders , Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5006","source_label":"ERC 5006","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5006, Rental NFT, NFT User Extension. It proposes an additional role (user) which can be granted to addresses that represent a user of the assets rather than an owner.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5006","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5006","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5006","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0424","slug":"erc-5007","title":"Time NFT, ERC-721 Time Extension","authors":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5007","source_label":"ERC 5007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5007, Time NFT, ERC-721 Time Extension. It proposes some additional functions (startTime, endTime) to help with on-chain time management.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5007","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5007","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5007","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0425","slug":"erc-5023","title":"Shareable Non-Fungible Token","authors":"Jarno Marttila , Martin Moravek","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jarno Marttila , Martin Moravek","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5023","source_label":"ERC 5023","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5023, Shareable Non-Fungible Token. This EIP standardizes an interface for non-fungible value-holding shareable tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5023","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5023","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5023","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0426","slug":"erc-5169","title":"Client Script URI for Token Contracts","authors":"James , Weiwu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"James , Weiwu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5169","source_label":"ERC 5169","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5169, Client Script URI for Token Contracts. This EIP provides a contract interface adding a scriptURI() function for locating executable scripts associated with the token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5169","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5169","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5169","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0427","slug":"erc-5192","title":"Minimal Soulbound NFTs","authors":"Tim Daubenschütz , Anders","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Tim Daubenschütz , Anders","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5192","source_label":"ERC 5192","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5192, Minimal Soulbound NFTs. It proposes a minimal interface to make tokens soulbound using the feature detection functionality of EIP-165.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5192","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5192","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5192","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0428","slug":"erc-5202","title":"Blueprint contract format","authors":"Charles Cooper , Edward Amor","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Charles Cooper , Edward Amor","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5202","source_label":"ERC 5202","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5202, Blueprint contract format. Define a standard for \"blueprint\" contracts, or contracts which represent initcode that is stored on-chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5202","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5202","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5202","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0429","slug":"erc-5219","title":"Contract Resource Requests","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5219","source_label":"ERC 5219","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5219, Contract Resource Requests. This EIP standardizes an interface to make resource requests to smart contracts and to receive HTTP-like responses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5219","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5219","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5219","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0430","slug":"erc-5267","title":"Retrieval of EIP-712 domain","authors":"Francisco Giordano","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5267","source_label":"ERC 5267","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5267, Retrieval of EIP-712 domain. This EIP complements EIP-712 by standardizing how contracts should publish the fields and values that describe their domain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5267","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5267","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5267","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0431","slug":"erc-5313","title":"Light Contract Ownership","authors":"William Entriken","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5313","source_label":"ERC 5313","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5313, Light Contract Ownership. This specification defines the minimum interface required to identify an account that controls a contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5313","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5313","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5313","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0432","slug":"erc-5375","title":"NFT Author Information and Consent","authors":"Samuele Marro , Luca Donno","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Samuele Marro , Luca Donno","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5375","source_label":"ERC 5375","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5375, NFT Author Information and Consent. This EIP standardizes a JSON format for storing off-chain information about NFT authors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5375","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5375","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5375","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0433","slug":"erc-5380","title":"ERC-721 Entitlement Extension","authors":"Gavin John , Tim Daubenschütz","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John , Tim Daubenschütz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5380","source_label":"ERC 5380","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5380, ERC-721 Entitlement Extension. A new interface that allows ERC-721 token owners to grant limited usage of those tokens to other addresses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5380","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5380","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5380","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0434","slug":"erc-5484","title":"Consensual Soulbound Tokens","authors":"Buzz Cai","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Buzz Cai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5484","source_label":"ERC 5484","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5484, Consensual Soulbound Tokens. An interface extending EIP-721 to create soulbound tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5484","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5484","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5484","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0435","slug":"erc-5489","title":"NFT Hyperlink Extension","authors":"IronMan_CH","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"IronMan_CH","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5489","source_label":"ERC 5489","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5489, NFT Hyperlink Extension. A new extension for NFTs (non-fungible token, aka EIP-721): nft-hyperlink-extention (hNFT), embedding NFTs with hyperlinks, referred to as “hNFTs”.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5489","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5489","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5489","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0436","slug":"erc-5507","title":"Refundable Tokens","authors":"elie222 , Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"elie222 , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5507","source_label":"ERC 5507","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5507, Refundable Tokens. Refund functionality for initial token offerings to ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5507","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5507","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5507","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0437","slug":"erc-5516","title":"Soulbound Multi-owner Tokens","authors":"Lucas Martín Grasso Ramos , Matias Arazi","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Lucas Martín Grasso Ramos , Matias Arazi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5516","source_label":"ERC 5516","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5516, Soulbound Multi-owner Tokens. A standard interface for non-transferable, multi-owner Soulbound tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5516","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5516","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5516","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0438","slug":"erc-5521","title":"Referable NFT","authors":"Saber Yu , Qin Wang , Shange Fu , Yilin Sai , Shiping Chen , Sherry Xu , Jiangshan Yu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Saber Yu , Qin Wang , Shange Fu , Yilin Sai , Shiping Chen , Sherry Xu , Jiangshan Yu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5521","source_label":"ERC 5521","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5521, Referable NFT. It proposes two referable indicators, referring and referred, and a time-based indicator createdTimestamp.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5521","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5521","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5521","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0439","slug":"erc-5528","title":"Refundable Fungible Token","authors":"StartfundInc","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"StartfundInc","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5528","source_label":"ERC 5528","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5528, Refundable Fungible Token. This specification defines a type of escrow service with the following flow: - The seller issues tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5528","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5528","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5528","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0440","slug":"erc-5564","title":"Stealth Addresses","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Matt Solomon , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Matt Solomon , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5564","source_label":"ERC 5564","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5564, Stealth Addresses. This specification establishes a standardized method for interacting with stealth addresses, which allow senders of transactions or transfers to non-interactively generate private accounts exclusively accessible by their recipients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5564","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5564","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5564","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0441","slug":"erc-5570","title":"Digital Receipt Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"Sean Darcy","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Sean Darcy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5570","source_label":"ERC 5570","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5570, Digital Receipt Non-Fungible Tokens. A standard schema for digital receipts of transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5570","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5570","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5570","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0442","slug":"erc-5585","title":"ERC-721 NFT Authorization","authors":"Veega Labs , Sean NG , Tiger , Fred , Fov Cao","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Veega Labs , Sean NG , Tiger , Fred , Fov Cao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5585","source_label":"ERC 5585","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5585, ERC-721 NFT Authorization. This EIP separates the ERC-721 NFT's commercial usage rights from its ownership to allow for the independent management of those rights.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5585","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5585","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5585","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0443","slug":"erc-5606","title":"Multiverse NFTs","authors":"Gaurang Torvekar , Khemraj Adhawade , Nikhil Asrani","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gaurang Torvekar , Khemraj Adhawade , Nikhil Asrani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5606","source_label":"ERC 5606","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5606, Multiverse NFTs. This specification defines a minimal interface to create a multiverse NFT standard for digital assets such as wearables and in-game items that, in turn, index the delegate NFTs on each platform where this asset exists.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5606","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5606","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5606","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0444","slug":"erc-5615","title":"ERC-1155 Supply Extension","authors":"Gavin John","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5615","source_label":"ERC 5615","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5615, ERC-1155 Supply Extension. This ERC standardizes an existing mechanism to fetch token supply data from ERC-1155 tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5615","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5615","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5615","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0445","slug":"erc-5625","title":"NFT Metadata JSON Schema dStorage Extension","authors":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Guang Han , Brian Wu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Guang Han , Brian Wu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5625","source_label":"ERC 5625","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5625, NFT Metadata JSON Schema dStorage Extension. This EIP extends the NFT metadata JSON schema defined in EIP-721 and EIP-1155, adding a dStorage key that provides information about how the NFT data is stored.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5625","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5625","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5625","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0446","slug":"erc-5646","title":"Token State Fingerprint","authors":"Naim Ashhab","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Naim Ashhab","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5646","source_label":"ERC 5646","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5646, Token State Fingerprint. This specification defines the minimum interface required to unambiguously identify the state of a mutable token without knowledge of implementation details.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5646","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5646","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5646","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0447","slug":"erc-5679","title":"Token Minting and Burning","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5679","source_label":"ERC 5679","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5679, Token Minting and Burning. A consistent way to extend token standards for minting and burning.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5679","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5679","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5679","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0448","slug":"erc-5725","title":"Transferable Vesting NFT","authors":"Apeguru , Marco De Vries , Mario , DeFiFoFum , Elliott Green","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Apeguru , Marco De Vries , Mario , DeFiFoFum , Elliott Green","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5725","source_label":"ERC 5725","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5725, Transferable Vesting NFT. A Non-Fungible Token (NFT) standard used to vest tokens (ERC-20 or otherwise) over a vesting release curve.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5725","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5725","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5725","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0449","slug":"erc-5732","title":"Commit Interface","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou , Matt Stam","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou , Matt Stam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5732","source_label":"ERC 5732","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5732, Commit Interface. A simple commit interface to support commit-reveal scheme which provides only a commit method but no reveal method, allowing implementations to integrate this interface with arbitrary reveal methods such as vote or transfer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5732","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5732","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5732","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0450","slug":"erc-5750","title":"General Extensibility for Method Behaviors","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5750","source_label":"ERC 5750","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5750, General Extensibility for Method Behaviors. This EIP standardizes the passing of unstructured call data to functions to enable future extensibility.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5750","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5750","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5750","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0451","slug":"erc-5773","title":"Context-Dependent Multi-Asset Tokens","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5773","source_label":"ERC 5773","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 5773, Context-Dependent Multi-Asset Tokens. The Multi-Asset NFT standard allows for the construction of a new primitive: context-dependent output of information per single NFT.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5773","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5773","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5773","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0452","slug":"erc-6059","title":"Parent-Governed Nestable Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6059","source_label":"ERC 6059","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6059, Parent-Governed Nestable Non-Fungible Tokens. The Parent-Governed Nestable NFT standard extends ERC-721 by allowing for a new inter-NFT relationship and interaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6059","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6059","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6059","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0453","slug":"erc-6066","title":"Signature Validation Method for NFTs","authors":"Jack Boyuan Xu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jack Boyuan Xu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6066","source_label":"ERC 6066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6066, Signature Validation Method for NFTs. While Externally Owned Accounts can validate signed messages with ecrecover() and smart contracts can validate signatures using specifications outlined in ERC-1271, currently there is no standard method to create or validate signatures made by NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0454","slug":"erc-6093","title":"Custom errors for commonly-used tokens","authors":"Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6093","source_label":"ERC 6093","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6093, Custom errors for commonly-used tokens. A standard set of custom errors for commonly-used tokens, which are defined as ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155 tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6093","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6093","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6093","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0455","slug":"erc-6105","title":"No Intermediary NFT Trading Protocol","authors":"5660-eth , Silvere Heraudeau , Martin McConnell , Abu , Wizard Wang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"5660-eth , Silvere Heraudeau , Martin McConnell , Abu , Wizard Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6105","source_label":"ERC 6105","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6105, No Intermediary NFT Trading Protocol. A marketplace functionality to ERC-721 to enable non-fungible token trading without relying on an intermediary trading platform.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6105","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6105","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6105","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0456","slug":"erc-6147","title":"Guard of NFT/SBT, an Extension of ERC-721","authors":"5660-eth , Wizard Wang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"5660-eth , Wizard Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6147","source_label":"ERC 6147","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6147, Guard of NFT/SBT, an Extension of ERC-721. It separates the holding right and transfer right of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) and defines a new role, guard with expires.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6147","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6147","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6147","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0457","slug":"erc-6150","title":"Hierarchical NFTs","authors":"Keegan Lee , msfew , Kartin , qizhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Keegan Lee , msfew , Kartin , qizhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6150","source_label":"ERC 6150","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6150, Hierarchical NFTs. It proposes a multi-layer filesystem-like hierarchical NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6150","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6150","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6150","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0458","slug":"erc-6220","title":"Composable NFTs utilizing Equippable Parts","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6220","source_label":"ERC 6220","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6220, Composable NFTs utilizing Equippable Parts. The Composable NFTs utilizing equippable parts standard extends ERC-721 by allowing the NFTs to selectively add parts to themselves via equipping.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6220","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6220","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6220","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0459","slug":"erc-6239","title":"Semantic Soulbound Tokens","authors":"Jessica Chang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jessica Chang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6239","source_label":"ERC 6239","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6239, Semantic Soulbound Tokens. This proposal extends ERC-721 and ERC-5192 by introducing Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples to Soulbound Tokens' (‘SBTs‘) metadata.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6239","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6239","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6239","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0460","slug":"erc-6381","title":"Public Non-Fungible Token Emote Repository","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6381","source_label":"ERC 6381","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6381, Public Non-Fungible Token Emote Repository. The Public Non-Fungible Token Emote Repository standard provides an enhanced interactive utility for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 by allowing NFTs to be emoted at.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6381","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6381","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6381","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0461","slug":"erc-6454","title":"Minimal Transferable NFT detection interface","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Francesco Sullo , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Francesco Sullo , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6454","source_label":"ERC 6454","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6454, Minimal Transferable NFT detection interface. The Minimalistic Transferable interface for Non-Fungible Tokens standard extends ERC-721 by introducing the ability to identify whether an NFT can be transferred or not.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6454","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6454","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6454","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0462","slug":"erc-6492","title":"Signature Validation for Predeploy Contracts","authors":"Ivo Georgiev , Agustin Aguilar","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ivo Georgiev , Agustin Aguilar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6492","source_label":"ERC 6492","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6492, Signature Validation for Predeploy Contracts. Contracts can sign verifiable messages via ERC-1271.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6492","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6492","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6492","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0463","slug":"erc-6538","title":"Stealth Meta-Address Registry","authors":"Matt Solomon , Toni Wahrstätter , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin , Gary Ghayrat","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Matt Solomon , Toni Wahrstätter , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin , Gary Ghayrat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6538","source_label":"ERC 6538","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6538, Stealth Meta-Address Registry. This specification defines a standardized way of storing and retrieving an entity's stealth meta-address, by extending ERC-5564.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6538","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6538","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6538","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0464","slug":"erc-6672","title":"Multi-redeemable NFTs","authors":"RE:DREAMER Lab , Archie Chang , Kai Yu , Yonathan Randyanto , Boyu Chu , Boxi Li , Jason Cheng","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"RE:DREAMER Lab , Archie Chang , Kai Yu , Yonathan Randyanto , Boyu Chu , Boxi Li , Jason Cheng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6672","source_label":"ERC 6672","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6672, Multi-redeemable NFTs. An extension to the ERC-721 standard for Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) to enable multi-redeemable NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6672","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6672","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6672","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0465","slug":"erc-6808","title":"Fungible Key Bound Token","authors":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6808","source_label":"ERC 6808","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6808, Fungible Key Bound Token. A standard interface for Fungible Key Bound Tokens (FKBT/s), a subset of the more general Key Bound Tokens (KBT/s).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6808","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6808","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6808","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0466","slug":"erc-6809","title":"Non-Fungible Key Bound Token","authors":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6809","source_label":"ERC 6809","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6809, Non-Fungible Key Bound Token. A standard interface for Non-Fungible Key Bound Tokens (NFKBT/s), a subset of the more general Key Bound Tokens (KBT/s).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6809","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6809","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6809","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0467","slug":"erc-6909","title":"Minimal Multi-Token Interface","authors":"JT Riley , Dillon , Sara , Vectorized , Neodaoist","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"JT Riley , Dillon , Sara , Vectorized , Neodaoist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6909","source_label":"ERC 6909","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6909, Minimal Multi-Token Interface. The following specifies a multi-token contract as a simplified alternative to the ERC-1155 Multi-Token Standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6909","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6909","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6909","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0468","slug":"erc-6982","title":"Efficient Default Lockable Tokens","authors":"Francesco Sullo , Alexe Spataru","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Francesco Sullo , Alexe Spataru","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6982","source_label":"ERC 6982","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 6982, Efficient Default Lockable Tokens. This proposal introduces a lockable interface for ERC-721 tokens that optimizes gas usage by eliminating unnecessary events.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6982","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6982","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6982","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0469","slug":"erc-7007","title":"Verifiable AI-Generated Content Token","authors":"Cathie So , Xiaohang Yu , Conway , Lee Ting Ting , Kartin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Cathie So , Xiaohang Yu , Conway , Lee Ting Ting , Kartin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7007","source_label":"ERC 7007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7007, Verifiable AI-Generated Content Token. The verifiable AI-generated content (AIGC) non-fungible token (NFT) standard is an extension of the ERC-721 token standard for AIGC.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7007","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7007","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7007","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0470","slug":"erc-7053","title":"Interoperable Digital Media Indexing","authors":"Bofu Chen , Tammy Yang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bofu Chen , Tammy Yang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7053","source_label":"ERC 7053","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7053, Interoperable Digital Media Indexing. An interoperable indexing strategy designed to enhance the organization and retrieval of digital media information across multiple smart contracts and EVM-compatible blockchains.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7053","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7053","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7053","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0471","slug":"erc-7066","title":"Lockable Extension for ERC-721","authors":"Piyush Chittara , StreamNFT , Srinivas Joshi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Piyush Chittara , StreamNFT , Srinivas Joshi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7066","source_label":"ERC 7066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7066, Lockable Extension for ERC-721. An extension of ERC-721, this standard incorporates locking features into NFTs, allowing for various uses while preventing sale or transfer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0472","slug":"erc-7092","title":"Financial Bonds","authors":"Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7092","source_label":"ERC 7092","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7092, Financial Bonds. This proposal introduces fixed-income financial bonds with key characteristics defined to facilitate bond issuance in the primary market and enable buying or selling bonds in the secondary market.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7092","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7092","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7092","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0473","slug":"erc-7160","title":"ERC-721 Multi-Metadata Extension","authors":"0xG , Marco Peyfuss","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"0xG , Marco Peyfuss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7160","source_label":"ERC 7160","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7160, ERC-721 Multi-Metadata Extension. An extension to the ERC-721 standard to support multiple metadata URIs per token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7160","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7160","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7160","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0474","slug":"erc-7201","title":"Namespaced Storage Layout","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Eric Lau","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Eric Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7201","source_label":"ERC 7201","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7201, Namespaced Storage Layout. We define the NatSpec annotation @custom:storage-location to document storage namespaces and their location in storage in Solidity or Vyper source code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7201","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7201","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7201","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0475","slug":"erc-7208","title":"On-Chain Data Containers","authors":"Rachid Ajaja , Matthijs de Vries , Alexandros Athanasopulos , Pavel Rubin , Sebastian Galimberti Romano , Daniel Berbesi , Apostolos Mavropoulos , Barbara Marcano , Daniel Ortega","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Rachid Ajaja , Matthijs de Vries , Alexandros Athanasopulos , Pavel Rubin , Sebastian Galimberti Romano , Daniel Berbesi , Apostolos Mavropoulos , Barbara Marcano , Daniel Ortega","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7208","source_label":"ERC 7208","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7208, On-Chain Data Containers. A series of interfaces for the abstraction of storage of on-chain data by implementing the logic functions that govern such data on independent smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7208","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7208","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7208","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0476","slug":"erc-7231","title":"Identity-aggregated NFT","authors":"Chloe Gu , Navid X. , Victor Yu , Archer H.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chloe Gu , Navid X. , Victor Yu , Archer H.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7231","source_label":"ERC 7231","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7231, Identity-aggregated NFT. This standard extends ERC-721 by binding individuals' Web2 and Web3 identities to non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and soulbound tokens (SBTs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7231","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7231","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7231","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0477","slug":"erc-7291","title":"Purpose bound money","authors":"Orchid-Dev , Victor Liew , Wong Tse Jian , Jacob Shan , Chin Sin Ong , Praveen Kumar","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Orchid-Dev , Victor Liew , Wong Tse Jian , Jacob Shan , Chin Sin Ong , Praveen Kumar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7291","source_label":"ERC 7291","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7291, Purpose bound money. A Purpose Bound Money (PBM) token is a wrapper around an ERC-1155 token that can be used for a limited activity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7291","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7291","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7291","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0478","slug":"erc-7401","title":"Parent-Governed Non-Fungible Tokens Nesting","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7401","source_label":"ERC 7401","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7401, Parent-Governed Non-Fungible Tokens Nesting. ❗️ The Parent-Governed NFT Nesting standard extends ERC-721 by allowing for a new inter-NFT relationship and interaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7401","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7401","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7401","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0479","slug":"erc-7409","title":"Public Non-Fungible Tokens Emote Repository","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7409","source_label":"ERC 7409","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7409, Public Non-Fungible Tokens Emote Repository. ❗️ The Public Non-Fungible Tokens Emote Repository standard provides an enhanced interactive utility for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 by allowing NFTs to be emoted at.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7409","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7409","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7409","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0480","slug":"erc-7432","title":"Non-Fungible Token Roles","authors":"Ernani São Thiago , Daniel Lima","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ernani São Thiago , Daniel Lima","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7432","source_label":"ERC 7432","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7432, Non-Fungible Token Roles. This standard introduces role management for NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7432","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7432","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7432","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0481","slug":"erc-7439","title":"Prevent ticket touting","authors":"LeadBest Consulting Group , Sandy Sung , Mars Peng , Taien Wang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"LeadBest Consulting Group , Sandy Sung , Mars Peng , Taien Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7439","source_label":"ERC 7439","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7439, Prevent ticket touting. This standard is an extension of ERC-721 and defines standard functions outlining a scope for ticketing agents or event organizers to take preventative actions to stop audiences being exploited in the ticket scalping market and allow customers to resell their tickets via authorized ticket resellers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7439","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7439","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7439","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0482","slug":"erc-7528","title":"ETH (Native Asset) Address Convention","authors":"Joey Santoro","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Joey Santoro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7528","source_label":"ERC 7528","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7528, ETH (Native Asset) Address Convention. The following standard proposes a convention for using the address 0xeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee in all contexts where an address is used to represent ETH in the same capacity as an ERC-20 token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7528","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7528","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7528","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0483","slug":"erc-7535","title":"Native Asset ERC-4626 Tokenized Vault","authors":"Joey Santoro","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Joey Santoro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7535","source_label":"ERC 7535","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7535, Native Asset ERC-4626 Tokenized Vault. This standard is an extension of the ERC-4626 spec with an identical interface and behavioral overrides for handling Ether or any native asset as the underlying.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7535","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7535","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7535","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0484","slug":"erc-7540","title":"Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults","authors":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali , João Martins","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali , João Martins","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7540","source_label":"ERC 7540","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7540, Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults. The following standard extends ERC-4626 by adding support for asynchronous deposit and redemption flows.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7540","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7540","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7540","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0485","slug":"erc-7575","title":"Multi-Asset ERC-4626 Vaults","authors":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7575","source_label":"ERC 7575","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7575, Multi-Asset ERC-4626 Vaults. The following standard adapts ERC-4626 to support multiple assets or entry points for the same share token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7575","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7575","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7575","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0486","slug":"erc-7578","title":"Physical Asset Redemption","authors":"Lee Vidor , David Tan , Lee Smith , Gabriel Stoica","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Lee Vidor , David Tan , Lee Smith , Gabriel Stoica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7578","source_label":"ERC 7578","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7578, Physical Asset Redemption. This proposal is an extension of ERC-721 and implements additional functionality and information pertaining to the NFT’s underlying physical asset by capturing information that enables the holder of physical asset backed NFTs to verify authenticity and facilitate redemption of the underlying physical assets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7578","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7578","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7578","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0487","slug":"erc-7588","title":"Blob Transactions Metadata JSON Schema","authors":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Aiden X","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Aiden X","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7588","source_label":"ERC 7588","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7588, Blob Transactions Metadata JSON Schema. A standard for attaching metadata to blobs carried by blob transactions, as outlined in EIP-4844.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7588","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7588","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7588","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0488","slug":"erc-7627","title":"Secure Messaging Protocol","authors":"Chen Liaoyuan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Chen Liaoyuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7627","source_label":"ERC 7627","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7627, Secure Messaging Protocol. This proposal implements the capability to securely exchange encrypted messages on-chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7627","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7627","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7627","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0489","slug":"erc-7631","title":"Dual Nature Token Pair","authors":"vectorized , Thomas , Quit , Michael Amadi , cygaar , Harrison","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"vectorized , Thomas , Quit , Michael Amadi , cygaar , Harrison","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7631","source_label":"ERC 7631","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7631, Dual Nature Token Pair. A fungible ERC-20 token contract and non-fungible ERC-721 token contract can be interlinked, allowing actions performed on one contract to be reflected on the other.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7631","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7631","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7631","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0490","slug":"erc-7634","title":"Limited Transfer Count NFT","authors":"Qin Wang , Saber Yu , Shiping Chen","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Qin Wang , Saber Yu , Shiping Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7634","source_label":"ERC 7634","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7634, Limited Transfer Count NFT. This standard extends ERC-721 with a mechanism that lets token owners/minters cap how many times a specific token can be transferred.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7634","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7634","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7634","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0491","slug":"erc-7656","title":"Generalized Contract-Linked Services","authors":"Francesco Sullo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francesco Sullo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7656","source_label":"ERC 7656","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7656, Generalized Contract-Linked Services. This proposal defines a factory capable of deploying generic services linked to specific contracts, such as ERC-4337 accounts or ERC-721 tokens (NFTs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7656","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7656","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7656","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0492","slug":"erc-7734","title":"Decentralized Identity Verification (DID)","authors":"Anushka Yadav","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Anushka Yadav","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7734","source_label":"ERC 7734","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7734, Decentralized Identity Verification (DID). This proposal introduces a standard for decentralized identity verification (DID) on the blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7734","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7734","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7734","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0493","slug":"erc-7743","title":"Multi-Owner Non-Fungible Tokens (MO-NFT)","authors":"Cheng Qian","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Cheng Qian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7743","source_label":"ERC 7743","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7743, Multi-Owner Non-Fungible Tokens (MO-NFT). A new standard for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that supports multiple owners.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7743","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7743","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7743","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0494","slug":"erc-7751","title":"Wrapping of bubbled up reverts","authors":"Daniel Gretzke , Sara Reynolds , Alice Henshaw , Marko Veniger , Hadrien Croubois","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Daniel Gretzke , Sara Reynolds , Alice Henshaw , Marko Veniger , Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7751","source_label":"ERC 7751","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7751, Wrapping of bubbled up reverts. A standard for handling bubbled up reverts in Ethereum smart contracts using a dedicated custom error.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7751","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7751","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7751","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0495","slug":"erc-7786","title":"Cross-Chain Messaging Gateway","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , CJ Cobb , Sergey Gorbunov , joxes","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , CJ Cobb , Sergey Gorbunov , joxes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7786","source_label":"ERC 7786","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7786, Cross-Chain Messaging Gateway. This proposal describes an interface, and the corresponding workflow, for smart contracts to send arbitrary data through cross-chain messaging protocols.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7786","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7786","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7786","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0496","slug":"erc-7813","title":"Store, Table-Based Introspectable Storage","authors":"alvarius , dk1a , frolic , ludens , vdrg , yonada","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"alvarius , dk1a , frolic , ludens , vdrg , yonada","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7813","source_label":"ERC 7813","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7813, Store, Table-Based Introspectable Storage. This standard introduces a flexible on-chain storage pattern that organizes data into structured tables that consist of records with fixed key and value schemas, similar to a traditional database.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7813","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7813","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7813","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0497","slug":"erc-7818","title":"Expirable ERC-20","authors":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7818","source_label":"ERC 7818","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7818, Expirable ERC-20. Introduces an extension for ERC-20 tokens, which facilitates the implementation of an expiration mechanism.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7818","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7818","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7818","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0498","slug":"erc-7820","title":"Access Control Registry","authors":"Shubham Khandelwal , Anushka Yadav","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Shubham Khandelwal , Anushka Yadav","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7820","source_label":"ERC 7820","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7820, Access Control Registry. The Access Control Registry (ACR) standard defines a universal interface for managing role-based access control across multiple smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7820","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7820","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7820","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0499","slug":"erc-7837","title":"Diffusive Tokens","authors":"Cheng Qian","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Cheng Qian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7837","source_label":"ERC 7837","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7837, Diffusive Tokens. A standard for a new type of fungible token, called Diffusive Tokens (DIFF).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7837","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7837","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7837","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0500","slug":"erc-7857","title":"AI Agents NFT with Private Metadata","authors":"Ming Wu , Jason Zeng , Wei Wu , Michael Heinrich","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ming Wu , Jason Zeng , Wei Wu , Michael Heinrich","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7857","source_label":"ERC 7857","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7857, AI Agents NFT with Private Metadata. A standard interface for NFTs specifically designed for AI agents, where the metadata represents agent capabilities and requires privacy protection.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7857","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7857","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7857","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0501","slug":"erc-7858","title":"Expirable NFTs and SBTs","authors":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK , parametprame , Nacharoen","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK , parametprame , Nacharoen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7858","source_label":"ERC 7858","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7858, Expirable NFTs and SBTs. Introduces an extension for ERC-721 Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) that adds an expiration mechanism, allowing tokens to become invalid after a predefined period.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7858","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7858","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7858","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0502","slug":"erc-7878","title":"Bequeathable Contracts","authors":"Wamith Mockbill","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wamith Mockbill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7878","source_label":"ERC 7878","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7878, Bequeathable Contracts. A standard interface for contracts to allow tokens to be inherited after the owner's death.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7878","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7878","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7878","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0503","slug":"erc-7893","title":"DeFi Protocol Solvency Proof Mechanism","authors":"Sean Luis Guada Rodríguez","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sean Luis Guada Rodríguez","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7893","source_label":"ERC 7893","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7893, DeFi Protocol Solvency Proof Mechanism. A standardized interface that enables DeFi protocols to implement verifiable solvency proofs through smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7893","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7893","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7893","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0504","slug":"erc-7908","title":"HD wallet In Treasury Management","authors":"Xiaoyu Liu , Yuxiang Fu , Yanyi Liang , Hao Zou , Siyuan Zheng , yuanshanhshan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Xiaoyu Liu , Yuxiang Fu , Yanyi Liang , Hao Zou , Siyuan Zheng , yuanshanhshan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7908","source_label":"ERC 7908","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7908, HD wallet In Treasury Management. This proposal aims to provide a standardized method for on-chain treasury management of institutional assets, ensuring secure private key generation, hierarchical management, and departmental permission isolation while supporting asset security and transaction efficiency in multi-chain environments.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7908","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7908","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7908","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0505","slug":"erc-7913","title":"Signature Verifiers","authors":"Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Aryeh Greenberg","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Aryeh Greenberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7913","source_label":"ERC 7913","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7913, Signature Verifiers. Externally Owned Accounts (EOA) can sign messages with their associated private keys.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7913","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7913","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7913","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0506","slug":"erc-7943","title":"uRWA - Universal Real World Asset Interface","authors":"Dario Lo Buglio , Tino Martinez Molina , Mihai Colceriu","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Dario Lo Buglio , Tino Martinez Molina , Mihai Colceriu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7943","source_label":"ERC 7943","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7943, uRWA - Universal Real World Asset Interface. The Universal RWA (uRWA) standard, a set of interfaces for tokenized Real World Assets (RWAs) such as securities, real estate, commodities, or other physical/financial assets on the blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7943","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7943","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7943","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0507","slug":"erc-7950","title":"Encode chain id with transaction hash","authors":"Lauri Peltonen","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Lauri Peltonen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7950","source_label":"ERC 7950","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7950, Encode chain id with transaction hash. This standard proposes a way to encode the combination of a chain ID and a transaction hash into one string.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7950","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7950","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7950","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0508","slug":"erc-7994","title":"Purpose-Bound ERC-20 with Conditional Unlock","authors":"Anushka Yadav , Akash Kothawade , Atishek Singh","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anushka Yadav , Akash Kothawade , Atishek Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7994","source_label":"ERC 7994","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 7994, Purpose-Bound ERC-20 with Conditional Unlock. This ERC extends the concept introduced in [ERC-7291] by enabling [ERC-20]-compatible tokens to carry multi-condition unlocking constraints, combining temporal, identity, and usage restrictions into a programmable structure.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7994","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7994","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7994","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0509","slug":"erc-8001","title":"Agent Coordination Framework","authors":"Kwame Bryan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kwame Bryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8001","source_label":"ERC 8001","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8001, Agent Coordination Framework. ERC-8001 defines a minimal, single-chain primitive for multi-party agent coordination.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8001","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8001","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8001","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0510","slug":"erc-8034","title":"Referable NFT Royalties","authors":"Ruiqiang Li , Qin Wang , Shiping Chen , Saber Yu , Brian Yecies , John Le","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ruiqiang Li , Qin Wang , Shiping Chen , Saber Yu , Brian Yecies , John Le","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8034","source_label":"ERC 8034","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8034, Referable NFT Royalties. Royalty Distribution, a standalone royalty distribution for Referable Non-Fungible Tokens (rNFTs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8034","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8034","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8034","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0511","slug":"erc-8042","title":"Diamond Storage","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8042","source_label":"ERC 8042","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8042, Diamond Storage. This standard formalizes the diamond storage pattern originally introduced by ERC-2535 Diamonds and widely adopted across smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8042","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8042","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8042","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0512","slug":"erc-8063","title":"Groups - Membership Tokens","authors":"Cheng Qian","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Cheng Qian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8063","source_label":"ERC 8063","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8063, Groups - Membership Tokens. This proposal defines a \"Group\" as an ERC-20 token where token balance represents membership level.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8063","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8063","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8063","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0513","slug":"erc-8126","title":"AI Agent Verification","authors":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8126","source_label":"ERC 8126","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8126, AI Agent Verification. A standard interface for verifying AI agents on Ethereum that have been registered via ERC-8004.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8126","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8126","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8126","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0514","slug":"erc-8161","title":"Transferable Tokenized Vault Requests","authors":"Cain O'Sullivan , Jeroen Offerijns","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Cain O'Sullivan , Jeroen Offerijns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8161","source_label":"ERC 8161","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8161, Transferable Tokenized Vault Requests. This standard extends ERC-7540 by adding optional transferability of pending deposit and redeem Requests.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8161","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8161","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8161","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0515","slug":"erc-8196","title":"AI Agent Authenticated Wallet","authors":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8196","source_label":"ERC 8196","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ERC 8196, AI Agent Authenticated Wallet. A standard interface for AI agent-authenticated wallets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8196","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8196","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8196","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0516","slug":"bip-46","title":"Address Scheme for Timelocked Fidelity Bonds","authors":"Chris Belcher","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Chris Belcher","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/46","source_label":"BIP 46","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 46, Address Scheme for Timelocked Fidelity Bonds. The derivation scheme for HD wallets which create timelocked addresses used for creating fidelity bonds.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-46","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-46","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-46","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0517","slug":"bip-53","title":"Disallow 64-byte transactions","authors":"Chris Stewart","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Chris Stewart","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/53","source_label":"BIP 53","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 53, Disallow 64-byte transactions. The rationale for disallowing transactions that are serialized to 64 bytes without the transaction's witness.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-53","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-53","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-53","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0518","slug":"bip-93","title":"codex32: Checksummed SSSS-aware BIP32 seeds","authors":"Leon Olsson Curr and Pearlwort Sneed","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Leon Olsson Curr and Pearlwort Sneed","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/93","source_label":"BIP 93","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 93, codex32: Checksummed SSSS-aware BIP32 seeds. We first describe the general checksummed base32 '''Why use base32 at all?''' The lack of mixed case makes it more efficient to read out loud, write, type or to put into QR codes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-93","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-93","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-93","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0519","slug":"bip-98","title":"Fast Merkle Trees","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/98","source_label":"BIP 98","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 98, Fast Merkle Trees. In many applications it is useful to prove membership of a data element in a set without having to reveal the entire contents of that set.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-98","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-98","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-98","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0520","slug":"bip-116","title":"MERKLEBRANCHVERIFY","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/116","source_label":"BIP 116","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 116, MERKLEBRANCHVERIFY. A general approach to bitcoin contracts is to fully enumerate the possible spending conditions and then program verification of these conditions into a single script.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-116","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-116","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-116","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0521","slug":"bip-117","title":"Tail Call Execution Semantics","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/117","source_label":"BIP 117","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 117, Tail Call Execution Semantics. BIP16 (Pay to Script Hash)[1] and BIP141 (Segregated Witness)[2] provide mechanisms by which script policy can be revealed at spend time as part of the execution witness.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-117","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-117","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-117","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0522","slug":"bip-118","title":"SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT for Taproot Scripts","authors":"Christian Decker","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Decker","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/118","source_label":"BIP 118","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 118, SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT for Taproot Scripts. This BIP modifies the behaviour of the [[bip-0342.mediawiki|BIP 342]] signature opcodes '''What about key path spends?''' This proposal only supports ANYPREVOUT signatures via script path spends, and does not support ANYPREVOUT signatures for key path spends.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-118","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-118","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-118","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0523","slug":"bip-119","title":"CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY","authors":"Jeremy Rubin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jeremy Rubin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/119","source_label":"BIP 119","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 119, CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY. A new opcode, OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY, to be activated as a change to the semantics of OP_NOP4.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-119","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-119","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-119","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0524","slug":"bip-122","title":"URI scheme for Blockchain references / exploration","authors":"Marco Pontello","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Marco Pontello","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/122","source_label":"BIP 122","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 122, URI scheme for Blockchain references / exploration. A URI scheme for looking up blocks, transactions and addresses on a Blockchain explorer, or in general to make proper Blockchain references.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-122","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-122","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-122","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0525","slug":"bip-126","title":"Best Practices for Heterogeneous Input Script Transactions","authors":"Kristov Atlas","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Kristov Atlas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/126","source_label":"BIP 126","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 126, Best Practices for Heterogeneous Input Script Transactions. When a Bitcoin transaction contains inputs that reference previous transaction outputs sent to different Bitcoin addresses, personally identifiable information of the user will leak into the blockchain in an uncontrolled manner.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-126","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-126","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-126","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0526","slug":"bip-128","title":"Timelock-Recovery Storage Format","authors":"Oren Z","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Oren Z","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/128","source_label":"BIP 128","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 128, Timelock-Recovery Storage Format. This document proposes a standard format for saving timelock-recovery plans, to allow different wallets to generate them, and different services to monitor/execute them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-128","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-128","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-128","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0527","slug":"bip-136","title":"Bech32 Encoded Tx Position References","authors":"Велеслав","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Велеслав","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/136","source_label":"BIP 136","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 136, Bech32 Encoded Tx Position References. A '''confirmed transaction position reference''', or '''TxRef''', is a reference to a particular location within the blockchain, specified by the block height and a transaction index within the block, and optionally, an outpoint index within the transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-136","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-136","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-136","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0528","slug":"bip-172","title":"Define Bitcoin Subunits as Satoshis","authors":"OceanSlim","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"OceanSlim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/172","source_label":"BIP 172","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 172, Define Bitcoin Subunits as Satoshis. To formally define and standardize Bitcoin's smallest indivisible unit (1/100,000,000 of a bitcoin) as \"satoshi\" (singular) or \"satoshis\" (plural), with \"sats\" as the standard abbreviated form.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-172","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-172","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-172","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0529","slug":"bip-178","title":"Version Extended WIF","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/178","source_label":"BIP 178","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 178, Version Extended WIF. An extension to the Wallet Import Format (WIF) to specify what kind of bitcoin address the private key corresponds to.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-178","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-178","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-178","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0530","slug":"bip-197","title":"Hashed Time-Locked Collateral Contract","authors":"Matthew Black","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Matthew Black","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/197","source_label":"BIP 197","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 197, Hashed Time-Locked Collateral Contract. A script for generalized debt agreement contract based on Hashed Time-Lock Contract (BIP 199) transactions according to the Atomic Loans specification (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.05117.pdf).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-197","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-197","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-197","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0531","slug":"bip-300","title":"Hashrate Escrows (Consensus layer)","authors":"Paul Sztorc","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Paul Sztorc","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/300","source_label":"BIP 300","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 300, Hashrate Escrows (Consensus layer). BIP-300 enables a new type of L2, where \"withdrawals\" (the L2-to-L1 txns) are governed by proof-of-work -- instead of a federation or fixed set of pubkeys.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-300","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-300","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-300","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0532","slug":"bip-301","title":"Blind Merged Mining (Consensus layer)","authors":"Paul Sztorc","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Paul Sztorc","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/301","source_label":"BIP 301","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 301, Blind Merged Mining (Consensus layer). Blind Merged Mining (BMM) allows SHA-256d miners to collect transaction fee revenue from other blockchains, without running any new software (i.e., without \"looking\" at those alt-chains, hence \"blind\").","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-301","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-301","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-301","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0533","slug":"bip-310","title":"Stratum protocol extensions","authors":"Pavel Moravec","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Pavel Moravec","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/310","source_label":"BIP 310","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 310, Stratum protocol extensions. This BIP provides a generic mechanism for specifying stratum protocol extensions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-310","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-310","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-310","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0534","slug":"bip-320","title":"nVersion bits for general purpose use","authors":"BtcDrak","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"BtcDrak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/320","source_label":"BIP 320","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 320, nVersion bits for general purpose use. This BIP reserves 16 bits of the block header nVersion field for general purpose use and removes their meaning for the purpose of version bits soft-fork signalling.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-320","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-320","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-320","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0535","slug":"bip-323","title":"24 nVersion bits for general purpose use","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/323","source_label":"BIP 323","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 323, 24 nVersion bits for general purpose use. 24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-323","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-323","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-323","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0536","slug":"bip-326","title":"Anti-fee-sniping in taproot transactions","authors":"Chris Belcher","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Chris Belcher","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/326","source_label":"BIP 326","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 326, Anti-fee-sniping in taproot transactions. This document proposes a certain type of wallet behaviour which uses BIP341 taproot[1].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-326","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-326","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-326","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0537","slug":"bip-329","title":"Wallet Labels Export Format","authors":"Craig Raw","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Craig Raw","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/329","source_label":"BIP 329","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 329, Wallet Labels Export Format. This document specifies a format for the export of labels that may be attached to various common types of records in a wallet.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-329","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-329","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-329","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0538","slug":"bip-330","title":"Transaction announcements reconciliation","authors":"Gleb Naumenko","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Gleb Naumenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/330","source_label":"BIP 330","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 330, Transaction announcements reconciliation. This document specifies a P2P protocol extension for reconciliation of transaction announcements between 2 nodes , which is a building block for efficient transaction relay protocols (e.g., [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.10518.pdf Erlay]).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-330","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-330","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-330","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0539","slug":"bip-331","title":"Ancestor Package Relay","authors":"Gloria Zhao","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gloria Zhao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/331","source_label":"BIP 331","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 331, Ancestor Package Relay. Peer-to-peer protocol messages enabling nodes to request and relay the unconfirmed ancestor package of a given transaction, and to request and relay transactions in batches.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-331","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-331","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-331","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0540","slug":"bip-360","title":"Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR)","authors":"Hunter Beast","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Hunter Beast","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/360","source_label":"BIP 360","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 360, Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). We define the Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR) output structure as follows: A P2MR output is similar to a P2TR output (as defined in [[bip-0341.mediawiki|BIP 341]]); however, unlike P2TR outputs, we disable the key path spend for the benefit of quantum resistance by omitting the internal key and the tap tweak step.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-360","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-360","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-360","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0541","slug":"bip-361","title":"Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset","authors":"Jameson Lopp","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Jameson Lopp","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/361","source_label":"BIP 361","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 361, Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset. {| class=\"wikitable\" |- style=\"text-align:center;\" ! Phase ! What Happens ! Who Must Act ! Time Horizon |- | A | Permitted sends are from legacy scripts to PQ scripts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-361","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-361","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-361","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0542","slug":"bip-372","title":"Pay-to-contract tweak fields for PSBT","authors":"Maxim Orlovsky","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Maxim Orlovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/372","source_label":"BIP 372","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 372, Pay-to-contract tweak fields for PSBT. The new per-input type is defined as follows: {| ! Name ! ! ! Description ! ! Description ! Versions Requiring Inclusion ! Versions Requiring Exclusion ! Versions Allowing Inclusion |- | P2C Key Tweak | PSBT_IN_P2C_TWEAK = 0x19 | | 33 bytes of compact public key serialization specifying to which keys the P2C tweak may be applied (i.e.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-372","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-372","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-372","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0543","slug":"bip-374","title":"Discrete Log Equality Proofs","authors":"Andrew Toth","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Andrew Toth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/374","source_label":"BIP 374","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 374, Discrete Log Equality Proofs. All conventions and notations are used as defined in [https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0327.mediawiki#notation BIP327].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-374","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-374","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-374","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0544","slug":"bip-375","title":"Sending Silent Payments with PSBTs","authors":"Andrew Toth","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Andrew Toth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/375","source_label":"BIP 375","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 375, Sending Silent Payments with PSBTs. This document specifies new fields and new field inclusion/exclusion requirements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-375","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-375","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-375","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0545","slug":"bip-376","title":"Spending Silent Payment outputs with PSBTs","authors":"nymius","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"nymius","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/376","source_label":"BIP 376","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 376, Spending Silent Payment outputs with PSBTs. We use the following functions and conventions: ser 32 (i): serializes a 32-bit unsigned integer ''i'' as a 4-byte sequence, most significant byte first.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-376","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-376","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-376","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0546","slug":"bip-389","title":"Multipath Descriptor Key Expressions","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/389","source_label":"BIP 389","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 389, Multipath Descriptor Key Expressions. This document specifies a modification to Key Expressions of Descriptors that are described in BIP 380.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-389","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-389","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-389","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0547","slug":"bip-390","title":"musig() Descriptor Key Expression","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/390","source_label":"BIP 390","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 390, musig() Descriptor Key Expression. This document specifies a musig() key expression for output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-390","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-390","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-390","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0548","slug":"bip-392","title":"Silent Payment Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Craig Raw","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Craig Raw","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/392","source_label":"BIP 392","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 392, Silent Payment Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies sp() output script descriptors for silent payments.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-392","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-392","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-392","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0549","slug":"bip-393","title":"Output Script Descriptor Annotations","authors":"Craig Raw","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Craig Raw","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/393","source_label":"BIP 393","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 393, Output Script Descriptor Annotations. This document specifies an optional annotation syntax for output script descriptors as defined in [[bip-0380.mediawiki|BIP 380]].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-393","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-393","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-393","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0550","slug":"bip-431","title":"Topology Restrictions for Pinning","authors":"Gloria Zhao","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gloria Zhao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/431","source_label":"BIP 431","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 431, Topology Restrictions for Pinning. This document describes pinning problems that can arise from limitations in mempool policy.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-431","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-431","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-431","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0551","slug":"bip-433","title":"Pay to Anchor (P2A)","authors":"Gregory Sanders","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Gregory Sanders","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/433","source_label":"BIP 433","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 433, Pay to Anchor (P2A). This document describes a new standard output script called Pay to Anchor (P2A) and prescribes making spending of this output type standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-433","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-433","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-433","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0552","slug":"bip-443","title":"OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY","authors":"Salvatore Ingala","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Salvatore Ingala","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/443","source_label":"BIP 443","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 443, OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY. To add consensus support for a new tapscript opcode that enables a new type of output restrictions: OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY ( OP_CCV ).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-443","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-443","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-443","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0553","slug":"bip-450","title":"Formosa—Seed encoding by themed mnemonic stories","authors":"Yuri S Villas Boas","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Yuri S Villas Boas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/450","source_label":"BIP 450","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BIP 450, Formosa—Seed encoding by themed mnemonic stories. Formosa, an expansion of BIP-0039 for the generation of deterministic wallets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-450","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-450","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-450","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0554","slug":"eip-2780","title":"Resource-based intrinsic transaction gas","authors":"Matt Garnett , Uri Klarman , Ben Adams , Maria Inês Silva , Anders Elowsson , Anthony Sassano , Dragan Rakita","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Matt Garnett , Uri Klarman , Ben Adams , Maria Inês Silva , Anders Elowsson , Anthony Sassano , Dragan Rakita","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2780","source_label":"EIP 2780","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 2780, Resource-based intrinsic transaction gas. This EIP decomposes the flat 21,000 intrinsic transaction cost into explicit primitives, each priced to match the resources a transaction actually consumes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2780","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2780","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2780","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0555","slug":"eip-3076","title":"Slashing Protection Interchange Format","authors":"Michael Sproul , Sacha Saint-Leger , Danny Ryan","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Michael Sproul , Sacha Saint-Leger , Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3076","source_label":"EIP 3076","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3076, Slashing Protection Interchange Format. A standard format for transferring a key's signing history allows validators to easily switch between clients without the risk of signing conflicting messages.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3076","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3076","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3076","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0556","slug":"eip-3155","title":"EVM trace specification","authors":"Martin Holst Swende , Marius van der Wijden","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende , Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3155","source_label":"EIP 3155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 3155, EVM trace specification. Introduce a new JSON standard for EVM traces during execution of state tests.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0557","slug":"eip-7495","title":"SSZ ProgressiveContainer","authors":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7495","source_label":"EIP 7495","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7495, SSZ ProgressiveContainer. A new Simple Serialize (SSZ) type to represent containers with forward-compatible Merkleization: A given field is always assigned the same stable generalized index (gindex) even when different container versions append new fields or drop existing fields.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7495","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7495","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7495","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0558","slug":"eip-7523","title":"Empty accounts deprecation","authors":"Peter Davies","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Peter Davies","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7523","source_label":"EIP 7523","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7523, Empty accounts deprecation. This EIP prohibits the state of any post-merge network from containing empty accounts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7523","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7523","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7523","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0559","slug":"eip-7610","title":"Revert creation in case of non-empty storage","authors":"Gary Rong , Martin Holst Swende","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gary Rong , Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7610","source_label":"EIP 7610","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7610, Revert creation in case of non-empty storage. This EIP causes contract creation to throw an error when attempted at an address with pre-existing storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7610","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7610","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7610","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0560","slug":"eip-7688","title":"Forward compatible consensus data structures","authors":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7688","source_label":"EIP 7688","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7688, Forward compatible consensus data structures. The changes needed to adopt ProgressiveContainer from EIP-7495 and ProgressiveList from EIP-7916 in consensus data structures.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7688","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7688","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7688","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0561","slug":"eip-7708","title":"ETH transfers emit a log","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Peter Davies , Etan Kissling , Gajinder Singh , Carson , Jared Wasinger","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Peter Davies , Etan Kissling , Gajinder Singh , Carson , Jared Wasinger","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7708","source_label":"EIP 7708","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7708, ETH transfers emit a log. Logs are often used to track when balance changes of assets on Ethereum.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7708","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7708","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7708","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0562","slug":"eip-7732","title":"Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation","authors":"Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7732","source_label":"EIP 7732","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7732, Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation. This EIP fundamentally changes the way an Ethereum block is validated by decoupling the execution validation from the consensus validation both logically as well as temporally.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7732","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7732","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7732","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0563","slug":"eip-7778","title":"Block Gas Accounting without Refunds","authors":"Ben Adams , Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ben Adams , Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7778","source_label":"EIP 7778","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7778, Block Gas Accounting without Refunds. This EIP modifies the block gas accounting mechanism to prevent the circumvention of block gas limits.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7778","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7778","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7778","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0564","slug":"eip-7784","title":"GETCONTRACT opcode","authors":"Tim Pechersky","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Pechersky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7784","source_label":"EIP 7784","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7784, GETCONTRACT opcode. This is a proposal to add a new opcode, GETCONTRACT.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7784","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7784","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7784","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0565","slug":"eip-7834","title":"Separate Metadata Section for EOF","authors":"Kaan Uzdogan , Marco Castignoli , Manuel Wedler","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Kaan Uzdogan , Marco Castignoli , Manuel Wedler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7834","source_label":"EIP 7834","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7834, Separate Metadata Section for EOF. Introduce a new separate metadata section to the Ethereum Object Format (EOF) that is unreachable by the code, and any changes to which does not affect the code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7834","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7834","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7834","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0566","slug":"eip-7843","title":"SLOTNUM opcode","authors":"Marc Harvey-Hill","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marc Harvey-Hill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7843","source_label":"EIP 7843","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7843, SLOTNUM opcode. To add a new opcode SLOTNUM (0x4b), that returns the corresponding slot number for the current block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7843","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7843","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7843","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0567","slug":"eip-7880","title":"EOF - EXTCODEADDRESS instruction","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7880","source_label":"EIP 7880","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7880, EOF - EXTCODEADDRESS instruction. Add an instruction to EOF that reads code delegation designations from an account without requiring code introspection.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7880","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7880","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7880","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0568","slug":"eip-7904","title":"Compute Gas Cost Analysis","authors":"Jacek Glen , Lukasz Glen , Maria Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jacek Glen , Lukasz Glen , Maria Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7904","source_label":"EIP 7904","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7904, Compute Gas Cost Analysis. This document reports an empirical analysis of the runtime of EVM compute operations and precompiles across the major execution clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7904","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7904","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7904","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0569","slug":"eip-7916","title":"SSZ ProgressiveList","authors":"Zsolt Felföldi , Cayman , Etan Kissling","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Zsolt Felföldi , Cayman , Etan Kissling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7916","source_label":"EIP 7916","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7916, SSZ ProgressiveList. A new Merkle tree shape for Simple Serialize (SSZ) types that results in fewer hashes when only a small number of leaves is used.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7916","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7916","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7916","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0570","slug":"eip-7928","title":"Block-Level Access Lists","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D`Amato , Jochem Brouwer , Ignacio Hagopian , Felipe Selmo , Rahul , Stefan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D`Amato , Jochem Brouwer , Ignacio Hagopian , Felipe Selmo , Rahul , Stefan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7928","source_label":"EIP 7928","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7928, Block-Level Access Lists. Block-Level Access Lists (BALs) that record all accounts and storage locations accessed during block execution, along with their post-execution values.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7928","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7928","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7928","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0571","slug":"eip-7954","title":"Increase Maximum Contract Size","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7954","source_label":"EIP 7954","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7954, Increase Maximum Contract Size. To raise the maximum allowed size for contract code deployed on Ethereum from 24,576 bytes to 65,536 bytes, and to raise the initcode size limit from 49,152 bytes to 131,072 bytes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7954","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7954","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7954","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0572","slug":"eip-7975","title":"eth/70 - partial block receipt lists","authors":"Felix Lange , Jochem Brouwer , Giulio Rebuffo","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Felix Lange , Jochem Brouwer , Giulio Rebuffo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7975","source_label":"EIP 7975","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7975, eth/70 - partial block receipt lists. This EIP modifies the 'eth' p2p protocol to allow requesting partial block receipt lists.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7975","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7975","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7975","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0573","slug":"eip-7976","title":"Increase Calldata Floor Cost","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7976","source_label":"EIP 7976","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7976, Increase Calldata Floor Cost. An adjustment to calldata pricing by raising the floor cost from 10/40 to 64/64 gas per calldata byte.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7976","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7976","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7976","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0574","slug":"eip-7981","title":"Increase Access List Cost","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7981","source_label":"EIP 7981","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7981, Increase Access List Cost. This EIP charges access lists for their data footprint, preventing the circumvention of the EIP-7623 floor pricing.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7981","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7981","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7981","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0575","slug":"eip-7997","title":"Deterministic Factory Contract","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Toni Wahrstätter , Nick Johnson , Jochem Brouwer","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Toni Wahrstätter , Nick Johnson , Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7997","source_label":"EIP 7997","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 7997, Deterministic Factory Contract. The availability of a well-known CREATE2 factory at 0x4e59b44847b379578588920cA78FbF26c0B4956C is made a formal requirement to enable deterministic deployments at identical addresses across EVM chains.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7997","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7997","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7997","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0576","slug":"eip-8024","title":"Backward compatible SWAPN, DUPN, EXCHANGE","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Charles Cooper , Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Charles Cooper , Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8024","source_label":"EIP 8024","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8024, Backward compatible SWAPN, DUPN, EXCHANGE. Currently, SWAP and DUP instructions are limited to a stack depth of 16.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8024","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8024","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8024","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0577","slug":"eip-8037","title":"State Creation Gas Cost Increase","authors":"Maria Silva , Carlos Perez , Jochem Brouwer , Ansgar Dietrichs , Łukasz Rozmej , Anders Elowsson , Francesco D'Amato , Dragan Rakita , Paweł Bylica , Spencer Taylor-Brown","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva , Carlos Perez , Jochem Brouwer , Ansgar Dietrichs , Łukasz Rozmej , Anders Elowsson , Francesco D'Amato , Dragan Rakita , Paweł Bylica , Spencer Taylor-Brown","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8037","source_label":"EIP 8037","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8037, State Creation Gas Cost Increase. This proposal increases the cost of state creation operations, thus avoiding excessive state growth under increased block gas limits.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8037","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8037","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8037","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0578","slug":"eip-8038","title":"State-access gas cost update","authors":"Maria Silva , Wei Han Ng , Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva , Wei Han Ng , Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8038","source_label":"EIP 8038","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8038, State-access gas cost update. This EIP updates the gas cost of state-access operations to reflect Ethereum's larger state and the consequent slowdown of these operations.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8038","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8038","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8038","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0579","slug":"eip-8045","title":"Exclude slashed validators from proposing","authors":"Francesco D'Amato , Barnabas Busa","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato , Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8045","source_label":"EIP 8045","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8045, Exclude slashed validators from proposing. A modification to the beacon chain proposer selection process to exclude slashed validators from being selected as proposers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8045","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8045","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8045","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0580","slug":"eip-8061","title":"Increase exit and consolidation churn","authors":"Francesco D'Amato , Anders Elowsson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato , Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8061","source_label":"EIP 8061","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8061, Increase exit and consolidation churn. This EIP roughly doubles the consolidation churn, as well as quadrupling the exit churn and restoring its proportionality to total stake (though maintaining the existing cap on activations).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8061","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8061","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8061","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0581","slug":"eip-8066","title":"Upgrade Mascots","authors":"Jordan Holberg , Andrew B Coathup","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Jordan Holberg , Andrew B Coathup","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8066","source_label":"EIP 8066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8066, Upgrade Mascots. This EIP establishes a mascot for each Ethereum network upgrade.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0582","slug":"eip-8070","title":"eth/72 - Sparse Blobpool","authors":"Raúl Kripalani , Bosul Mun , Francesco D'Amato , Csaba Kiraly , Felix Lange , Marios Ioannou , Alex Stokes , Kamil Salakhiev","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Raúl Kripalani , Bosul Mun , Francesco D'Amato , Csaba Kiraly , Felix Lange , Marios Ioannou , Alex Stokes , Kamil Salakhiev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8070","source_label":"EIP 8070","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8070, eth/72 - Sparse Blobpool. This proposal introduces the sparse blobpool, a construction that brings cell-level, custody-aligned sampling in the Execution Layer (EL).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8070","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8070","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8070","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0583","slug":"eip-8133","title":"Network Upgrade Naming","authors":"Pooja Ranjan","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pooja Ranjan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8133","source_label":"EIP 8133","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8133, Network Upgrade Naming. This EIP documents the naming conventions used for Ethereum network upgrades across the Execution Layer, Consensus Layer, post-Merge combined upgrades, and Blob-Parameter-Only upgrades.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8133","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8133","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8133","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0584","slug":"eip-8136","title":"Cell-Level Deltas for Data Column Broadcast","authors":"Marco Munizaga , Daniel Knopik , Sukun Tarachandani , Aarsh Shah","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marco Munizaga , Daniel Knopik , Sukun Tarachandani , Aarsh Shah","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8136","source_label":"EIP 8136","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8136, Cell-Level Deltas for Data Column Broadcast. Cell-Level Deltas for Data Column Broadcast optimizes PeerDAS (EIP-7594) by allowing more efficient transfers of blob data columns across the network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8136","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8136","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8136","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0585","slug":"eip-8159","title":"eth/71 - Block Access List Exchange","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8159","source_label":"EIP 8159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8159, eth/71 - Block Access List Exchange. This EIP modifies the 'eth' p2p protocol to support Block-level Access Lists (BALs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8159","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8159","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8159","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0586","slug":"eip-8163","title":"Reserve `EXTENSION (0xae)` opcode","authors":"Bruce Collie , Piotr Dobaczewski","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Bruce Collie , Piotr Dobaczewski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8163","source_label":"EIP 8163","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8163, Reserve `EXTENSION (0xae)` opcode. Reserve an opcode EXTENSION (0xae) which will be guaranteed to not become a valid opcode on Ethereum L1 EVM, but which will be available to be used in other EVMs as a prefix to encode extension instructions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8163","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8163","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8163","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0587","slug":"eip-8182","title":"Private ETH and ERC-20 Transfers","authors":"Tom Lehman","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Tom Lehman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8182","source_label":"EIP 8182","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8182, Private ETH and ERC-20 Transfers. Private ETH and ERC-20 transfers via a shielded-pool system contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8182","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8182","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8182","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0588","slug":"eip-8189","title":"snap/2 - BAL-Based State Healing","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Gary Rong","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Gary Rong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8189","source_label":"EIP 8189","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8189, snap/2 - BAL-Based State Healing. This EIP upgrades the snap protocol from version 1 to version 2, removing GetTrieNodes (0x06) / TrieNodes (0x07) and adding GetBlockAccessLists (0x08) / BlockAccessLists (0x09) to enable BAL-based state healing during snap sync.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8189","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8189","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8189","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0589","slug":"eip-8246","title":"Remove SELFDESTRUCT Burn","authors":"Paweł Bylica","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8246","source_label":"EIP 8246","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8246, Remove SELFDESTRUCT Burn. This EIP removes the remaining cases where SELFDESTRUCT burns ETH.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8246","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8246","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8246","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0590","slug":"eip-8261","title":"Gas Limit Schedule","authors":"Barnabas Busa","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8261","source_label":"EIP 8261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"EIP 8261, Gas Limit Schedule. This EIP recommends that, starting with Gloas (EIP-7732), consensus layer clients source their gas limit preference from an optional GAS_LIMIT_SCHEDULE field in the consensus layer config.yaml instead of hardcoded, release-scoped defaults.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8261","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8261","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8261","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0591","slug":"zksync-era","title":"zkSync: a validity-proof rollup with an EVM-like virtual machine","authors":"Matter Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Matter Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.zksync.io/","source_label":"zkSync protocol docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"zkSync Era asks a settlement contract to accept a proof of an EVM-like transition, not a waiting period and not a promise from the sequencer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zksync-era","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zksync-era","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zksync-era","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0592","slug":"op-stack-spec","title":"OP Stack protocol specification","authors":"OP Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"OP Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://specs.optimism.io/","source_label":"OP Stack specs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The OP Stack separates the rollup configuration from the fault-proof programme. A chain that says it is an OP Stack chain is naming a spec, not a guarantee that the fault proof is live.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/op-stack-spec","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/op-stack-spec","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/op-stack-spec","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0593","slug":"arbitrum-bold","title":"BoLD: a bounded dispute protocol for an optimistic rollup","authors":"Offchain Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Offchain Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.arbitrum.io/how-arbitrum-works/bold/gentle-introduction","source_label":"Arbitrum BoLD introduction","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"BoLD tries to bound how long a dispute can be delayed by an adversary, so a single honest party can finish a challenge against many liars.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arbitrum-bold","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/arbitrum-bold","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arbitrum-bold","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0594","slug":"starknet-architecture","title":"Starknet architecture: a validity rollup over Cairo","authors":"StarkWare","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"StarkWare","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.starknet.io/","source_label":"Starknet architecture docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Starknet is a validity rollup whose execution is Cairo, proved to a settlement contract. The STARK convinces the contract. It does not choose the sequencer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/starknet-architecture","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/starknet-architecture","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/starknet-architecture","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0595","slug":"scroll-zkevm","title":"Scroll: a zkEVM rollup design","authors":"Scroll","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Scroll","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.scroll.io/","source_label":"Scroll documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Scroll's design is a zkEVM: a proof that an Ethereum-like execution trace is valid, checked by a settlement contract rather than re-executed by every validator.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/scroll-zkevm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/scroll-zkevm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/scroll-zkevm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0596","slug":"taiko-based-rollup","title":"Taiko: a based contestable rollup","authors":"Taiko Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Taiko Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.taiko.xyz/","source_label":"Taiko documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Taiko proposes that Ethereum proposers, not a separate sequencer, order the rollup, and that a contest can still challenge the execution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/taiko-based-rollup","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/taiko-based-rollup","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/taiko-based-rollup","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0597","slug":"linea-zkevm","title":"Linea: a zkEVM rollup specification","authors":"Consensys","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Consensys","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.linea.build/","source_label":"Linea documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Linea publishes a zkEVM rollup: execution is argued by proof to a settlement contract, and the sequencer's order is not itself the proof.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/linea-zkevm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/linea-zkevm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/linea-zkevm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0598","slug":"fuel-vm","title":"FuelVM: a virtual machine for parallel transaction execution","authors":"Fuel Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Fuel Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.fuel.network/","source_label":"Fuel documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Fuel's design bet is a UTXO-like state model and a virtual machine built so transactions that do not touch the same state can execute together.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fuel-vm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fuel-vm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fuel-vm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0599","slug":"monad-bft","title":"MonadBFT and deferred execution","authors":"Monad","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Monad","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.monad.xyz/","source_label":"Monad architecture docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Monad's published design splits consensus on the order of transactions from execution of those transactions, and it names a BFT protocol for the order.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/monad-bft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/monad-bft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/monad-bft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0600","slug":"sei-architecture","title":"Sei: a trading-oriented chain architecture","authors":"Sei Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Sei Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.sei.io/","source_label":"Sei documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Sei publishes a chain whose block path is specialised for order matching, rather than treating an exchange as an ordinary contract on a general virtual machine.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sei-architecture","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sei-architecture","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sei-architecture","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0601","slug":"berachain-pol","title":"Proof of liquidity","authors":"Berachain","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Berachain","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.berachain.com/","source_label":"Berachain documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Proof of liquidity, as Berachain publishes it, tries to direct stake-weight toward liquidity in named venues, instead of treating stake as a pure bond.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/berachain-pol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/berachain-pol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/berachain-pol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0602","slug":"hyperliquid-l1","title":"Hyperliquid L1 and on-chain order book","authors":"Hyperliquid","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Hyperliquid","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs","source_label":"Hyperliquid docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Hyperliquid publishes a chain whose purpose is an on-chain order book and perps matching, with consensus serving that book rather than a general contract platform first.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperliquid-l1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hyperliquid-l1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperliquid-l1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0603","slug":"dydx-v4-chain","title":"dYdX v4: an application-specific chain for perpetuals","authors":"dYdX Trading","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"dYdX Trading","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.dydx.xyz/","source_label":"dYdX v4 docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"dYdX v4 moves the perpetual order book onto its own chain, so matching is no longer a set of Ethereum transactions in a smart contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dydx-v4-chain","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dydx-v4-chain","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dydx-v4-chain","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0604","slug":"lido-steth","title":"Lido: liquid staking for Ethereum validators","authors":"Lido","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Lido","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.lido.fi/","source_label":"Lido documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Lido's design pools ether with node operators and issues a rebate token, stETH, that is a claim on that pool rather than a second kind of ether.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lido-steth","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lido-steth","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lido-steth","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0605","slug":"rocket-pool","title":"Rocket Pool: a permissionless Ethereum staking pool","authors":"Rocket Pool","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Rocket Pool","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.rocketpool.net/","source_label":"Rocket Pool docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Rocket Pool publishes a staking pool where a node operator posts their own bond beside pooled ether, and the liquid token is a claim on the pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rocket-pool","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/rocket-pool","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rocket-pool","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0606","slug":"ssv-network","title":"Secret shared validators: split an Ethereum validator across operators","authors":"SSV Network","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"SSV Network","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.ssv.network/","source_label":"SSV documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"SSV splits a validator key across operators so that a threshold, not a single operator, can sign. The Ethereum protocol still sees one validator.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ssv-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ssv-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ssv-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0607","slug":"obol-dvt","title":"Obol: distributed validator technology","authors":"Obol","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Obol","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.obol.org/","source_label":"Obol documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Obol publishes a distributed-validator setup: several operators jointly run one Ethereum validator, with a threshold signature and a cluster definition.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/obol-dvt","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/obol-dvt","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/obol-dvt","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0608","slug":"eigen-da","title":"EigenDA: a data-availability service beside Ethereum","authors":"Eigen Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Eigen Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/Layr-Labs/eigenda","source_label":"EigenDA repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/Layr-Labs/eigenda","editorial_line":"EigenDA offers data availability as a service that Ethereum rollups can point at. Availability here is a claim about operators in that service, not about Ethereum blob space by default.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eigen-da","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eigen-da","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eigen-da","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0609","slug":"symbiotic-restaking","title":"Symbiotic: a shared security marketplace","authors":"Symbiotic","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Symbiotic","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.symbiotic.fi/","source_label":"Symbiotic docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Symbiotic publishes a marketplace where collateral can be assigned to networks that define their own slashing conditions, rather than one protocol defining every use.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/symbiotic-restaking","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/symbiotic-restaking","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/symbiotic-restaking","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0610","slug":"ethena-usde","title":"USDe: a delta-neutral synthetic dollar design","authors":"Ethena Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ethena Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.ethena.fi/","source_label":"Ethena documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Ethena publishes USDe as a token backed by a delta-neutral position: collateral hedged with a short derivatives position, not by cash in a bank account described in this note.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ethena-usde","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethena-usde","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ethena-usde","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0611","slug":"ondo-finance","title":"Ondo: tokenised fund access","authors":"Ondo","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ondo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.ondo.finance/","source_label":"Ondo documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Ondo publishes tokenised access to fund interests. The token is a claim under the documents, not the fund, and not a stablecoin by default.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ondo-finance","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ondo-finance","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ondo-finance","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0612","slug":"sky-protocol","title":"Sky: the system that succeeded the Dai documents","authors":"Sky","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Sky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.sky.money/","source_label":"Sky documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Sky publishes the later system around USDS and the Sky savings and governance contracts. It is not the 2017 Dai paper, and it does not inherit that paper's parameters.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sky-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sky-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sky-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0613","slug":"spark-protocol","title":"Spark: a lending market allocated from Sky","authors":"Spark","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Spark","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.spark.fi/","source_label":"Spark documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Spark publishes a lending market whose balance sheet is allocated, in the docs, from the Sky system, rather than a standalone pool of unrelated deposits only.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spark-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spark-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spark-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0614","slug":"aave-gho","title":"GHO: a stablecoin minted against Aave collateral","authors":"Aave","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Aave","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://aave.com/docs/ecosystem/gho","source_label":"Aave GHO documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"GHO is minted as a debt against collateral posted in Aave, rather than as a receipt for dollars in a bank.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aave-gho","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aave-gho","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aave-gho","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0615","slug":"frax-protocol","title":"Frax: a fractional and fully backed stablecoin design, by the version the docs name","authors":"Frax Finance","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Frax Finance","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.frax.finance/","source_label":"Frax documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Frax's documents describe a dollar token whose backing the protocol itself changes between collateral and a governance-token component, depending on the version you open.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/frax-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/frax-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/frax-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0616","slug":"pendle-yield","title":"Pendle: splitting a yield-bearing token into principal and yield","authors":"Pendle","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pendle","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.pendle.finance/","source_label":"Pendle documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Pendle's design wraps a yield-bearing token and splits a maturity into a principal claim and a yield claim that can be traded separately.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pendle-yield","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pendle-yield","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pendle-yield","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0617","slug":"euler-vault-kit","title":"Euler Vault Kit: credit vaults with isolated risk","authors":"Euler","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Euler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.euler.finance/","source_label":"Euler documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Euler Vault Kit publishes lending vaults whose collateral and liability can be isolated per vault, after the earlier monolithic market.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/euler-vault-kit","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/euler-vault-kit","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/euler-vault-kit","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0618","slug":"synthetix-v3","title":"Synthetix v3: collateralised debt for synthetic positions","authors":"Synthetix","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Synthetix","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.synthetix.io/","source_label":"Synthetix documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Synthetix v3 documents a collateral and debt system for synthetic positions, with pools that are no longer the single shared debt pool of the earliest design.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/synthetix-v3","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/synthetix-v3","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/synthetix-v3","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0619","slug":"gmx-v2","title":"GMX: a liquidity-pool perpetual exchange","authors":"GMX","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"GMX","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.gmx.io/docs/intro/","source_label":"GMX docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"GMX documents perpetuals and swaps against a pooled liquidity vault, where liquidity providers take the other side of trader profit and loss.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gmx-v2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gmx-v2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gmx-v2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0620","slug":"layerzero-v2","title":"LayerZero v2: endpoint, message libraries, and decentralised verifier networks","authors":"LayerZero Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"LayerZero Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.layerzero.network/v2","source_label":"LayerZero v2 docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"LayerZero v2 splits an endpoint that applications call from the message libraries and verifier sets that actually attest a remote event.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/layerzero-v2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/layerzero-v2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/layerzero-v2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0621","slug":"wormhole-protocol","title":"Wormhole: guardian-attested generic message passing","authors":"Wormhole Foundation","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Wormhole Foundation","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.wormhole.com/","source_label":"Wormhole docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Wormhole publishes generic messages attested by a guardian set. The guardian quorum, not a light client of the source chain, is the trust assumption in the base design.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/wormhole-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/wormhole-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/wormhole-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0622","slug":"axelar-network","title":"Axelar: cross-chain messages verified by its validator set","authors":"Axelar","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Axelar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.axelar.dev/","source_label":"Axelar docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Axelar publishes cross-chain delivery verified by Axelar's own validator set, which runs a consensus the destination application is asked to trust.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/axelar-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/axelar-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/axelar-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0623","slug":"hyperlane-protocol","title":"Hyperlane: modular interchain security","authors":"Hyperlane","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Hyperlane","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.hyperlane.xyz/","source_label":"Hyperlane docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Hyperlane publishes message passing where the application picks an interchain security module, instead of inheriting one unnamed verifier.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperlane-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hyperlane-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperlane-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0624","slug":"circle-cctp","title":"Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol: native burn and mint for USDC","authors":"Circle","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Circle","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://developers.circle.com/cctp","source_label":"Circle CCTP docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"CCTP burns USDC on a source chain and mints USDC on a destination chain when Circle's attestation service signs the burn. The attestation is the trust assumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/circle-cctp","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/circle-cctp","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/circle-cctp","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0625","slug":"chainlink-ccip","title":"Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol","authors":"Chainlink","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chainlink","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.chain.link/ccip","source_label":"Chainlink CCIP docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"CCIP publishes cross-chain messages and token movements verified by Chainlink's specified risk-management and committing sets, not by the 2017 oracle white paper alone.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainlink-ccip","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainlink-ccip","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainlink-ccip","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0626","slug":"across-intents","title":"Across: intents settled by a relayer and a settlement contract","authors":"Across","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Across","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.across.to/","source_label":"Across docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Across publishes an intent: a user names a destination fill, a relayer fills it, and a settlement contract later reimburses the relayer if the origin deposit checks out.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/across-intents","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/across-intents","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/across-intents","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0627","slug":"hop-protocol","title":"Hop: transfer bonds and an AMM between rollup representations","authors":"Hop","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Hop","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.hop.exchange/","source_label":"Hop docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Hop publishes a transfer that mints a hop token against a bonded rollup exit, then swaps that representation through an AMM so a user does not wait out the rollup's full exit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hop-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hop-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hop-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0628","slug":"pyth-network","title":"Pyth: first-party signed prices aggregated on a chain","authors":"Pyth Data Association","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pyth Data Association","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.pyth.network/","source_label":"Pyth documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Pyth publishes prices signed by first-party publishers and aggregated into a feed a contract can read. The signature set is the oracle assumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pyth-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pyth-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pyth-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0629","slug":"redstone-oracles","title":"RedStone: modular price delivery","authors":"RedStone","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"RedStone","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.redstone.finance/","source_label":"RedStone docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"RedStone publishes a modular oracle: signed data can be pushed on demand or stored for a contract to pull, rather than one contract updated on a fixed heartbeat only.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/redstone-oracles","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/redstone-oracles","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/redstone-oracles","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0630","slug":"api3-airnode","title":"API3: first-party oracles and Airnode","authors":"API3","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"API3","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.api3.org/","source_label":"API3 documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"API3's design asks the API provider to run the oracle, so the signer is the party who already operates the API, rather than a third-party node repeating it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/api3-airnode","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/api3-airnode","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/api3-airnode","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0631","slug":"chronicle-oracles","title":"Chronicle: a validator-attested price oracle","authors":"Chronicle Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chronicle Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.chroniclelabs.org/","source_label":"Chronicle docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Chronicle publishes prices attested by a named validator set whose signatures a contract verifies.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chronicle-oracles","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chronicle-oracles","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chronicle-oracles","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0632","slug":"world-id","title":"World ID: a proof of personhood protocol","authors":"Tools for Humanity","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Tools for Humanity","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://whitepaper.world.org/","source_label":"World whitepaper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"World ID publishes a proof-of-personhood credential: a person proves they are in a set of unique humans without, in the design, revealing which human.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/world-id","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/world-id","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/world-id","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0633","slug":"farcaster-protocol","title":"Farcaster: identity contracts and off-chain messages","authors":"Farcaster","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Farcaster","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.farcaster.xyz/","source_label":"Farcaster docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Farcaster publishes an identity on a settlement chain and messages stored off that chain, so a social post is not itself an Ethereum transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/farcaster-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/farcaster-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/farcaster-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0634","slug":"ens-protocol","title":"Ethereum Name Service: names, resolvers, and records","authors":"ENS","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"ENS","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.ens.domains/","source_label":"ENS documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"ENS publishes a name registry and a resolver interface. The name is a record. It is not a certificate that the website it points at is honest.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ens-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ens-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ens-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0635","slug":"safe-smart-account","title":"Safe: owner sets, thresholds, and modules","authors":"Safe","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Safe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.safe.global/","source_label":"Safe documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"A Safe account stores owners and a threshold. Execution is valid when enough owners sign, or when a module the owners enabled is allowed to call.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/safe-smart-account","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/safe-smart-account","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/safe-smart-account","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0636","slug":"cow-protocol","title":"CoW: batch auctions and solvers","authors":"CoW Protocol","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"CoW Protocol","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.cow.fi/","source_label":"CoW Protocol docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"CoW Protocol publishes a batch auction: orders are collected, solvers compete to settle the batch, and a settlement contract checks the uniform clearing rules.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cow-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cow-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cow-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0637","slug":"uniswapx","title":"UniswapX: signed intents filled by a reactor","authors":"Uniswap Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Uniswap Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.uniswap.org/contracts/uniswapx/overview","source_label":"UniswapX overview","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"UniswapX publishes a signed order that a filler can execute through a reactor contract, which checks the user's limit before moving tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswapx","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswapx","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswapx","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0638","slug":"oneinch-fusion","title":"1inch Fusion: resolvers filling signed swap orders","authors":"1inch","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"1inch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.1inch.io/","source_label":"1inch documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"1inch's Fusion design publishes a signed swap that resolvers fill, instead of sending the user's market order straight into a pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/oneinch-fusion","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/oneinch-fusion","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/oneinch-fusion","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0639","slug":"polymarket-ctf","title":"Polymarket: an exchange on conditional tokens","authors":"Polymarket","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Polymarket","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.polymarket.com/","source_label":"Polymarket documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Polymarket publishes an exchange for outcome tokens. The payoff rule is the conditional-token framework it integrates, not a price the exchange prints.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polymarket-ctf","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/polymarket-ctf","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polymarket-ctf","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0640","slug":"gnosis-conditional-tokens","title":"Conditional tokens: partitions of collateral on a reported outcome","authors":"Gnosis","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Gnosis","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/gnosis/conditional-tokens-contracts","source_label":"Conditional tokens repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/gnosis/conditional-tokens-contracts","editorial_line":"Conditional tokens split collateral into positions that pay out when an oracle reports an outcome. The split is the design. The oracle is an input.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gnosis-conditional-tokens","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gnosis-conditional-tokens","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gnosis-conditional-tokens","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0641","slug":"kleros-court","title":"Kleros: a court that selects jurors with a Schelling-point vote","authors":"Kleros","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Kleros","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/kleros/kleros","source_label":"Kleros court repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/kleros/kleros","editorial_line":"Kleros publishes a court: jurors stake, are drawn to rule on evidence, and are rewarded if they vote with the majority. The majority is the output, not an external truth.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kleros-court","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kleros-court","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kleros-court","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0642","slug":"reality-eth","title":"Reality.eth: bonded questions and arbitration","authors":"Reality.eth","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Reality.eth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/RealityETH/reality-eth-monorepo","source_label":"Reality.eth repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/RealityETH/reality-eth-monorepo","editorial_line":"Reality.eth publishes a question that anyone can answer with a bond, and anyone can replace by posting a larger bond, with arbitration as the last step the contract names.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/reality-eth","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/reality-eth","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/reality-eth","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0643","slug":"risc-zero-zkvm","title":"RISC Zero zkVM: proving RISC-V execution","authors":"RISC Zero","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"RISC Zero","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://risczero.com/","source_label":"RISC Zero documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"RISC Zero publishes a zkVM that proves a RISC-V program ran, so a contract can verify a receipt instead of re-running the program.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/risc-zero-zkvm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/risc-zero-zkvm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/risc-zero-zkvm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0644","slug":"sp1-zkvm","title":"SP1: a zkVM for RISC-V programs","authors":"Succinct","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Succinct","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://docs.succinct.xyz/docs/sp1/introduction","source_label":"SP1 introduction","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"SP1 publishes a zkVM that proves RISC-V execution, with a receipt a Groth16 or PLONK wrapper can compress for a settlement contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sp1-zkvm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sp1-zkvm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sp1-zkvm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0645","slug":"jolt-zkvm","title":"Jolt: lookups for a virtual machine","authors":"Arasu Arun, Srinath Setty and Justin Thaler","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Arasu Arun, Srinath Setty and Justin Thaler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1217","source_label":"ePrint 2023/1217","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Jolt proposes proving a virtual machine with lookups rather than by arithmetising every instruction into a bespoke constraint system.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jolt-zkvm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/jolt-zkvm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jolt-zkvm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0646","slug":"plonky2-proofs","title":"Plonky2: a recursive SNARK stack","authors":"Polygon Zero","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Polygon Zero","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2","source_label":"Plonky2 repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/0xPolygonZero/plonky2","editorial_line":"Plonky2 publishes a SNARK aimed at fast recursion: a proof can verify other proofs, which is the property a zkEVM uses to fold a large trace.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonky2-proofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plonky2-proofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonky2-proofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0647","slug":"halo2-proofs","title":"Halo 2: a proving system without a trusted setup, as published by Zcash","authors":"Electric Coin Company","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Electric Coin Company","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://zcash.github.io/halo2/","source_label":"Halo 2 book","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Halo 2 publishes a proving system that removes the trusted setup of the earlier SNARK deployments Zcash had used, by using a different polynomial argument.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/halo2-proofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/halo2-proofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/halo2-proofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0648","slug":"noir-language","title":"Noir: a language that compiles to a constraint system","authors":"Aztec","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Aztec","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://noir-lang.org/","source_label":"Noir language","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Noir publishes a language for writing programs that compile to constraints a proving backend can prove. The language is not the backend.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/noir-language","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/noir-language","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/noir-language","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0649","slug":"aztec-protocol","title":"Aztec: a privacy-preserving rollup design","authors":"Aztec","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Aztec","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://docs.aztec.network/","source_label":"Aztec documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Aztec publishes a rollup whose state transitions are proved, and whose user state is encrypted so the settlement contract sees a proof rather than the plaintext balances.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aztec-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aztec-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aztec-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0650","slug":"penumbra-protocol","title":"Penumbra: a shielded zone for a Cosmos-style chain","authors":"Penumbra Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Penumbra Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://protocol.penumbra.zone/","source_label":"Penumbra protocol specification","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Penumbra publishes a shielded chain: amounts and trading intents are hidden, while a public nullifier set still prevents double spends.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/penumbra-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/penumbra-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/penumbra-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0651","slug":"namada-shielded","title":"Namada: shielded transfers beside a public chain","authors":"Namada","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Namada","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://docs.namada.net/","source_label":"Namada documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Namada publishes a shielded set for transfers, with a public chain around it, so privacy is a pool users enter rather than a property of every action.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/namada-shielded","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/namada-shielded","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/namada-shielded","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0652","slug":"anoma-architecture","title":"Anoma: intent-centric architecture","authors":"Anoma","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anoma","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/anoma/whitepaper","source_label":"Anoma whitepaper repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/anoma/whitepaper","editorial_line":"Anoma publishes an architecture where users sign intents, solvers match them, and a transaction kernel settles the match. The chain is the settlement of intents, not a gas meter for arbitrary calls first.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/anoma-architecture","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/anoma-architecture","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/anoma-architecture","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0653","slug":"iron-fish","title":"Iron Fish: a shielded payments chain","authors":"Iron Fish","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Iron Fish","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://ironfish.network/learn/whitepaper","source_label":"Iron Fish whitepaper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Iron Fish publishes a payments chain whose transfers are shielded by default, using a note and nullifier construction in the Sapling line.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/iron-fish","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/iron-fish","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/iron-fish","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0654","slug":"secret-network","title":"Secret Network: contracts with encrypted state on a known validator set","authors":"Secret Labs","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Secret Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://docs.scrt.network/","source_label":"Secret Network documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Secret Network publishes contracts whose state is encrypted, with a validator set that can compute on that state inside a trusted execution environment.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/secret-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/secret-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/secret-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0655","slug":"oasis-protocol","title":"Oasis: confidential ParaTimes beside a consensus layer","authors":"Oasis Protocol","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Oasis Protocol","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://docs.oasis.io/","source_label":"Oasis documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Oasis publishes a consensus layer and separate ParaTimes, some of which claim confidential execution. The confidential claim lives in the ParaTime, not in every transaction on the consensus layer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/oasis-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/oasis-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/oasis-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0656","slug":"phala-network","title":"Phala: off-chain workers with on-chain attestation","authors":"Phala","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Phala","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://docs.phala.network/","source_label":"Phala documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Phala publishes workers that execute off the consensus path and post attestations so a contract can check which program ran inside which hardware.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/phala-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/phala-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/phala-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0657","slug":"celestia-da-spec","title":"Celestia: data-availability sampling as a deployed network","authors":"Celestia Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Celestia Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.celestia.org/","source_label":"Celestia documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Celestia's docs describe a network that samples data availability, the idea in the LazyLedger paper, as an operational chain rather than only as a 2019 construction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/celestia-da-spec","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/celestia-da-spec","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/celestia-da-spec","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0658","slug":"avail-da","title":"Avail: data availability with validity proofs of the data commitment","authors":"Avail","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Avail","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.availproject.org/","source_label":"Avail documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Avail publishes a data-availability chain whose commitment a client can check with a validity proof, so the client is not only trusting a committee's signature that the data exists.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/avail-da","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/avail-da","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/avail-da","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0659","slug":"espresso-sequencer","title":"Espresso: a shared sequencer with a hotshot-style consensus","authors":"Espresso Systems","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Espresso Systems","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.espressosys.com/","source_label":"Espresso documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Espresso publishes a shared sequencer: many rollups can take their order of transactions from one consensus, instead of each running a private mempool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/espresso-sequencer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/espresso-sequencer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/espresso-sequencer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0660","slug":"babylon-btc-staking","title":"Babylon: Bitcoin staking as a timestamp and slashable bond","authors":"Babylon Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Babylon Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.babylonlabs.io/","source_label":"Babylon documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Babylon publishes a way to lock bitcoin in a Bitcoin script and use that lock as a bond for another network, with slashing expressed as a Bitcoin transaction rather than as a wrapped token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/babylon-btc-staking","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/babylon-btc-staking","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/babylon-btc-staking","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0661","slug":"stacks-nakamoto","title":"Stacks Nakamoto: Bitcoin-finalised block production","authors":"Stacks","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Stacks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.stacks.co/","source_label":"Stacks documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Nakamoto release of Stacks publishes block production that settles its history to Bitcoin, so a reorg of Stacks is tied to a reorg of Bitcoin rather than to a separate short fork rule.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stacks-nakamoto","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stacks-nakamoto","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stacks-nakamoto","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0662","slug":"rootstock-rsk","title":"Rootstock: a merged-mined Bitcoin sidechain with an EVM","authors":"RootstockLabs","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"RootstockLabs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://dev.rootstock.io/","source_label":"Rootstock developer docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Rootstock publishes an EVM sidechain merged-mined with Bitcoin, with a bridge between bitcoin and the sidechain's representation of it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rootstock-rsk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/rootstock-rsk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rootstock-rsk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0663","slug":"citrea-rollup","title":"Citrea: a zk-rollup that settles to Bitcoin","authors":"Citrea","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Citrea","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.citrea.xyz/","source_label":"Citrea documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Citrea publishes a rollup whose proof is verified in Bitcoin script, so Bitcoin is the settlement layer rather than a checkpoint someone tweets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/citrea-rollup","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/citrea-rollup","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/citrea-rollup","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0664","slug":"botanix-spiderchain","title":"Spiderchain: an EVM chain pegged by a rotating set of Bitcoin multisigs","authors":"Botanix Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Botanix Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.botanixlabs.xyz/","source_label":"Botanix documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Botanix publishes an EVM chain whose bitcoin peg is held by a rotating set of multisignature wallets, the spiderchain, rather than by a validity proof in Bitcoin script.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/botanix-spiderchain","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/botanix-spiderchain","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/botanix-spiderchain","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0665","slug":"block-stm","title":"Block-STM: parallel execution by turning a preset order into a schedule","authors":"Rati Gelashvili, Alexander Spiegelman, Zhuolun Xiang, George Danezis, Dahlia Malkhi and others","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Rati Gelashvili, Alexander Spiegelman, Zhuolun Xiang, George Danezis, Dahlia Malkhi and others","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06871","source_label":"arXiv:2203.06871","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Block-STM executes a block's transactions in parallel against a preset serial order, then re-executes the ones that read a value the parallel run got wrong.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/block-stm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/block-stm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/block-stm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0666","slug":"plonky3-proofs","title":"Plonky3: a toolkit of proof-system components","authors":"Polygon Zero","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Polygon Zero","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://github.com/Plonky3/Plonky3","source_label":"Plonky3 repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/Plonky3/Plonky3","editorial_line":"Plonky3 publishes components, fields, hashes, and AIR machinery, rather than one circuit. A project that says it uses Plonky3 has named a toolkit, not a statement.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonky3-proofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plonky3-proofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonky3-proofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0667","slug":"lightning-bolts","title":"Basis of Lightning Technology: the public protocol specifications","authors":"Lightning protocol authors","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Lightning protocol authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/lightning/bolts","source_label":"Lightning BOLTs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/lightning/bolts","editorial_line":"The BOLTs are the public specification of Lightning: channels, commitments, and routed payments on top of Bitcoin, not a single company's product.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lightning-bolts","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lightning-bolts","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lightning-bolts","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0668","slug":"ark-protocol","title":"Ark: out-of-round payments against a shared Bitcoin transaction","authors":"Ark Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ark Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/arkade-os/arkd","source_label":"Ark daemon repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/arkade-os/arkd","editorial_line":"Ark publishes a way for many users to hold bitcoin in a shared transaction and pay each other without each opening a Lightning channel, by refreshing that shared output on a schedule.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ark-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ark-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ark-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0669","slug":"cashu-ecash","title":"Cashu: Chaumian ecash notes on top of Bitcoin custodians","authors":"Cashu","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Cashu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/cashubtc/nuts","source_label":"Cashu NUTs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/cashubtc/nuts","editorial_line":"Cashu publishes Chaumian ecash: a mint blinds and signs notes, and a bearer proof spends them. The mint is a custodian. The cryptography hides which note is which, not the fact of custody.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cashu-ecash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cashu-ecash","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cashu-ecash","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0670","slug":"fedimint-protocol","title":"Fedimint: federated Chaumian ecash","authors":"Fedimint","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Fedimint","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint","source_label":"Fedimint repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint","editorial_line":"Fedimint publishes Chaumian ecash run by a federation: a threshold of guardians must sign, so custody is a threshold rather than a single mint.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fedimint-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fedimint-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fedimint-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0671","slug":"rgb-protocol","title":"RGB: client-side validated contracts anchored to Bitcoin","authors":"RGB protocol authors","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"RGB protocol authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.rgb.info/","source_label":"RGB documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"RGB publishes contracts whose state is validated by the client, with Bitcoin used as an anchor and a commitment, not as the place the contract state is published.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rgb-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/rgb-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rgb-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0672","slug":"zcash-protocol","title":"Zcash protocol specification","authors":"Electric Coin Company and Zcash contributors","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Electric Coin Company and Zcash contributors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://zips.z.cash/protocol/protocol.pdf","source_label":"Zcash protocol specification","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Zcash protocol specification is the document that defines shielded notes, nullifiers, and the consensus rules around them. It is not the Zerocash paper, and it is not a marketing page.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zcash-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zcash-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zcash-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0673","slug":"zero-to-monero","title":"Zero to Monero: a technical review of the Monero protocol","authors":"Kurt M. Alonso and Koe","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kurt M. Alonso and Koe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://www.getmonero.org/library/Zero-to-Monero-2-0-0.pdf","source_label":"Zero to Monero PDF","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Zero to Monero is a book-length explanation of how Monero's transactions, ring signatures, and confidential amounts fit together. It is not the CryptoNote paper and not a substitute for the source code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zero-to-monero","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zero-to-monero","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zero-to-monero","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0674","slug":"town-crier","title":"Town Crier: an authenticated data feed from HTTPS using trusted hardware","authors":"Fan Zhang, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels and Elaine Shi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Fan Zhang, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/168","source_label":"ePrint 2016/168","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Town Crier proposes a bridge from an HTTPS website to a contract by running the TLS client inside trusted hardware and attesting the bytes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/town-crier","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/town-crier","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/town-crier","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0675","slug":"deco-tls","title":"DECO: proving statements about TLS data without a trusted hardware box","authors":"Fan Zhang, Deepak Maram, Harjasleen Malvai, Steven Goldfeder and Ari Juels","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Fan Zhang, Deepak Maram, Harjasleen Malvai, Steven Goldfeder and Ari Juels","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1025","source_label":"ePrint 2019/1025","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"DECO proposes that a user prove a fact about a TLS session with a website, to a verifier, without putting the session inside trusted hardware.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/deco-tls","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/deco-tls","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/deco-tls","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0676","slug":"privacy-pools","title":"Privacy pools: association-set proofs for compliant withdrawals","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Jacob Illum, Fabian Schär, Ameen Soleimani and others","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Jacob Illum, Fabian Schär, Ameen Soleimani and others","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://ssrn.com/abstract=4563364","source_label":"SSRN 4563364","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The privacy-pools paper proposes that a withdrawal prove membership in an association set that has excluded known bad deposits, so privacy and a blocklist are both explicit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/privacy-pools","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/privacy-pools","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/privacy-pools","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0677","slug":"tornado-cash-design","title":"Tornado Cash: a fixed-denomination mixer proved by a succinct argument","authors":"Tornado Cash developers","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Tornado Cash developers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/tornadocash/tornado-core","source_label":"tornado-core repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/tornadocash/tornado-core","editorial_line":"The tornado-core repository publishes a mixer: a deposit of a fixed denomination is a commitment, and a withdrawal proves knowledge of some unused commitment without saying which.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tornado-cash-design","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tornado-cash-design","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tornado-cash-design","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0678","slug":"railgun-privacy","title":"RAILGUN: shielded balances inside a smart-contract system","authors":"RAILGUN","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"RAILGUN","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://docs.railgun.org/","source_label":"RAILGUN documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"RAILGUN publishes shielded balances for tokens: a user deposits into a private balance and later transacts with proofs, rather than with a single fixed-denomination pool only.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/railgun-privacy","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/railgun-privacy","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/railgun-privacy","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0679","slug":"yearn-v2","title":"Yearn v2: vaults that allocate deposits to strategies","authors":"Yearn","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Yearn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.yearn.fi/","source_label":"Yearn documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Yearn publishes vaults: a deposit token is issued against assets that strategies allocate, and the vault's share price moves with those strategies.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/yearn-v2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/yearn-v2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/yearn-v2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0680","slug":"convex-finance","title":"Convex: a metering layer for Curve gauge weights","authors":"Convex","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Convex","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.convexfinance.com/","source_label":"Convex documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Convex publishes a system that locks governance tokens and meters emissions toward Curve gauges, so depositors can receive incentives without locking the underlying governance token themselves.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/convex-finance","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/convex-finance","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/convex-finance","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0681","slug":"centrifuge-protocol","title":"Centrifuge: pools of real-world assets with tranche tokens","authors":"Centrifuge","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Centrifuge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.centrifuge.io/","source_label":"Centrifuge documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Centrifuge publishes pools that finance assets described off chain, and tranche tokens that take different layers of loss and return.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/centrifuge-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/centrifuge-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/centrifuge-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0682","slug":"maple-finance","title":"Maple: undercollateralised lending pools with delegates","authors":"Maple","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Maple","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.maple.finance/","source_label":"Maple documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Maple publishes lending pools where a delegate originates loans that are not fully collateralised on chain, and lenders hold a claim on that pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/maple-finance","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/maple-finance","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/maple-finance","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0683","slug":"goldfinch-protocol","title":"Goldfinch: backers, liquidity providers, and off-chain borrowers","authors":"Goldfinch","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Goldfinch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.goldfinch.finance/","source_label":"Goldfinch documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Goldfinch publishes a split between backers who assess a borrower and liquidity providers who supply capital to a senior pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/goldfinch-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/goldfinch-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/goldfinch-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0684","slug":"jito-block-engine","title":"Jito: a Solana block engine and tip auction","authors":"Jito Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jito Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.jito.wtf/","source_label":"Jito documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Jito publishes a block engine that runs an off-chain auction for transaction order, paying a tip, beside Solana's leader schedule.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jito-block-engine","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/jito-block-engine","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jito-block-engine","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0685","slug":"marinade-staking","title":"Marinade: a Solana stake pool","authors":"Marinade","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Marinade","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.marinade.finance/","source_label":"Marinade documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Marinade publishes a stake pool that delegates SOL across validators and issues a liquid token as a claim on that delegated stake.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/marinade-staking","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/marinade-staking","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/marinade-staking","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0686","slug":"jupiter-aggregator","title":"Jupiter: a Solana route aggregator","authors":"Jupiter","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Jupiter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.jup.ag/","source_label":"Jupiter docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Jupiter publishes a router that searches Solana venues for a path and settles it in one transaction. The router is not a liquidity pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jupiter-aggregator","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/jupiter-aggregator","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jupiter-aggregator","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0687","slug":"drift-protocol","title":"Drift: a Solana perpetual exchange with a liquidity pool","authors":"Drift Labs","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Drift Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/velocity-exchange/protocol-v2","source_label":"Drift Protocol v2 repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/velocity-exchange/protocol-v2","editorial_line":"Drift publishes perpetuals on Solana, with liquidity from a pool and from limit orders, and with funding payments between longs and shorts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/drift-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/drift-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/drift-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0688","slug":"orca-whirlpools","title":"Whirlpools: concentrated liquidity on Solana","authors":"Orca","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Orca","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.orca.so/","source_label":"Orca documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Whirlpools publish concentrated liquidity: a provider chooses a price range, and the pool uses their capital only inside it, in the Uniswap v3 lineage but as a Solana program.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/orca-whirlpools","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/orca-whirlpools","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/orca-whirlpools","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0689","slug":"raydium-amm","title":"Raydium: an AMM and an order-book hybrid on Solana","authors":"Raydium","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Raydium","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.raydium.io/","source_label":"Raydium documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Raydium publishes an automated market maker that can also place resting liquidity into an order book, so a pool and a book share inventory.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raydium-amm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/raydium-amm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raydium-amm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0690","slug":"kamino-finance","title":"Kamino: automated liquidity and lending on Solana","authors":"Kamino","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Kamino","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.kamino.finance/","source_label":"Kamino documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Kamino publishes vaults that manage concentrated-liquidity positions and a lending market beside them. The vault's rebalance rule is the product.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kamino-finance","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kamino-finance","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kamino-finance","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0691","slug":"etherfi-staking","title":"ether.fi: a liquid restaking and staking design with operator separation","authors":"ether.fi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"ether.fi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/etherfi-protocol/smart-contracts","source_label":"ether.fi smart contracts","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/etherfi-protocol/smart-contracts","editorial_line":"ether.fi publishes a flow where a staker receives a liquid claim and an operator runs the validator, with the docs drawing a line between who holds which key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/etherfi-staking","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/etherfi-staking","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/etherfi-staking","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0692","slug":"puffer-protocol","title":"Puffer: Ethereum validators with anti-slashing claims","authors":"Puffer","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Puffer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.puffer.fi/","source_label":"Puffer documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Puffer publishes a liquid staking design that adds a rule about how validators are run, including a claim that some slashing conditions are reduced by the protocol's constraints.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/puffer-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/puffer-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/puffer-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0693","slug":"celo-ultragreen","title":"Celo: a proof-of-stake payments chain","authors":"Celo","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Celo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.celo.org/learn/celo","source_label":"Celo protocol docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Celo publishes a proof-of-stake payments chain with a stable-value token as an application, not as the consensus itself.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/celo-ultragreen","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/celo-ultragreen","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/celo-ultragreen","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0694","slug":"nervos-ckb","title":"Nervos CKB: a cell model generalisation of the UTXO","authors":"Nervos","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Nervos","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/nervosnetwork/rfcs/blob/master/rfcs/0002-ckb/0002-ckb.md","source_label":"CKB RFC 0002","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/nervosnetwork/rfcs","editorial_line":"Nervos CKB generalises Bitcoin's UTXO into a cell: a piece of state with capacity, a lock script, and a type script. The chain verifies the scripts. It does not embed one global virtual machine as the only rule.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nervos-ckb","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nervos-ckb","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nervos-ckb","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0695","slug":"kaspa-ghostdag","title":"Kaspa: a blockDAG that orders blocks with GHOSTDAG","authors":"Kaspa","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Kaspa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://kaspa.org/","source_label":"Kaspa project documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Kaspa implements a blockDAG ordered by GHOSTDAG, the PHANTOM line of research, so blocks that are not on a single chain can still be partially ordered.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kaspa-ghostdag","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kaspa-ghostdag","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kaspa-ghostdag","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0696","slug":"cometbft-spec","title":"CometBFT: the consensus implementation in the Tendermint line","authors":"CometBFT maintainers","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"CometBFT maintainers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.cometbft.com/","source_label":"CometBFT documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"CometBFT is the software specification of the Tendermint-style consensus many chains run. The 2018 Tendermint paper is the ancestor. This is the implementation's document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cometbft-spec","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cometbft-spec","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cometbft-spec","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0697","slug":"xcm-polkadot","title":"Cross-Consensus Messaging: Polkadot's message format","authors":"Parity and Web3 Foundation","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Parity and Web3 Foundation","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.polkadot.com/","source_label":"Polkadot XCM documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"XCM is a message format between consensus systems in the Polkadot line. It is not a bridge to Ethereum, and it is not the Polkadot white paper's security argument restated.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/xcm-polkadot","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/xcm-polkadot","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/xcm-polkadot","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0698","slug":"nightshade-near","title":"Nightshade: NEAR's sharding design","authors":"NEAR team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"NEAR team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://www.near.org/papers/nightshade","source_label":"Nightshade paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Nightshade is NEAR's sharding design: chunks of a block are produced per shard and a block attests to those chunks, so one validator need not execute every shard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nightshade-near","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nightshade-near","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nightshade-near","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0699","slug":"sui-move","title":"Sui Move: objects, not accounts, as the programming model","authors":"Mysten Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mysten Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.sui.io/","source_label":"Sui Move documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Sui's Move dialect publishes objects with owners and IDs. A transaction that touches only owned objects need not take a total order with every other transaction, under the docs' rules.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sui-move","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sui-move","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sui-move","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0700","slug":"move-language","title":"Move: a language with resources that cannot be copied","authors":"Sam Blackshear and the Move team","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Sam Blackshear and the Move team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/move-language/move","source_label":"Move language repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/move-language/move","editorial_line":"Move publishes resources: values that the type system is supposed to stop you copying or discarding silently, aimed at assets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/move-language","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/move-language","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/move-language","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0701","slug":"deepbook-sui","title":"DeepBook: a central limit order book as a Sui shared object","authors":"Mysten Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mysten Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.sui.io/onchain-finance/deepbook","source_label":"DeepBook documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"DeepBook publishes an order book implemented as shared objects on Sui, so matching is a chain transaction rather than a private server.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/deepbook-sui","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/deepbook-sui","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/deepbook-sui","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0702","slug":"walrus-storage","title":"Walrus: blob storage with a committee, published beside Sui","authors":"Mysten Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Mysten Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://docs.wal.app/","source_label":"Walrus documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Walrus publishes blob storage where a committee encodes and holds blobs, and Sui records the availability certificate rather than the blob.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/walrus-storage","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/walrus-storage","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/walrus-storage","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0703","slug":"ethereum-consensus-specs","title":"Ethereum proof-of-stake consensus specifications","authors":"Ethereum consensus-spec contributors","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ethereum consensus-spec contributors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs","source_label":"ethereum/consensus-specs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs","editorial_line":"The consensus-specs repository is the document set that defines the beacon chain, fork choice, and validator duties. Gasper is the research name. This repository is the specification.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ethereum-consensus-specs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum-consensus-specs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ethereum-consensus-specs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0704","slug":"flashbots-mev-boost","title":"MEV-Boost: a proposer and builder marketplace for Ethereum blocks","authors":"Flashbots","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Flashbots","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost","source_label":"flashbots/mev-boost","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/flashbots/mev-boost","editorial_line":"MEV-Boost publishes a sidecar that lets a proposer accept a builder's block header and reveal the body only after committing, so the proposer need not build the block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flashbots-mev-boost","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flashbots-mev-boost","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flashbots-mev-boost","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0705","slug":"suave-architecture","title":"SUAVE: a separate chain for preferences and block building","authors":"Flashbots","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Flashbots","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://writings.flashbots.net/the-future-of-mev-is-suave/","source_label":"Flashbots SUAVE essay","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"SUAVE proposes a chain where users send preferences and builders compute on them, so order flow is not handed to a single relay by default.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/suave-architecture","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/suave-architecture","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/suave-architecture","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0706","slug":"cosmos-sdk","title":"The Cosmos SDK: an application framework on CometBFT","authors":"Interchain contributors","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Interchain contributors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.cosmos.network/","source_label":"Cosmos SDK documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Cosmos SDK is the application framework that turns a state machine into a chain on top of CometBFT-style consensus. The Cosmos white paper is the interchain thesis. This is the framework.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cosmos-sdk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cosmos-sdk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cosmos-sdk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0707","slug":"solana-core-docs","title":"Solana cluster and consensus documentation","authors":"Solana Labs and Anza","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Solana Labs and Anza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.anza.xyz/","source_label":"Anza validator documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Solana white paper describes proof of history and the architecture. The cluster documentation is the operational consensus text: tower votes, forks, and how a leader schedule is supposed to behave.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/solana-core-docs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/solana-core-docs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/solana-core-docs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0708","slug":"firedancer-client","title":"Firedancer: an independent Solana validator client","authors":"Jump Crypto","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Jump Crypto","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/firedancer-io/firedancer","source_label":"firedancer repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/firedancer-io/firedancer","editorial_line":"Firedancer publishes an independent Solana validator implementation. A second client is a diversity bet. It is not a new consensus protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/firedancer-client","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/firedancer-client","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/firedancer-client","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0709","slug":"chainflip-protocol","title":"Chainflip: a threshold-custody cross-chain AMM","authors":"Chainflip Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chainflip Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.chainflip.io/","source_label":"Chainflip documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Chainflip publishes an AMM whose inventories are native assets on their own chains, held by a threshold of validators, rather than wrapped tokens on one ledger.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainflip-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainflip-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainflip-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0710","slug":"compound-v3","title":"Compound III: a single-borrow-asset market","authors":"Compound Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Compound Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.compound.finance/","source_label":"Compound documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Compound III, as documented, is a market with one borrow asset and many collateral assets, rather than the cross-borrow matrix of the earlier white paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compound-v3","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/compound-v3","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compound-v3","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0711","slug":"liquity-v2","title":"Liquity V2: user-set rates and batched liquidations","authors":"Liquity","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Liquity","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.liquity.org/","source_label":"Liquity documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Liquity V2 documents a collateralised debt position where the borrower sets an interest rate and competes for redemption ordering, rather than paying one protocol-wide fee.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/liquity-v2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/liquity-v2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/liquity-v2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0712","slug":"reflexer-rai","title":"RAI: a reflex index governed by a controller, not a dollar peg","authors":"Reflexer","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Reflexer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.reflexer.finance/","source_label":"Reflexer documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"RAI publishes a collateralised token whose target price is set by a controller that reacts to market deviation, rather than by a promise to redeem for one dollar.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/reflexer-rai","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/reflexer-rai","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/reflexer-rai","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0713","slug":"enshrined-pbs-note","title":"An out-of-protocol block market beside Ethereum consensus","authors":"Flashbots and Ethereum researchers","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Flashbots and Ethereum researchers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/proposer-block-builder-separation-friendly-fee-market-designs/9725","source_label":"ethresear.ch PBS note","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The proposer-builder separation note argues that the party who orders transactions inside a block need not be the party who proposes the block to consensus.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/enshrined-pbs-note","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/enshrined-pbs-note","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/enshrined-pbs-note","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0714","slug":"lasso-lookups","title":"Lasso: lookup arguments for large tables","authors":"Srinath Setty, Justin Thaler and Riad Wahby","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Srinath Setty, Justin Thaler and Riad Wahby","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1752","source_label":"ePrint 2022/1752","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Lasso proposes lookup arguments that stay cheap even when the table is far larger than the number of lookups, which is the regime a virtual machine needs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lasso-lookups","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lasso-lookups","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lasso-lookups","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0715","slug":"redshift-proofs","title":"Redshift: a transparent SNARK with a universal setup","authors":"Assimakis Kattis, Konstantin Panarin and Alexander Vlasov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Assimakis Kattis, Konstantin Panarin and Alexander Vlasov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1400","source_label":"ePrint 2019/1400","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Redshift proposes a SNARK with a universal and updatable setup, in the transparent-setup line, aimed at proving general circuits without a fresh ceremony per circuit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/redshift-proofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/redshift-proofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/redshift-proofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0716","slug":"iota-coordicide","title":"Coordicide: removing the IOTA coordinator","authors":"IOTA Foundation","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"IOTA Foundation","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://files.iota.org/papers/Coordicide_WP.pdf","source_label":"Coordicide white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Coordicide proposes a consensus for the IOTA tangle that does not depend on a coordinator node. The historic tangle paper is the earlier design. This is the removal plan.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/iota-coordicide","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/iota-coordicide","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/iota-coordicide","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0717","slug":"chia-consensus","title":"Chia: proofs of space and time as a consensus","authors":"Bram Cohen and the Chia Network","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Bram Cohen and the Chia Network","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.chia.net/chia-blockchain/consensus/consensus-intro","source_label":"Chia consensus introduction","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Chia publishes consensus from proofs of space, checked across time, so farmers allocate disk rather than continuous hash power.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chia-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chia-consensus","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chia-consensus","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0718","slug":"threshold-tbtc","title":"tBTC: bitcoin custody by a signer set with a redemption flow","authors":"Threshold Network","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Threshold Network","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.threshold.network/","source_label":"Threshold documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"tBTC publishes a redemption path from a token back to bitcoin, with custody held by a signer set, rather than by a single custodian's published IOU.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/threshold-tbtc","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/threshold-tbtc","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/threshold-tbtc","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0719","slug":"connext-amarok","title":"Connext Amarok: modular cross-chain transfers","authors":"Connext","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Connext","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.connext.network/","source_label":"Connext documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Connext publishes cross-chain transfers where liquidity is fronted on the destination and repaid when the origin message is authenticated by the messaging layer the docs select.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/connext-amarok","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/connext-amarok","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/connext-amarok","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0720","slug":"stargate-finance","title":"Stargate: unified liquidity pools for cross-chain transfers","authors":"Stargate","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Stargate","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://stargateprotocol.gitbook.io/stargate","source_label":"Stargate docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Stargate publishes pools of a shared asset on several chains, so a transfer debits one pool and credits another, with a messaging layer underneath.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stargate-finance","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stargate-finance","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stargate-finance","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0721","slug":"lens-protocol","title":"Lens: on-chain social graph profiles","authors":"Aave","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Aave","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/lens-protocol/lens-v3","source_label":"Lens Protocol V3 repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/lens-protocol/lens-v3","editorial_line":"Lens publishes profiles and follow relationships as on-chain records, with content pointers rather than a requirement that every post's bytes live in contract storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lens-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lens-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lens-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0722","slug":"gelato-automate","title":"Gelato: a network of executors for contract tasks","authors":"Gelato","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Gelato","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/gelatodigital/automate","source_label":"Gelato Automate repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/gelatodigital/automate","editorial_line":"Gelato publishes executors who call a contract when a condition is met, so a user does not have to send the transaction that finishes their own intent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gelato-automate","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gelato-automate","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gelato-automate","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0723","slug":"keep3r-network","title":"Keep3r: a registry of jobs and keepers","authors":"Andre Cronje and contributors","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Andre Cronje and contributors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.keep3r.network/","source_label":"Keep3r documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Keep3r publishes a registry where jobs pay keepers to call them. The registry is a labour market for transactions, not a security layer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/keep3r-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/keep3r-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/keep3r-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0724","slug":"band-protocol","title":"Band: an oracle script executed by a validator set","authors":"Band Protocol","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Band Protocol","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.bandchain.org/","source_label":"BandChain documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Band publishes oracle scripts: a request is executed by Band's validator set, and the result is signed back to the consumer chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/band-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/band-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/band-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0725","slug":"akash-network","title":"Akash: a marketplace for compute leases","authors":"Akash","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Akash","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://docs.akash.network/","source_label":"Akash documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Akash publishes a marketplace where providers bid on deployment leases and a tenant pays for compute. The lease is the product. Verification of the workload is a separate, harder claim.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/akash-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/akash-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/akash-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0726","slug":"render-network","title":"Render: a marketplace for rendering jobs","authors":"Render Network","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Render Network","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://know.rendernetwork.com/","source_label":"Render knowledge base","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"The Render Network publishes a marketplace where node operators perform rendering jobs and a proof-of-render, as the docs define it, is how a job is accepted.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/render-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/render-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/render-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0727","slug":"ionet-network","title":"io.net: a network of GPU suppliers","authors":"io.net","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"io.net","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://io.net/docs/guides/getting-started","source_label":"io.net documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"io.net publishes a network that aggregates GPU suppliers for compute jobs. The design question is who checks that a GPU did the work.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ionet-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ionet-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ionet-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0728","slug":"ritual-symphony","title":"Symphony: execution-aware consensus and proposer disaggregation","authors":"Ritual","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Ritual","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://whitepaper.ritualfoundation.org/Ritual-WP.pdf","source_label":"Symphony, Ritual, 20 April 2026","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Symphony argues that ordinary consensus assumes execution is cheap and deterministic, and that this fails when a transaction is expensive or random. It proposes to split a proposer's control of a block into separate checks, and to accept a proof of delegated work instead of asking every validator to re-run it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ritual-symphony","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ritual-symphony","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ritual-symphony","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0729","slug":"subsquid-network","title":"SQD: a decentralised query network for chain data","authors":"Subsquid","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Subsquid","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://docs.sqd.dev/en/home","source_label":"SQD documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"SQD publishes a network that stores and serves chain data to indexers, so a query does not have to hit a full node for every read.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/subsquid-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/subsquid-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/subsquid-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0730","slug":"base-op-stack","title":"Base: an OP Stack rollup operated as a product","authors":"Coinbase","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Coinbase","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.base.org/get-started/base","source_label":"Base documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Base publishes itself as an OP Stack chain with an operator. The fault-proof and bridge rules are the OP Stack's, plus whatever operator role Base's own docs add.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/base-op-stack","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/base-op-stack","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/base-op-stack","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0731","slug":"polygon-zkevm","title":"Polygon zkEVM: a validity rollup in the zkEVM family","authors":"Polygon Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Polygon Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/0xPolygon/zkevm-node","source_label":"Polygon zkEVM node repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/0xPolygon/zkevm-node","editorial_line":"Polygon zkEVM publishes a validity rollup aimed at Ethereum-like execution, with a prover stack the docs distinguish from Polygon's earlier proof-of-stake chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polygon-zkevm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/polygon-zkevm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polygon-zkevm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0732","slug":"superstate-funds","title":"Superstate: tokenised fund shares with transfer restrictions","authors":"Superstate","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Superstate","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.superstate.com/","source_label":"Superstate documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Superstate publishes fund shares as tokens with transfer restrictions, so the chain records a register the fund's documents still control.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/superstate-funds","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/superstate-funds","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/superstate-funds","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0733","slug":"usual-protocol","title":"Usual: a stablecoin claim backed by treasury-style collateral, as the docs describe","authors":"Usual","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Usual","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.usual.money/","source_label":"Usual documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Usual publishes a dollar token whose docs say the backing is short-dated sovereign collateral, with a separate governance token. The collateral type is the claim. The yield is not restated here.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/usual-protocol","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/usual-protocol","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/usual-protocol","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0734","slug":"meteora-dlmm","title":"Meteora DLMM: discrete liquidity on Solana","authors":"Meteora","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Meteora","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.meteora.ag/get-started","source_label":"Meteora documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Meteora's DLMM publishes liquidity in discrete bins, so a provider chooses bins instead of a continuous range, and the pool price moves bin by bin.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/meteora-dlmm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/meteora-dlmm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/meteora-dlmm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0735","slug":"sanctum-lsts","title":"Sanctum: a liquidity layer for Solana stake tokens","authors":"Sanctum","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Sanctum","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://learn.sanctum.so/","source_label":"Sanctum documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Sanctum publishes a liquidity layer so stake-pool tokens can be swapped or used without each waiting out Solana deactivation on its own.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sanctum-lsts","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sanctum-lsts","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sanctum-lsts","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0736","slug":"swell-network","title":"Swell: a liquid staking and restaking token","authors":"Swell","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Swell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.swellnetwork.io/","source_label":"Swell documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Swell publishes a liquid staking token and, in later docs, a restaking path. The token is a claim on the validators and on any restaking assignment the docs add.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/swell-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/swell-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/swell-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0737","slug":"kelp-dao","title":"Kelp: a liquid restaking token","authors":"Kelp","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Kelp","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://kerneldao.gitbook.io/kernel/","source_label":"Kelp and Kernel documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Kelp publishes a liquid token that represents a restaked position, so the holder has a claim on assets that are already subject to a restaking slashing condition.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kelp-dao","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kelp-dao","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kelp-dao","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0738","slug":"karak-restaking","title":"Karak: restaking with a catalogue of services","authors":"Karak","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Karak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-karak/blob/main/README-protocol.md","source_label":"Karak protocol readme, public audit copy","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-karak","editorial_line":"Karak publishes a restaking catalogue: assets can be assigned to services that define slashing, in the same family of ideas as other shared-security markets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/karak-restaking","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/karak-restaking","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/karak-restaking","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0739","slug":"noble-usdc","title":"Noble: an issuance chain for native assets in the Cosmos line","authors":"Noble","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Noble","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://docs.noble.xyz/","source_label":"Noble documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Noble publishes a chain whose role is to issue native assets, such as a Circle-related USDC, into the IBC network, so the asset is minted there rather than wrapped by an unnamed bridge.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/noble-usdc","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/noble-usdc","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/noble-usdc","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0740","slug":"injective-exchange","title":"Injective: an on-chain order-book exchange module","authors":"Injective Labs","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Injective Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.injective.network/","source_label":"Injective documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Injective publishes an exchange module: an order book in the chain's state machine, so a trade is a consensus transition rather than a contract call on a general virtual machine only.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/injective-exchange","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/injective-exchange","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/injective-exchange","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0741","slug":"osmosis-amm","title":"Osmosis: an AMM as a chain, with governance over pools","authors":"Osmosis Labs","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Osmosis Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.osmosis.zone/","source_label":"Osmosis documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Osmosis publishes an AMM where pools are first-class state and governance can set which pools exist and how fees work, on a chain in the Cosmos line.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/osmosis-amm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/osmosis-amm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/osmosis-amm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0742","slug":"movement-move","title":"Movement: a Move execution environment that settles elsewhere","authors":"Movement Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Movement Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.movementnetwork.xyz/","source_label":"Movement documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Movement publishes a Move execution environment that can settle to another chain, so the Move state machine and the settlement proof are separate objects.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/movement-move","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/movement-move","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/movement-move","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0743","slug":"astro-sequencer","title":"Astria: a shared sequencer for rollups","authors":"Astria","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Astria","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.astria.org/","source_label":"Astria documentation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"Astria publishes a shared sequencer that rollups can treat as their order source, with the rollup still responsible for execution and settlement.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/astro-sequencer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/astro-sequencer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/astro-sequencer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0744","slug":"tlsnotary","title":"TLSNotary: notarising a TLS session","authors":"TLSNotary contributors","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"TLSNotary contributors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://tlsnotary.org/","source_label":"TLSNotary","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":null,"editorial_line":"TLSNotary publishes a way to split a TLS session so a notary can attest that a server sent some bytes, without the notary seeing every byte and without trusted hardware.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tlsnotary","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tlsnotary","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tlsnotary","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0745","slug":"sovereign-sdk","title":"Sovereign SDK: a toolkit for rollups with replaceable DA and proof","authors":"Sovereign Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Sovereign Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/Sovereign-Labs/sovereign-sdk","source_label":"Sovereign SDK repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/Sovereign-Labs/sovereign-sdk","editorial_line":"The Sovereign SDK publishes a toolkit for building a rollup whose data-availability layer and proof system are modules, not a single chain's hard-wired choice.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sovereign-sdk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sovereign-sdk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sovereign-sdk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0746","slug":"erc-1056","title":"Ethereum Lightweight Identity","authors":"Pelle Braendgaard, Joel Torstensson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Pelle Braendgaard, Joel Torstensson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1056.md","source_label":"ERC 1056","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1056.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1056.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1056 (Ethereum Lightweight Identity). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1056","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1056","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1056","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0747","slug":"erc-1062","title":"Formalize IPFS hash into ENS(Ethereum Name Service) resolver","authors":"Phyrex Tsai, Portal Network Team","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Phyrex Tsai, Portal Network Team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1062.md","source_label":"ERC 1062","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1062.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1062.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1062 (Formalize IPFS hash into ENS(Ethereum Name Service) resolver). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1062","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1062","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1062","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0748","slug":"erc-1066","title":"Status Codes","authors":"Brooklyn Zelenka, Tom Carchrae, Gleb Naumenko","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Brooklyn Zelenka, Tom Carchrae, Gleb Naumenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1066.md","source_label":"ERC 1066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1066.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1066.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1066 (Status Codes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0749","slug":"erc-1077","title":"Gas relay for contract calls","authors":"Alex Van de Sande, Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alex Van de Sande, Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1077.md","source_label":"ERC 1077","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1077.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1077.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1077 (Gas relay for contract calls). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1077","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1077","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1077","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0750","slug":"erc-1078","title":"Universal login / signup using ENS subdomains","authors":"Alex Van de Sande","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alex Van de Sande","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1078.md","source_label":"ERC 1078","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1078.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1078.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1078 (Universal login / signup using ENS subdomains). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1078","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1078","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1078","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0751","slug":"erc-1080","title":"Recoverable Token","authors":"Bradley Leatherwood","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Bradley Leatherwood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1080.md","source_label":"ERC 1080","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1080.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1080.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1080 (Recoverable Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1080","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1080","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1080","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0752","slug":"erc-1081","title":"Standard Bounties","authors":"Mark Beylin, Kevin Owocki, Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Mark Beylin, Kevin Owocki, Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1081.md","source_label":"ERC 1081","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1081.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1081.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1081 (Standard Bounties). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1081","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1081","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1081","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0753","slug":"erc-1123","title":"Revised Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard","authors":"g. nicholas d’andrea, Piper Merriam, Nick Gheorghita, Danny Ryan","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"g. nicholas d’andrea, Piper Merriam, Nick Gheorghita, Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1123.md","source_label":"ERC 1123","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1123.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1123.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1123 (Revised Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1123","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1123","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1123","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0754","slug":"erc-1129","title":"Standardised DAPP announcements","authors":"Jan Turk","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1129.md","source_label":"ERC 1129","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1129.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1129.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1129 (Standardised DAPP announcements). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1129","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1129","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1129","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0755","slug":"erc-1132","title":"Extending ERC20 with token locking capability","authors":"nitika-goel","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"nitika-goel","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1132.md","source_label":"ERC 1132","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1132.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1132.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1132 (Extending ERC20 with token locking capability). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1132","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1132","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1132","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0756","slug":"erc-1154","title":"Oracle Interface","authors":"Alan Lu","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alan Lu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1154.md","source_label":"ERC 1154","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1154.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1154.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1154 (Oracle Interface). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1154","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1154","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1154","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0757","slug":"erc-1175","title":"Wallet & shop standard for all tokens (erc20)","authors":"Jet Lim","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jet Lim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1175.md","source_label":"ERC 1175","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1175.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1175.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1175 (Wallet & shop standard for all tokens (erc20)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1175","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1175","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1175","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0758","slug":"erc-1178","title":"Multi-class Token Standard","authors":"Albert Chon","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Albert Chon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1178.md","source_label":"ERC 1178","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1178.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1178.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1178 (Multi-class Token Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1178","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1178","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1178","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0759","slug":"erc-1185","title":"Storage of DNS Records in ENS","authors":"Jim McDonald","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jim McDonald","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1185.md","source_label":"ERC 1185","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1185.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1185.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1185 (Storage of DNS Records in ENS). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1185","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1185","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1185","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0760","slug":"erc-1191","title":"Add chain id to mixed-case checksum address encoding","authors":"Juliano Rizzo","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Juliano Rizzo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1191.md","source_label":"ERC 1191","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1191.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1191.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1191 (Add chain id to mixed-case checksum address encoding). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1191","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1191","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1191","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0761","slug":"erc-1202","title":"Voting Interface","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou, ERC-1202 Working Group","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou, ERC-1202 Working Group","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1202.md","source_label":"ERC 1202","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1202.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1202.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1202 (Voting Interface). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1202","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1202","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1202","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0762","slug":"erc-1203","title":"ERC-1203 Multi-Class Token Standard (ERC-20 Extension)","authors":"Jeff Huang, Min Zu","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jeff Huang, Min Zu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1203.md","source_label":"ERC 1203","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1203.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1203.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1203 (ERC-1203 Multi-Class Token Standard (ERC-20 Extension)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1203","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1203","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1203","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0763","slug":"erc-1207","title":"DAuth Access Delegation Standard","authors":"Xiaoyu Wang, Bicong Wang","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Xiaoyu Wang, Bicong Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1207.md","source_label":"ERC 1207","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1207.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1207.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1207 (DAuth Access Delegation Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1207","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1207","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1207","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0764","slug":"erc-1261","title":"Membership Verification Token (MVT)","authors":"Chaitanya Potti, Partha Bhattacharya","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Chaitanya Potti, Partha Bhattacharya","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1261.md","source_label":"ERC 1261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1261.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1261.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1261 (Membership Verification Token (MVT)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1261","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1261","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1261","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0765","slug":"erc-1319","title":"Smart Contract Package Registry Interface","authors":"Piper Merriam, Christopher Gewecke, g. nicholas d'andrea, Nick Gheorghita","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Piper Merriam, Christopher Gewecke, g. nicholas d'andrea, Nick Gheorghita","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1319.md","source_label":"ERC 1319","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1319.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1319.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1319 (Smart Contract Package Registry Interface). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1319","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1319","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1319","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0766","slug":"erc-1337","title":"Subscriptions on the blockchain","authors":"Kevin Owocki, Andrew Redden, Scott Burke, Kevin Seagraves, Luka Kacil, Štefan Šimec, Piotr Kosiński, ankit raj, John Griffin, Nathan Creswell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Kevin Owocki, Andrew Redden, Scott Burke, Kevin Seagraves, Luka Kacil, Štefan Šimec, Piotr Kosiński, ankit raj, John Griffin, Nathan Creswell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1337.md","source_label":"ERC 1337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1337.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1337.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1337 (Subscriptions on the blockchain). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0767","slug":"erc-137","title":"Ethereum Domain Name Service - Specification","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-137.md","source_label":"ERC 137","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-137.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-137.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 137 (Ethereum Domain Name Service - Specification). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-137","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-137","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-137","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0768","slug":"erc-1386","title":"Attestation management contract","authors":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1386.md","source_label":"ERC 1386","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1386.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1386.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1386 (Attestation management contract). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1386","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1386","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1386","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0769","slug":"erc-1387","title":"Merkle Tree Attestations with Privacy enabled","authors":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1387.md","source_label":"ERC 1387","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1387.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1387.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1387 (Merkle Tree Attestations with Privacy enabled). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1387","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1387","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1387","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0770","slug":"erc-1388","title":"Attestation Issuers Management List","authors":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1388.md","source_label":"ERC 1388","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1388.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1388.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1388 (Attestation Issuers Management List). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1388","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1388","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1388","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0771","slug":"erc-1417","title":"Poll Standard","authors":"Chaitanya Potti, Partha Bhattacharya","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Chaitanya Potti, Partha Bhattacharya","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1417.md","source_label":"ERC 1417","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1417.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1417.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1417 (Poll Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1417","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1417","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1417","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0772","slug":"erc-1438","title":"dApp Components (avatar) & Universal Wallet","authors":"Jet Lim","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jet Lim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1438.md","source_label":"ERC 1438","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1438.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1438.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1438 (dApp Components (avatar) & Universal Wallet). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1438","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1438","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1438","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0773","slug":"erc-1444","title":"Localized Messaging with Signal-to-Text","authors":"Brooklyn Zelenka, Jennifer Cooper","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Brooklyn Zelenka, Jennifer Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1444.md","source_label":"ERC 1444","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1444.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1444.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1444 (Localized Messaging with Signal-to-Text). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1444","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1444","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1444","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0774","slug":"erc-1462","title":"Base Security Token","authors":"Maxim Kupriianov, Julian Svirsky","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Maxim Kupriianov, Julian Svirsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1462.md","source_label":"ERC 1462","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1462.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1462.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1462 (Base Security Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1462","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1462","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1462","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0775","slug":"erc-1484","title":"Digital Identity Aggregator","authors":"Anurag Angara, Andy Chorlian, Shane Hampton, Noah Zinsmeister","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Anurag Angara, Andy Chorlian, Shane Hampton, Noah Zinsmeister","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1484.md","source_label":"ERC 1484","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1484.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1484.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1484 (Digital Identity Aggregator). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1484","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1484","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1484","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0776","slug":"erc-1491","title":"Human Cost Accounting Standard (Like Gas but for humans)","authors":"Iamnot Chris","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Iamnot Chris","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1491.md","source_label":"ERC 1491","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1491.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1491.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1491 (Human Cost Accounting Standard (Like Gas but for humans)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1491","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1491","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1491","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0777","slug":"erc-1504","title":"Upgradable Smart Contract","authors":"Kaidong Wu, Chuqiao Ren, Ruthia He, Yun Ma, Xuanzhe Liu","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Kaidong Wu, Chuqiao Ren, Ruthia He, Yun Ma, Xuanzhe Liu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1504.md","source_label":"ERC 1504","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1504.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1504.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1504 (Upgradable Smart Contract). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1504","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1504","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1504","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0778","slug":"erc-1523","title":"Standard for Insurance Policies as ERC-721 Non Fungible Tokens","authors":"Christoph Mussenbrock","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christoph Mussenbrock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1523.md","source_label":"ERC 1523","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1523.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1523.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1523 (Standard for Insurance Policies as ERC-721 Non Fungible Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1523","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1523","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1523","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0779","slug":"erc-1538","title":"Transparent Contract Standard","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1538.md","source_label":"ERC 1538","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1538.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1538.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1538 (Transparent Contract Standard). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1538","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1538","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1538","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0780","slug":"erc-1577","title":"contenthash field for ENS","authors":"Dean Eigenmann, Nick Johnson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dean Eigenmann, Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1577.md","source_label":"ERC 1577","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1577.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1577.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1577 (contenthash field for ENS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1577","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1577","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1577","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0781","slug":"erc-1581","title":"Non-wallet usage of keys derived from BIP-32 trees","authors":"Michele Balistreri","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Michele Balistreri","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1581.md","source_label":"ERC 1581","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1581.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1581.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1581 (Non-wallet usage of keys derived from BIP-32 trees). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1581","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1581","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1581","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0782","slug":"erc-1592","title":"Address and ERC20-compliant transfer rules","authors":"Cyril Lapinte, Laurent Aapro","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Cyril Lapinte, Laurent Aapro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1592.md","source_label":"ERC 1592","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1592.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1592.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1592 (Address and ERC20-compliant transfer rules). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1592","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1592","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1592","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0783","slug":"erc-1613","title":"Gas stations network","authors":"Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1613.md","source_label":"ERC 1613","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1613.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1613.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1613 (Gas stations network). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1613","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1613","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1613","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0784","slug":"erc-1616","title":"Attribute Registry Standard","authors":"0age, Santiago Palladino, Leo Arias, Alejo Salles, Stephane Gosselin","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"0age, Santiago Palladino, Leo Arias, Alejo Salles, Stephane Gosselin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1616.md","source_label":"ERC 1616","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1616.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1616.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1616 (Attribute Registry Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1616","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1616","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1616","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0785","slug":"erc-1620","title":"Money Streaming","authors":"Paul Berg","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Paul Berg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1620.md","source_label":"ERC 1620","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1620.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1620.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1620 (Money Streaming). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1620","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1620","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1620","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0786","slug":"erc-1633","title":"Re-Fungible Token Standard (RFT)","authors":"Billy Rennekamp, Dan Long, Kiryl Yermakou, Nate van der Ende","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Billy Rennekamp, Dan Long, Kiryl Yermakou, Nate van der Ende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1633.md","source_label":"ERC 1633","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1633.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1633.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1633 (Re-Fungible Token Standard (RFT)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1633","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1633","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1633","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0787","slug":"erc-1710","title":"URL Format for Web3 Browsers","authors":"Bruno Barbieri","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Bruno Barbieri","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1710.md","source_label":"ERC 1710","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1710.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1710.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1710 (URL Format for Web3 Browsers). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1710","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1710","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1710","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0788","slug":"erc-1753","title":"Smart Contract Interface for Licences","authors":"Lucas Cullen, Kai Yeung, Anna Crowley, Caroline Marshall, Katrina Donaghy","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Lucas Cullen, Kai Yeung, Anna Crowley, Caroline Marshall, Katrina Donaghy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1753.md","source_label":"ERC 1753","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1753.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1753.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1753 (Smart Contract Interface for Licences). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1753","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1753","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1753","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0789","slug":"erc-1761","title":"Scoped Approval Interface","authors":"Witek Radomski, Andrew Cooke, James Therien, Eric Binet","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Witek Radomski, Andrew Cooke, James Therien, Eric Binet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1761.md","source_label":"ERC 1761","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1761.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1761.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1761 (Scoped Approval Interface). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1761","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1761","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1761","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0790","slug":"erc-1775","title":"App Keys, application specific wallet accounts","authors":"Vincent Eli, Dan Finlay","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Vincent Eli, Dan Finlay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1775.md","source_label":"ERC 1775","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1775.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1775.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1775 (App Keys, application specific wallet accounts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1775","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1775","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1775","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0791","slug":"erc-181","title":"ENS support for reverse resolution of Ethereum addresses","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-181.md","source_label":"ERC 181","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-181.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-181.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 181 (ENS support for reverse resolution of Ethereum addresses). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-181","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-181","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-181","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0792","slug":"erc-1812","title":"Ethereum Verifiable Claims","authors":"Pelle Braendgaard","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Pelle Braendgaard","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1812.md","source_label":"ERC 1812","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1812.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1812.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1812 (Ethereum Verifiable Claims). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1812","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1812","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1812","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0793","slug":"erc-1822","title":"Universal Upgradeable Proxy Standard (UUPS)","authors":"Gabriel Barros, Patrick Gallagher","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Gabriel Barros, Patrick Gallagher","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1822.md","source_label":"ERC 1822","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1822.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1822.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1822 (Universal Upgradeable Proxy Standard (UUPS)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1822","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1822","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1822","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0794","slug":"erc-1844","title":"ENS Interface Discovery","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1844.md","source_label":"ERC 1844","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1844.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1844.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1844 (ENS Interface Discovery). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1844","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1844","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1844","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0795","slug":"erc-190","title":"Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard","authors":"Piper Merriam, Tim Coulter, Denis Erfurt, RJ Catalano, Iuri Matias","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Piper Merriam, Tim Coulter, Denis Erfurt, RJ Catalano, Iuri Matias","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-190.md","source_label":"ERC 190","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-190.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-190.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 190 (Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-190","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-190","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-190","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0796","slug":"erc-1900","title":"dType - Decentralized Type System for EVM","authors":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1900.md","source_label":"ERC 1900","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1900.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1900.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1900 (dType - Decentralized Type System for EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1900","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1900","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1900","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0797","slug":"erc-1921","title":"dType Functions Extension","authors":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1921.md","source_label":"ERC 1921","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1921.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1921.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1921 (dType Functions Extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1921","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1921","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1921","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0798","slug":"erc-1922","title":"zk-SNARK Verifier Standard","authors":"Michael Connor, Chaitanya Konda, Duncan Westland","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Michael Connor, Chaitanya Konda, Duncan Westland","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1922.md","source_label":"ERC 1922","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1922.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1922.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1922 (zk-SNARK Verifier Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1922","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1922","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1922","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0799","slug":"erc-1923","title":"zk-SNARK Verifier Registry Standard","authors":"Michael Connor, Chaitanya Konda, Duncan Westland","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Michael Connor, Chaitanya Konda, Duncan Westland","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1923.md","source_label":"ERC 1923","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1923.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1923.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1923 (zk-SNARK Verifier Registry Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1923","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1923","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1923","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0800","slug":"erc-1948","title":"Non-fungible Data Token","authors":"Johann Barbie, Ben Bollen, pinkiebell","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Johann Barbie, Ben Bollen, pinkiebell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1948.md","source_label":"ERC 1948","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1948.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1948.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1948 (Non-fungible Data Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1948","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1948","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1948","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0801","slug":"erc-1973","title":"Scalable Rewards","authors":"Lee Raj, Qin Jian","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Lee Raj, Qin Jian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1973.md","source_label":"ERC 1973","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1973.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1973.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1973 (Scalable Rewards). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1973","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1973","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1973","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0802","slug":"erc-1996","title":"Holdable Token","authors":"Julio Faura, Fernando Paris, Daniel Lehrner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Julio Faura, Fernando Paris, Daniel Lehrner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-1996.md","source_label":"ERC 1996","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-1996.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-1996.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 1996 (Holdable Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1996","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1996","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1996","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0803","slug":"erc-2009","title":"Compliance Service","authors":"Daniel Lehrner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Daniel Lehrner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2009.md","source_label":"ERC 2009","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2009.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2009.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2009 (Compliance Service). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2009","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2009","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2009","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0804","slug":"erc-2018","title":"Clearable Token","authors":"Julio Faura, Fernando Paris, Daniel Lehrner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Julio Faura, Fernando Paris, Daniel Lehrner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2018.md","source_label":"ERC 2018","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2018.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2018.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2018 (Clearable Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2018","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2018","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2018","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0805","slug":"erc-2019","title":"Fundable Token","authors":"Fernando Paris, Julio Faura, Daniel Lehrner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Fernando Paris, Julio Faura, Daniel Lehrner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2019.md","source_label":"ERC 2019","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2019.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2019.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2019 (Fundable Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2019","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2019","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2019","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0806","slug":"erc-2020","title":"E-Money Standard Token","authors":"Julio Faura, Fernando Paris, Daniel Lehrner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Julio Faura, Fernando Paris, Daniel Lehrner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2020.md","source_label":"ERC 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2020.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2020.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2020 (E-Money Standard Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2020","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2020","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2020","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0807","slug":"erc-2021","title":"Payoutable Token","authors":"Fernando Paris, Julio Faura, Daniel Lehrner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Fernando Paris, Julio Faura, Daniel Lehrner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2021.md","source_label":"ERC 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2021.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2021.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2021 (Payoutable Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2021","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2021","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2021","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0808","slug":"erc-205","title":"ENS support for contract ABIs","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-205.md","source_label":"ERC 205","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-205.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-205.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 205 (ENS support for contract ABIs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-205","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-205","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-205","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0809","slug":"erc-2157","title":"dType Storage Extension - Decentralized Type System for EVM","authors":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2157.md","source_label":"ERC 2157","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2157.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2157.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2157 (dType Storage Extension - Decentralized Type System for EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2157","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2157","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2157","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0810","slug":"erc-2193","title":"dType Alias Extension - Decentralized Type System","authors":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Loredana Cirstea, Christian Tzurcanu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2193.md","source_label":"ERC 2193","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2193.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2193.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2193 (dType Alias Extension - Decentralized Type System). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2193","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2193","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2193","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0811","slug":"erc-2266","title":"Atomic Swap-based American Call Option Contract Standard","authors":"Runchao Han, Haoyu Lin, Jiangshan Yu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Runchao Han, Haoyu Lin, Jiangshan Yu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2266.md","source_label":"ERC 2266","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2266.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2266.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2266 (Atomic Swap-based American Call Option Contract Standard). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2266","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2266","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2266","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0812","slug":"erc-2304","title":"Multichain address resolution for ENS","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2304.md","source_label":"ERC 2304","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2304.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2304.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2304 (Multichain address resolution for ENS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2304","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2304","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2304","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0813","slug":"erc-2333","title":"BLS12-381 Key Generation","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2333.md","source_label":"ERC 2333","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2333.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2333.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2333 (BLS12-381 Key Generation). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2333","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2333","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2333","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0814","slug":"erc-2334","title":"BLS12-381 Deterministic Account Hierarchy","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2334.md","source_label":"ERC 2334","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2334.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2334.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2334 (BLS12-381 Deterministic Account Hierarchy). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2334","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2334","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2334","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0815","slug":"erc-2335","title":"BLS12-381 Keystore","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2335.md","source_label":"ERC 2335","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2335.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2335.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2335 (BLS12-381 Keystore). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2335","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2335","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2335","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0816","slug":"erc-2386","title":"Ethereum 2 Hierarchical Deterministic Walletstore","authors":"Jim McDonald","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Jim McDonald","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2386.md","source_label":"ERC 2386","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2386.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2386.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2386 (Ethereum 2 Hierarchical Deterministic Walletstore). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2386","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2386","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2386","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0817","slug":"erc-2390","title":"Geo-ENS","authors":"James Choncholas","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"James Choncholas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2390.md","source_label":"ERC 2390","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2390.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2390.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2390 (Geo-ENS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2390","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2390","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2390","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0818","slug":"erc-2400","title":"Transaction Receipt URI","authors":"Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt, Eric Dvorsak","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt, Eric Dvorsak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2400.md","source_label":"ERC 2400","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2400.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2400.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2400 (Transaction Receipt URI). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2400","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2400","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2400","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0819","slug":"erc-2470","title":"Singleton Factory","authors":"Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2470.md","source_label":"ERC 2470","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2470.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2470.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2470 (Singleton Factory). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2470","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2470","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2470","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0820","slug":"erc-2477","title":"Token Metadata Integrity","authors":"Kristijan Sedlak, William Entriken, Witek Radomski","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kristijan Sedlak, William Entriken, Witek Radomski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2477.md","source_label":"ERC 2477","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2477.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2477.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2477 (Token Metadata Integrity). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2477","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2477","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2477","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0821","slug":"erc-2494","title":"Baby Jubjub Elliptic Curve","authors":"Barry WhiteHat, Marta Bellés, Jordi Baylina","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Barry WhiteHat, Marta Bellés, Jordi Baylina","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2494.md","source_label":"ERC 2494","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2494.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2494.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2494 (Baby Jubjub Elliptic Curve). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2494","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2494","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2494","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0822","slug":"erc-2520","title":"Multiple contenthash records for ENS","authors":"Filip Štamcar","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Filip Štamcar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2520.md","source_label":"ERC 2520","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2520.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2520.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2520 (Multiple contenthash records for ENS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2520","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2520","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2520","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0823","slug":"erc-2525","title":"ENSLogin","authors":"Hadrien Croubois","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2525.md","source_label":"ERC 2525","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2525.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2525.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2525 (ENSLogin). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2525","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2525","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2525","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0824","slug":"erc-2544","title":"ENS Wildcard Resolution","authors":"Nick Johnson, 0age","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Nick Johnson, 0age","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2544.md","source_label":"ERC 2544","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2544.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2544.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2544 (ENS Wildcard Resolution). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2544","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2544","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2544","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0825","slug":"erc-2569","title":"Saving and Displaying Image Onchain for Universal Tokens","authors":"Hua Zhang, Yuefei Tan, Derek Zhou, Ran Xing","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Hua Zhang, Yuefei Tan, Derek Zhou, Ran Xing","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2569.md","source_label":"ERC 2569","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2569.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2569.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2569 (Saving and Displaying Image Onchain for Universal Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2569","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2569","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2569","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0826","slug":"erc-2615","title":"Non-Fungible Token with mortgage and rental functions","authors":"Kohshi Shiba","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kohshi Shiba","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2615.md","source_label":"ERC 2615","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2615.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2615.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2615 (Non-Fungible Token with mortgage and rental functions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2615","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2615","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2615","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0827","slug":"erc-2645","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Wallet for Layer-2","authors":"Tom Brand, Louis Guthmann","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Tom Brand, Louis Guthmann","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2645.md","source_label":"ERC 2645","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2645.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2645.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2645 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallet for Layer-2). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2645","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2645","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2645","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0828","slug":"erc-2680","title":"Ethereum 2 wallet layout","authors":"Jim McDonald","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jim McDonald","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2680.md","source_label":"ERC 2680","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2680.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2680.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2680 (Ethereum 2 wallet layout). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2680","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2680","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2680","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0829","slug":"erc-2746","title":"Rules Engine Standard","authors":"Aaron Kendall, Juan Blanco","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Aaron Kendall, Juan Blanco","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2746.md","source_label":"ERC 2746","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2746.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2746.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2746 (Rules Engine Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2746","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2746","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2746","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0830","slug":"erc-2767","title":"Contract Ownership Governance","authors":"Soham Zemse, Nick Mudge","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Soham Zemse, Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2767.md","source_label":"ERC 2767","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2767.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2767.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2767 (Contract Ownership Governance). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2767","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2767","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2767","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0831","slug":"erc-2770","title":"Meta-Transactions Forwarder Contract","authors":"Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2770.md","source_label":"ERC 2770","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2770.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2770.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2770 (Meta-Transactions Forwarder Contract). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2770","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2770","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2770","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0832","slug":"erc-2848","title":"My Own Messages (MOM)","authors":"Giuseppe Bertone","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Giuseppe Bertone","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2848.md","source_label":"ERC 2848","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2848.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2848.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2848 (My Own Messages (MOM)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2848","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2848","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2848","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0833","slug":"erc-2876","title":"Deposit contract and address standard","authors":"Jonathan Underwood","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jonathan Underwood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2876.md","source_label":"ERC 2876","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2876.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2876.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2876 (Deposit contract and address standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2876","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2876","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2876","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0834","slug":"erc-2917","title":"Staking Reward Calculation","authors":"Tony Carson, Mehmet Sabir Kiraz, Süleyman Kardaş","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Tony Carson, Mehmet Sabir Kiraz, Süleyman Kardaş","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2917.md","source_label":"ERC 2917","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2917.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2917.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2917 (Staking Reward Calculation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2917","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2917","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2917","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0835","slug":"erc-2942","title":"EthPM URI Specification","authors":"Nick Gheorghita, Piper Merriam, g. nicholas d'andrea, Benjamin Hauser","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Nick Gheorghita, Piper Merriam, g. nicholas d'andrea, Benjamin Hauser","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2942.md","source_label":"ERC 2942","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2942.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2942.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2942 (EthPM URI Specification). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2942","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2942","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2942","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0836","slug":"erc-2980","title":"Swiss Compliant Asset Token","authors":"Gianluca Perletti, Alan Scarpellini, Roberto Gorini, Manuel Olivi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Gianluca Perletti, Alan Scarpellini, Roberto Gorini, Manuel Olivi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-2980.md","source_label":"ERC 2980","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-2980.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-2980.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 2980 (Swiss Compliant Asset Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2980","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2980","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2980","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0837","slug":"erc-3000","title":"Optimistic enactment governance standard","authors":"Jorge Izquierdo, Fabien Marino","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jorge Izquierdo, Fabien Marino","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3000.md","source_label":"ERC 3000","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3000.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3000.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3000 (Optimistic enactment governance standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3000","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3000","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3000","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0838","slug":"erc-3005","title":"Batched meta transactions","authors":"Matt","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Matt","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3005.md","source_label":"ERC 3005","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3005.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3005.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3005 (Batched meta transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3005","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3005","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3005","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0839","slug":"erc-3009","title":"Transfer With Authorization","authors":"Peter Jihoon Kim, Kevin Britz, David Knott","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Peter Jihoon Kim, Kevin Britz, David Knott","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3009.md","source_label":"ERC 3009","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3009.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3009.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3009 (Transfer With Authorization). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3009","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3009","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3009","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0840","slug":"erc-3135","title":"Exclusive Claimable Token","authors":"Zhenyu Sun","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Zhenyu Sun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3135.md","source_label":"ERC 3135","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3135.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3135.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3135 (Exclusive Claimable Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3135","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3135","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3135","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0841","slug":"erc-3156","title":"Flash Loans","authors":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3156.md","source_label":"ERC 3156","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3156.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3156.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3156 (Flash Loans). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3156","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3156","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3156","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0842","slug":"erc-3224","title":"Described Data","authors":"Richard Moore, Nick Johnson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Richard Moore, Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3224.md","source_label":"ERC 3224","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3224.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3224.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3224 (Described Data). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3224","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3224","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3224","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0843","slug":"erc-3234","title":"Batch Flash Loans","authors":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3234.md","source_label":"ERC 3234","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3234.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3234.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3234 (Batch Flash Loans). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3234","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3234","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3234","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0844","slug":"erc-3386","title":"ERC-721 and ERC-1155 to ERC-20 Wrapper","authors":"Calvin Koder","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Calvin Koder","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3386.md","source_label":"ERC 3386","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3386.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3386.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3386 (ERC-721 and ERC-1155 to ERC-20 Wrapper). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3386","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3386","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3386","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0845","slug":"erc-3440","title":"ERC-721 Editions Standard","authors":"Nathan Ginnever","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Nathan Ginnever","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3440.md","source_label":"ERC 3440","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3440.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3440.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3440 (ERC-721 Editions Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3440","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3440","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3440","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0846","slug":"erc-3450","title":"Standardized Shamir Secret Sharing Scheme for BIP-39 Mnemonics","authors":"Daniel Streit","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Daniel Streit","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3450.md","source_label":"ERC 3450","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3450.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3450.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3450 (Standardized Shamir Secret Sharing Scheme for BIP-39 Mnemonics). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3450","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3450","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3450","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0847","slug":"erc-3561","title":"Trust Minimized Upgradeability Proxy","authors":"Sam Porter","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Sam Porter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3561.md","source_label":"ERC 3561","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3561.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3561.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3561 (Trust Minimized Upgradeability Proxy). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3561","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3561","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3561","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0848","slug":"erc-3569","title":"Sealed NFT Metadata Standard","authors":"Sean Papanikolas","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Sean Papanikolas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3569.md","source_label":"ERC 3569","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3569.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3569.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3569 (Sealed NFT Metadata Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3569","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3569","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3569","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0849","slug":"erc-3589","title":"Assemble assets into NFTs","authors":"Zhenyu Sun, Xinqi Yang","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Zhenyu Sun, Xinqi Yang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3589.md","source_label":"ERC 3589","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3589.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3589.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3589 (Assemble assets into NFTs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3589","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3589","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3589","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0850","slug":"erc-3722","title":"Poster","authors":"Auryn Macmillan","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Auryn Macmillan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3722.md","source_label":"ERC 3722","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3722.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3722.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3722 (Poster). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3722","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3722","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3722","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0851","slug":"erc-3754","title":"A Vanilla Non-Fungible Token Standard","authors":"Simon Tian","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Simon Tian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3754.md","source_label":"ERC 3754","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3754.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3754.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3754 (A Vanilla Non-Fungible Token Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3754","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3754","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3754","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0852","slug":"erc-3770","title":"Chain-specific addresses","authors":"Lukas Schor, Richard Meissner, Pedro Gomes, ligi","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Lukas Schor, Richard Meissner, Pedro Gomes, ligi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3770.md","source_label":"ERC 3770","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3770.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3770.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3770 (Chain-specific addresses). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3770","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3770","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3770","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0853","slug":"erc-3772","title":"Compressed Integers","authors":"Soham Zemse","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Soham Zemse","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-3772.md","source_label":"ERC 3772","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-3772.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-3772.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 3772 (Compressed Integers). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3772","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3772","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3772","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0854","slug":"erc-4341","title":"Ordered NFT Batch Standard","authors":"Simon Tian","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Simon Tian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4341.md","source_label":"ERC 4341","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4341.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4341.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4341 (Ordered NFT Batch Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4341","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4341","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4341","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0855","slug":"erc-4353","title":"Interface for Staked Tokens in NFTs","authors":"Rex Creed, Dane Scarborough","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Rex Creed, Dane Scarborough","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4353.md","source_label":"ERC 4353","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4353.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4353.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4353 (Interface for Staked Tokens in NFTs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4353","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4353","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4353","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0856","slug":"erc-4393","title":"Micropayments for NFTs and Multi Tokens","authors":"Jules Lai","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Jules Lai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4393.md","source_label":"ERC 4393","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4393.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4393.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4393 (Micropayments for NFTs and Multi Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4393","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4393","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4393","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0857","slug":"erc-4430","title":"Described Transactions","authors":"Richard Moore, Nick Johnson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Richard Moore, Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4430.md","source_label":"ERC 4430","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4430.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4430.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4430 (Described Transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4430","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4430","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4430","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0858","slug":"erc-4494","title":"Permit for ERC-721 NFTs","authors":"Simon Fremaux, William Schwab","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Simon Fremaux, William Schwab","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4494.md","source_label":"ERC 4494","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4494.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4494.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4494 (Permit for ERC-721 NFTs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4494","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4494","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4494","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0859","slug":"erc-4521","title":"721/20-compatible transfer","authors":"Ross Campbell","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ross Campbell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4521.md","source_label":"ERC 4521","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4521.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4521.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4521 (721/20-compatible transfer). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4521","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4521","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4521","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0860","slug":"erc-4524","title":"Safer ERC-20","authors":"William Schwab","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"William Schwab","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4524.md","source_label":"ERC 4524","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4524.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4524.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4524 (Safer ERC-20). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4524","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4524","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4524","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0861","slug":"erc-4527","title":"QR Code transmission protocol for wallets","authors":"Aaron Chen, Sora Lee, ligi, Dan Miller, AndreasGassmann, xardass, Lixin Liu","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Aaron Chen, Sora Lee, ligi, Dan Miller, AndreasGassmann, xardass, Lixin Liu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4527.md","source_label":"ERC 4527","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4527.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4527.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4527 (QR Code transmission protocol for wallets). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4527","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4527","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4527","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0862","slug":"erc-4546","title":"Wrapped Deposits","authors":"Justice Hudson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Justice Hudson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4546.md","source_label":"ERC 4546","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4546.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4546.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4546 (Wrapped Deposits). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4546","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4546","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4546","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0863","slug":"erc-4671","title":"Non-Tradable Tokens Standard","authors":"Omar Aflak, Pol-Malo Le Bris, Marvin Martin","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Omar Aflak, Pol-Malo Le Bris, Marvin Martin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4671.md","source_label":"ERC 4671","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4671.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4671.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4671 (Non-Tradable Tokens Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4671","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4671","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4671","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0864","slug":"erc-4675","title":"Multi-Fractional Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"David Kim","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"David Kim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4675.md","source_label":"ERC 4675","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4675.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4675.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4675 (Multi-Fractional Non-Fungible Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4675","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4675","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4675","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0865","slug":"erc-4799","title":"Non-Fungible Token Ownership Designation Standard","authors":"David Buckman, Isaac Buckman","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"David Buckman, Isaac Buckman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4799.md","source_label":"ERC 4799","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4799.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4799.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4799 (Non-Fungible Token Ownership Designation Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4799","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4799","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4799","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0866","slug":"erc-4824","title":"Common Interfaces for DAOs","authors":"Joshua Tan, Isaac Patka, Ido Gershtein, Eyal Eithcowich, Michael Zargham, Sam Furter","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Joshua Tan, Isaac Patka, Ido Gershtein, Eyal Eithcowich, Michael Zargham, Sam Furter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4824.md","source_label":"ERC 4824","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4824.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4824.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4824 (Common Interfaces for DAOs). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4824","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4824","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4824","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0867","slug":"erc-4883","title":"Composable SVG NFT","authors":"Andrew B Coathup, Alex, Damian Martinelli, blockdev, Austin Griffith","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Andrew B Coathup, Alex, Damian Martinelli, blockdev, Austin Griffith","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4883.md","source_label":"ERC 4883","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4883.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4883.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4883 (Composable SVG NFT). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4883","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4883","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4883","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0868","slug":"erc-4885","title":"Subscription NFTs and Multi Tokens","authors":"Jules Lai","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jules Lai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4885.md","source_label":"ERC 4885","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4885.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4885.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4885 (Subscription NFTs and Multi Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4885","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4885","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4885","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0869","slug":"erc-4886","title":"Proxy Ownership Register","authors":"Omnus Sunmo","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Omnus Sunmo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4886.md","source_label":"ERC 4886","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4886.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4886.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4886 (Proxy Ownership Register). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4886","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4886","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4886","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0870","slug":"erc-4931","title":"Generic Token Upgrade Standard","authors":"John Peterson, Roberto Bayardo, David Núñez","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"John Peterson, Roberto Bayardo, David Núñez","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4931.md","source_label":"ERC 4931","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4931.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4931.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4931 (Generic Token Upgrade Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4931","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4931","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4931","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0871","slug":"erc-4944","title":"Contract with Exactly One Non-fungible Token","authors":"Víctor Muñoz, Josep Lluis de la Rosa, Andres El-Fakdi","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Víctor Muñoz, Josep Lluis de la Rosa, Andres El-Fakdi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4944.md","source_label":"ERC 4944","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4944.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4944.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4944 (Contract with Exactly One Non-fungible Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4944","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4944","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4944","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0872","slug":"erc-4950","title":"Entangled Tokens","authors":"Víctor Muñoz, Josep Lluis de la Rosa, Easy Innova","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Víctor Muñoz, Josep Lluis de la Rosa, Easy Innova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4950.md","source_label":"ERC 4950","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4950.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4950.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4950 (Entangled Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4950","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4950","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4950","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0873","slug":"erc-4972","title":"Name-Owned Account","authors":"Shu Dong, Qi Zhou, Zihao Chen","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Shu Dong, Qi Zhou, Zihao Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4972.md","source_label":"ERC 4972","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4972.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4972.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4972 (Name-Owned Account). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4972","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4972","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4972","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0874","slug":"erc-4973","title":"Account-bound Tokens","authors":"Tim Daubenschütz","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Tim Daubenschütz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4973.md","source_label":"ERC 4973","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4973.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4973.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4973 (Account-bound Tokens). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4973","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4973","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4973","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0875","slug":"erc-4974","title":"Ratings","authors":"Daniel Tedesco","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Daniel Tedesco","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4974.md","source_label":"ERC 4974","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4974.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4974.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4974 (Ratings). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4974","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4974","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4974","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0876","slug":"erc-4987","title":"Held token interface","authors":"Devin Conley","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Devin Conley","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-4987.md","source_label":"ERC 4987","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-4987.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-4987.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 4987 (Held token interface). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4987","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4987","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4987","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0877","slug":"erc-5005","title":"Zodiac Modular Accounts","authors":"Auryn Macmillan, Kei Kreutler","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Auryn Macmillan, Kei Kreutler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5005.md","source_label":"ERC 5005","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5005.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5005.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5005 (Zodiac Modular Accounts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5005","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5005","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5005","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0878","slug":"erc-5008","title":"ERC-721 Nonce Extension","authors":"Anders, Lance, Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders, Lance, Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5008.md","source_label":"ERC 5008","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5008.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5008.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5008 (ERC-721 Nonce Extension). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5008","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5008","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5008","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0879","slug":"erc-5018","title":"Filesystem-like Interface for Contracts","authors":"Qi Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Qi Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5018.md","source_label":"ERC 5018","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5018.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5018.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5018 (Filesystem-like Interface for Contracts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5018","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5018","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5018","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0880","slug":"erc-5050","title":"Interactive NFTs with Modular Environments","authors":"Alexi","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alexi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5050.md","source_label":"ERC 5050","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5050.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5050.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5050 (Interactive NFTs with Modular Environments). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5050","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5050","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5050","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0881","slug":"erc-5058","title":"Lockable Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"Tyler, Alex, John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Tyler, Alex, John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5058.md","source_label":"ERC 5058","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5058.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5058.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5058 (Lockable Non-Fungible Tokens). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5058","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5058","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5058","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0882","slug":"erc-5094","title":"URL Format for Ethereum Network Switching","authors":"Luc van Kampen, Jakob Helgesson, Joshua Hendrix","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Luc van Kampen, Jakob Helgesson, Joshua Hendrix","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5094.md","source_label":"ERC 5094","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5094.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5094.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5094 (URL Format for Ethereum Network Switching). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5094","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5094","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5094","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0883","slug":"erc-5095","title":"Principal Token","authors":"Julian Traversa, Robert Robbins, Alberto Cuesta Cañada","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Julian Traversa, Robert Robbins, Alberto Cuesta Cañada","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5095.md","source_label":"ERC 5095","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5095.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5095.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5095 (Principal Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5095","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5095","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5095","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0884","slug":"erc-5114","title":"Soulbound Badge","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5114.md","source_label":"ERC 5114","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5114.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5114.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5114 (Soulbound Badge). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5114","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5114","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5114","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0885","slug":"erc-5115","title":"SY Token","authors":"Vu Nguyen, Long Vuong, Anton Buenavista","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Vu Nguyen, Long Vuong, Anton Buenavista","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5115.md","source_label":"ERC 5115","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5115.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5115.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5115 (SY Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5115","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5115","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5115","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0886","slug":"erc-5131","title":"SAFE Authentication For ENS","authors":"Wilkins Chung, Jalil Wahdatehagh, Cry, Sillytuna, Cyberpnk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Wilkins Chung, Jalil Wahdatehagh, Cry, Sillytuna, Cyberpnk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5131.md","source_label":"ERC 5131","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5131.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5131.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5131 (SAFE Authentication For ENS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5131","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5131","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5131","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0887","slug":"erc-5139","title":"Remote Procedure Call Provider Lists","authors":"Sam Wilson","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5139.md","source_label":"ERC 5139","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5139.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5139.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5139 (Remote Procedure Call Provider Lists). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5139","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5139","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5139","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0888","slug":"erc-5143","title":"Slippage Protection for Tokenized Vault","authors":"Hadrien Croubois","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5143.md","source_label":"ERC 5143","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5143.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5143.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5143 (Slippage Protection for Tokenized Vault). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5143","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5143","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5143","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0889","slug":"erc-5164","title":"Cross-Chain Execution","authors":"Brendan Asselstine, Pierrick Turelier, Chris Whinfrey","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Brendan Asselstine, Pierrick Turelier, Chris Whinfrey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5164.md","source_label":"ERC 5164","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5164.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5164.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5164 (Cross-Chain Execution). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5164","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5164","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5164","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0890","slug":"erc-5173","title":"NFT Future Rewards (nFR)","authors":"Yale ReiSoleil, dRadiant, D Wang, PhD","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Yale ReiSoleil, dRadiant, D Wang, PhD","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5173.md","source_label":"ERC 5173","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5173.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5173.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5173 (NFT Future Rewards (nFR)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5173","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5173","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5173","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0891","slug":"erc-5185","title":"NFT Updatable Metadata Extension","authors":"Christophe Le Bars","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Christophe Le Bars","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5185.md","source_label":"ERC 5185","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5185.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5185.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5185 (NFT Updatable Metadata Extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5185","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5185","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5185","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0892","slug":"erc-5187","title":"Extend EIP-1155 with rentable usage rights","authors":"DerivStudio","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"DerivStudio","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5187.md","source_label":"ERC 5187","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5187.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5187.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5187 (Extend EIP-1155 with rentable usage rights). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5187","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5187","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5187","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0893","slug":"erc-5189","title":"Account Abstraction via Endorsed Operations","authors":"Agustín Aguilar, Philippe Castonguay, Michael Standen","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Agustín Aguilar, Philippe Castonguay, Michael Standen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5189.md","source_label":"ERC 5189","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5189.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5189.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5189 (Account Abstraction via Endorsed Operations). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5189","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5189","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5189","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0894","slug":"erc-5216","title":"ERC-1155 Allowance Extension","authors":"Iván Mañús, Juan Carlos Cantó","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Iván Mañús, Juan Carlos Cantó","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5216.md","source_label":"ERC 5216","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5216.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5216.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5216 (ERC-1155 Allowance Extension). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5216","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5216","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5216","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0895","slug":"erc-5218","title":"NFT Rights Management","authors":"James Grimmelmann, Yan Ji, Tyler Kell","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"James Grimmelmann, Yan Ji, Tyler Kell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5218.md","source_label":"ERC 5218","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5218.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5218.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5218 (NFT Rights Management). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5218","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5218","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5218","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0896","slug":"erc-5247","title":"Smart Contract Executable Proposal Interface","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5247.md","source_label":"ERC 5247","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5247.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5247.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5247 (Smart Contract Executable Proposal Interface). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5247","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5247","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5247","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0897","slug":"erc-5252","title":"Account-bound Finance","authors":"Hyungsuk Kang, Viktor Pernjek","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Hyungsuk Kang, Viktor Pernjek","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5252.md","source_label":"ERC 5252","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5252.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5252.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5252 (Account-bound Finance). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5252","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5252","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5252","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0898","slug":"erc-5269","title":"ERC Detection and Discovery","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5269.md","source_label":"ERC 5269","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5269.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5269.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5269 (ERC Detection and Discovery). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5269","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5269","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5269","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0899","slug":"erc-5289","title":"Ethereum Notary Interface","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5289.md","source_label":"ERC 5289","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5289.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5289.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5289 (Ethereum Notary Interface). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5289","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5289","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5289","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0900","slug":"erc-5298","title":"ENS Trust to hold NFTs under ENS name","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5298.md","source_label":"ERC 5298","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5298.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5298.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5298 (ENS Trust to hold NFTs under ENS name). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5298","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5298","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5298","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0901","slug":"erc-5334","title":"EIP-721 User And Expires And Level Extension","authors":"Yan","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Yan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5334.md","source_label":"ERC 5334","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5334.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5334.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5334 (EIP-721 User And Expires And Level Extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5334","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5334","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5334","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0902","slug":"erc-5409","title":"EIP-1155 Non-Fungible Token extension","authors":"Ronan Sandford","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5409.md","source_label":"ERC 5409","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5409.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5409.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5409 (EIP-1155 Non-Fungible Token extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5409","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5409","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5409","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0903","slug":"erc-5437","title":"Security Contact Interface","authors":"Zainan Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5437.md","source_label":"ERC 5437","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5437.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5437.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5437 (Security Contact Interface). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5437","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5437","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5437","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0904","slug":"erc-5453","title":"Endorsement - Permit for Any Functions","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5453.md","source_label":"ERC 5453","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5453.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5453.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5453 (Endorsement - Permit for Any Functions). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5453","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5453","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5453","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0905","slug":"erc-5485","title":"Jurisdiction, Accreditation, and Enforcement","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5485.md","source_label":"ERC 5485","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5485.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5485.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5485 (Jurisdiction, Accreditation, and Enforcement). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5485","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5485","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5485","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0906","slug":"erc-5496","title":"Multi-privilege Management NFT Extension","authors":"Jeremy Z","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jeremy Z","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5496.md","source_label":"ERC 5496","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5496.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5496.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5496 (Multi-privilege Management NFT Extension). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5496","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5496","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5496","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0907","slug":"erc-55","title":"Mixed-case checksum address encoding","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Alex Van de Sande","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Alex Van de Sande","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-55.md","source_label":"ERC 55","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-55.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-55.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 55 (Mixed-case checksum address encoding). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-55","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-55","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-55","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0908","slug":"erc-5501","title":"Rental & Delegation NFT - EIP-721 Extension","authors":"Jan Smrža, David Rábel, Tomáš Janča, Jan Bureš, DOBBYLABS","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jan Smrža, David Rábel, Tomáš Janča, Jan Bureš, DOBBYLABS","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5501.md","source_label":"ERC 5501","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5501.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5501.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5501 (Rental & Delegation NFT - EIP-721 Extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5501","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5501","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5501","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0909","slug":"erc-5505","title":"EIP-1155 asset backed NFT extension","authors":"liszechung","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"liszechung","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5505.md","source_label":"ERC 5505","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5505.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5505.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5505 (EIP-1155 asset backed NFT extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5505","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5505","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5505","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0910","slug":"erc-5539","title":"Revocation List Registry","authors":"Philipp Bolte, Lauritz Leifermann, Dennis von der Bey","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Philipp Bolte, Lauritz Leifermann, Dennis von der Bey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5539.md","source_label":"ERC 5539","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5539.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5539.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5539 (Revocation List Registry). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5539","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5539","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5539","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0911","slug":"erc-5553","title":"Representing IP and its Royalty Structure","authors":"Roy Osherove","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Roy Osherove","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5553.md","source_label":"ERC 5553","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5553.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5553.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5553 (Representing IP and its Royalty Structure). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5553","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5553","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5553","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0912","slug":"erc-5554","title":"NFT Legal Use, Repurposing, and Remixing","authors":"Isaac Patka, COALA Licensing Taskforce","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Isaac Patka, COALA Licensing Taskforce","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5554.md","source_label":"ERC 5554","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5554.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5554.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5554 (NFT Legal Use, Repurposing, and Remixing). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5554","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5554","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5554","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0913","slug":"erc-5559","title":"Cross Chain Write Deferral Protocol","authors":"Paul Gauvreau, Nick Johnson","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Paul Gauvreau, Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5559.md","source_label":"ERC 5559","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5559.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5559.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5559 (Cross Chain Write Deferral Protocol). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5559","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5559","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5559","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0914","slug":"erc-5560","title":"Redeemable NFTs","authors":"Olivier Fernandez, Frédéric Le Coidic, Julien Béranger","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Olivier Fernandez, Frédéric Le Coidic, Julien Béranger","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5560.md","source_label":"ERC 5560","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5560.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5560.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5560 (Redeemable NFTs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5560","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5560","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5560","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0915","slug":"erc-5568","title":"Well-Known Format for Required Actions","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5568.md","source_label":"ERC 5568","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5568.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5568.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5568 (Well-Known Format for Required Actions). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5568","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5568","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5568","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0916","slug":"erc-5573","title":"Sign-In with Ethereum Capabilities, ReCaps","authors":"Oliver Terbu, Jacob Ward, Charles Lehner, Sam Gbafa, Wayne Chang, Charles Cunningham","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Oliver Terbu, Jacob Ward, Charles Lehner, Sam Gbafa, Wayne Chang, Charles Cunningham","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5573.md","source_label":"ERC 5573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5573.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5573.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5573 (Sign-In with Ethereum Capabilities, ReCaps). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5573","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5573","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5573","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0917","slug":"erc-5604","title":"NFT Lien","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou, Allen Zhou, Alex Qin","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou, Allen Zhou, Alex Qin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5604.md","source_label":"ERC 5604","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5604.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5604.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5604 (NFT Lien). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5604","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5604","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5604","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0918","slug":"erc-5630","title":"New approach for encryption / decryption","authors":"Firn Protocol, Fried L. Trout, Weiji Guo","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Firn Protocol, Fried L. Trout, Weiji Guo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5630.md","source_label":"ERC 5630","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5630.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5630.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5630 (New approach for encryption / decryption). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5630","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5630","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5630","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0919","slug":"erc-5633","title":"Composable Soulbound NFT, EIP-1155 Extension","authors":"HonorLabs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"HonorLabs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5633.md","source_label":"ERC 5633","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5633.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5633.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5633 (Composable Soulbound NFT, EIP-1155 Extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5633","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5633","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5633","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0920","slug":"erc-5635","title":"NFT Licensing Agreements","authors":"Timi, 0xTriple7","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Timi, 0xTriple7","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5635.md","source_label":"ERC 5635","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5635.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5635.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5635 (NFT Licensing Agreements). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5635","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5635","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5635","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0921","slug":"erc-5639","title":"Delegation Registry","authors":"foobar, Wilkins Chung, ryley-o, Jake Rockland, andy8052","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"foobar, Wilkins Chung, ryley-o, Jake Rockland, andy8052","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5639.md","source_label":"ERC 5639","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5639.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5639.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5639 (Delegation Registry). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5639","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5639","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5639","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0922","slug":"erc-5643","title":"Subscription NFTs","authors":"cygaar","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"cygaar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5643.md","source_label":"ERC 5643","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5643.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5643.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5643 (Subscription NFTs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5643","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5643","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5643","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0923","slug":"erc-5700","title":"Bindable Token Interface","authors":"Leeren","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Leeren","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5700.md","source_label":"ERC 5700","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5700.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5700.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5700 (Bindable Token Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5700","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5700","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5700","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0924","slug":"erc-5719","title":"Signature replacement interface","authors":"Agustin Aguilar","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Agustin Aguilar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5719.md","source_label":"ERC 5719","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5719.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5719.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5719 (Signature replacement interface). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5719","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5719","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5719","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0925","slug":"erc-5727","title":"Semi-Fungible Soulbound Token","authors":"Austin Zhu, Terry Chen","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Austin Zhu, Terry Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5727.md","source_label":"ERC 5727","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5727.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5727.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5727 (Semi-Fungible Soulbound Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5727","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5727","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5727","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0926","slug":"erc-5744","title":"Latent Fungible Token","authors":"Cozy Finance, Tony Sheng, Matt Solomon, David Laprade, Payom Dousti, Chad Fleming, Franz Chen","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Cozy Finance, Tony Sheng, Matt Solomon, David Laprade, Payom Dousti, Chad Fleming, Franz Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5744.md","source_label":"ERC 5744","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5744.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5744.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5744 (Latent Fungible Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5744","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5744","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5744","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0927","slug":"erc-5753","title":"Lockable Extension for EIP-721","authors":"Filipp Makarov","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Filipp Makarov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5753.md","source_label":"ERC 5753","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5753.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5753.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5753 (Lockable Extension for EIP-721). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5753","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5753","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5753","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0928","slug":"erc-5791","title":"Physical Backed Tokens","authors":"2pmflow, locationtba, Cameron Robertson, cygaar, Brian Weick, vectorized, djdabs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"2pmflow, locationtba, Cameron Robertson, cygaar, Brian Weick, vectorized, djdabs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5791.md","source_label":"ERC 5791","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5791.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5791.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5791 (Physical Backed Tokens). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5791","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5791","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5791","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0929","slug":"erc-5805","title":"Voting with delegation","authors":"Hadrien Croubois, Francisco Giordano","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois, Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5805.md","source_label":"ERC 5805","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5805.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5805.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5805 (Voting with delegation). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5805","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5805","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5805","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0930","slug":"erc-5827","title":"Auto-renewable allowance extension","authors":"zlace, zhongfu, edison0xyz","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"zlace, zhongfu, edison0xyz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5827.md","source_label":"ERC 5827","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5827.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5827.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5827 (Auto-renewable allowance extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5827","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5827","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5827","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0931","slug":"erc-5850","title":"Complex Numbers stored in `bytes32` types","authors":"Paul Edge","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Paul Edge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5850.md","source_label":"ERC 5850","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5850.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5850.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5850 (Complex Numbers stored in `bytes32` types). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5850","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5850","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5850","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0932","slug":"erc-5851","title":"On-Chain Verifiable Credentials","authors":"Yu Liu, Junyi Zhong","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Yu Liu, Junyi Zhong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5851.md","source_label":"ERC 5851","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5851.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5851.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5851 (On-Chain Verifiable Credentials). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5851","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5851","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5851","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0933","slug":"erc-5883","title":"Token Transfer by Social Recovery","authors":"Erhard Dinhobl, Kevin Riedl","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Erhard Dinhobl, Kevin Riedl","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5883.md","source_label":"ERC 5883","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5883.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5883.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5883 (Token Transfer by Social Recovery). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5883","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5883","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5883","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0934","slug":"erc-5902","title":"Smart Contract Event Hooks","authors":"Simon Brown","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Simon Brown","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5902.md","source_label":"ERC 5902","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5902.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5902.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5902 (Smart Contract Event Hooks). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5902","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5902","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5902","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0935","slug":"erc-5982","title":"Role-based Access Control","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-5982.md","source_label":"ERC 5982","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-5982.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-5982.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 5982 (Role-based Access Control). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5982","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5982","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5982","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0936","slug":"erc-6047","title":"ERC-721 Balance indexing via Transfer event","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6047.md","source_label":"ERC 6047","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6047.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6047.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6047 (ERC-721 Balance indexing via Transfer event). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6047","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6047","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6047","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0937","slug":"erc-6065","title":"Real Estate Token","authors":"Alex, Ben Fusek, Daniel Fallon-Cyr","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex, Ben Fusek, Daniel Fallon-Cyr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6065.md","source_label":"ERC 6065","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6065.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6065.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6065 (Real Estate Token). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6065","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6065","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6065","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0938","slug":"erc-6120","title":"Universal Token Router","authors":"Derion, Zergity, Ngo Quang Anh, BerlinP, Khanh Pham, Hal Blackburn","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Derion, Zergity, Ngo Quang Anh, BerlinP, Khanh Pham, Hal Blackburn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6120.md","source_label":"ERC 6120","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6120.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6120.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6120 (Universal Token Router). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6120","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6120","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6120","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0939","slug":"erc-6123","title":"Smart Derivative Contract","authors":"Christian Fries, Peter Kohl-Landgraf, Alexandros Korpis","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Christian Fries, Peter Kohl-Landgraf, Alexandros Korpis","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6123.md","source_label":"ERC 6123","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6123.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6123.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6123 (Smart Derivative Contract). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6123","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6123","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6123","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0940","slug":"erc-6170","title":"Cross-Chain Messaging Interface","authors":"Sujith Somraaj","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Sujith Somraaj","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6170.md","source_label":"ERC 6170","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6170.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6170.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6170 (Cross-Chain Messaging Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6170","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6170","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6170","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0941","slug":"erc-6224","title":"Contracts Dependencies Registry","authors":"Artem Chystiakov","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Artem Chystiakov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6224.md","source_label":"ERC 6224","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6224.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6224.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6224 (Contracts Dependencies Registry). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6224","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6224","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6224","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0942","slug":"erc-6229","title":"Tokenized Vaults with Lock-in Period","authors":"Anderson Chen, Martinet Lee, Anton Cheng","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anderson Chen, Martinet Lee, Anton Cheng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6229.md","source_label":"ERC 6229","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6229.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6229.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6229 (Tokenized Vaults with Lock-in Period). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6229","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6229","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6229","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0943","slug":"erc-6268","title":"Untransferability Indicator for EIP-1155","authors":"Yuki Aoki","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Yuki Aoki","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6268.md","source_label":"ERC 6268","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6268.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6268.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6268 (Untransferability Indicator for EIP-1155). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6268","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6268","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6268","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0944","slug":"erc-6315","title":"ERC-2771 Namespaced Account Abstraction","authors":"Gavin John","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6315.md","source_label":"ERC 6315","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6315.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6315.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6315 (ERC-2771 Namespaced Account Abstraction). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6315","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6315","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6315","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0945","slug":"erc-6327","title":"Elastic Signature","authors":"George","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"George","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6327.md","source_label":"ERC 6327","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6327.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6327.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6327 (Elastic Signature). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6327","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6327","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6327","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0946","slug":"erc-634","title":"Storage of text records in ENS","authors":"Richard Moore","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Richard Moore","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-634.md","source_label":"ERC 634","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-634.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-634.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 634 (Storage of text records in ENS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-634","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-634","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-634","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0947","slug":"erc-6353","title":"Charity token","authors":"Aubay, BOCA Jeabby, EL MERSHATI Laith, KEMP Elia","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Aubay, BOCA Jeabby, EL MERSHATI Laith, KEMP Elia","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6353.md","source_label":"ERC 6353","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6353.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6353.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6353 (Charity token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6353","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6353","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6353","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0948","slug":"erc-6357","title":"Single-contract Multi-delegatecall","authors":"Gavin John","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6357.md","source_label":"ERC 6357","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6357.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6357.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6357 (Single-contract Multi-delegatecall). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6357","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6357","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6357","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0949","slug":"erc-6358","title":"Cross-Chain Token States Synchronization","authors":"Shawn Zheng, Jason Cheng, George Huang, Kay Lin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Shawn Zheng, Jason Cheng, George Huang, Kay Lin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6358.md","source_label":"ERC 6358","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6358.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6358.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6358 (Cross-Chain Token States Synchronization). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6358","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6358","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6358","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0950","slug":"erc-6366","title":"Permission Token","authors":"Chiro, Victor Dusart","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Chiro, Victor Dusart","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6366.md","source_label":"ERC 6366","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6366.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6366.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6366 (Permission Token). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6366","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6366","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6366","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0951","slug":"erc-6372","title":"Contract clock","authors":"Hadrien Croubois, Francisco Giordano","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois, Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6372.md","source_label":"ERC 6372","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6372.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6372.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6372 (Contract clock). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6372","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6372","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6372","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0952","slug":"erc-6384","title":"Human-readable offline signatures","authors":"Tal Be'ery, RoiV","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Tal Be'ery, RoiV","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6384.md","source_label":"ERC 6384","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6384.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6384.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6384 (Human-readable offline signatures). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6384","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6384","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6384","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0953","slug":"erc-6464","title":"Multi-operator, per-token ERC-721 approvals.","authors":"Cristian Espinoza, Simon Fremaux, David Huber, and Arran Schlosberg","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Cristian Espinoza, Simon Fremaux, David Huber, and Arran Schlosberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6464.md","source_label":"ERC 6464","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6464.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6464.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6464 (Multi-operator, per-token ERC-721 approvals.). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6464","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6464","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6464","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0954","slug":"erc-6506","title":"P2P Escrowed Governance Incentives","authors":"Josh Weintraub","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Josh Weintraub","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6506.md","source_label":"ERC 6506","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6506.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6506.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6506 (P2P Escrowed Governance Incentives). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6506","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6506","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6506","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0955","slug":"erc-6551","title":"Non-fungible Token Bound Accounts","authors":"Jayden Windle, Benny Giang, Steve Jang, Druzy Downs, Raymond Huynh, Alanah Lam, Wilkins Chung, Paul Sullivan, Auryn Macmillan, Jan-Felix Schwarz, Anton Bukov, Mikhail Melnik et al.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jayden Windle, Benny Giang, Steve Jang, Druzy Downs, Raymond Huynh, Alanah Lam, Wilkins Chung, Paul Sullivan, Auryn Macmillan, Jan-Felix Schwarz, Anton Bukov, Mikhail Melnik et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6551.md","source_label":"ERC 6551","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6551.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6551.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6551 (Non-fungible Token Bound Accounts). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6551","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6551","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6551","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0956","slug":"erc-6596","title":"Cultural and Historical Asset Token","authors":"Phillip Pon, Gary Liu, Henry Chan, Joey Liu, Lauren Ho, Jeff Leung, Brian Liang, Joyce Li, Avir Mahtani, Antoine Cote, David Leung","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Phillip Pon, Gary Liu, Henry Chan, Joey Liu, Lauren Ho, Jeff Leung, Brian Liang, Joyce Li, Avir Mahtani, Antoine Cote, David Leung","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6596.md","source_label":"ERC 6596","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6596.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6596.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6596 (Cultural and Historical Asset Token). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6596","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6596","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6596","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0957","slug":"erc-6604","title":"Abstract Token","authors":"Chris Walker","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chris Walker","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6604.md","source_label":"ERC 6604","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6604.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6604.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6604 (Abstract Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6604","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6604","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6604","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0958","slug":"erc-6617","title":"Bit Based Permission","authors":"Chiro, Victor Dusart","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chiro, Victor Dusart","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6617.md","source_label":"ERC 6617","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6617.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6617.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6617 (Bit Based Permission). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6617","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6617","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6617","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0959","slug":"erc-6662","title":"AA Account Metadata For Authentication","authors":"Shu Dong, Zihao Chen, Peter Chen","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Shu Dong, Zihao Chen, Peter Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6662.md","source_label":"ERC 6662","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6662.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6662.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6662 (AA Account Metadata For Authentication). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6662","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6662","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6662","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0960","slug":"erc-6682","title":"NFT Flashloans","authors":"out.eth","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"out.eth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6682.md","source_label":"ERC 6682","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6682.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6682.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6682 (NFT Flashloans). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6682","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6682","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6682","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0961","slug":"erc-67","title":"URI Scheme with Metadata, Value and Bytecode","authors":"Alex Van de Sande","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Alex Van de Sande","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-67.md","source_label":"ERC 67","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-67.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-67.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 67 (URI Scheme with Metadata, Value and Bytecode). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-67","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-67","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-67","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0962","slug":"erc-6734","title":"L2 Token List","authors":"Kelvin Fichter, Andreas Freund, Pavel Sinelnikov","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Kelvin Fichter, Andreas Freund, Pavel Sinelnikov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6734.md","source_label":"ERC 6734","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6734.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6734.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6734 (L2 Token List). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6734","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6734","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6734","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0963","slug":"erc-6735","title":"L2 Aliasing of EVM-based Addresses","authors":"Kelvin Fichter, Andreas Freund","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Kelvin Fichter, Andreas Freund","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6735.md","source_label":"ERC 6735","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6735.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6735.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6735 (L2 Aliasing of EVM-based Addresses). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6735","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6735","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6735","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0964","slug":"erc-6785","title":"ERC-721 Utilities Information Extension","authors":"Otniel Nicola, Bogdan Popa","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Otniel Nicola, Bogdan Popa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6785.md","source_label":"ERC 6785","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6785.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6785.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6785 (ERC-721 Utilities Information Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6785","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6785","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6785","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0965","slug":"erc-6786","title":"Registry for royalties payment for NFTs","authors":"Otniel Nicola, Bogdan Popa","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Otniel Nicola, Bogdan Popa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6786.md","source_label":"ERC 6786","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6786.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6786.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6786 (Registry for royalties payment for NFTs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6786","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6786","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6786","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0966","slug":"erc-6787","title":"Order Book DEX with Two Phase Withdrawal","authors":"Jessica, Roy, Jun","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jessica, Roy, Jun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6787.md","source_label":"ERC 6787","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6787.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6787.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6787 (Order Book DEX with Two Phase Withdrawal). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6787","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6787","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6787","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0967","slug":"erc-6806","title":"ERC-721 Holding Time Tracking","authors":"Saitama, Combo, Luigi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Saitama, Combo, Luigi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6806.md","source_label":"ERC 6806","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6806.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6806.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6806 (ERC-721 Holding Time Tracking). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6806","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6806","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6806","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0968","slug":"erc-6821","title":"Support ENS Name for Web3 URL","authors":"Qi Zhou, Qiang Zhu","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Qi Zhou, Qiang Zhu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6821.md","source_label":"ERC 6821","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6821.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6821.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6821 (Support ENS Name for Web3 URL). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6821","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6821","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6821","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0969","slug":"erc-6823","title":"Token Mapping Slot Retrieval Extension","authors":"qdqd","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"qdqd","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6823.md","source_label":"ERC 6823","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6823.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6823.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6823 (Token Mapping Slot Retrieval Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6823","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6823","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6823","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0970","slug":"erc-6860","title":"Web3 URL to EVM Call Message Translation","authors":"Qi Zhou, Chao Pi, Sam Wilson, Nicolas Deschildre","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Qi Zhou, Chao Pi, Sam Wilson, Nicolas Deschildre","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6860.md","source_label":"ERC 6860","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6860.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6860.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6860 (Web3 URL to EVM Call Message Translation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6860","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6860","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6860","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0971","slug":"erc-6864","title":"Upgradable Fungible Token","authors":"Jeff Huang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jeff Huang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6864.md","source_label":"ERC 6864","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6864.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6864.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6864 (Upgradable Fungible Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6864","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6864","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6864","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0972","slug":"erc-6865","title":"On-Chain EIP-712 Visualization","authors":"Abderrahmen Hanafi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Abderrahmen Hanafi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6865.md","source_label":"ERC 6865","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6865.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6865.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6865 (On-Chain EIP-712 Visualization). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6865","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6865","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6865","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0973","slug":"erc-6900","title":"Modular Smart Contract Accounts","authors":"Adam Egyed, Fangting Liu, Jay Paik, Yoav Weiss, Huawei Gu, Daniel Lim, Ruben Koch, David Philipson, Howy Ho, Nikita Belenkov, zer0dot, David Kim","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Adam Egyed, Fangting Liu, Jay Paik, Yoav Weiss, Huawei Gu, Daniel Lim, Ruben Koch, David Philipson, Howy Ho, Nikita Belenkov, zer0dot, David Kim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6900.md","source_label":"ERC 6900","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6900.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6900.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6900 (Modular Smart Contract Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6900","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6900","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6900","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0974","slug":"erc-6932","title":"Subscription-Based Token","authors":"360 Core, Robin Rajput","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"360 Core, Robin Rajput","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6932.md","source_label":"ERC 6932","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6932.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6932.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6932 (Subscription-Based Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6932","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6932","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6932","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0975","slug":"erc-6944","title":"ERC-5219 Resolve Mode","authors":"Gavin John, Qi Zhou","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Gavin John, Qi Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6944.md","source_label":"ERC 6944","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6944.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6944.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6944 (ERC-5219 Resolve Mode). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6944","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6944","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6944","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0976","slug":"erc-6956","title":"Asset-bound Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"Thomas Bergmueller, Lukas Meyer","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Thomas Bergmueller, Lukas Meyer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6956.md","source_label":"ERC 6956","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6956.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6956.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6956 (Asset-bound Non-Fungible Tokens). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6956","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6956","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6956","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0977","slug":"erc-6960","title":"Dual Layer Token","authors":"Adam Boudjemaa, Mohamad Hammoud, Nawar Hisso, Khawla Hassan, Mohammad Zakeri Rad, Ashish Sood","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Adam Boudjemaa, Mohamad Hammoud, Nawar Hisso, Khawla Hassan, Mohammad Zakeri Rad, Ashish Sood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6960.md","source_label":"ERC 6960","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6960.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6960.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6960 (Dual Layer Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6960","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6960","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6960","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0978","slug":"erc-6981","title":"Reserved Ownership Accounts","authors":"Paul Sullivan, Wilkins Chung, Kartik Patel","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Paul Sullivan, Wilkins Chung, Kartik Patel","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6981.md","source_label":"ERC 6981","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6981.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6981.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6981 (Reserved Ownership Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6981","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6981","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6981","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0979","slug":"erc-6997","title":"ERC-721 with transaction validation step.","authors":"Eduard López i Fina","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Eduard López i Fina","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-6997.md","source_label":"ERC 6997","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-6997.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-6997.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 6997 (ERC-721 with transaction validation step.). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6997","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6997","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6997","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0980","slug":"erc-7015","title":"NFT Creator Attribution","authors":"indreams","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"indreams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7015.md","source_label":"ERC 7015","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7015.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7015.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7015 (NFT Creator Attribution). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7015","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7015","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7015","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0981","slug":"erc-7085","title":"NFT Relationship Enhancement","authors":"Guang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Guang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7085.md","source_label":"ERC 7085","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7085.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7085.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7085 (NFT Relationship Enhancement). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7085","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7085","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7085","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0982","slug":"erc-7087","title":"MIME type for Web3 URL in Auto Mode","authors":"Qi Zhou, Nicolas Deschildre","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Qi Zhou, Nicolas Deschildre","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7087.md","source_label":"ERC 7087","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7087.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7087.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7087 (MIME type for Web3 URL in Auto Mode). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7087","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7087","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7087","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0983","slug":"erc-7093","title":"Social Recovery Interface","authors":"John Zhang, Davis Xiang, Kyle Xu, George Zhang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"John Zhang, Davis Xiang, Kyle Xu, George Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7093.md","source_label":"ERC 7093","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7093.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7093.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7093 (Social Recovery Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7093","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7093","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7093","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0984","slug":"erc-7144","title":"ERC-20 with transaction validation step.","authors":"Eduard López i Fina","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Eduard López i Fina","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7144.md","source_label":"ERC 7144","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7144.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7144.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7144 (ERC-20 with transaction validation step.). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7144","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7144","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7144","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0985","slug":"erc-7196","title":"Simple token, Simplified ERC-20","authors":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7196.md","source_label":"ERC 7196","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7196.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7196.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7196 (Simple token, Simplified ERC-20). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7196","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7196","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7196","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0986","slug":"erc-7204","title":"Contract wallet management token","authors":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7204.md","source_label":"ERC 7204","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7204.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7204.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7204 (Contract wallet management token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7204","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7204","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7204","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0987","slug":"erc-7246","title":"Encumber - Splitting Ownership & Guarantees","authors":"Coburn Berry, Mykel Pereira, Scott Silver","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Coburn Berry, Mykel Pereira, Scott Silver","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7246.md","source_label":"ERC 7246","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7246.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7246.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7246 (Encumber - Splitting Ownership & Guarantees). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7246","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7246","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7246","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0988","slug":"erc-725","title":"General data key/value store and execution","authors":"Fabian Vogelsteller, Tyler Yasaka","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Fabian Vogelsteller, Tyler Yasaka","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-725.md","source_label":"ERC 725","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-725.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-725.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 725 (General data key/value store and execution). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-725","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-725","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-725","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0989","slug":"erc-7254","title":"Token Revenue Sharing","authors":"Quy Phan, Quy Phan","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Quy Phan, Quy Phan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7254.md","source_label":"ERC 7254","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7254.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7254.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7254 (Token Revenue Sharing). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7254","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7254","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7254","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0990","slug":"erc-7272","title":"Ethereum Access Token","authors":"Chris Chung, Raphael Roullet","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chris Chung, Raphael Roullet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7272.md","source_label":"ERC 7272","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7272.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7272.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7272 (Ethereum Access Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7272","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7272","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7272","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0991","slug":"erc-7280","title":"NFT Metadata Extension like JSON-LD","authors":"Yohei Nishikubo","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Yohei Nishikubo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7280.md","source_label":"ERC 7280","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7280.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7280.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7280 (NFT Metadata Extension like JSON-LD). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7280","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7280","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7280","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0992","slug":"erc-7303","title":"Token-Controlled Token Circulation","authors":"Ko Fujimura","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ko Fujimura","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7303.md","source_label":"ERC 7303","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7303.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7303.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7303 (Token-Controlled Token Circulation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7303","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7303","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7303","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0993","slug":"erc-7390","title":"Vanilla Options for ERC-20 Tokens","authors":"Ewan Humbert, Lassi Maksimainen","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ewan Humbert, Lassi Maksimainen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7390.md","source_label":"ERC 7390","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7390.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7390.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7390 (Vanilla Options for ERC-20 Tokens). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7390","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7390","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7390","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0994","slug":"erc-7399","title":"⚡ Flash Loans ⚡","authors":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Michael Amadi, Devtooligan, Ultrasecr.eth, Sam Bacha","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Michael Amadi, Devtooligan, Ultrasecr.eth, Sam Bacha","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7399.md","source_label":"ERC 7399","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7399.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7399.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7399 (⚡ Flash Loans ⚡). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7399","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7399","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7399","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0995","slug":"erc-7405","title":"Portable Smart Contract Accounts","authors":"Aaron Yee","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Aaron Yee","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7405.md","source_label":"ERC 7405","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7405.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7405.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7405 (Portable Smart Contract Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7405","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7405","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7405","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0996","slug":"erc-7406","title":"Multi-Namespace Onchain Registry","authors":"Mengshi Zhang, Zihao Chen","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mengshi Zhang, Zihao Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7406.md","source_label":"ERC 7406","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7406.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7406.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7406 (Multi-Namespace Onchain Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7406","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7406","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7406","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0997","slug":"erc-7410","title":"ERC-20 Update Allowance By Spender","authors":"Mohammad Zakeri Rad, Adam Boudjemaa, Mohamad Hammoud","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mohammad Zakeri Rad, Adam Boudjemaa, Mohamad Hammoud","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7410.md","source_label":"ERC 7410","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7410.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7410.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7410 (ERC-20 Update Allowance By Spender). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7410","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7410","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7410","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0998","slug":"erc-7412","title":"On-Demand Off-Chain Data Retrieval","authors":"Noah Litvin, db","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Noah Litvin, db","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7412.md","source_label":"ERC 7412","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7412.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7412.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7412 (On-Demand Off-Chain Data Retrieval). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7412","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7412","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7412","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0999","slug":"erc-7417","title":"Token Converter","authors":"Dexaran","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Dexaran","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7417.md","source_label":"ERC 7417","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7417.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7417.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7417 (Token Converter). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7417","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7417","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7417","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1000","slug":"erc-7425","title":"Tokenized Reserve","authors":"Jimmy Debe","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jimmy Debe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7425.md","source_label":"ERC 7425","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7425.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7425.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7425 (Tokenized Reserve). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7425","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7425","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7425","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1001","slug":"erc-7444","title":"Time Locks Maturity","authors":"Thanh Trinh, Joshua Weintraub, Rob Montgomery","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Thanh Trinh, Joshua Weintraub, Rob Montgomery","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7444.md","source_label":"ERC 7444","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7444.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7444.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7444 (Time Locks Maturity). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7444","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7444","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7444","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1002","slug":"erc-7484","title":"Registry Extension for ERC-7579","authors":"Konrad Kopp, zeroknots","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Konrad Kopp, zeroknots","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7484.md","source_label":"ERC 7484","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7484.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7484.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7484 (Registry Extension for ERC-7579). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7484","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7484","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7484","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1003","slug":"erc-7496","title":"NFT Dynamic Traits","authors":"Adam Montgomery, Ryan Ghods, 0age, James Wenzel, Stephan Min","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Adam Montgomery, Ryan Ghods, 0age, James Wenzel, Stephan Min","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7496.md","source_label":"ERC 7496","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7496.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7496.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7496 (NFT Dynamic Traits). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7496","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7496","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7496","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1004","slug":"erc-7498","title":"NFT Redeemables","authors":"Ryan Ghods, 0age, Adam Montgomery, Stephan Min","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ryan Ghods, 0age, Adam Montgomery, Stephan Min","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7498.md","source_label":"ERC 7498","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7498.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7498.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7498 (NFT Redeemables). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7498","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7498","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7498","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1005","slug":"erc-7506","title":"Trusted Hint Registry","authors":"Philipp Bolte, Dennis von der Bey, Lauritz Leifermann","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Philipp Bolte, Dennis von der Bey, Lauritz Leifermann","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7506.md","source_label":"ERC 7506","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7506.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7506.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7506 (Trusted Hint Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7506","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7506","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7506","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1006","slug":"erc-7507","title":"Multi-User NFT Extension","authors":"Ming Jiang, Zheng Han, Fan Yang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ming Jiang, Zheng Han, Fan Yang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7507.md","source_label":"ERC 7507","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7507.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7507.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7507 (Multi-User NFT Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7507","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7507","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7507","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1007","slug":"erc-7508","title":"Dynamic On-Chain Token Attributes Repository","authors":"Steven Pineda, Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Steven Pineda, Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7508.md","source_label":"ERC 7508","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7508.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7508.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7508 (Dynamic On-Chain Token Attributes Repository). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7508","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7508","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7508","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1008","slug":"erc-7509","title":"Entity Component System","authors":"Rickey","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Rickey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7509.md","source_label":"ERC 7509","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7509.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7509.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7509 (Entity Component System). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7509","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7509","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7509","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1009","slug":"erc-7510","title":"Cross-Contract Hierarchical NFT","authors":"Ming Jiang, Zheng Han, Fan Yang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ming Jiang, Zheng Han, Fan Yang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7510.md","source_label":"ERC 7510","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7510.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7510.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7510 (Cross-Contract Hierarchical NFT). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7510","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7510","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7510","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1010","slug":"erc-7511","title":"Minimal Proxy Contract with PUSH0","authors":"0xAA, vectorized, 0age","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"0xAA, vectorized, 0age","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7511.md","source_label":"ERC 7511","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7511.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7511.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7511 (Minimal Proxy Contract with PUSH0). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7511","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7511","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7511","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1011","slug":"erc-7512","title":"Onchain Representation for Audits","authors":"Richard Meissner - Safe, Robert Chen - OtterSec, Matthias Egli - ChainSecurity, Jan Kalivoda - Ackee Blockchain, Michael Lewellen - OpenZeppelin, Shay Zluf - Hats Finance et al.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Richard Meissner - Safe, Robert Chen - OtterSec, Matthias Egli - ChainSecurity, Jan Kalivoda - Ackee Blockchain, Michael Lewellen - OpenZeppelin, Shay Zluf - Hats Finance et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7512.md","source_label":"ERC 7512","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7512.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7512.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7512 (Onchain Representation for Audits). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7512","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7512","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7512","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1012","slug":"erc-7513","title":"Smart NFT - A Component for Intent-Centric","authors":"MJ Tseng, Clay, Jeffery.c, Johnny.c","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"MJ Tseng, Clay, Jeffery.c, Johnny.c","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7513.md","source_label":"ERC 7513","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7513.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7513.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7513 (Smart NFT - A Component for Intent-Centric). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7513","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7513","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7513","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1013","slug":"erc-7517","title":"Content Consent for AI/ML Data Mining","authors":"Bofu Chen, Tammy Yang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bofu Chen, Tammy Yang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7517.md","source_label":"ERC 7517","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7517.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7517.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7517 (Content Consent for AI/ML Data Mining). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7517","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7517","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7517","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1014","slug":"erc-7518","title":"Dynamic Compliant Interop Security Token","authors":"Abhinav, Prithvish Baidya, Rajat Kumar, Prasanth Kalangi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Abhinav, Prithvish Baidya, Rajat Kumar, Prasanth Kalangi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7518.md","source_label":"ERC 7518","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7518.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7518.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7518 (Dynamic Compliant Interop Security Token). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7518","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7518","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7518","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1015","slug":"erc-7521","title":"General Intents for Smart Contract Wallets","authors":"Stephen Monn, Bikem Bengisu","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Stephen Monn, Bikem Bengisu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7521.md","source_label":"ERC 7521","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7521.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7521.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7521 (General Intents for Smart Contract Wallets). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7521","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7521","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7521","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1016","slug":"erc-7522","title":"OIDC ZK Verifier for AA Account","authors":"Shu Dong, Yudao Yan, Song Z, Kai Chen","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Shu Dong, Yudao Yan, Song Z, Kai Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7522.md","source_label":"ERC 7522","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7522.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7522.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7522 (OIDC ZK Verifier for AA Account). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7522","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7522","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7522","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1017","slug":"erc-7524","title":"PLUME Signature in Wallets","authors":"Yush G, Kobi Gurkan, Richard Liu, Vivek Bhupatiraju, Barry Whitehat","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Yush G, Kobi Gurkan, Richard Liu, Vivek Bhupatiraju, Barry Whitehat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7524.md","source_label":"ERC 7524","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7524.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7524.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7524 (PLUME Signature in Wallets). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7524","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7524","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7524","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1018","slug":"erc-7527","title":"Token Bound Function Oracle AMM","authors":"Elaine Zhang, Jerry, Amandafanny, Shouhao Wong, 0xPoet","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Elaine Zhang, Jerry, Amandafanny, Shouhao Wong, 0xPoet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7527.md","source_label":"ERC 7527","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7527.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7527.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7527 (Token Bound Function Oracle AMM). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7527","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7527","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7527","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1019","slug":"erc-7529","title":"Contract Discovery and eTLD+1 Association","authors":"Todd Chapman, Charlie Sibbach, Sean Sing","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Todd Chapman, Charlie Sibbach, Sean Sing","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7529.md","source_label":"ERC 7529","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7529.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7529.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7529 (Contract Discovery and eTLD+1 Association). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7529","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7529","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7529","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1020","slug":"erc-7531","title":"Staked ERC-721 Ownership Recognition","authors":"Francesco Sullo","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Francesco Sullo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7531.md","source_label":"ERC 7531","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7531.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7531.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7531 (Staked ERC-721 Ownership Recognition). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7531","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7531","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7531","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1021","slug":"erc-7533","title":"Public Cross Port","authors":"George, Zisu","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"George, Zisu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7533.md","source_label":"ERC 7533","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7533.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7533.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7533 (Public Cross Port). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7533","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7533","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7533","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1022","slug":"erc-7538","title":"Multiplicative Tokens","authors":"Gavin John","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7538.md","source_label":"ERC 7538","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7538.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7538.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7538 (Multiplicative Tokens). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7538","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7538","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7538","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1023","slug":"erc-7546","title":"Upgradeable Clone for Scalable Contracts","authors":"Shogo Ochiai, Kai Hiroi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Shogo Ochiai, Kai Hiroi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7546.md","source_label":"ERC 7546","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7546.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7546.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7546 (Upgradeable Clone for Scalable Contracts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7546","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7546","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7546","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1024","slug":"erc-7548","title":"Open IP Protocol built on NFTs","authors":"Combo, Saitama, CT29, Luigi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Combo, Saitama, CT29, Luigi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7548.md","source_label":"ERC 7548","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7548.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7548.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7548 (Open IP Protocol built on NFTs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7548","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7548","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7548","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1025","slug":"erc-7555","title":"Single Sign-On for Account Discovery","authors":"Alexander Müller, Gregory Markou, Willem Olding, Belma Gutlic, Marin Petrunić, Pedro Gomes","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Alexander Müller, Gregory Markou, Willem Olding, Belma Gutlic, Marin Petrunić, Pedro Gomes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7555.md","source_label":"ERC 7555","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7555.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7555.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7555 (Single Sign-On for Account Discovery). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7555","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7555","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7555","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1026","slug":"erc-7561","title":"Simple NFT, Simplified ERC-721","authors":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7561.md","source_label":"ERC 7561","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7561.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7561.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7561 (Simple NFT, Simplified ERC-721). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7561","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7561","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7561","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1027","slug":"erc-7562","title":"Account Abstraction Validation Scope Rules","authors":"Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7562.md","source_label":"ERC 7562","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7562.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7562.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7562 (Account Abstraction Validation Scope Rules). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7562","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7562","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7562","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1028","slug":"erc-7564","title":"Contract wallet management NFT","authors":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Xiang, Ben77, Mingshi S.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7564.md","source_label":"ERC 7564","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7564.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7564.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7564 (Contract wallet management NFT). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7564","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7564","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7564","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1029","slug":"erc-7565","title":"Perpetual Contract NFTs as Collateral","authors":"Hyoungsung Kim, Yong-Suk Park, Hyun-Sik Kim","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Hyoungsung Kim, Yong-Suk Park, Hyun-Sik Kim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7565.md","source_label":"ERC 7565","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7565.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7565.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7565 (Perpetual Contract NFTs as Collateral). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7565","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7565","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7565","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1030","slug":"erc-7566","title":"Multiplayer Game Communication","authors":"Rickey","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Rickey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7566.md","source_label":"ERC 7566","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7566.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7566.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7566 (Multiplayer Game Communication). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7566","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7566","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7566","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1031","slug":"erc-7572","title":"Contract-level metadata via `contractURI()`","authors":"Devin Finzer, Alex Atallah, Ryan Ghods","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Devin Finzer, Alex Atallah, Ryan Ghods","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7572.md","source_label":"ERC 7572","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7572.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7572.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7572 (Contract-level metadata via `contractURI()`). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7572","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7572","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7572","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1032","slug":"erc-7573","title":"Conditional-upon-Transfer-Decryption for DvP","authors":"Christian Fries, Peter Kohl-Landgraf","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Christian Fries, Peter Kohl-Landgraf","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7573.md","source_label":"ERC 7573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7573.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7573.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7573 (Conditional-upon-Transfer-Decryption for DvP). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7573","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7573","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7573","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1033","slug":"erc-7574","title":"Authentication SBT using Credential","authors":"Geunyoung Kim, JaeCheol Ryou","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Geunyoung Kim, JaeCheol Ryou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7574.md","source_label":"ERC 7574","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7574.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7574.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7574 (Authentication SBT using Credential). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7574","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7574","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7574","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1034","slug":"erc-7579","title":"Minimal Modular Smart Accounts","authors":"zeroknots, Konrad Kopp, Taek Lee, Fil Makarov, Elim Poon, Lyu Min","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"zeroknots, Konrad Kopp, Taek Lee, Fil Makarov, Elim Poon, Lyu Min","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7579.md","source_label":"ERC 7579","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7579.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7579.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7579 (Minimal Modular Smart Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7579","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7579","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7579","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1035","slug":"erc-7580","title":"Advertisement Tracking Interface","authors":"wart","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"wart","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7580.md","source_label":"ERC 7580","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7580.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7580.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7580 (Advertisement Tracking Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7580","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7580","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7580","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1036","slug":"erc-7582","title":"Modular Accounts with Delegated Validation","authors":"Shivanshi Tyagi, Ross Campbell","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Shivanshi Tyagi, Ross Campbell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7582.md","source_label":"ERC 7582","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7582.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7582.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7582 (Modular Accounts with Delegated Validation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7582","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7582","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7582","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1037","slug":"erc-7585","title":"MixHash and Public Data Storage Proofs","authors":"Liu Zhicong, William Entriken, Wei Qiushi, Si Changjun","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Liu Zhicong, William Entriken, Wei Qiushi, Si Changjun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7585.md","source_label":"ERC 7585","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7585.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7585.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7585 (MixHash and Public Data Storage Proofs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7585","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7585","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7585","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1038","slug":"erc-7586","title":"Interest Rate Swaps","authors":"Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7586.md","source_label":"ERC 7586","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7586.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7586.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7586 (Interest Rate Swaps). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7586","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7586","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7586","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1039","slug":"erc-7589","title":"Semi-Fungible Token Roles","authors":"Ernani São Thiago, Daniel Lima","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ernani São Thiago, Daniel Lima","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7589.md","source_label":"ERC 7589","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7589.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7589.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7589 (Semi-Fungible Token Roles). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7589","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7589","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7589","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1040","slug":"erc-7590","title":"ERC-20 Holder Extension for NFTs","authors":"Steven Pineda, Jan Turk","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Steven Pineda, Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7590.md","source_label":"ERC 7590","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7590.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7590.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7590 (ERC-20 Holder Extension for NFTs). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7590","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7590","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7590","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1041","slug":"erc-7595","title":"Collateralized NFT","authors":"571nKY, Cosmos, f4t50, Harpocrates","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"571nKY, Cosmos, f4t50, Harpocrates","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7595.md","source_label":"ERC 7595","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7595.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7595.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7595 (Collateralized NFT). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7595","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7595","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7595","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1042","slug":"erc-7597","title":"Signature Validation Extension for Permit","authors":"Yvonne Zhang, Aloysius Chan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Yvonne Zhang, Aloysius Chan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7597.md","source_label":"ERC 7597","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7597.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7597.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7597 (Signature Validation Extension for Permit). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7597","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7597","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7597","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1043","slug":"erc-7598","title":"Use contract signature for signed transfer","authors":"Yvonne Zhang, Aloysius Chan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Yvonne Zhang, Aloysius Chan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7598.md","source_label":"ERC 7598","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7598.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7598.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7598 (Use contract signature for signed transfer). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7598","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7598","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7598","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1044","slug":"erc-7603","title":"ERC-1155 Multi-Asset extension","authors":"Haru","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Haru","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7603.md","source_label":"ERC 7603","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7603.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7603.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7603 (ERC-1155 Multi-Asset extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7603","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7603","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7603","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1045","slug":"erc-7604","title":"ERC-1155 Permit Approvals","authors":"calvbore, emiliolanzalaco","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"calvbore, emiliolanzalaco","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7604.md","source_label":"ERC 7604","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7604.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7604.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7604 (ERC-1155 Permit Approvals). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7604","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7604","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7604","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1046","slug":"erc-7613","title":"Puppet Proxy Contract","authors":"Igor Żuk","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Igor Żuk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7613.md","source_label":"ERC 7613","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7613.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7613.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7613 (Puppet Proxy Contract). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7613","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7613","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7613","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1047","slug":"erc-7615","title":"Atomic Push-based Data Feed Among Contracts","authors":"Elaine Zhang, Jerry, Amandafanny, Shouhao Wong, Doris Che, Henry Yuan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Elaine Zhang, Jerry, Amandafanny, Shouhao Wong, Doris Che, Henry Yuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7615.md","source_label":"ERC 7615","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7615.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7615.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7615 (Atomic Push-based Data Feed Among Contracts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7615","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7615","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7615","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1048","slug":"erc-7617","title":"Chunk support for ERC-5219 mode in Web3 URL","authors":"Qi Zhou, Nicolas Deschildre","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Qi Zhou, Nicolas Deschildre","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7617.md","source_label":"ERC 7617","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7617.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7617.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7617 (Chunk support for ERC-5219 mode in Web3 URL). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7617","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7617","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7617","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1049","slug":"erc-7618","title":"Content encoding in ERC-5219 mode Web3 URL","authors":"Qi Zhou, Nicolas Deschildre","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Qi Zhou, Nicolas Deschildre","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7618.md","source_label":"ERC 7618","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7618.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7618.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7618 (Content encoding in ERC-5219 mode Web3 URL). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7618","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7618","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7618","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1050","slug":"erc-7621","title":"Basket Token","authors":"Dominic Ryder, Michael Ryder, Callum Mitchell-Clark","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Dominic Ryder, Michael Ryder, Callum Mitchell-Clark","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7621.md","source_label":"ERC 7621","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7621.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7621.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7621 (Basket Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7621","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7621","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7621","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1051","slug":"erc-7628","title":"ERC-721 Ownership Shares Extension","authors":"Chen Liaoyuan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Chen Liaoyuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7628.md","source_label":"ERC 7628","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7628.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7628.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7628 (ERC-721 Ownership Shares Extension). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7628","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7628","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7628","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1052","slug":"erc-7629","title":"ERC-20/ERC-721 Unified Token Interface","authors":"0xZeus1111, Nvuwa","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"0xZeus1111, Nvuwa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7629.md","source_label":"ERC 7629","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7629.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7629.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7629 (ERC-20/ERC-721 Unified Token Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7629","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7629","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7629","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1053","slug":"erc-7632","title":"Interfaces for Named Token","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7632.md","source_label":"ERC 7632","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7632.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7632.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7632 (Interfaces for Named Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7632","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7632","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7632","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1054","slug":"erc-7638","title":"Batch Calls Encoding in SCA","authors":"George, Zisu","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"George, Zisu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7638.md","source_label":"ERC 7638","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7638.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7638.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7638 (Batch Calls Encoding in SCA). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7638","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7638","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7638","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1055","slug":"erc-7641","title":"Intrinsic RevShare Token","authors":"Conway, Cathie So, Xiaohang Yu, Suning Yao, Kartin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Conway, Cathie So, Xiaohang Yu, Suning Yao, Kartin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7641.md","source_label":"ERC 7641","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7641.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7641.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7641 (Intrinsic RevShare Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7641","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7641","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7641","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1056","slug":"erc-7644","title":"ERC-721 Name Registry Extension","authors":"Chen Liaoyuan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Chen Liaoyuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7644.md","source_label":"ERC 7644","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7644.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7644.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7644 (ERC-721 Name Registry Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7644","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7644","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7644","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1057","slug":"erc-7649","title":"Bonding curve-embedded liquidity for NFTs","authors":"Arif Khan, Ahmad Matyana, Basil Gorin, Vijay Bhayani","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Arif Khan, Ahmad Matyana, Basil Gorin, Vijay Bhayani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7649.md","source_label":"ERC 7649","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7649.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7649.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7649 (Bonding curve-embedded liquidity for NFTs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7649","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7649","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7649","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1058","slug":"erc-7651","title":"Fractionally Represented Non-Fungible Token","authors":"Acme, Calder","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Acme, Calder","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7651.md","source_label":"ERC 7651","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7651.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7651.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7651 (Fractionally Represented Non-Fungible Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7651","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7651","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7651","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1059","slug":"erc-7652","title":"ERC-721 Guarantee Extension","authors":"Liu.C.Dao, Sam","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Liu.C.Dao, Sam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7652.md","source_label":"ERC 7652","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7652.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7652.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7652 (ERC-721 Guarantee Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7652","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7652","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7652","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1060","slug":"erc-7654","title":"Request Method Types","authors":"Rickey","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Rickey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7654.md","source_label":"ERC 7654","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7654.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7654.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7654 (Request Method Types). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7654","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7654","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7654","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1061","slug":"erc-7662","title":"AI Agent NFTs","authors":"Greg Marlin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Greg Marlin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7662.md","source_label":"ERC 7662","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7662.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7662.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7662 (AI Agent NFTs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7662","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7662","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7662","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1062","slug":"erc-7673","title":"Distinguishable base256emoji Addresses","authors":"William Morriss","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7673.md","source_label":"ERC 7673","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7673.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7673.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7673 (Distinguishable base256emoji Addresses). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7673","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7673","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7673","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1063","slug":"erc-7674","title":"Temporary Approval Extension for ERC-20","authors":"Xenia Shape, Mikhail Melnik, Hadrien Croubois","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Xenia Shape, Mikhail Melnik, Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7674.md","source_label":"ERC 7674","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7674.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7674.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7674 (Temporary Approval Extension for ERC-20). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7674","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7674","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7674","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1064","slug":"erc-7677","title":"Paymaster Web Service Capability","authors":"Lukas Rosario, Dror Tirosh, Wilson Cusack, Kristof Gazso, Hazim Jumali","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lukas Rosario, Dror Tirosh, Wilson Cusack, Kristof Gazso, Hazim Jumali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7677.md","source_label":"ERC 7677","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7677.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7677.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7677 (Paymaster Web Service Capability). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7677","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7677","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7677","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1065","slug":"erc-7679","title":"UserOperation Builder","authors":"Derek Chiang, Garvit Khatri, Fil Makarov, Kristof Gazso, Derek Rein, Tomas Rocchi, bumblefudge","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Derek Chiang, Garvit Khatri, Fil Makarov, Kristof Gazso, Derek Rein, Tomas Rocchi, bumblefudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7679.md","source_label":"ERC 7679","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7679.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7679.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7679 (UserOperation Builder). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7679","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7679","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7679","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1066","slug":"erc-7681","title":"Dual Nature Multi Token Protocol","authors":"Sennett Lau","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Sennett Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7681.md","source_label":"ERC 7681","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7681.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7681.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7681 (Dual Nature Multi Token Protocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7681","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7681","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7681","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1067","slug":"erc-7682","title":"Auxiliary Funds Capability","authors":"Lukas Rosario, Wilson Cusack, Alex Donesky","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lukas Rosario, Wilson Cusack, Alex Donesky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7682.md","source_label":"ERC 7682","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7682.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7682.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7682 (Auxiliary Funds Capability). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7682","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7682","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7682","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1068","slug":"erc-7683","title":"Cross Chain Intents","authors":"Francisco Giordano, Mark Toda, Matt Rice, Nick Pai, Alexander Lindgren, Mark Gretzke, Chris Cashwell","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francisco Giordano, Mark Toda, Matt Rice, Nick Pai, Alexander Lindgren, Mark Gretzke, Chris Cashwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7683.md","source_label":"ERC 7683","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7683.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7683.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7683 (Cross Chain Intents). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7683","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7683","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7683","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1069","slug":"erc-7694","title":"Solana Storage Router","authors":"Avneet Singh, 0xc0de4c0ffee","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Avneet Singh, 0xc0de4c0ffee","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7694.md","source_label":"ERC 7694","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7694.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7694.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7694 (Solana Storage Router). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7694","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7694","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7694","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1070","slug":"erc-7695","title":"Ownership Delegation and Context for ERC-721","authors":"Duc Tho Tran","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Duc Tho Tran","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7695.md","source_label":"ERC 7695","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7695.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7695.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7695 (Ownership Delegation and Context for ERC-721). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7695","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7695","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7695","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1071","slug":"erc-7699","title":"ERC-20 Transfer Reference Extension","authors":"Radek Svarz","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Radek Svarz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7699.md","source_label":"ERC 7699","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7699.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7699.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7699 (ERC-20 Transfer Reference Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7699","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7699","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7699","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1072","slug":"erc-7700","title":"Cross-chain Storage Router Protocol","authors":"Avneet Singh, 0xc0de4c0ffee, Nick Johnson, Makoto Inoue","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Avneet Singh, 0xc0de4c0ffee, Nick Johnson, Makoto Inoue","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7700.md","source_label":"ERC 7700","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7700.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7700.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7700 (Cross-chain Storage Router Protocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7700","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7700","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7700","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1073","slug":"erc-7710","title":"Smart Contract Delegation","authors":"Ryan McPeck, Dan Finlay, Rob Dawson, Derek Chiang","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ryan McPeck, Dan Finlay, Rob Dawson, Derek Chiang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7710.md","source_label":"ERC 7710","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7710.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7710.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7710 (Smart Contract Delegation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7710","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7710","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7710","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1074","slug":"erc-7715","title":"Request Permissions from Wallets","authors":"Luka Isailovic, Derek Rein, Dan Finlay, Derek Chiang, Fil Makarov, Pedro Gomes, Conner Swenberg, Lukas Rosario, Idris Bowman, Jeff Smale","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Luka Isailovic, Derek Rein, Dan Finlay, Derek Chiang, Fil Makarov, Pedro Gomes, Conner Swenberg, Lukas Rosario, Idris Bowman, Jeff Smale","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7715.md","source_label":"ERC 7715","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7715.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7715.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7715 (Request Permissions from Wallets). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7715","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7715","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7715","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1075","slug":"erc-7720","title":"Deferred Token Transfer","authors":"Chen Liaoyuan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Chen Liaoyuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7720.md","source_label":"ERC 7720","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7720.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7720.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7720 (Deferred Token Transfer). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7720","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7720","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7720","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1076","slug":"erc-7721","title":"Lockable Extension for ERC-1155","authors":"Piyush Chittara","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Piyush Chittara","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7721.md","source_label":"ERC 7721","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7721.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7721.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7721 (Lockable Extension for ERC-1155). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7721","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7721","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7721","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1077","slug":"erc-7722","title":"Opaque Token","authors":"Ivica Aračić, Ante Bešlić, Mirko Katanić, SWIAT","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ivica Aračić, Ante Bešlić, Mirko Katanić, SWIAT","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7722.md","source_label":"ERC 7722","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7722.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7722.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7722 (Opaque Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7722","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7722","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7722","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1078","slug":"erc-7726","title":"Common Quote Oracle","authors":"alcueca, ruvaag, totomanov, r0ohafza","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"alcueca, ruvaag, totomanov, r0ohafza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7726.md","source_label":"ERC 7726","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7726.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7726.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7726 (Common Quote Oracle). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7726","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7726","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7726","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1079","slug":"erc-7729","title":"Token with Metadata","authors":"msfew","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"msfew","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7729.md","source_label":"ERC 7729","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7729.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7729.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7729 (Token with Metadata). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7729","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7729","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7729","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1080","slug":"erc-7730","title":"Structured Data Clear Signing Format","authors":"Laurent Castillo, Derek Rein, Pierre Aoun, Arik Galansky, Bartosz Rozwarski, Kaan Uzdogan, Fredrik, Alex Forshtat","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Laurent Castillo, Derek Rein, Pierre Aoun, Arik Galansky, Bartosz Rozwarski, Kaan Uzdogan, Fredrik, Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7730.md","source_label":"ERC 7730","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7730.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7730.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7730 (Structured Data Clear Signing Format). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7730","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7730","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7730","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1081","slug":"erc-7738","title":"Permissionless Script Registry","authors":"Victor Zhang, James Brown","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Victor Zhang, James Brown","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7738.md","source_label":"ERC 7738","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7738.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7738.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7738 (Permissionless Script Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7738","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7738","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7738","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1082","slug":"erc-7739","title":"Readable Typed Signatures for Smart Accounts","authors":"vectorized, Sihoon Lee, Francisco Giordano, Hadrien Croubois, Ernesto García, Im Juno, howydev, Atarpara, 0xcuriousapple","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"vectorized, Sihoon Lee, Francisco Giordano, Hadrien Croubois, Ernesto García, Im Juno, howydev, Atarpara, 0xcuriousapple","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7739.md","source_label":"ERC 7739","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7739.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7739.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7739 (Readable Typed Signatures for Smart Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7739","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7739","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7739","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1083","slug":"erc-7741","title":"Authorize Operator","authors":"Jeroen Offerijns, João Martins","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Jeroen Offerijns, João Martins","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7741.md","source_label":"ERC 7741","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7741.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7741.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7741 (Authorize Operator). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7741","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7741","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7741","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1084","slug":"erc-7744","title":"Code Index","authors":"Tim Pechersky","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Pechersky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7744.md","source_label":"ERC 7744","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7744.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7744.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7744 (Code Index). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7744","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7744","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7744","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1085","slug":"erc-7746","title":"Composable Security Middleware Hooks","authors":"Tim Pechersky","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Pechersky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7746.md","source_label":"ERC 7746","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7746.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7746.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7746 (Composable Security Middleware Hooks). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7746","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7746","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7746","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1086","slug":"erc-7750","title":"Decentralized Employment System","authors":"James Savechives","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"James Savechives","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7750.md","source_label":"ERC 7750","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7750.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7750.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7750 (Decentralized Employment System). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7750","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7750","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7750","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1087","slug":"erc-7754","title":"Tamperproof Extension Wallets API (TWIST)","authors":"Erik Marks, Guillaume Grosbois","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Erik Marks, Guillaume Grosbois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7754.md","source_label":"ERC 7754","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7754.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7754.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7754 (Tamperproof Extension Wallets API (TWIST)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7754","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7754","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7754","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1088","slug":"erc-7758","title":"Transfer With Authorization","authors":"Peter Jihoon Kim, Kevin Britz, David Knott, Dongri Jin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Peter Jihoon Kim, Kevin Britz, David Knott, Dongri Jin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7758.md","source_label":"ERC 7758","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7758.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7758.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7758 (Transfer With Authorization). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7758","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7758","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7758","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1089","slug":"erc-7760","title":"Minimal Upgradeable Proxies","authors":"Atarpara, JT Riley, Thomas, xiaobaiskill, Vectorized","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Atarpara, JT Riley, Thomas, xiaobaiskill, Vectorized","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7760.md","source_label":"ERC 7760","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7760.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7760.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7760 (Minimal Upgradeable Proxies). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7760","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7760","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7760","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1090","slug":"erc-7765","title":"Privileged Non-Fungible Tokens Tied To RWA","authors":"frank","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"frank","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7765.md","source_label":"ERC 7765","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7765.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7765.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7765 (Privileged Non-Fungible Tokens Tied To RWA). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7765","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7765","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7765","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1091","slug":"erc-7766","title":"Signature Aggregation for ERC-4337","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7766.md","source_label":"ERC 7766","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7766.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7766.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7766 (Signature Aggregation for ERC-4337). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7766","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7766","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7766","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1092","slug":"erc-7769","title":"JSON-RPC API for ERC-4337","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7769.md","source_label":"ERC 7769","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7769.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7769.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7769 (JSON-RPC API for ERC-4337). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7769","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7769","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7769","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1093","slug":"erc-7770","title":"Fractional Reserve Token","authors":"Yaron Velner","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Yaron Velner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7770.md","source_label":"ERC 7770","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7770.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7770.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7770 (Fractional Reserve Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7770","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7770","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7770","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1094","slug":"erc-7774","title":"Cache invalidation in ERC-5219 mode Web3 URL","authors":"Nicolas Deschildre, Sam Wilson","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Nicolas Deschildre, Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7774.md","source_label":"ERC 7774","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7774.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7774.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7774 (Cache invalidation in ERC-5219 mode Web3 URL). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7774","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7774","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7774","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1095","slug":"erc-7776","title":"Transparent Financial Statements","authors":"Ignacio Ceaglio","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ignacio Ceaglio","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7776.md","source_label":"ERC 7776","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7776.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7776.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7776 (Transparent Financial Statements). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7776","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7776","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7776","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1096","slug":"erc-7777","title":"Governance for Human Robot Societies","authors":"OpenMind, Jan Liphardt, Shaohong Zhong, Boyuan Chen, Paige Xu, James Ball, Thamer Dridi","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"OpenMind, Jan Liphardt, Shaohong Zhong, Boyuan Chen, Paige Xu, James Ball, Thamer Dridi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7777.md","source_label":"ERC 7777","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7777.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7777.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7777 (Governance for Human Robot Societies). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7777","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7777","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7777","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1097","slug":"erc-7779","title":"Interoperable Delegated Accounts","authors":"David Kim, Richard Meissner, Akshay Patel, Joshua Kim, Fangting, Yoav Weiss","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"David Kim, Richard Meissner, Akshay Patel, Joshua Kim, Fangting, Yoav Weiss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7779.md","source_label":"ERC 7779","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7779.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7779.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7779 (Interoperable Delegated Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7779","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7779","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7779","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1098","slug":"erc-7780","title":"Validation Module Extension for ERC-7579","authors":"zeroknots, Konrad Kopp, Taek Lee, Fil Makarov","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"zeroknots, Konrad Kopp, Taek Lee, Fil Makarov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7780.md","source_label":"ERC 7780","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7780.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7780.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7780 (Validation Module Extension for ERC-7579). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7780","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7780","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7780","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1099","slug":"erc-7785","title":"Onchain registration of chain identifiers","authors":"Marco Stronati, Jeff Lau","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marco Stronati, Jeff Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7785.md","source_label":"ERC 7785","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7785.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7785.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7785 (Onchain registration of chain identifiers). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7785","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7785","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7785","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1100","slug":"erc-7787","title":"Soulbound Degradable Governance","authors":"Guilherme Neves, Rafael Castaneda","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Guilherme Neves, Rafael Castaneda","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7787.md","source_label":"ERC 7787","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7787.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7787.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7787 (Soulbound Degradable Governance). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7787","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7787","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7787","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1101","slug":"erc-7794","title":"Grant Registry","authors":"Guilherme Neves","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Guilherme Neves","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7794.md","source_label":"ERC 7794","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7794.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7794.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7794 (Grant Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7794","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7794","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7794","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1102","slug":"erc-7795","title":"Wallet Call Token Capabilities","authors":"Agustín Aguilar, Michael Standen, Peter Kieltyka, William Hua, Philippe Castonguay","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Agustín Aguilar, Michael Standen, Peter Kieltyka, William Hua, Philippe Castonguay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7795.md","source_label":"ERC 7795","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7795.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7795.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7795 (Wallet Call Token Capabilities). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7795","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7795","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7795","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1103","slug":"erc-7796","title":"Conditional send transaction RPC","authors":"Dror Tirosh, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Dror Tirosh, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7796.md","source_label":"ERC 7796","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7796.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7796.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7796 (Conditional send transaction RPC). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7796","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7796","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7796","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1104","slug":"erc-7802","title":"Token With Mint/Burn Access Across Chains","authors":"skeletor, parti, joxes, ng, agus duha, disco, gotzen, 0age, Mark Tyneway, Zain Bacchus, Matt Solomon, Maurelian, Blaine Malone","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"skeletor, parti, joxes, ng, agus duha, disco, gotzen, 0age, Mark Tyneway, Zain Bacchus, Matt Solomon, Maurelian, Blaine Malone","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7802.md","source_label":"ERC 7802","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7802.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7802.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7802 (Token With Mint/Burn Access Across Chains). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7802","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7802","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7802","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1105","slug":"erc-7803","title":"EIP-712 Extensions for Account Abstraction","authors":"Francisco Giordano","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7803.md","source_label":"ERC 7803","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7803.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7803.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7803 (EIP-712 Extensions for Account Abstraction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7803","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7803","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7803","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1106","slug":"erc-7806","title":"Minimal intent-centric EOA smart account","authors":"hellohanchen","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"hellohanchen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7806.md","source_label":"ERC 7806","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7806.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7806.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7806 (Minimal intent-centric EOA smart account). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7806","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7806","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7806","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1107","slug":"erc-7811","title":"Wallet Asset Discovery","authors":"Luka Isailovic, Konrad Kopp, Derek Rein, Chris Smith","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Luka Isailovic, Konrad Kopp, Derek Rein, Chris Smith","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7811.md","source_label":"ERC 7811","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7811.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7811.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7811 (Wallet Asset Discovery). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7811","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7811","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7811","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1108","slug":"erc-7812","title":"ZK Identity Registry","authors":"Artem Chystiakov, Oleksandr Kurbatov, Yaroslav Panasenko, Michael Elliot, Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Artem Chystiakov, Oleksandr Kurbatov, Yaroslav Panasenko, Michael Elliot, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7812.md","source_label":"ERC 7812","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7812.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7812.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7812 (ZK Identity Registry). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7812","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7812","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7812","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1109","slug":"erc-7821","title":"Minimal Batch Executor Interface","authors":"Vectorized, Jake Moxey, Hadrien Croubois","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vectorized, Jake Moxey, Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7821.md","source_label":"ERC 7821","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7821.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7821.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7821 (Minimal Batch Executor Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7821","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7821","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7821","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1110","slug":"erc-7827","title":"JSON Contract with Value Version Control","authors":"lex-clinic","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lex-clinic","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7827.md","source_label":"ERC 7827","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7827.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7827.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7827 (JSON Contract with Value Version Control). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7827","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7827","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7827","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1111","slug":"erc-7828","title":"Interoperable Names","authors":"Sam Kaufman, Marco Stronati, Yuliya Alexiev, Jeff Lau, Sam Wilson, Vitalik Buterin, Teddy, Joxes, Racu, Skeletor Spaceman, TiTi, Gori, Ardy, Onizuka, Lumi, Moebius et al.","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Sam Kaufman, Marco Stronati, Yuliya Alexiev, Jeff Lau, Sam Wilson, Vitalik Buterin, Teddy, Joxes, Racu, Skeletor Spaceman, TiTi, Gori, Ardy, Onizuka, Lumi, Moebius et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7828.md","source_label":"ERC 7828","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7828.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7828.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7828 (Interoperable Names). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7828","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7828","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7828","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1112","slug":"erc-7829","title":"Data Asset NFT","authors":"Allen Dong, Lonika Zhang, Steven He","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Allen Dong, Lonika Zhang, Steven He","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7829.md","source_label":"ERC 7829","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7829.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7829.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7829 (Data Asset NFT). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7829","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7829","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7829","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1113","slug":"erc-7831","title":"Multi-Chain Addressing","authors":"Sam Wilson","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7831.md","source_label":"ERC 7831","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7831.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7831.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7831 (Multi-Chain Addressing). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7831","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7831","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7831","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1114","slug":"erc-7832","title":"Sustainable collaborative NFT collections","authors":"Gustavo Lobo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gustavo Lobo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7832.md","source_label":"ERC 7832","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7832.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7832.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7832 (Sustainable collaborative NFT collections). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7832","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7832","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7832","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1115","slug":"erc-7836","title":"Wallet Call Preparation API","authors":"Lukas Rosario, Conner Swenberg, Adam Hodges, Paaras Bhandari, Jake Moxey","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lukas Rosario, Conner Swenberg, Adam Hodges, Paaras Bhandari, Jake Moxey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7836.md","source_label":"ERC 7836","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7836.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7836.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7836 (Wallet Call Preparation API). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7836","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7836","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7836","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1116","slug":"erc-7841","title":"Cross-chain Message Format and Mailbox","authors":"Ellie Davidson, Alex Xiong, Philippe Camacho, and Ben Fisch","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ellie Davidson, Alex Xiong, Philippe Camacho, and Ben Fisch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7841.md","source_label":"ERC 7841","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7841.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7841.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7841 (Cross-chain Message Format and Mailbox). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7841","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7841","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7841","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1117","slug":"erc-7845","title":"Universal Orchestrator RPC","authors":"Kieran Goodary, Pillar Wallet, Luke Wickens, Rana Khoury","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Kieran Goodary, Pillar Wallet, Luke Wickens, Rana Khoury","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7845.md","source_label":"ERC 7845","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7845.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7845.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7845 (Universal Orchestrator RPC). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7845","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7845","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7845","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1118","slug":"erc-7846","title":"Wallet Connection API","authors":"Conner Swenberg, Jake Moxey, Lukas Rosario","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Conner Swenberg, Jake Moxey, Lukas Rosario","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7846.md","source_label":"ERC 7846","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7846.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7846.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7846 (Wallet Connection API). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7846","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7846","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7846","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1119","slug":"erc-7847","title":"Social Media NFTs","authors":"Nick Juntilla","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Nick Juntilla","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7847.md","source_label":"ERC 7847","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7847.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7847.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7847 (Social Media NFTs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7847","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7847","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7847","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1120","slug":"erc-7856","title":"Chain-Specific Payment Requests","authors":"Jack Chuma","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jack Chuma","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7856.md","source_label":"ERC 7856","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7856.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7856.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7856 (Chain-Specific Payment Requests). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7856","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7856","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7856","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1121","slug":"erc-7861","title":"ERC-721 Verifiable Credential Extension","authors":"Valerio Massimo Camaiani","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Valerio Massimo Camaiani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7861.md","source_label":"ERC 7861","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7861.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7861.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7861 (ERC-721 Verifiable Credential Extension). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7861","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7861","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7861","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1122","slug":"erc-7866","title":"Decentralised User Profiles","authors":"Kumar Anirudha","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kumar Anirudha","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7866.md","source_label":"ERC 7866","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7866.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7866.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7866 (Decentralised User Profiles). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7866","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7866","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7866","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1123","slug":"erc-7871","title":"Wallet Signing API","authors":"Lukas Rosario, Jake Moxey, Cody Crozier, Conner Swenberg","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lukas Rosario, Jake Moxey, Cody Crozier, Conner Swenberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7871.md","source_label":"ERC 7871","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7871.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7871.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7871 (Wallet Signing API). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7871","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7871","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7871","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1124","slug":"erc-7876","title":"Ethereum Network Configuration for DApps","authors":"Bogdan Gusiev, Sergey Bomko","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Bogdan Gusiev, Sergey Bomko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7876.md","source_label":"ERC 7876","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7876.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7876.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7876 (Ethereum Network Configuration for DApps). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7876","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7876","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7876","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1125","slug":"erc-7884","title":"Operation Router","authors":"Lucas Picollo, Alex Netto, Nick Johnson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Lucas Picollo, Alex Netto, Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7884.md","source_label":"ERC 7884","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7884.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7884.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7884 (Operation Router). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7884","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7884","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7884","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1126","slug":"erc-7887","title":"Cancelation for ERC-7540 Tokenized Vaults","authors":"Jeroen Offerijns, Vikram Arun","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jeroen Offerijns, Vikram Arun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7887.md","source_label":"ERC 7887","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7887.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7887.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7887 (Cancelation for ERC-7540 Tokenized Vaults). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7887","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7887","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7887","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1127","slug":"erc-7888","title":"Crosschain Broadcaster","authors":"Henry Arneson, Chris Buckland","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Henry Arneson, Chris Buckland","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7888.md","source_label":"ERC 7888","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7888.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7888.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7888 (Crosschain Broadcaster). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7888","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7888","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7888","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1128","slug":"erc-7891","title":"Splitting and Merging of NFTs","authors":"Nitin Bhagat, JongWook Bae, Su-Hyun Lee","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Nitin Bhagat, JongWook Bae, Su-Hyun Lee","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7891.md","source_label":"ERC 7891","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7891.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7891.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7891 (Splitting and Merging of NFTs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7891","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7891","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7891","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1129","slug":"erc-7895","title":"API for Hierarchical Accounts","authors":"Wilson Cusack, Jake Feldman, Montana Wong, Felix Zhang, Jake Moxey","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wilson Cusack, Jake Feldman, Montana Wong, Felix Zhang, Jake Moxey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7895.md","source_label":"ERC 7895","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7895.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7895.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7895 (API for Hierarchical Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7895","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7895","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7895","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1130","slug":"erc-7897","title":"Wallet-Linked Services for Smart Accounts","authors":"Francesco Sullo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francesco Sullo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7897.md","source_label":"ERC 7897","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7897.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7897.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7897 (Wallet-Linked Services for Smart Accounts). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7897","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7897","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7897","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1131","slug":"erc-7902","title":"Wallet Capabilities for Account Abstraction","authors":"Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7902.md","source_label":"ERC 7902","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7902.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7902.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7902 (Wallet Capabilities for Account Abstraction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7902","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7902","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7902","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1132","slug":"erc-7920","title":"Composite EIP-712 Signatures","authors":"Sola Ogunsakin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sola Ogunsakin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7920.md","source_label":"ERC 7920","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7920.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7920.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7920 (Composite EIP-712 Signatures). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7920","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7920","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7920","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1133","slug":"erc-7929","title":"PermaLink Asset Bound Token","authors":"Mihai Onila, Nick Zeman, Narcis Cotaie","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mihai Onila, Nick Zeman, Narcis Cotaie","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7929.md","source_label":"ERC 7929","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7929.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7929.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7929 (PermaLink Asset Bound Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7929","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7929","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7929","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1134","slug":"erc-7930","title":"Interoperable Addresses","authors":"Teddy, Joxes, Nick Johnson, Francisco Giordano, Skeletor Spaceman, Racu, TiTi, Gori, Ardy, Onizuka, Sam Kaufman, Marco Stronati, Yuliya Alexiev, Jeff Lau, Sam Wilson et al.","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Teddy, Joxes, Nick Johnson, Francisco Giordano, Skeletor Spaceman, Racu, TiTi, Gori, Ardy, Onizuka, Sam Kaufman, Marco Stronati, Yuliya Alexiev, Jeff Lau, Sam Wilson et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7930.md","source_label":"ERC 7930","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7930.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7930.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7930 (Interoperable Addresses). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7930","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7930","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7930","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1135","slug":"erc-7936","title":"Versioned Proxy Contract Interface","authors":"Raphina Liu, Monica Jin, Martin Monperrus","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Raphina Liu, Monica Jin, Martin Monperrus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7936.md","source_label":"ERC 7936","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7936.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7936.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7936 (Versioned Proxy Contract Interface). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7936","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7936","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7936","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1136","slug":"erc-7945","title":"Confidential Transactions Supported Token","authors":"Siyuan Zheng, Zhe Han, Xiaoyu Liu, Wenwei Ma, Jun Meng Tan, Yuxiang Fu, Kecheng Gao, Alwin Ng Jun Wei, Chenxin Wang, Xiang Gao, yuanshanhshan, Hao Zou, Yanyi Liang, Yuehua Zhang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Siyuan Zheng, Zhe Han, Xiaoyu Liu, Wenwei Ma, Jun Meng Tan, Yuxiang Fu, Kecheng Gao, Alwin Ng Jun Wei, Chenxin Wang, Xiang Gao, yuanshanhshan, Hao Zou, Yanyi Liang, Yuehua Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7945.md","source_label":"ERC 7945","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7945.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7945.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7945 (Confidential Transactions Supported Token). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7945","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7945","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7945","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1137","slug":"erc-7946","title":"Unidirectional Wallet Uplink aka UWULink","authors":"Moody Salem, Tina Zheng","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Moody Salem, Tina Zheng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7946.md","source_label":"ERC 7946","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7946.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7946.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7946 (Unidirectional Wallet Uplink aka UWULink). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7946","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7946","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7946","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1138","slug":"erc-7947","title":"Account Abstraction Recovery Interface","authors":"Artem Chystiakov","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Artem Chystiakov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7947.md","source_label":"ERC 7947","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7947.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7947.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7947 (Account Abstraction Recovery Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7947","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7947","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7947","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1139","slug":"erc-7955","title":"Permissionless CREATE2 Factory","authors":"Nicholas Rodrigues Lordello, Richard Meissner, Valentin Seehausen","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Nicholas Rodrigues Lordello, Richard Meissner, Valentin Seehausen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7955.md","source_label":"ERC 7955","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7955.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7955.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7955 (Permissionless CREATE2 Factory). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7955","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7955","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7955","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1140","slug":"erc-7962","title":"Key Hash Based Tokens","authors":"Alex Tian, Zhixiong Pan, Geoffrey, liyingxuan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Alex Tian, Zhixiong Pan, Geoffrey, liyingxuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7962.md","source_label":"ERC 7962","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7962.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7962.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7962 (Key Hash Based Tokens). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7962","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7962","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7962","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1141","slug":"erc-7964","title":"Crosschain EIP-712 Signatures","authors":"Ernesto García","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ernesto García","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7964.md","source_label":"ERC 7964","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7964.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7964.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7964 (Crosschain EIP-712 Signatures). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7964","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7964","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7964","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1142","slug":"erc-7965","title":"Proof-based Broadcast in ERC-7786 Gateways","authors":"Ernesto García","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ernesto García","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7965.md","source_label":"ERC 7965","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7965.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7965.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7965 (Proof-based Broadcast in ERC-7786 Gateways). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7965","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7965","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7965","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1143","slug":"erc-7968","title":"Owner-Authorized Token Transfer Protocol","authors":"Julius Lauterbach","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Julius Lauterbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7968.md","source_label":"ERC 7968","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7968.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7968.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7968 (Owner-Authorized Token Transfer Protocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7968","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7968","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7968","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1144","slug":"erc-7969","title":"DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Registry","authors":"Mike Fu, Matthew Yu, Ernesto García","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mike Fu, Matthew Yu, Ernesto García","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7969.md","source_label":"ERC 7969","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7969.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7969.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7969 (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7969","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7969","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7969","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1145","slug":"erc-7984","title":"Confidential Fungible Token","authors":"Aryeh Greenberg, Ernesto García, Hadrien Croubois, Ghazi Ben Amor, Clement Danjou, Joseph Andre Turk, Silas Davis, Nicolas Pasquier","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Aryeh Greenberg, Ernesto García, Hadrien Croubois, Ghazi Ben Amor, Clement Danjou, Joseph Andre Turk, Silas Davis, Nicolas Pasquier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7984.md","source_label":"ERC 7984","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7984.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7984.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7984 (Confidential Fungible Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7984","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7984","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7984","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1146","slug":"erc-7985","title":"Gateway Attributes for Message Control","authors":"Ernesto García, Kalman Lajko, Valera Grinenko","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ernesto García, Kalman Lajko, Valera Grinenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7985.md","source_label":"ERC 7985","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7985.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7985.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7985 (Gateway Attributes for Message Control). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7985","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7985","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7985","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1147","slug":"erc-7988","title":"Minimal Avatar Smart Wallet (MASW)","authors":"0xMostafas","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"0xMostafas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7988.md","source_label":"ERC 7988","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7988.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7988.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7988 (Minimal Avatar Smart Wallet (MASW)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7988","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7988","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7988","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1148","slug":"erc-7992","title":"Verifiable ML Model Inference (ZKML)","authors":"Aryaethn","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Aryaethn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7992.md","source_label":"ERC 7992","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7992.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7992.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7992 (Verifiable ML Model Inference (ZKML)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7992","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7992","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7992","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1149","slug":"erc-7996","title":"Contract Feature Detection","authors":"raffy.eth","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"raffy.eth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-7996.md","source_label":"ERC 7996","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-7996.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-7996.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 7996 (Contract Feature Detection). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7996","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7996","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7996","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1150","slug":"erc-8000","title":"Operator contract for non delegated EOAs","authors":"Marcelo Morgado, Manoj Patidar","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marcelo Morgado, Manoj Patidar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8000.md","source_label":"ERC 8000","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8000.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8000.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8000 (Operator contract for non delegated EOAs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8000","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8000","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8000","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1151","slug":"erc-8002","title":"Simplified Payment Verification Gateway","authors":"Artem Chystiakov, Oleh Komendant","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Artem Chystiakov, Oleh Komendant","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8002.md","source_label":"ERC 8002","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8002.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8002.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8002 (Simplified Payment Verification Gateway). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8002","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8002","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8002","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1152","slug":"erc-8004","title":"Trustless Agents","authors":"Marco De Rossi, Davide Crapis, Jordan Ellis, Erik Reppel","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marco De Rossi, Davide Crapis, Jordan Ellis, Erik Reppel","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8004.md","source_label":"ERC 8004","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8004.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8004.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8004 (Trustless Agents). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8004","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8004","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8004","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1153","slug":"erc-801","title":"Canary Standard","authors":"ligi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"ligi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-801.md","source_label":"ERC 801","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-801.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-801.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 801 (Canary Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-801","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-801","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-801","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1154","slug":"erc-8017","title":"Payout Race","authors":"Kyle Thornton","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kyle Thornton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8017.md","source_label":"ERC 8017","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8017.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8017.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8017 (Payout Race). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8017","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8017","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8017","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1155","slug":"erc-8019","title":"Minimal Wallet-Managed Auto-Login for SIWE","authors":"Ivo Georgiev, Vijay Krishnavanshi","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ivo Georgiev, Vijay Krishnavanshi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8019.md","source_label":"ERC 8019","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8019.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8019.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8019 (Minimal Wallet-Managed Auto-Login for SIWE). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8019","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8019","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8019","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1156","slug":"erc-8023","title":"Multi-step Contract Ownership","authors":"David Kim","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"David Kim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8023.md","source_label":"ERC 8023","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8023.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8023.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8023 (Multi-step Contract Ownership). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8023","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8023","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8023","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1157","slug":"erc-8033","title":"Agent Council Oracles","authors":"Rohan Parikh, Jon Michael Ross","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Rohan Parikh, Jon Michael Ross","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8033.md","source_label":"ERC 8033","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8033.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8033.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8033 (Agent Council Oracles). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8033","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8033","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8033","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1158","slug":"erc-8040","title":"ESG Tokenization Protocol","authors":"Leandro Lemos","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Leandro Lemos","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8040.md","source_label":"ERC 8040","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8040.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8040.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8040 (ESG Tokenization Protocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8040","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8040","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8040","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1159","slug":"erc-8041","title":"Fixed-Supply Agent NFT Collections","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8041.md","source_label":"ERC 8041","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8041.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8041.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8041 (Fixed-Supply Agent NFT Collections). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8041","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8041","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8041","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1160","slug":"erc-8047","title":"Forensic Token (Forest)","authors":"Sirawit Techavanitch, Supachate Innet","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sirawit Techavanitch, Supachate Innet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8047.md","source_label":"ERC 8047","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8047.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8047.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8047 (Forensic Token (Forest)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8047","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8047","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8047","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1161","slug":"erc-8048","title":"Onchain Metadata for Token Registries","authors":"Prem Makeig, Rafael Abuawad","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig, Rafael Abuawad","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8048.md","source_label":"ERC 8048","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8048.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8048.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8048 (Onchain Metadata for Token Registries). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8048","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8048","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8048","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1162","slug":"erc-8049","title":"Contract-Level Onchain Metadata","authors":"Prem Makeig, Rafael Abuawad","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig, Rafael Abuawad","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8049.md","source_label":"ERC 8049","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8049.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8049.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8049 (Contract-Level Onchain Metadata). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8049","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8049","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8049","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1163","slug":"erc-8054","title":"Forkable ERC-20 Token","authors":"Kevin, Fuxing","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kevin, Fuxing","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8054.md","source_label":"ERC 8054","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8054.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8054.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8054 (Forkable ERC-20 Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8054","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8054","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8054","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1164","slug":"erc-8056","title":"Scaled UI Amount Extension for ERC-20 Tokens","authors":"Chris Ridmann, Daniel Gretzke, Gilbert Shih, Tino Martinez Molina, Markus Osterlund","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Chris Ridmann, Daniel Gretzke, Gilbert Shih, Tino Martinez Molina, Markus Osterlund","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8056.md","source_label":"ERC 8056","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8056.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8056.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8056 (Scaled UI Amount Extension for ERC-20 Tokens). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8056","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8056","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8056","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1165","slug":"erc-8065","title":"Zero Knowledge Token Wrapper","authors":"Jiahui Cui, 0xZPL","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jiahui Cui, 0xZPL","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8065.md","source_label":"ERC 8065","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8065.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8065.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8065 (Zero Knowledge Token Wrapper). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8065","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8065","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8065","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1166","slug":"erc-8074","title":"Self-Describing Bytes via EIP-712 Selectors","authors":"Andrew Richardson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Andrew Richardson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8074.md","source_label":"ERC 8074","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8074.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8074.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8074 (Self-Describing Bytes via EIP-712 Selectors). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8074","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8074","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8074","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1167","slug":"erc-8084","title":"Zero-knowledge proof metadata","authors":"cococay","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"cococay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8084.md","source_label":"ERC 8084","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8084.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8084.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8084 (Zero-knowledge proof metadata). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8084","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8084","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8084","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1168","slug":"erc-8085","title":"Dual-Mode Fungible Tokens","authors":"Rowan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Rowan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8085.md","source_label":"ERC 8085","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8085.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8085.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8085 (Dual-Mode Fungible Tokens). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8085","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8085","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8085","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1169","slug":"erc-8086","title":"Privacy Token","authors":"Rowan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Rowan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8086.md","source_label":"ERC 8086","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8086.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8086.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8086 (Privacy Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8086","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8086","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8086","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1170","slug":"erc-8092","title":"Associated Accounts","authors":"Steve Katzman, Amie Corso, Stephan Cilliers","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Steve Katzman, Amie Corso, Stephan Cilliers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8092.md","source_label":"ERC 8092","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8092.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8092.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8092 (Associated Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8092","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8092","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8092","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1171","slug":"erc-8100","title":"Representable Contract State","authors":"Christian Fries, Peter Kohl-Landgraf, Raphael Prandtl","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Christian Fries, Peter Kohl-Landgraf, Raphael Prandtl","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8100.md","source_label":"ERC 8100","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8100.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8100.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8100 (Representable Contract State). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8100","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8100","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8100","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1172","slug":"erc-8106","title":"RWA Event-based Compliance Framework","authors":"Andrew Wang, Jack Yin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Andrew Wang, Jack Yin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8106.md","source_label":"ERC 8106","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8106.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8106.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8106 (RWA Event-based Compliance Framework). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8106","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8106","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8106","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1173","slug":"erc-8107","title":"ENS Trust Registry for Agent Coordination","authors":"Kwame Bryan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kwame Bryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8107.md","source_label":"ERC 8107","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8107.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8107.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8107 (ENS Trust Registry for Agent Coordination). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8107","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8107","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8107","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1174","slug":"erc-8109","title":"Diamonds, Simplified","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8109.md","source_label":"ERC 8109","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8109.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8109.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8109 (Diamonds, Simplified). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8109","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8109","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8109","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1175","slug":"erc-8110","title":"Domain Architecture for Diamonds","authors":"Hoang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Hoang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8110.md","source_label":"ERC 8110","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8110.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8110.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8110 (Domain Architecture for Diamonds). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8110","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8110","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8110","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1176","slug":"erc-8111","title":"Bound Signatures","authors":"William Morriss","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8111.md","source_label":"ERC 8111","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8111.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8111.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8111 (Bound Signatures). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8111","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8111","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8111","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1177","slug":"erc-8113","title":"Series Accounting for Incentivized Vaults","authors":"Yash Saraswat","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Yash Saraswat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8113.md","source_label":"ERC 8113","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8113.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8113.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8113 (Series Accounting for Incentivized Vaults). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8113","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8113","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8113","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1178","slug":"erc-8117","title":"Anti-Poisoning Compact EVM Address Format","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8117.md","source_label":"ERC 8117","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8117.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8117.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8117 (Anti-Poisoning Compact EVM Address Format). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8117","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8117","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8117","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1179","slug":"erc-8119","title":"Parameterized Storage Keys","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8119.md","source_label":"ERC 8119","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8119.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8119.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8119 (Parameterized Storage Keys). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8119","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8119","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8119","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1180","slug":"erc-8121","title":"Cross-Chain Function Calls via Hooks","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8121.md","source_label":"ERC 8121","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8121.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8121.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8121 (Cross-Chain Function Calls via Hooks). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8121","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8121","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8121","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1181","slug":"erc-8122","title":"Minimal Agent Registry","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8122.md","source_label":"ERC 8122","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8122.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8122.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8122 (Minimal Agent Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8122","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8122","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8122","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1182","slug":"erc-8127","title":"Human Readable Token Identifiers","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8127.md","source_label":"ERC 8127","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8127.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8127.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8127 (Human Readable Token Identifiers). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8127","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8127","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8127","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1183","slug":"erc-8143","title":"Smart Credential Resolution Interface","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8143.md","source_label":"ERC 8143","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8143.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8143.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8143 (Smart Credential Resolution Interface). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8143","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8143","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8143","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1184","slug":"erc-8152","title":"Content-Addressable Logic Modules (CALM)","authors":"Radek Svarz, Nick Mudge, William Morriss","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Radek Svarz, Nick Mudge, William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8152.md","source_label":"ERC 8152","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8152.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8152.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8152 (Content-Addressable Logic Modules (CALM)). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8152","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8152","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8152","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1185","slug":"erc-8153","title":"Facet-Based Diamonds","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8153.md","source_label":"ERC 8153","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8153.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8153.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8153 (Facet-Based Diamonds). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8153","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8153","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8153","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1186","slug":"erc-8167","title":"Modular Dispatch Proxies","authors":"William Morriss, Radek Svarz","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"William Morriss, Radek Svarz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8167.md","source_label":"ERC 8167","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8167.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8167.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8167 (Modular Dispatch Proxies). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8167","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8167","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8167","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1187","slug":"erc-8176","title":"Descriptor Attestations for ERC-7730","authors":"Bartosz Rozwarski","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Bartosz Rozwarski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8176.md","source_label":"ERC 8176","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8176.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8176.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8176 (Descriptor Attestations for ERC-7730). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8176","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8176","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8176","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1188","slug":"erc-8179","title":"Blob Space Segments","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Skeletor Spaceman","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Skeletor Spaceman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8179.md","source_label":"ERC 8179","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8179.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8179.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8179 (Blob Space Segments). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8179","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8179","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8179","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1189","slug":"erc-8180","title":"Blob Authenticated Messaging","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Skeletor Spaceman, Orca","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Skeletor Spaceman, Orca","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8180.md","source_label":"ERC 8180","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8180.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8180.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8180 (Blob Authenticated Messaging). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8180","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8180","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8180","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1190","slug":"erc-8183","title":"Agentic Commerce","authors":"Davide Crapis, Bryan Lim, Tay Weixiong, Chooi Zuhwa","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Davide Crapis, Bryan Lim, Tay Weixiong, Chooi Zuhwa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8183.md","source_label":"ERC 8183","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8183.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8183.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8183 (Agentic Commerce). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8183","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8183","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8183","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1191","slug":"erc-8187","title":"Token Puller","authors":"Guillermo Narvaja","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Guillermo Narvaja","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8187.md","source_label":"ERC 8187","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8187.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8187.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8187 (Token Puller). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8187","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8187","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8187","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1192","slug":"erc-8199","title":"Sandboxed Smart Wallet","authors":"David Kim","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"David Kim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8199.md","source_label":"ERC 8199","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8199.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8199.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8199 (Sandboxed Smart Wallet). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8199","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8199","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8199","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1193","slug":"erc-8217","title":"Agent NFT Identity Bindings","authors":"Prem Makeig","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Prem Makeig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8217.md","source_label":"ERC 8217","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8217.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8217.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8217 (Agent NFT Identity Bindings). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8217","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8217","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8217","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1194","slug":"erc-8226","title":"Regulated Agent Mandate","authors":"Ludovico Rossi, Dario Lo Buglio, Thamer Dridi, Nabil El Alami Khalifi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Ludovico Rossi, Dario Lo Buglio, Thamer Dridi, Nabil El Alami Khalifi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8226.md","source_label":"ERC 8226","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8226.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8226.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8226 (Regulated Agent Mandate). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8226","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8226","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8226","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1195","slug":"erc-823","title":"Token Exchange Standard","authors":"Kashish Khullar","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Kashish Khullar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-823.md","source_label":"ERC 823","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-823.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-823.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 823 (Token Exchange Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-823","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-823","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-823","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1196","slug":"erc-8255","title":"Expiring Token Approvals","authors":"Moody Salem","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Moody Salem","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8255.md","source_label":"ERC 8255","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8255.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8255.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8255 (Expiring Token Approvals). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8255","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8255","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8255","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1197","slug":"erc-8257","title":"Agent Tool Registry","authors":"Cody Sears, Ryan Ghods","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Cody Sears, Ryan Ghods","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8257.md","source_label":"ERC 8257","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8257.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8257.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8257 (Agent Tool Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8257","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8257","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8257","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1198","slug":"erc-8262","title":"Zero-Knowledge Compliance Oracle","authors":"DROO, Bloo, Merkle Bonsai, Jan","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"DROO, Bloo, Merkle Bonsai, Jan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8262.md","source_label":"ERC 8262","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8262.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8262.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8262 (Zero-Knowledge Compliance Oracle). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8262","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8262","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8262","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1199","slug":"erc-8273","title":"Attestation-Gated Agentic Actions","authors":"Yunan Li, Qingzhi Zha, Xianrui Qin, Vitto Rivabella","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Yunan Li, Qingzhi Zha, Xianrui Qin, Vitto Rivabella","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8273.md","source_label":"ERC 8273","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8273.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8273.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8273 (Attestation-Gated Agentic Actions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8273","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8273","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8273","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1200","slug":"erc-8286","title":"Modular Accounts for Frame Transactions","authors":"Chiranjeev Mishra, Pedro Gomes, Alex Forshtat","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chiranjeev Mishra, Pedro Gomes, Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8286.md","source_label":"ERC 8286","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8286.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8286.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8286 (Modular Accounts for Frame Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8286","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8286","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8286","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1201","slug":"erc-8290","title":"Shielded Note Teleportation","authors":"georgeh","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"georgeh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8290.md","source_label":"ERC 8290","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8290.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8290.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8290 (Shielded Note Teleportation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8290","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8290","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8290","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1202","slug":"erc-831","title":"URI Format for Ethereum","authors":"ligi","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"ligi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-831.md","source_label":"ERC 831","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-831.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-831.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 831 (URI Format for Ethereum). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-831","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-831","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-831","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1203","slug":"erc-8320","title":"Regulated Asset Claim","authors":"Edwin Mata, Ludovico Rossi, Dario Lo Buglio, Thamer Dridi, Nabil El Alami Khalifi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Edwin Mata, Ludovico Rossi, Dario Lo Buglio, Thamer Dridi, Nabil El Alami Khalifi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8320.md","source_label":"ERC 8320","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8320.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8320.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8320 (Regulated Asset Claim). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8320","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8320","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8320","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1204","slug":"erc-8325","title":"Asset Anchor Registry","authors":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8325.md","source_label":"ERC 8325","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8325.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8325.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8325 (Asset Anchor Registry). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8325","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8325","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8325","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1205","slug":"erc-8326","title":"Canonical Document Bundle Anchor","authors":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8326.md","source_label":"ERC 8326","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8326.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8326.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8326 (Canonical Document Bundle Anchor). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8326","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8326","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8326","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1206","slug":"erc-8327","title":"Directional Transfer Domain Registry","authors":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8327.md","source_label":"ERC 8327","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8327.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8327.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8327 (Directional Transfer Domain Registry). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8327","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8327","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8327","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1207","slug":"erc-8328","title":"Subject-Linked Compliance Event Log","authors":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8328.md","source_label":"ERC 8328","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8328.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8328.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8328 (Subject-Linked Compliance Event Log). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8328","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8328","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8328","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1208","slug":"erc-8329","title":"Subject-Linked Impact Snapshot Log","authors":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8329.md","source_label":"ERC 8329","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8329.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8329.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8329 (Subject-Linked Impact Snapshot Log). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8329","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8329","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8329","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1209","slug":"erc-8330","title":"Subject-Linked NAV Snapshot Oracle","authors":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Turner, David Hay, Reagan Simpson, Collins Musyimi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8330.md","source_label":"ERC 8330","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8330.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8330.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8330 (Subject-Linked NAV Snapshot Oracle). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8330","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8330","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8330","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1210","slug":"erc-8349","title":"Index-Based Multi-Facet Proxy","authors":"Artem Buchikhin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Artem Buchikhin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8349.md","source_label":"ERC 8349","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8349.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8349.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8349 (Index-Based Multi-Facet Proxy). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8349","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8349","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8349","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1211","slug":"erc-8350","title":"Agent Memory State Registry","authors":"Everest An, XiaoHai, Luo, Eric","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Everest An, XiaoHai, Luo, Eric","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8350.md","source_label":"ERC 8350","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8350.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8350.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8350 (Agent Memory State Registry). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8350","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8350","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8350","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1212","slug":"erc-8354","title":"Confidential Agent Policy Verdicts","authors":"Muhammad Zidan Fatonie, Faisal Firdani, Maulana Asykari Muhammad","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Muhammad Zidan Fatonie, Faisal Firdani, Maulana Asykari Muhammad","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8354.md","source_label":"ERC 8354","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8354.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8354.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8354 (Confidential Agent Policy Verdicts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8354","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8354","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8354","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1213","slug":"erc-8377","title":"Reference-Relative Slippage Bounds","authors":"Faisal Firdani","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Faisal Firdani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8377.md","source_label":"ERC 8377","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8377.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8377.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8377 (Reference-Relative Slippage Bounds). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8377","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8377","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8377","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1214","slug":"erc-838","title":"ABI specification for REVERT reason string","authors":"Federico Bond, Renan Rodrigues de Souza","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Federico Bond, Renan Rodrigues de Souza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-838.md","source_label":"ERC 838","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-838.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-838.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 838 (ABI specification for REVERT reason string). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-838","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-838","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-838","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1215","slug":"erc-8410","title":"Portable Execution Plan Artifact","authors":"Moody Salem","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Moody Salem","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-8410.md","source_label":"ERC 8410","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-8410.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-8410.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 8410 (Portable Execution Plan Artifact). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8410","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8410","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8410","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1216","slug":"erc-875","title":"Simpler NFT standard with batching and native atomic swaps","authors":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Weiwu Zhang, James Sangalli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-875.md","source_label":"ERC 875","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-875.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-875.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 875 (Simpler NFT standard with batching and native atomic swaps). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-875","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-875","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-875","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1217","slug":"erc-884","title":"DGCL Token","authors":"Dave Sag","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dave Sag","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-884.md","source_label":"ERC 884","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-884.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-884.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 884 (DGCL Token). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-884","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-884","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-884","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1218","slug":"erc-897","title":"DelegateProxy","authors":"Jorge Izquierdo, Manuel Araoz","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jorge Izquierdo, Manuel Araoz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-897.md","source_label":"ERC 897","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-897.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-897.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 897 (DelegateProxy). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-897","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-897","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-897","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1219","slug":"erc-900","title":"Simple Staking Interface","authors":"Dean Eigenmann, Jorge Izquierdo","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dean Eigenmann, Jorge Izquierdo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-900.md","source_label":"ERC 900","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-900.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-900.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 900 (Simple Staking Interface). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-900","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-900","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-900","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1220","slug":"erc-902","title":"Token Validation","authors":"Brooklyn Zelenka, Tom Carchrae, Gleb Naumenko","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Brooklyn Zelenka, Tom Carchrae, Gleb Naumenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-902.md","source_label":"ERC 902","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-902.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-902.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 902 (Token Validation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-902","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-902","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-902","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1221","slug":"erc-918","title":"Mineable Token Standard","authors":"Jay Logelin, Infernal_toast, Michael Seiler, Brandon Grill","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jay Logelin, Infernal_toast, Michael Seiler, Brandon Grill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-918.md","source_label":"ERC 918","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-918.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-918.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 918 (Mineable Token Standard). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-918","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-918","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-918","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1222","slug":"erc-926","title":"Address metadata registry","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-926.md","source_label":"ERC 926","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-926.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-926.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 926 (Address metadata registry). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-926","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-926","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-926","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1223","slug":"erc-927","title":"Generalised authorisations","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-927.md","source_label":"ERC 927","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-927.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-927.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 927 (Generalised authorisations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-927","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-927","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-927","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1224","slug":"erc-998","title":"Composable Non-Fungible Token","authors":"Matt Lockyer, Nick Mudge, Jordan Schalm, sebastian echeverry, Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Matt Lockyer, Nick Mudge, Jordan Schalm, sebastian echeverry, Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/master/ERCS/erc-998.md","source_label":"ERC 998","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/erc-998.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/erc-998.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs","editorial_line":"A desk note on ERC 998 (Composable Non-Fungible Token). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-998","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-998","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-998","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1225","slug":"eip-1","title":"EIP Purpose and Guidelines","authors":"Martin Becze, Hudson Jameson, et al.","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Martin Becze, Hudson Jameson, et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1.md","source_label":"EIP 1","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1 (EIP Purpose and Guidelines). The file's status is Living. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1226","slug":"eip-100","title":"Change difficulty adjustment to target mean block time including uncles","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-100.md","source_label":"EIP 100","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-100.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-100.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 100 (Change difficulty adjustment to target mean block time including uncles). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-100","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-100","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-100","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1227","slug":"eip-101","title":"Serenity Currency and Crypto Abstraction","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-101.md","source_label":"EIP 101","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-101.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-101.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 101 (Serenity Currency and Crypto Abstraction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-101","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-101","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-101","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1228","slug":"eip-1010","title":"Uniformity Between 0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B and 0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c","authors":"Anderson Wesley","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Anderson Wesley","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1010.md","source_label":"EIP 1010","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1010.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1010.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1010 (Uniformity Between 0xAb5801a7D398351b8bE11C439e05C5B3259aeC9B and 0x15E55EF43efA8348dDaeAa455F16C43B64917e3c). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1010","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1010","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1010","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1229","slug":"eip-1011","title":"Hybrid Casper FFG","authors":"Danny Ryan, Chih-Cheng Liang","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Danny Ryan, Chih-Cheng Liang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1011.md","source_label":"EIP 1011","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1011.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1011.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1011 (Hybrid Casper FFG). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1011","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1011","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1011","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1230","slug":"eip-1013","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Constantinople\"","authors":"Nick Savers","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Savers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1013.md","source_label":"EIP 1013","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1013.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1013.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1013 (\"Hardfork Meta: Constantinople\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1013","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1013","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1013","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1231","slug":"eip-1014","title":"Skinny CREATE2","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1014.md","source_label":"EIP 1014","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1014.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1014.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1014 (Skinny CREATE2). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1014","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1014","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1014","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1232","slug":"eip-1015","title":"Configurable On Chain Issuance","authors":"Alex Van de Sande","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alex Van de Sande","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1015.md","source_label":"EIP 1015","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1015.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1015.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1015 (Configurable On Chain Issuance). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1015","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1015","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1015","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1233","slug":"eip-1051","title":"Overflow checking for the EVM","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1051.md","source_label":"EIP 1051","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1051.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1051.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1051 (Overflow checking for the EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1051","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1051","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1051","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1234","slug":"eip-1057","title":"ProgPoW, a Programmatic Proof-of-Work","authors":"Greg Colvin, Andrea Lanfranchi, Michael Carter, IfDefElse","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Andrea Lanfranchi, Michael Carter, IfDefElse","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1057.md","source_label":"EIP 1057","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1057.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1057.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1057 (ProgPoW, a Programmatic Proof-of-Work). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1057","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1057","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1057","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1235","slug":"eip-107","title":"safe \"eth_sendTransaction\" authorization via html popup","authors":"Ronan Sandford","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-107.md","source_label":"EIP 107","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-107.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-107.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 107 (safe \"eth_sendTransaction\" authorization via html popup). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-107","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-107","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-107","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1236","slug":"eip-1087","title":"Net gas metering for SSTORE operations","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1087.md","source_label":"EIP 1087","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1087.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1087.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1087 (Net gas metering for SSTORE operations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1087","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1087","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1087","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1237","slug":"eip-1102","title":"Opt-in account exposure","authors":"Paul Bouchon, Erik Marks","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Paul Bouchon, Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1102.md","source_label":"EIP 1102","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1102.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1102.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1102 (Opt-in account exposure). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1102","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1102","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1102","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1238","slug":"eip-1109","title":"PRECOMPILEDCALL opcode (Remove CALL costs for precompiled contracts)","authors":"Jordi Baylina","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jordi Baylina","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1109.md","source_label":"EIP 1109","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1109.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1109.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1109 (PRECOMPILEDCALL opcode (Remove CALL costs for precompiled contracts)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1109","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1109","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1109","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1239","slug":"eip-1186","title":"RPC-Method to get Merkle Proofs - eth_getProof","authors":"Simon Jentzsch, Christoph Jentzsch","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Simon Jentzsch, Christoph Jentzsch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1186.md","source_label":"EIP 1186","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1186.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1186.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1186 (RPC-Method to get Merkle Proofs - eth_getProof). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1186","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1186","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1186","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1240","slug":"eip-1227","title":"Defuse Difficulty Bomb and Reset Block Reward","authors":"SmeargleUsedFly","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"SmeargleUsedFly","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1227.md","source_label":"EIP 1227","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1227.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1227.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1227 (Defuse Difficulty Bomb and Reset Block Reward). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1227","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1227","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1227","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1241","slug":"eip-1234","title":"Constantinople Difficulty Bomb Delay and Block Reward Adjustment","authors":"Afri Schoedon","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Afri Schoedon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1234.md","source_label":"EIP 1234","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1234.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1234.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1234 (Constantinople Difficulty Bomb Delay and Block Reward Adjustment). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1234","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1234","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1234","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1242","slug":"eip-1240","title":"Remove Difficulty Bomb","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1240.md","source_label":"EIP 1240","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1240.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1240.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1240 (Remove Difficulty Bomb). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1240","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1240","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1240","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1243","slug":"eip-1276","title":"Eliminate Difficulty Bomb and Adjust Block Reward on Constantinople Shift","authors":"EOS Classic","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"EOS Classic","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1276.md","source_label":"EIP 1276","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1276.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1276.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1276 (Eliminate Difficulty Bomb and Adjust Block Reward on Constantinople Shift). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1276","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1276","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1276","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1244","slug":"eip-1285","title":"Increase Gcallstipend gas in the CALL opcode","authors":"Ben Kaufman, Adam Levi","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Ben Kaufman, Adam Levi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1285.md","source_label":"EIP 1285","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1285.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1285.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1285 (Increase Gcallstipend gas in the CALL opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1285","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1285","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1285","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1245","slug":"eip-1295","title":"Modify Ethereum PoW Incentive Structure and Delay Difficulty Bomb","authors":"Brian Venturo","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Brian Venturo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1295.md","source_label":"EIP 1295","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1295.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1295.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1295 (Modify Ethereum PoW Incentive Structure and Delay Difficulty Bomb). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1295","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1295","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1295","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1246","slug":"eip-1352","title":"Specify restricted address range for precompiles/system contracts","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1352.md","source_label":"EIP 1352","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1352.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1352.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1352 (Specify restricted address range for precompiles/system contracts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1352","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1352","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1352","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1247","slug":"eip-1355","title":"Ethash 1a","authors":"Paweł Bylica, Jean M. Cyr","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Paweł Bylica, Jean M. Cyr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1355.md","source_label":"EIP 1355","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1355.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1355.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1355 (Ethash 1a). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1355","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1355","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1355","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1248","slug":"eip-1380","title":"Reduced gas cost for call to self","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Jacques Wagener","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Jacques Wagener","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1380.md","source_label":"EIP 1380","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1380.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1380.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1380 (Reduced gas cost for call to self). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1380","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1380","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1380","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1249","slug":"eip-1418","title":"Blockchain Storage Rent Payment","authors":"William Entriken","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1418.md","source_label":"EIP 1418","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1418.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1418.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1418 (Blockchain Storage Rent Payment). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1418","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1418","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1418","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1250","slug":"eip-1459","title":"Node Discovery via DNS","authors":"Felix Lange, Péter Szilágyi","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Felix Lange, Péter Szilágyi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1459.md","source_label":"EIP 1459","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1459.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1459.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1459 (Node Discovery via DNS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1459","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1459","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1459","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1251","slug":"eip-1470","title":"Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC)","authors":"Gerhard Wagner","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Gerhard Wagner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1470.md","source_label":"EIP 1470","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1470.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1470.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1470 (Smart Contract Weakness Classification (SWC)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1470","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1470","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1470","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1252","slug":"eip-1474","title":"Remote procedure call specification","authors":"Paul Bouchon, Erik Marks","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Paul Bouchon, Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1474.md","source_label":"EIP 1474","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1474.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1474.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1474 (Remote procedure call specification). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1474","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1474","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1474","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1253","slug":"eip-1482","title":"Define a maximum block timestamp drift","authors":"Maurelian","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Maurelian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1482.md","source_label":"EIP 1482","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1482.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1482.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1482 (Define a maximum block timestamp drift). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1482","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1482","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1482","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1254","slug":"eip-1485","title":"TEthashV1","authors":"trustfarm, trustfarm","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"trustfarm, trustfarm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1485.md","source_label":"EIP 1485","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1485.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1485.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1485 (TEthashV1). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1485","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1485","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1485","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1255","slug":"eip-150","title":"Gas cost changes for IO-heavy operations","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-150.md","source_label":"EIP 150","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-150.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-150.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 150 (Gas cost changes for IO-heavy operations). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-150","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-150","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-150","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1256","slug":"eip-155","title":"Simple replay attack protection","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-155.md","source_label":"EIP 155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-155.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-155.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 155 (Simple replay attack protection). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1257","slug":"eip-1571","title":"EthereumStratum/2.0.0","authors":"Andrea Lanfranchi, Pawel Bylica, Marius Van Der Wijden","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Andrea Lanfranchi, Pawel Bylica, Marius Van Der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1571.md","source_label":"EIP 1571","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1571.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1571.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1571 (EthereumStratum/2.0.0). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1571","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1571","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1571","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1258","slug":"eip-158","title":"State clearing","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-158.md","source_label":"EIP 158","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-158.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-158.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 158 (State clearing). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-158","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-158","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-158","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1259","slug":"eip-1588","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Ethereum ProgPoW\"","authors":"Ikmyeong Na","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Ikmyeong Na","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1588.md","source_label":"EIP 1588","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1588.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1588.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1588 (\"Hardfork Meta: Ethereum ProgPoW\"). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1588","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1588","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1588","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1260","slug":"eip-160","title":"EXP cost increase","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-160.md","source_label":"EIP 160","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-160.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-160.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 160 (EXP cost increase). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-160","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-160","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-160","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1261","slug":"eip-161","title":"State trie clearing (invariant-preserving alternative)","authors":"Gavin Wood","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Gavin Wood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-161.md","source_label":"EIP 161","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-161.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-161.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 161 (State trie clearing (invariant-preserving alternative)). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-161","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-161","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-161","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1262","slug":"eip-1679","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Istanbul\"","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Afri Schoedon","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Afri Schoedon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1679.md","source_label":"EIP 1679","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1679.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1679.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1679 (\"Hardfork Meta: Istanbul\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1679","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1679","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1679","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1263","slug":"eip-1681","title":"Temporal Replay Protection","authors":"Martin Holst Swende","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1681.md","source_label":"EIP 1681","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1681.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1681.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1681 (Temporal Replay Protection). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1681","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1681","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1681","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1264","slug":"eip-1682","title":"Storage Rent","authors":"Felix J Lange, Martin Holst Swende","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Felix J Lange, Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1682.md","source_label":"EIP 1682","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1682.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1682.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1682 (Storage Rent). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1682","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1682","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1682","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1265","slug":"eip-170","title":"Contract code size limit","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-170.md","source_label":"EIP 170","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-170.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-170.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 170 (Contract code size limit). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-170","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-170","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-170","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1266","slug":"eip-1702","title":"Generalized Account Versioning Scheme","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1702.md","source_label":"EIP 1702","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1702.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1702.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1702 (Generalized Account Versioning Scheme). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1702","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1702","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1702","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1267","slug":"eip-1706","title":"Disable SSTORE with gasleft lower than call stipend","authors":"Alex Forshtat, Yoav Weiss","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Forshtat, Yoav Weiss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1706.md","source_label":"EIP 1706","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1706.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1706.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1706 (Disable SSTORE with gasleft lower than call stipend). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1706","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1706","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1706","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1268","slug":"eip-1716","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Petersburg\"","authors":"Afri Schoedon, Marius van der Wijden","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Afri Schoedon, Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1716.md","source_label":"EIP 1716","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1716.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1716.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1716 (\"Hardfork Meta: Petersburg\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1716","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1716","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1716","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1269","slug":"eip-1767","title":"GraphQL interface to Ethereum node data","authors":"Nick Johnson, Raúl Kripalani, Kris Shinn","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Nick Johnson, Raúl Kripalani, Kris Shinn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1767.md","source_label":"EIP 1767","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1767.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1767.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1767 (GraphQL interface to Ethereum node data). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1767","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1767","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1767","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1270","slug":"eip-1803","title":"Rename opcodes for clarity","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1803.md","source_label":"EIP 1803","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1803.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1803.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1803 (Rename opcodes for clarity). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1803","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1803","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1803","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1271","slug":"eip-1829","title":"Precompile for Elliptic Curve Linear Combinations","authors":"Remco Bloemen","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Remco Bloemen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1829.md","source_label":"EIP 1829","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1829.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1829.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1829 (Precompile for Elliptic Curve Linear Combinations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1829","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1829","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1829","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1272","slug":"eip-1872","title":"Ethereum Network Upgrade Windows","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1872.md","source_label":"EIP 1872","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1872.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1872.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1872 (Ethereum Network Upgrade Windows). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1872","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1872","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1872","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1273","slug":"eip-1890","title":"Commitment to Sustainable Ecosystem Funding","authors":"Gregory Markou, Kevin Owocki, Lane Rettig","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Gregory Markou, Kevin Owocki, Lane Rettig","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1890.md","source_label":"EIP 1890","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1890.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1890.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1890 (Commitment to Sustainable Ecosystem Funding). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1890","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1890","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1890","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1274","slug":"eip-1895","title":"Support for an Elliptic Curve Cycle","authors":"Alexandre Belling","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alexandre Belling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1895.md","source_label":"EIP 1895","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1895.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1895.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1895 (Support for an Elliptic Curve Cycle). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1895","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1895","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1895","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1275","slug":"eip-1901","title":"Add OpenRPC Service Discovery To JSON-RPC Services","authors":"Shane Jonas, Zachary Belford","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Shane Jonas, Zachary Belford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1901.md","source_label":"EIP 1901","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1901.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1901.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1901 (Add OpenRPC Service Discovery To JSON-RPC Services). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1901","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1901","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1901","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1276","slug":"eip-1930","title":"CALLs with strict gas semantic. Revert if not enough gas available.","authors":"Ronan Sandford","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1930.md","source_label":"EIP 1930","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1930.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1930.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1930 (CALLs with strict gas semantic. Revert if not enough gas available.). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1930","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1930","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1930","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1277","slug":"eip-1959","title":"New Opcode to check if a chainID is part of the history of chainIDs","authors":"Ronan Sandford","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1959.md","source_label":"EIP 1959","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1959.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1959.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1959 (New Opcode to check if a chainID is part of the history of chainIDs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1959","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1959","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1959","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1278","slug":"eip-1962","title":"EC arithmetic and pairings with runtime definitions","authors":"Alex Vlasov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Vlasov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1962.md","source_label":"EIP 1962","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1962.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1962.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1962 (EC arithmetic and pairings with runtime definitions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1962","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1962","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1962","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1279","slug":"eip-1965","title":"Method to check if a chainID is valid at a specific block Number","authors":"Ronan Sandford","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1965.md","source_label":"EIP 1965","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1965.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1965.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1965 (Method to check if a chainID is valid at a specific block Number). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1965","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1965","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1965","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1280","slug":"eip-198","title":"Big integer modular exponentiation","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-198.md","source_label":"EIP 198","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-198.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-198.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 198 (Big integer modular exponentiation). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-198","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-198","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-198","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1281","slug":"eip-1985","title":"Sane limits for certain EVM parameters","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1985.md","source_label":"EIP 1985","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-1985.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-1985.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 1985 (Sane limits for certain EVM parameters). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1985","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1985","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1985","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1282","slug":"eip-2","title":"Homestead Hard-fork Changes","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2.md","source_label":"EIP 2","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2 (Homestead Hard-fork Changes). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1283","slug":"eip-2003","title":"EVMC modules for implementations of precompiled contracts","authors":"Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2003.md","source_label":"EIP 2003","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2003.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2003.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2003 (EVMC modules for implementations of precompiled contracts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2003","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2003","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2003","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1284","slug":"eip-2014","title":"Extended State Oracle","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2014.md","source_label":"EIP 2014","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2014.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2014.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2014 (Extended State Oracle). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2014","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2014","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2014","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1285","slug":"eip-2015","title":"wallet_updateEthereumChain RPC Method","authors":"Pedro Gomes, Erik Marks, Pandapip1","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Pedro Gomes, Erik Marks, Pandapip1","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2015.md","source_label":"EIP 2015","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2015.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2015.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2015 (wallet_updateEthereumChain RPC Method). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2015","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2015","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2015","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1286","slug":"eip-2025","title":"Block Rewards Proposal for funding Eth1.x","authors":"James Hancock","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2025.md","source_label":"EIP 2025","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2025.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2025.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2025 (Block Rewards Proposal for funding Eth1.x). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2025","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2025","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2025","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1287","slug":"eip-2026","title":"State Rent H - Fixed Prepayment for accounts","authors":"Alexey Akhunov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2026.md","source_label":"EIP 2026","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2026.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2026.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2026 (State Rent H - Fixed Prepayment for accounts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2026","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2026","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2026","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1288","slug":"eip-2027","title":"State Rent C - Net contract size accounting","authors":"Alexey Akhunov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2027.md","source_label":"EIP 2027","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2027.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2027.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2027 (State Rent C - Net contract size accounting). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2027","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2027","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2027","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1289","slug":"eip-2029","title":"State Rent A - State counters contract","authors":"Alexey Akhunov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2029.md","source_label":"EIP 2029","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2029.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2029.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2029 (State Rent A - State counters contract). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2029","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2029","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2029","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1290","slug":"eip-2031","title":"State Rent B - Net transaction counter","authors":"Alexey Akhunov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2031.md","source_label":"EIP 2031","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2031.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2031.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2031 (State Rent B - Net transaction counter). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2031","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2031","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2031","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1291","slug":"eip-2035","title":"Stateless Clients - Repricing SLOAD and SSTORE to pay for block proofs","authors":"Alexey Akhunov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2035.md","source_label":"EIP 2035","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2035.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2035.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2035 (Stateless Clients - Repricing SLOAD and SSTORE to pay for block proofs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2035","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2035","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2035","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1292","slug":"eip-2045","title":"Particle gas costs for EVM opcodes","authors":"Casey Detrio, Alex Beregszaszi","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Casey Detrio, Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2045.md","source_label":"EIP 2045","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2045.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2045.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2045 (Particle gas costs for EVM opcodes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2045","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2045","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2045","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1293","slug":"eip-2046","title":"Reduced gas cost for static calls made to precompiles","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2046.md","source_label":"EIP 2046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2046.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2046.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2046 (Reduced gas cost for static calls made to precompiles). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2046","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2046","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2046","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1294","slug":"eip-2069","title":"Recommendation for using YAML ABI in ERCs/EIPs","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2069.md","source_label":"EIP 2069","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2069.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2069.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2069 (Recommendation for using YAML ABI in ERCs/EIPs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2069","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2069","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2069","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1295","slug":"eip-2070","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Berlin\"","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2070.md","source_label":"EIP 2070","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2070.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2070.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2070 (\"Hardfork Meta: Berlin\"). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2070","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2070","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2070","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1296","slug":"eip-210","title":"Blockhash refactoring","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-210.md","source_label":"EIP 210","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-210.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-210.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 210 (Blockhash refactoring). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-210","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-210","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-210","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1297","slug":"eip-2242","title":"Transaction Postdata","authors":"John Adler","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"John Adler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2242.md","source_label":"EIP 2242","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2242.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2242.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2242 (Transaction Postdata). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2242","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2242","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2242","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1298","slug":"eip-2256","title":"wallet_getOwnedAssets JSON-RPC Method","authors":"Loredana Cirstea","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Loredana Cirstea","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2256.md","source_label":"EIP 2256","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2256.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2256.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2256 (wallet_getOwnedAssets JSON-RPC Method). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2256","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2256","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2256","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1299","slug":"eip-2294","title":"Explicit bound to Chain ID size","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou, Alex Beregszaszi, Bryant Eisenbach","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou, Alex Beregszaszi, Bryant Eisenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2294.md","source_label":"EIP 2294","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2294.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2294.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2294 (Explicit bound to Chain ID size). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2294","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2294","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2294","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1300","slug":"eip-2315","title":"Simple Subroutines for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin, Martin Holst Swende, Brooklyn Zelenka, John Max Skaller","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Martin Holst Swende, Brooklyn Zelenka, John Max Skaller","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2315.md","source_label":"EIP 2315","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2315.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2315.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2315 (Simple Subroutines for the EVM). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2315","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2315","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2315","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1301","slug":"eip-2327","title":"BEGINDATA opcode","authors":"Martin Lundfall","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Martin Lundfall","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2327.md","source_label":"EIP 2327","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2327.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2327.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2327 (BEGINDATA opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2327","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2327","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2327","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1302","slug":"eip-233","title":"Formal process of hard forks","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-233.md","source_label":"EIP 233","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-233.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-233.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 233 (Formal process of hard forks). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-233","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-233","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-233","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1303","slug":"eip-2330","title":"EXTSLOAD opcode","authors":"Dominic Letz, Santiago Palladino","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Dominic Letz, Santiago Palladino","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2330.md","source_label":"EIP 2330","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2330.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2330.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2330 (EXTSLOAD opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2330","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2330","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2330","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1304","slug":"eip-2378","title":"EIPs Eligible for Inclusion","authors":"James Hancock","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2378.md","source_label":"EIP 2378","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2378.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2378.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2378 (EIPs Eligible for Inclusion). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2378","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2378","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2378","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1305","slug":"eip-2384","title":"Muir Glacier Difficulty Bomb Delay","authors":"Eric Conner","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Eric Conner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2384.md","source_label":"EIP 2384","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2384.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2384.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2384 (Muir Glacier Difficulty Bomb Delay). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2384","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2384","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2384","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1306","slug":"eip-2387","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Muir Glacier\"","authors":"James Hancock","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2387.md","source_label":"EIP 2387","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2387.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2387.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2387 (\"Hardfork Meta: Muir Glacier\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2387","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2387","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2387","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1307","slug":"eip-2458","title":"Updates and Updated-by Header","authors":"Edson Ayllon","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Edson Ayllon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2458.md","source_label":"EIP 2458","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2458.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2458.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2458 (Updates and Updated-by Header). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2458","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2458","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2458","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1308","slug":"eip-2474","title":"Coinbase calls","authors":"Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2474.md","source_label":"EIP 2474","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2474.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2474.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2474 (Coinbase calls). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2474","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2474","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2474","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1309","slug":"eip-2488","title":"Deprecate the CALLCODE opcode","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2488.md","source_label":"EIP 2488","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2488.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2488.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2488 (Deprecate the CALLCODE opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2488","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2488","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2488","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1310","slug":"eip-2515","title":"Implement Difficulty Freeze","authors":"James Hancock","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2515.md","source_label":"EIP 2515","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2515.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2515.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2515 (Implement Difficulty Freeze). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2515","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2515","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2515","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1311","slug":"eip-2539","title":"BLS12-377 curve operations","authors":"Alex Vlasov, hujw77","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Vlasov, hujw77","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2539.md","source_label":"EIP 2539","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2539.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2539.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2539 (BLS12-377 curve operations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2539","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2539","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2539","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1312","slug":"eip-2542","title":"New opcodes TXGASLIMIT and CALLGASLIMIT","authors":"Alex Forshtat","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2542.md","source_label":"EIP 2542","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2542.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2542.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2542 (New opcodes TXGASLIMIT and CALLGASLIMIT). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2542","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2542","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2542","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1313","slug":"eip-2566","title":"Human Readable Parameters for Contract Function Execution","authors":"Joseph Stockermans","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Joseph Stockermans","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2566.md","source_label":"EIP 2566","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2566.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2566.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2566 (Human Readable Parameters for Contract Function Execution). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2566","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2566","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2566","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1314","slug":"eip-2583","title":"Penalty for account trie misses","authors":"Martin Holst Swende","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2583.md","source_label":"EIP 2583","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2583.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2583.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2583 (Penalty for account trie misses). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2583","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2583","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2583","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1315","slug":"eip-2584","title":"Trie format transition with overlay trees","authors":"Guillaume Ballet","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2584.md","source_label":"EIP 2584","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2584.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2584.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2584 (Trie format transition with overlay trees). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2584","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2584","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2584","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1316","slug":"eip-2593","title":"Escalator fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain","authors":"Dan Finlay","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Dan Finlay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2593.md","source_label":"EIP 2593","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2593.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2593.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2593 (Escalator fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2593","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2593","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2593","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1317","slug":"eip-2657","title":"Ephemeral Testnet Yolo","authors":"James Hancock","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2657.md","source_label":"EIP 2657","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2657.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2657.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2657 (Ephemeral Testnet Yolo). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2657","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2657","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2657","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1318","slug":"eip-2666","title":"Repricing of precompiles and Keccak256 function","authors":"Alex Vlasov","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Vlasov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2666.md","source_label":"EIP 2666","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2666.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2666.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2666 (Repricing of precompiles and Keccak256 function). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2666","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2666","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2666","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1319","slug":"eip-2677","title":"Limit size of `initcode`","authors":"Martin Holst Swende, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2677.md","source_label":"EIP 2677","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2677.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2677.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2677 (Limit size of `initcode`). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2677","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2677","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2677","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1320","slug":"eip-2711","title":"Sponsored, expiring and batch transactions.","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2711.md","source_label":"EIP 2711","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2711.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2711.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2711 (Sponsored, expiring and batch transactions.). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2711","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2711","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2711","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1321","slug":"eip-2733","title":"Transaction Package","authors":"Matt Garnett","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Matt Garnett","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2733.md","source_label":"EIP 2733","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2733.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2733.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2733 (Transaction Package). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2733","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2733","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2733","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1322","slug":"eip-2786","title":"Ethereum Provider Connect/Disconnect Events","authors":"Micah Zoltu, Erik Marks","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu, Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2786.md","source_label":"EIP 2786","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2786.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2786.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2786 (Ethereum Provider Connect/Disconnect Events). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2786","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2786","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2786","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1323","slug":"eip-2803","title":"Rich Transactions","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2803.md","source_label":"EIP 2803","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2803.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2803.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2803 (Rich Transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2803","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2803","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2803","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1324","slug":"eip-2831","title":"Transaction Replacement Message Type","authors":"Gregory Markou","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Gregory Markou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2831.md","source_label":"EIP 2831","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2831.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2831.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2831 (Transaction Replacement Message Type). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2831","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2831","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2831","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1325","slug":"eip-2844","title":"Add DID related methods to the JSON-RPC","authors":"Joel Thorstensson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Joel Thorstensson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2844.md","source_label":"EIP 2844","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2844.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2844.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2844 (Add DID related methods to the JSON-RPC). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2844","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2844","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2844","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1326","slug":"eip-2926","title":"Chunk-Based Code Merkleization","authors":"Sina Mahmoodi, Alex Beregszaszi, Guillaume Ballet, Jochem Brouwer, Ignacio Hagopian","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Sina Mahmoodi, Alex Beregszaszi, Guillaume Ballet, Jochem Brouwer, Ignacio Hagopian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2926.md","source_label":"EIP 2926","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2926.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2926.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2926 (Chunk-Based Code Merkleization). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2926","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2926","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2926","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1327","slug":"eip-2936","title":"EXTCLEAR Opcode For SELFDESTRUCTed contracts","authors":"William Morriss","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2936.md","source_label":"EIP 2936","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2936.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2936.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2936 (EXTCLEAR Opcode For SELFDESTRUCTed contracts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2936","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2936","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2936","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1328","slug":"eip-2937","title":"SET_INDESTRUCTIBLE opcode","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2937.md","source_label":"EIP 2937","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2937.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2937.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2937 (SET_INDESTRUCTIBLE opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2937","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2937","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2937","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1329","slug":"eip-2938","title":"Account Abstraction","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Ansgar Dietrichs, Matt Garnett, Will Villanueva, Sam Wilson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Ansgar Dietrichs, Matt Garnett, Will Villanueva, Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2938.md","source_label":"EIP 2938","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2938.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2938.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2938 (Account Abstraction). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2938","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2938","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2938","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1330","slug":"eip-2970","title":"IS_STATIC opcode","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2970.md","source_label":"EIP 2970","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2970.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2970.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2970 (IS_STATIC opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2970","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2970","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2970","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1331","slug":"eip-2972","title":"Wrapped Legacy Transactions","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2972.md","source_label":"EIP 2972","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2972.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2972.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2972 (Wrapped Legacy Transactions). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2972","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2972","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2972","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1332","slug":"eip-2997","title":"IMPERSONATECALL Opcode","authors":"Sergio Demian Lerner","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Sergio Demian Lerner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-2997.md","source_label":"EIP 2997","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-2997.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-2997.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 2997 (IMPERSONATECALL Opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2997","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2997","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2997","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1333","slug":"eip-3","title":"Addition of CALLDEPTH opcode","authors":"Martin Holst Swende","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3.md","source_label":"EIP 3","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3 (Addition of CALLDEPTH opcode). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1334","slug":"eip-3014","title":"eth_symbol JSON-RPC method","authors":"Peter Grassberger","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Peter Grassberger","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3014.md","source_label":"EIP 3014","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3014.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3014.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3014 (eth_symbol JSON-RPC method). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3014","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3014","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3014","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1335","slug":"eip-3026","title":"BW6-761 curve operations","authors":"Youssef El Housni, Michael Connor, Aurore Guillevic, hujw77","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Youssef El Housni, Michael Connor, Aurore Guillevic, hujw77","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3026.md","source_label":"EIP 3026","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3026.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3026.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3026 (BW6-761 curve operations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3026","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3026","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3026","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1336","slug":"eip-3030","title":"BLS Remote Signer HTTP API","authors":"Herman Junge","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Herman Junge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3030.md","source_label":"EIP 3030","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3030.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3030.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3030 (BLS Remote Signer HTTP API). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3030","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3030","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3030","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1337","slug":"eip-3041","title":"Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getBlockByHash`","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3041.md","source_label":"EIP 3041","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3041.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3041.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3041 (Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getBlockByHash`). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3041","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3041","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3041","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1338","slug":"eip-3044","title":"Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getBlockByNumber`","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3044.md","source_label":"EIP 3044","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3044.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3044.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3044 (Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getBlockByNumber`). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3044","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3044","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3044","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1339","slug":"eip-3045","title":"Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getUncleByBlockHashAndIndex`","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3045.md","source_label":"EIP 3045","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3045.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3045.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3045 (Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getUncleByBlockHashAndIndex`). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3045","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3045","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3045","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1340","slug":"eip-3046","title":"Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getUncleByBlockNumberAndIndex`","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3046.md","source_label":"EIP 3046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3046.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3046.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3046 (Adds `baseFee` to `eth_getUncleByBlockNumberAndIndex`). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3046","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3046","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3046","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1341","slug":"eip-3068","title":"Precompile for BN256 HashToCurve Algorithms","authors":"Dr. Christopher Gorman","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Dr. Christopher Gorman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3068.md","source_label":"EIP 3068","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3068.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3068.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3068 (Precompile for BN256 HashToCurve Algorithms). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3068","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3068","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3068","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1342","slug":"eip-3074","title":"AUTH and AUTHCALL opcodes","authors":"Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs, Matt Garnett, Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs, Matt Garnett, Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3074.md","source_label":"EIP 3074","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3074.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3074.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3074 (AUTH and AUTHCALL opcodes). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3074","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3074","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3074","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1343","slug":"eip-3085","title":"wallet_addEthereumChain RPC Method","authors":"Erik Marks, Pedro Gomes, Pandapip1","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Erik Marks, Pedro Gomes, Pandapip1","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3085.md","source_label":"EIP 3085","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3085.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3085.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3085 (wallet_addEthereumChain RPC Method). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3085","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3085","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3085","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1344","slug":"eip-3091","title":"Block Explorer API Routes","authors":"Pedro Gomes, ligi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pedro Gomes, ligi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3091.md","source_label":"EIP 3091","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3091.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3091.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3091 (Block Explorer API Routes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3091","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3091","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3091","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1345","slug":"eip-3102","title":"Binary trie structure","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3102.md","source_label":"EIP 3102","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3102.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3102.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3102 (Binary trie structure). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3102","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3102","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3102","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1346","slug":"eip-3143","title":"Increase block rewards to 5 ETH","authors":"Ben Tinner","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ben Tinner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3143.md","source_label":"EIP 3143","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3143.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3143.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3143 (Increase block rewards to 5 ETH). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3143","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3143","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3143","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1347","slug":"eip-3220","title":"Crosschain Identifier Specification","authors":"Weijia Zhang, Peter Robinson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Weijia Zhang, Peter Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3220.md","source_label":"EIP 3220","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3220.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3220.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3220 (Crosschain Identifier Specification). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3220","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3220","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3220","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1348","slug":"eip-3238","title":"Difficulty Bomb Delay to Q2/2022","authors":"Afri Schoedon","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Afri Schoedon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3238.md","source_label":"EIP 3238","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3238.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3238.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3238 (Difficulty Bomb Delay to Q2/2022). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3238","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3238","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3238","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1349","slug":"eip-3267","title":"Giving Ethereum fees to Future Salaries","authors":"Victor Porton, Victor Porton","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Victor Porton, Victor Porton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3267.md","source_label":"EIP 3267","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3267.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3267.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3267 (Giving Ethereum fees to Future Salaries). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3267","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3267","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3267","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1350","slug":"eip-3298","title":"Remove storage-clear refund and refund cap","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Martin Swende, Jochem Brouwer","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Martin Swende, Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3298.md","source_label":"EIP 3298","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3298.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3298.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3298 (Remove storage-clear refund and refund cap). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3298","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3298","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3298","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1351","slug":"eip-3300","title":"Phase out refunds","authors":"William Morriss","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3300.md","source_label":"EIP 3300","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3300.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3300.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3300 (Phase out refunds). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3300","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3300","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3300","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1352","slug":"eip-3322","title":"Account gas storage opcodes","authors":"William Morriss","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3322.md","source_label":"EIP 3322","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3322.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3322.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3322 (Account gas storage opcodes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3322","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3322","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3322","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1353","slug":"eip-3326","title":"Wallet Switch Ethereum Chain RPC Method (`wallet_switchEthereumChain`)","authors":"Erik Marks","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3326.md","source_label":"EIP 3326","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3326.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3326.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3326 (Wallet Switch Ethereum Chain RPC Method (`wallet_switchEthereumChain`)). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3326","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3326","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3326","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1354","slug":"eip-3332","title":"MEDGASPRICE Opcode","authors":"Justice Hudson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Justice Hudson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3332.md","source_label":"EIP 3332","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3332.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3332.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3332 (MEDGASPRICE Opcode). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3332","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3332","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3332","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1355","slug":"eip-3336","title":"Paged memory allocation for the EVM","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3336.md","source_label":"EIP 3336","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3336.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3336.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3336 (Paged memory allocation for the EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3336","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3336","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3336","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1356","slug":"eip-3337","title":"Frame pointer support for memory load and store operations","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3337.md","source_label":"EIP 3337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3337.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3337.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3337 (Frame pointer support for memory load and store operations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1357","slug":"eip-3338","title":"Limit account nonce to 2^52","authors":"Micah Zoltu, Alex Beregszaszi","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Micah Zoltu, Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3338.md","source_label":"EIP 3338","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3338.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3338.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3338 (Limit account nonce to 2^52). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3338","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3338","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3338","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1358","slug":"eip-3368","title":"Increase block rewards to 3 ETH, with 2 Year Decay to 1 ETH Scheduled","authors":"Michael D. Carter","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Michael D. Carter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3368.md","source_label":"EIP 3368","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3368.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3368.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3368 (Increase block rewards to 3 ETH, with 2 Year Decay to 1 ETH Scheduled). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3368","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3368","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3368","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1359","slug":"eip-3372","title":"5 FNV primes for ethash","authors":"mineruniter969, mineruniter969","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"mineruniter969, mineruniter969","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3372.md","source_label":"EIP 3372","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3372.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3372.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3372 (5 FNV primes for ethash). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3372","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3372","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3372","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1360","slug":"eip-3374","title":"Predictable Proof-of-Work (POW) Sunsetting","authors":"Query0x","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Query0x","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3374.md","source_label":"EIP 3374","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3374.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3374.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3374 (Predictable Proof-of-Work (POW) Sunsetting). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3374","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3374","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3374","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1361","slug":"eip-3382","title":"Hardcoded Block Gas Limit","authors":"Philippe Castonguay","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Philippe Castonguay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3382.md","source_label":"EIP 3382","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3382.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3382.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3382 (Hardcoded Block Gas Limit). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3382","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3382","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3382","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1362","slug":"eip-3403","title":"Partial removal of refunds","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Martin Swende","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3403.md","source_label":"EIP 3403","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3403.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3403.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3403 (Partial removal of refunds). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3403","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3403","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3403","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1363","slug":"eip-3416","title":"Median Gas Premium","authors":"HexZorro, Mojtaba Tefagh","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"HexZorro, Mojtaba Tefagh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3416.md","source_label":"EIP 3416","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3416.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3416.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3416 (Median Gas Premium). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3416","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3416","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3416","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1364","slug":"eip-3436","title":"Expanded Clique Block Choice Rule","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3436.md","source_label":"EIP 3436","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3436.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3436.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3436 (Expanded Clique Block Choice Rule). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3436","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3436","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3436","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1365","slug":"eip-3455","title":"SUDO Opcode","authors":"William Morriss, Baptiste Vauthey","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"William Morriss, Baptiste Vauthey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3455.md","source_label":"EIP 3455","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3455.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3455.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3455 (SUDO Opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3455","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3455","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3455","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1366","slug":"eip-3508","title":"Transaction Data Opcodes","authors":"Alex Papageorgiou","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Papageorgiou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3508.md","source_label":"EIP 3508","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3508.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3508.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3508 (Transaction Data Opcodes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3508","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3508","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3508","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1367","slug":"eip-3520","title":"Transaction Destination Opcode","authors":"Alex Papageorgiou","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Papageorgiou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3520.md","source_label":"EIP 3520","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3520.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3520.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3520 (Transaction Destination Opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3520","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3520","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3520","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1368","slug":"eip-3521","title":"Reduce access list cost","authors":"Matt Garnett","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Matt Garnett","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3521.md","source_label":"EIP 3521","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3521.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3521.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3521 (Reduce access list cost). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3521","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3521","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3521","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1369","slug":"eip-3534","title":"Restricted Chain Context Type Transactions","authors":"Isaac Ardis","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Isaac Ardis","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3534.md","source_label":"EIP 3534","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3534.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3534.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3534 (Restricted Chain Context Type Transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3534","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3534","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3534","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1370","slug":"eip-3540","title":"EOF - EVM Object Format v1","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda, Matt Garnett, Piotr Dobaczewski","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda, Matt Garnett, Piotr Dobaczewski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3540.md","source_label":"EIP 3540","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3540.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3540.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3540 (EOF - EVM Object Format v1). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3540","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3540","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3540","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1371","slug":"eip-3554","title":"Difficulty Bomb Delay to December 2021","authors":"James Hancock","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3554.md","source_label":"EIP 3554","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3554.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3554.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3554 (Difficulty Bomb Delay to December 2021). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3554","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3554","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3554","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1372","slug":"eip-3584","title":"Block Access List","authors":"Gajinder Singh, Piper Merriam","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Gajinder Singh, Piper Merriam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3584.md","source_label":"EIP 3584","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3584.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3584.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3584 (Block Access List). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3584","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3584","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3584","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1373","slug":"eip-3670","title":"EOF - Code Validation","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3670.md","source_label":"EIP 3670","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3670.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3670.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3670 (EOF - Code Validation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3670","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3670","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3670","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1374","slug":"eip-3690","title":"EOF - JUMPDEST Table","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3690.md","source_label":"EIP 3690","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3690.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3690.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3690 (EOF - JUMPDEST Table). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3690","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3690","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3690","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1375","slug":"eip-3709","title":"Remove Support for Type 1 Transactions","authors":"Gregory Markou","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Gregory Markou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3709.md","source_label":"EIP 3709","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3709.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3709.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3709 (Remove Support for Type 1 Transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3709","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3709","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3709","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1376","slug":"eip-3756","title":"Gas Limit Cap","authors":"lightclient","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3756.md","source_label":"EIP 3756","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3756.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3756.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3756 (Gas Limit Cap). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3756","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3756","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3756","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1377","slug":"eip-3779","title":"Safer Control Flow for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin, Greg Colvin, Brooklyn Zelenka","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Greg Colvin, Brooklyn Zelenka","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3779.md","source_label":"EIP 3779","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3779.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3779.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3779 (Safer Control Flow for the EVM). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3779","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3779","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3779","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1378","slug":"eip-3788","title":"Strict enforcement of chainId","authors":"Gregory Markou","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Gregory Markou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3788.md","source_label":"EIP 3788","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3788.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3788.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3788 (Strict enforcement of chainId). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3788","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3788","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3788","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1379","slug":"eip-3978","title":"Gas refunds on reverts","authors":"Anton Bukov, Mikhail Melnik","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Anton Bukov, Mikhail Melnik","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3978.md","source_label":"EIP 3978","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-3978.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-3978.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 3978 (Gas refunds on reverts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3978","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3978","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3978","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1380","slug":"eip-4","title":"EIP Classification","authors":"Joseph Chow","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Joseph Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4.md","source_label":"EIP 4","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4 (EIP Classification). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1381","slug":"eip-4200","title":"EOF - Static relative jumps","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4200.md","source_label":"EIP 4200","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4200.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4200.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4200 (EOF - Static relative jumps). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4200","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4200","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4200","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1382","slug":"eip-4345","title":"Difficulty Bomb Delay to June 2022","authors":"Tim Beiko, James Hancock, Thomas Jay Rush","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Tim Beiko, James Hancock, Thomas Jay Rush","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4345.md","source_label":"EIP 4345","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4345.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4345.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4345 (Difficulty Bomb Delay to June 2022). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4345","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4345","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4345","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1383","slug":"eip-4396","title":"Time-Aware Base Fee Calculation","authors":"Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4396.md","source_label":"EIP 4396","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4396.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4396.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4396 (Time-Aware Base Fee Calculation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4396","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4396","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4396","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1384","slug":"eip-4444","title":"Bound Historical Data in Execution Clients","authors":"George Kadianakis, lightclient, Alex Stokes","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"George Kadianakis, lightclient, Alex Stokes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4444.md","source_label":"EIP 4444","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4444.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4444.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4444 (Bound Historical Data in Execution Clients). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4444","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4444","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4444","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1385","slug":"eip-4488","title":"Transaction calldata gas cost reduction with total calldata limit","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4488.md","source_label":"EIP 4488","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4488.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4488.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4488 (Transaction calldata gas cost reduction with total calldata limit). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4488","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4488","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4488","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1386","slug":"eip-4520","title":"Multi-byte opcodes prefixed by EB and EC.","authors":"Brayton Goodall, Mihir Faujdar","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Brayton Goodall, Mihir Faujdar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4520.md","source_label":"EIP 4520","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4520.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4520.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4520 (Multi-byte opcodes prefixed by EB and EC.). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4520","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4520","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4520","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1387","slug":"eip-4573","title":"Procedures for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin, Greg Colvin","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Greg Colvin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4573.md","source_label":"EIP 4573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4573.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4573.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4573 (Procedures for the EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4573","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4573","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4573","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1388","slug":"eip-4747","title":"Simplify EIP-161","authors":"Peter Davies","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Peter Davies","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4747.md","source_label":"EIP 4747","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4747.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4747.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4747 (Simplify EIP-161). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4747","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4747","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4747","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1389","slug":"eip-4750","title":"EOF - Functions","authors":"Andrei Maiboroda, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Andrei Maiboroda, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4750.md","source_label":"EIP 4750","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4750.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4750.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4750 (EOF - Functions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4750","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4750","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4750","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1390","slug":"eip-4758","title":"Deactivate SELFDESTRUCT","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4758.md","source_label":"EIP 4758","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4758.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4758.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4758 (Deactivate SELFDESTRUCT). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4758","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4758","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4758","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1391","slug":"eip-4760","title":"SELFDESTRUCT bomb","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4760.md","source_label":"EIP 4760","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4760.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4760.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4760 (SELFDESTRUCT bomb). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4760","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4760","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4760","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1392","slug":"eip-4762","title":"Statelessness gas cost changes","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Ignacio Hagopian, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Ignacio Hagopian, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4762.md","source_label":"EIP 4762","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4762.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4762.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4762 (Statelessness gas cost changes). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4762","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4762","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4762","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1393","slug":"eip-4803","title":"Limit transaction gas to a maximum of 2^63-1","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4803.md","source_label":"EIP 4803","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4803.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4803.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4803 (Limit transaction gas to a maximum of 2^63-1). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4803","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4803","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4803","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1394","slug":"eip-4863","title":"Beacon chain push withdrawals","authors":"Alex Stokes, Danny Ryan","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Stokes, Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-4863.md","source_label":"EIP 4863","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-4863.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-4863.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 4863 (Beacon chain push withdrawals). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4863","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4863","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4863","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1395","slug":"eip-5","title":"Gas Usage for `RETURN` and `CALL*`","authors":"Christian Reitwiessner","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5.md","source_label":"EIP 5","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5 (Gas Usage for `RETURN` and `CALL*`). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1396","slug":"eip-5000","title":"MULDIV instruction","authors":"Harikrishnan Mulackal, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Harikrishnan Mulackal, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5000.md","source_label":"EIP 5000","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5000.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5000.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5000 (MULDIV instruction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5000","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5000","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5000","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1397","slug":"eip-5003","title":"Insert Code into EOAs with AUTHUSURP","authors":"Dan Finlay, Sam Wilson","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Dan Finlay, Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5003.md","source_label":"EIP 5003","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5003.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5003.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5003 (Insert Code into EOAs with AUTHUSURP). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5003","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5003","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5003","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1398","slug":"eip-5022","title":"Increase price of SSTORE from zero to non-zero to 40k gas","authors":"Green","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Green","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5022.md","source_label":"EIP 5022","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5022.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5022.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5022 (Increase price of SSTORE from zero to non-zero to 40k gas). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5022","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5022","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5022","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1399","slug":"eip-5027","title":"Remove the limit on contract code size","authors":"Qi Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Qi Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5027.md","source_label":"EIP 5027","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5027.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5027.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5027 (Remove the limit on contract code size). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5027","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5027","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5027","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1400","slug":"eip-5065","title":"Instruction for transferring ether","authors":"Mudit Gupta","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Mudit Gupta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5065.md","source_label":"EIP 5065","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5065.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5065.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5065 (Instruction for transferring ether). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5065","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5065","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5065","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1401","slug":"eip-5069","title":"EIP Editor Handbook","authors":"Pooja Ranjan, Gavin John, Sam Wilson, et al.","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Pooja Ranjan, Gavin John, Sam Wilson, et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5069.md","source_label":"EIP 5069","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5069.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5069.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5069 (EIP Editor Handbook). The file's status is Living. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5069","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5069","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5069","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1402","slug":"eip-5081","title":"Expirable Transaction","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou, Nick Johnson, Konrad Feldmeier","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou, Nick Johnson, Konrad Feldmeier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5081.md","source_label":"EIP 5081","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5081.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5081.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5081 (Expirable Transaction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5081","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5081","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5081","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1403","slug":"eip-5133","title":"Delaying Difficulty Bomb to mid-September 2022","authors":"Tomasz Kajetan Stanczak, Eric Marti Haynes, Josh Klopfenstein, Abhimanyu Nag","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Tomasz Kajetan Stanczak, Eric Marti Haynes, Josh Klopfenstein, Abhimanyu Nag","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5133.md","source_label":"EIP 5133","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5133.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5133.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5133 (Delaying Difficulty Bomb to mid-September 2022). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5133","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5133","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5133","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1404","slug":"eip-5283","title":"Semaphore for Reentrancy Protection","authors":"Sergio D. Lerner","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Sergio D. Lerner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5283.md","source_label":"EIP 5283","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5283.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5283.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5283 (Semaphore for Reentrancy Protection). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5283","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5283","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5283","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1405","slug":"eip-5345","title":"Silent Signing Extension for JSON-RPC","authors":"Stanley Wu, Mücahit Büyükyılmaz, Muhammed Emin Aydın","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Stanley Wu, Mücahit Büyükyılmaz, Muhammed Emin Aydın","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5345.md","source_label":"EIP 5345","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5345.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5345.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5345 (Silent Signing Extension for JSON-RPC). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5345","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5345","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5345","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1406","slug":"eip-5450","title":"EOF - Stack Validation","authors":"Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi, Danno Ferrin","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5450.md","source_label":"EIP 5450","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5450.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5450.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5450 (EOF - Stack Validation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5450","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5450","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5450","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1407","slug":"eip-5478","title":"CREATE2COPY Opcode","authors":"Qi Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Qi Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5478.md","source_label":"EIP 5478","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5478.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5478.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5478 (CREATE2COPY Opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5478","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5478","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5478","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1408","slug":"eip-5593","title":"Restrict Ethereum Provider API Injection","authors":"Yan Zhu, Brian R. Bondy, Andrea Brancaleoni, Kyle Den Hartog","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Yan Zhu, Brian R. Bondy, Andrea Brancaleoni, Kyle Den Hartog","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5593.md","source_label":"EIP 5593","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5593.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5593.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5593 (Restrict Ethereum Provider API Injection). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5593","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5593","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5593","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1409","slug":"eip-5757","title":"Process for Approving External Resources","authors":"Sam Wilson","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5757.md","source_label":"EIP 5757","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5757.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5757.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5757 (Process for Approving External Resources). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5757","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5757","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5757","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1410","slug":"eip-5806","title":"Delegate transaction","authors":"Hadrien Croubois","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5806.md","source_label":"EIP 5806","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5806.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5806.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5806 (Delegate transaction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5806","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5806","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5806","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1411","slug":"eip-5920","title":"PAY opcode","authors":"Gavin John, Zainan Victor Zhou, Sam Wilson, Jochem Brouwer, Charles Cooper","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John, Zainan Victor Zhou, Sam Wilson, Jochem Brouwer, Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5920.md","source_label":"EIP 5920","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5920.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5920.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5920 (PAY opcode). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5920","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5920","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5920","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1412","slug":"eip-5988","title":"Add Poseidon hash function precompile","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta, Eli Ben Sasson, Avihu Levy, David Levit Gurevich","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta, Eli Ben Sasson, Avihu Levy, David Levit Gurevich","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-5988.md","source_label":"EIP 5988","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-5988.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-5988.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 5988 (Add Poseidon hash function precompile). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5988","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5988","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5988","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1413","slug":"eip-6","title":"Renaming SUICIDE opcode","authors":"Hudson Jameson","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Hudson Jameson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6.md","source_label":"EIP 6","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6 (Renaming SUICIDE opcode). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1414","slug":"eip-6046","title":"Replace SELFDESTRUCT with DEACTIVATE","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6046.md","source_label":"EIP 6046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6046.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6046.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6046 (Replace SELFDESTRUCT with DEACTIVATE). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6046","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6046","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6046","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1415","slug":"eip-6049","title":"Deprecate SELFDESTRUCT","authors":"William Entriken","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6049.md","source_label":"EIP 6049","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6049.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6049.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6049 (Deprecate SELFDESTRUCT). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6049","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6049","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6049","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1416","slug":"eip-6051","title":"Private Key Encapsulation","authors":"Base Labs, Weiji Guo","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Base Labs, Weiji Guo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6051.md","source_label":"EIP 6051","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6051.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6051.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6051 (Private Key Encapsulation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6051","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6051","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6051","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1417","slug":"eip-606","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Homestead\"","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-606.md","source_label":"EIP 606","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-606.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-606.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 606 (\"Hardfork Meta: Homestead\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-606","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-606","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-606","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1418","slug":"eip-607","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Spurious Dragon\"","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-607.md","source_label":"EIP 607","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-607.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-607.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 607 (\"Hardfork Meta: Spurious Dragon\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-607","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-607","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-607","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1419","slug":"eip-608","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Tangerine Whistle\"","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-608.md","source_label":"EIP 608","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-608.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-608.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 608 (\"Hardfork Meta: Tangerine Whistle\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-608","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-608","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-608","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1420","slug":"eip-609","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: Byzantium\"","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-609.md","source_label":"EIP 609","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-609.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-609.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 609 (\"Hardfork Meta: Byzantium\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-609","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-609","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-609","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1421","slug":"eip-615","title":"Subroutines and Static Jumps for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin, Brooklyn Zelenka, Paweł Bylica, Christian Reitwiessner","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Brooklyn Zelenka, Paweł Bylica, Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-615.md","source_label":"EIP 615","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-615.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-615.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 615 (Subroutines and Static Jumps for the EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-615","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-615","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-615","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1422","slug":"eip-616","title":"SIMD Operations for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Greg Colvin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-616.md","source_label":"EIP 616","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-616.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-616.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 616 (SIMD Operations for the EVM). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-616","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-616","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-616","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1423","slug":"eip-6188","title":"Nonce Cap","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6188.md","source_label":"EIP 6188","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6188.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6188.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6188 (Nonce Cap). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6188","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6188","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6188","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1424","slug":"eip-6189","title":"Alias Contracts","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6189.md","source_label":"EIP 6189","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6189.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6189.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6189 (Alias Contracts). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6189","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6189","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6189","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1425","slug":"eip-6190","title":"Verkle-compatible SELFDESTRUCT","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6190.md","source_label":"EIP 6190","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6190.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6190.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6190 (Verkle-compatible SELFDESTRUCT). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6190","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6190","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6190","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1426","slug":"eip-6206","title":"EOF - JUMPF and non-returning functions","authors":"Andrei Maiboroda, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Matt Garnett","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Andrei Maiboroda, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Matt Garnett","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6206.md","source_label":"EIP 6206","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6206.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6206.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6206 (EOF - JUMPF and non-returning functions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6206","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6206","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6206","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1427","slug":"eip-6404","title":"SSZ transactions","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Vitalik Buterin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6404.md","source_label":"EIP 6404","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6404.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6404.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6404 (SSZ transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6404","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6404","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6404","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1428","slug":"eip-6465","title":"SSZ withdrawals root","authors":"Etan Kissling, Mikhail Kalinin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Mikhail Kalinin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6465.md","source_label":"EIP 6465","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6465.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6465.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6465 (SSZ withdrawals root). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6465","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6465","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6465","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1429","slug":"eip-6466","title":"SSZ receipts","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Vitalik Buterin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6466.md","source_label":"EIP 6466","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6466.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6466.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6466 (SSZ receipts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6466","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6466","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6466","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1430","slug":"eip-6475","title":"SSZ Optional","authors":"Etan Kissling, Zahary Karadjov","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Zahary Karadjov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6475.md","source_label":"EIP 6475","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6475.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6475.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6475 (SSZ Optional). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6475","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6475","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6475","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1431","slug":"eip-649","title":"Metropolis Difficulty Bomb Delay and Block Reward Reduction","authors":"Afri Schoedon, Vitalik Buterin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Afri Schoedon, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-649.md","source_label":"EIP 649","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-649.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-649.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 649 (Metropolis Difficulty Bomb Delay and Block Reward Reduction). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-649","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-649","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-649","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1432","slug":"eip-6493","title":"SSZ transaction signature scheme","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Matt Garnett, Vitalik Buterin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Matt Garnett, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6493.md","source_label":"EIP 6493","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6493.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6493.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6493 (SSZ transaction signature scheme). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6493","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6493","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6493","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1433","slug":"eip-663","title":"SWAPN, DUPN and EXCHANGE instructions","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Charles Cooper, Danno Ferrin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Charles Cooper, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-663.md","source_label":"EIP 663","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-663.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-663.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 663 (SWAPN, DUPN and EXCHANGE instructions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-663","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-663","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-663","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1434","slug":"eip-665","title":"Add precompiled contract for Ed25519 signature verification","authors":"Tobias Oberstein","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Tobias Oberstein","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-665.md","source_label":"EIP 665","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-665.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-665.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 665 (Add precompiled contract for Ed25519 signature verification). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-665","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-665","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-665","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1435","slug":"eip-6690","title":"EVM Modular Arithmetic Extensions","authors":"Jared Wasinger, Alex Beregszaszi, Vitalik Buterin, Radosław Zagórowicz, Paweł Bylica","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jared Wasinger, Alex Beregszaszi, Vitalik Buterin, Radosław Zagórowicz, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6690.md","source_label":"EIP 6690","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6690.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6690.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6690 (EVM Modular Arithmetic Extensions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6690","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6690","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6690","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1436","slug":"eip-6789","title":"Rename gas to mana","authors":"pcaversaccio","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"pcaversaccio","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6789.md","source_label":"EIP 6789","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6789.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6789.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6789 (Rename gas to mana). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6789","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6789","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6789","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1437","slug":"eip-6800","title":"Ethereum state using a unified verkle tree","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Guillaume Ballet, Piper Merriam, Gottfried Herold, Ignacio Hagopian, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh, Danno Ferrin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Guillaume Ballet, Piper Merriam, Gottfried Herold, Ignacio Hagopian, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6800.md","source_label":"EIP 6800","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6800.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6800.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6800 (Ethereum state using a unified verkle tree). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6800","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6800","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6800","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1438","slug":"eip-6810","title":"Ex Post Facto Cascading Revert","authors":"William Morriss","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6810.md","source_label":"EIP 6810","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6810.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6810.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6810 (Ex Post Facto Cascading Revert). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6810","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6810","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6810","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1439","slug":"eip-6811","title":"To The Moon—10 Minute Blocks","authors":"Pandapip1","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Pandapip1","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6811.md","source_label":"EIP 6811","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6811.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6811.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6811 (To The Moon—10 Minute Blocks). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6811","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6811","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6811","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1440","slug":"eip-6873","title":"Preimage retention","authors":"Guillaume Ballet","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6873.md","source_label":"EIP 6873","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6873.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6873.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6873 (Preimage retention). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6873","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6873","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6873","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1441","slug":"eip-6888","title":"Arithmetic verification at EVM level","authors":"Renan Rodrigues de Souza","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Renan Rodrigues de Souza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6888.md","source_label":"EIP 6888","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6888.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6888.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6888 (Arithmetic verification at EVM level). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6888","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6888","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6888","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1442","slug":"eip-689","title":"Address Collision of Contract Address Causes Exceptional Halt","authors":"Yoichi Hirai","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Yoichi Hirai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-689.md","source_label":"EIP 689","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-689.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-689.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 689 (Address Collision of Contract Address Causes Exceptional Halt). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-689","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-689","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-689","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1443","slug":"eip-6913","title":"SETCODE instruction","authors":"William Morriss","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6913.md","source_label":"EIP 6913","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6913.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6913.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6913 (SETCODE instruction). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6913","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6913","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6913","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1444","slug":"eip-6914","title":"Reuse Withdrawn Validator Indices","authors":"Lion, Danny Ryan","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Lion, Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6914.md","source_label":"EIP 6914","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6914.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6914.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6914 (Reuse Withdrawn Validator Indices). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6914","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6914","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6914","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1445","slug":"eip-6968","title":"Contract Secured Revenue on an EVM based L2","authors":"Zak Cole, Zak Cole, Kevin Owocki, lightclient","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Zak Cole, Zak Cole, Kevin Owocki, lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6968.md","source_label":"EIP 6968","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6968.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6968.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6968 (Contract Secured Revenue on an EVM based L2). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6968","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6968","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6968","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1446","slug":"eip-698","title":"OPCODE 0x46 BLOCKREWARD","authors":"Cody Burns","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Cody Burns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-698.md","source_label":"EIP 698","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-698.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-698.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 698 (OPCODE 0x46 BLOCKREWARD). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-698","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-698","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-698","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1447","slug":"eip-6988","title":"Elected block proposer has not been slashed","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6988.md","source_label":"EIP 6988","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-6988.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-6988.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 6988 (Elected block proposer has not been slashed). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6988","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6988","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6988","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1448","slug":"eip-7","title":"DELEGATECALL","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7.md","source_label":"EIP 7","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7 (DELEGATECALL). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1449","slug":"eip-7039","title":"Scheme-Handler Discovery Option for Wallets","authors":"Sam Wilson","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7039.md","source_label":"EIP 7039","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7039.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7039.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7039 (Scheme-Handler Discovery Option for Wallets). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7039","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7039","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7039","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1450","slug":"eip-7069","title":"Revamped CALL instructions","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Danno Ferrin, Andrei Maiboroda, Charles Cooper","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Danno Ferrin, Andrei Maiboroda, Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7069.md","source_label":"EIP 7069","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7069.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7069.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7069 (Revamped CALL instructions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7069","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7069","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7069","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1451","slug":"eip-7199","title":"Linter Scope","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7199.md","source_label":"EIP 7199","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7199.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7199.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7199 (Linter Scope). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7199","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7199","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7199","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1452","slug":"eip-7266","title":"Remove BLAKE2 compression precompile","authors":"pcaversaccio","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"pcaversaccio","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7266.md","source_label":"EIP 7266","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7266.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7266.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7266 (Remove BLAKE2 compression precompile). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7266","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7266","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7266","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1453","slug":"eip-7329","title":"ERC/EIP Repository split","authors":"Lightclient, Danno Ferrin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Lightclient, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7329.md","source_label":"EIP 7329","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7329.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7329.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7329 (ERC/EIP Repository split). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7329","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7329","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7329","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1454","slug":"eip-7377","title":"Migration Transaction","authors":"lightclient, Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"lightclient, Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7377.md","source_label":"EIP 7377","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7377.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7377.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7377 (Migration Transaction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7377","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7377","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7377","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1455","slug":"eip-7378","title":"Add time-weighted averaging to the base fee","authors":"Guy Goren","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Guy Goren","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7378.md","source_label":"EIP 7378","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7378.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7378.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7378 (Add time-weighted averaging to the base fee). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7378","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7378","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7378","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1456","slug":"eip-7441","title":"Upgrade block proposer election to Whisk","authors":"George Kadianakis, Justin Drake, dapplion","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"George Kadianakis, Justin Drake, dapplion","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7441.md","source_label":"EIP 7441","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7441.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7441.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7441 (Upgrade block proposer election to Whisk). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7441","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7441","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7441","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1457","slug":"eip-7480","title":"EOF - Data section access instructions","authors":"Andrei Maiboroda, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Andrei Maiboroda, Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7480.md","source_label":"EIP 7480","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7480.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7480.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7480 (EOF - Data section access instructions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7480","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7480","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7480","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1458","slug":"eip-7503","title":"Zero-Knowledge Wormholes","authors":"Keyvan Kambakhsh, Hamid Bateni, Amir Kahoori, Nobitex Labs, 0xwormhole","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Keyvan Kambakhsh, Hamid Bateni, Amir Kahoori, Nobitex Labs, 0xwormhole","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7503.md","source_label":"EIP 7503","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7503.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7503.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7503 (Zero-Knowledge Wormholes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7503","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7503","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7503","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1459","slug":"eip-7519","title":"Atomic Storage Operations SCREDIT and SDEBIT","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7519.md","source_label":"EIP 7519","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7519.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7519.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7519 (Atomic Storage Operations SCREDIT and SDEBIT). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7519","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7519","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7519","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1460","slug":"eip-7542","title":"eth/70 - available-blocks-extended protocol","authors":"Ahmad Bitar","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ahmad Bitar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7542.md","source_label":"EIP 7542","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7542.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7542.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7542 (eth/70 - available-blocks-extended protocol). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7542","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7542","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7542","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1461","slug":"eip-7543","title":"EVM arbitrary precision decimal math","authors":"1m1","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"1m1","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7543.md","source_label":"EIP 7543","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7543.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7543.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7543 (EVM arbitrary precision decimal math). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7543","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7543","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7543","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1462","slug":"eip-7545","title":"Verkle proof verification precompile","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Diederik Loerakker","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Diederik Loerakker","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7545.md","source_label":"EIP 7545","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7545.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7545.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7545 (Verkle proof verification precompile). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7545","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7545","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7545","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1463","slug":"eip-7547","title":"Inclusion lists","authors":"mike, Vitalik, Francesco, Terence, potuz, Manav","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"mike, Vitalik, Francesco, Terence, potuz, Manav","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7547.md","source_label":"EIP 7547","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7547.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7547.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7547 (Inclusion lists). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7547","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7547","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7547","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1464","slug":"eip-7557","title":"Block-level Warming with fair cost savings","authors":"Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7557.md","source_label":"EIP 7557","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7557.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7557.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7557 (Block-level Warming with fair cost savings). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7557","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7557","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7557","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1465","slug":"eip-7568","title":"Hardfork Meta Backfill - Berlin to Shapella","authors":"Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7568.md","source_label":"EIP 7568","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7568.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7568.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7568 (Hardfork Meta Backfill - Berlin to Shapella). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7568","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7568","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7568","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1466","slug":"eip-7569","title":"Hardfork Meta - Dencun","authors":"Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7569.md","source_label":"EIP 7569","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7569.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7569.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7569 (Hardfork Meta - Dencun). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7569","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7569","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7569","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1467","slug":"eip-7577","title":"Versioning Scheme for EIPs","authors":"danceratopz, Ahmad Bitar","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"danceratopz, Ahmad Bitar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7577.md","source_label":"EIP 7577","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7577.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7577.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7577 (Versioning Scheme for EIPs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7577","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7577","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7577","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1468","slug":"eip-758","title":"Subscriptions and filters for completed transactions","authors":"Jack Peterson","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jack Peterson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-758.md","source_label":"EIP 758","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-758.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-758.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 758 (Subscriptions and filters for completed transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-758","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-758","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-758","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1469","slug":"eip-7587","title":"Reserve Precompile Address Range for RIPs","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen, Ansgar Dietrichs, Danny Ryan, Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen, Ansgar Dietrichs, Danny Ryan, Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7587.md","source_label":"EIP 7587","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7587.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7587.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7587 (Reserve Precompile Address Range for RIPs). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7587","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7587","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7587","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1470","slug":"eip-7591","title":"BLS signed transactions","authors":"Marius van der Wijden","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7591.md","source_label":"EIP 7591","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7591.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7591.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7591 (BLS signed transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7591","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7591","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7591","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1471","slug":"eip-7600","title":"Hardfork Meta - Pectra","authors":"Tim Beiko","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7600.md","source_label":"EIP 7600","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7600.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7600.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7600 (Hardfork Meta - Pectra). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7600","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7600","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7600","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1472","slug":"eip-7607","title":"Hardfork Meta - Fusaka","authors":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7607.md","source_label":"EIP 7607","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7607.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7607.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7607 (Hardfork Meta - Fusaka). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7607","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7607","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7607","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1473","slug":"eip-7609","title":"Decrease base cost of TLOAD/TSTORE","authors":"Charles Cooper, James Prestwich, brockelmore","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Charles Cooper, James Prestwich, brockelmore","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7609.md","source_label":"EIP 7609","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7609.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7609.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7609 (Decrease base cost of TLOAD/TSTORE). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7609","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7609","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7609","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1474","slug":"eip-7612","title":"Verkle state transition via an overlay tree","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Ansgar Dietrichs, Ignacio Hagopian, Gottfried Herold, Jamie Lokier, Tanishq Jasoria, Parithosh Jayanthi, Gabriel Rocheleau, Karim Taam","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Ansgar Dietrichs, Ignacio Hagopian, Gottfried Herold, Jamie Lokier, Tanishq Jasoria, Parithosh Jayanthi, Gabriel Rocheleau, Karim Taam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7612.md","source_label":"EIP 7612","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7612.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7612.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7612 (Verkle state transition via an overlay tree). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7612","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7612","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7612","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1475","slug":"eip-7619","title":"Precompile Falcon512 generic verifier","authors":"Erick Pacheco Pedraza, Marcos Allende, Diego Lopez León","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Erick Pacheco Pedraza, Marcos Allende, Diego Lopez León","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7619.md","source_label":"EIP 7619","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7619.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7619.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7619 (Precompile Falcon512 generic verifier). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7619","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7619","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7619","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1476","slug":"eip-7620","title":"EOF Contract Creation","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda, Piotr Dobaczewski","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda, Piotr Dobaczewski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7620.md","source_label":"EIP 7620","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7620.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7620.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7620 (EOF Contract Creation). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7620","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7620","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7620","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1477","slug":"eip-7636","title":"Extension of EIP-778 for \"client\" ENR Entry","authors":"James Kempton","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"James Kempton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7636.md","source_label":"EIP 7636","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7636.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7636.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7636 (Extension of EIP-778 for \"client\" ENR Entry). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7636","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7636","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7636","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1478","slug":"eip-7637","title":"Optimize EOA EXTCODEHASH","authors":"Jame","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Jame","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7637.md","source_label":"EIP 7637","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7637.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7637.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7637 (Optimize EOA EXTCODEHASH). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7637","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7637","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7637","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1479","slug":"eip-7639","title":"eth/70 - Cease serving history before PoS","authors":"lightclient","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7639.md","source_label":"EIP 7639","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7639.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7639.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7639 (eth/70 - Cease serving history before PoS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7639","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7639","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7639","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1480","slug":"eip-7643","title":"History accumulator for pre-PoS data","authors":"lightclient, kdeme","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lightclient, kdeme","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7643.md","source_label":"EIP 7643","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7643.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7643.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7643 (History accumulator for pre-PoS data). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7643","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7643","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7643","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1481","slug":"eip-7645","title":"Alias ORIGIN to SENDER","authors":"Cyrus Adkisson, Eirik Ulversøy","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Cyrus Adkisson, Eirik Ulversøy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7645.md","source_label":"EIP 7645","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7645.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7645.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7645 (Alias ORIGIN to SENDER). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7645","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7645","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7645","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1482","slug":"eip-7650","title":"Programmable access lists","authors":"Qi Zhou, Zhiqiang Xu","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Qi Zhou, Zhiqiang Xu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7650.md","source_label":"EIP 7650","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7650.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7650.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7650 (Programmable access lists). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7650","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7650","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7650","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1483","slug":"eip-7657","title":"Sync committee slashings","authors":"Etan Kissling","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7657.md","source_label":"EIP 7657","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7657.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7657.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7657 (Sync committee slashings). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7657","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7657","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7657","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1484","slug":"eip-7658","title":"Light client data backfill","authors":"Etan Kissling","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7658.md","source_label":"EIP 7658","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7658.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7658.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7658 (Light client data backfill). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7658","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7658","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7658","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1485","slug":"eip-7664","title":"Access-Key opcode","authors":"Diederik Loerakker","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Diederik Loerakker","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7664.md","source_label":"EIP 7664","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7664.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7664.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7664 (Access-Key opcode). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7664","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7664","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7664","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1486","slug":"eip-7666","title":"EVM-ify the identity precompile","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Kevaundray Wedderburn","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Kevaundray Wedderburn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7666.md","source_label":"EIP 7666","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7666.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7666.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7666 (EVM-ify the identity precompile). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7666","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7666","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7666","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1487","slug":"eip-7667","title":"Raise gas costs of hash functions","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7667.md","source_label":"EIP 7667","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7667.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7667.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7667 (Raise gas costs of hash functions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7667","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7667","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7667","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1488","slug":"eip-7668","title":"Remove bloom filters","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7668.md","source_label":"EIP 7668","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7668.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7668.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7668 (Remove bloom filters). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7668","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7668","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7668","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1489","slug":"eip-7675","title":"Retroactively Included EIPs","authors":"Tim Beiko","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7675.md","source_label":"EIP 7675","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7675.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7675.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7675 (Retroactively Included EIPs). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7675","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7675","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7675","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1490","slug":"eip-7676","title":"EOF - Prepare for Address Space Extension","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7676.md","source_label":"EIP 7676","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7676.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7676.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7676 (EOF - Prepare for Address Space Extension). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7676","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7676","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7676","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1491","slug":"eip-7684","title":"Return deposits for distinct credentials","authors":"Lion","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lion","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7684.md","source_label":"EIP 7684","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7684.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7684.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7684 (Return deposits for distinct credentials). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7684","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7684","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7684","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1492","slug":"eip-7686","title":"Linear EVM memory limits","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7686.md","source_label":"EIP 7686","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7686.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7686.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7686 (Linear EVM memory limits). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7686","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7686","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7686","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1493","slug":"eip-7692","title":"EVM Object Format (EOFv1) Meta","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda, Piotr Dobaczewski, Danno Ferrin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Paweł Bylica, Andrei Maiboroda, Piotr Dobaczewski, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7692.md","source_label":"EIP 7692","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7692.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7692.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7692 (EVM Object Format (EOFv1) Meta). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7692","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7692","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7692","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1494","slug":"eip-7698","title":"EOF - Creation transaction","authors":"Piotr Dobaczewski, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Piotr Dobaczewski, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7698.md","source_label":"EIP 7698","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7698.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7698.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7698 (EOF - Creation transaction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7698","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7698","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7698","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1495","slug":"eip-7701","title":"Native Account Abstraction","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7701.md","source_label":"EIP 7701","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7701.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7701.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7701 (Native Account Abstraction). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7701","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7701","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7701","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1496","slug":"eip-7703","title":"Increase calldata cost","authors":"William Morriss","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7703.md","source_label":"EIP 7703","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7703.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7703.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7703 (Increase calldata cost). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7703","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7703","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7703","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1497","slug":"eip-7705","title":"NONREENTRANT and REENTRANT opcodes","authors":"Charles Cooper","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7705.md","source_label":"EIP 7705","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7705.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7705.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7705 (NONREENTRANT and REENTRANT opcodes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7705","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7705","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7705","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1498","slug":"eip-7706","title":"Separate gas type for calldata","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7706.md","source_label":"EIP 7706","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7706.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7706.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7706 (Separate gas type for calldata). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7706","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7706","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7706","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1499","slug":"eip-7707","title":"Incentivize Access List Provisioning","authors":"Ben Adams, Oleg Iakushkin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ben Adams, Oleg Iakushkin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7707.md","source_label":"EIP 7707","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7707.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7707.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7707 (Incentivize Access List Provisioning). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7707","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7707","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7707","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1500","slug":"eip-7709","title":"Read BLOCKHASH from Storage and Update Cost","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Tomasz Stanczak, Guillaume Ballet, Gajinder Singh, Tanishq Jasoria, Ignacio Hagopian, Jochem Brouwer, Gabriel Rocheleau","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Tomasz Stanczak, Guillaume Ballet, Gajinder Singh, Tanishq Jasoria, Ignacio Hagopian, Jochem Brouwer, Gabriel Rocheleau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7709.md","source_label":"EIP 7709","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7709.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7709.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7709 (Read BLOCKHASH from Storage and Update Cost). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7709","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7709","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7709","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1501","slug":"eip-7713","title":"Box type for EIP-712 messages","authors":"Francisco Giordano","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7713.md","source_label":"EIP 7713","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7713.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7713.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7713 (Box type for EIP-712 messages). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7713","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7713","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7713","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1502","slug":"eip-7716","title":"Anti-Correlation Attestation Penalties","authors":"dapplion, Toni Wahrstätter, Vitalik Buterin, Oisín Kyne","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"dapplion, Toni Wahrstätter, Vitalik Buterin, Oisín Kyne","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7716.md","source_label":"EIP 7716","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7716.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7716.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7716 (Anti-Correlation Attestation Penalties). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7716","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7716","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7716","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1503","slug":"eip-7723","title":"Network Upgrade Inclusion Stages","authors":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Nixo, Parithosh Jayanthi","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Nixo, Parithosh Jayanthi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7723.md","source_label":"EIP 7723","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7723.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7723.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7723 (Network Upgrade Inclusion Stages). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7723","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7723","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7723","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1504","slug":"eip-7727","title":"EVM Transaction Bundles","authors":"Lily Johnson","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lily Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7727.md","source_label":"EIP 7727","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7727.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7727.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7727 (EVM Transaction Bundles). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7727","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7727","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7727","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1505","slug":"eip-7736","title":"Leaf-level state expiry in verkle trees","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Wei Han Ng","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Wei Han Ng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7736.md","source_label":"EIP 7736","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7736.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7736.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7736 (Leaf-level state expiry in verkle trees). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7736","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7736","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7736","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1506","slug":"eip-7742","title":"Uncouple blob count between CL and EL","authors":"Alex Stokes","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alex Stokes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7742.md","source_label":"EIP 7742","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7742.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7742.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7742 (Uncouple blob count between CL and EL). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7742","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7742","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7742","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1507","slug":"eip-7745","title":"Trustless log and transaction index","authors":"Zsolt Felföldi","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Zsolt Felföldi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7745.md","source_label":"EIP 7745","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7745.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7745.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7745 (Trustless log and transaction index). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7745","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7745","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7745","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1508","slug":"eip-7748","title":"State conversion to Verkle Tree","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Ignacio Hagopian, Gajinder Singh, Ansgar Dietrichs, Gottfried Herold, Jamie Lokier, Tanishq Jasoria, Parithosh Jayanthi, Gabriel Rocheleau, Karim Taam","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Ignacio Hagopian, Gajinder Singh, Ansgar Dietrichs, Gottfried Herold, Jamie Lokier, Tanishq Jasoria, Parithosh Jayanthi, Gabriel Rocheleau, Karim Taam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7748.md","source_label":"EIP 7748","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7748.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7748.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7748 (State conversion to Verkle Tree). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7748","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7748","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7748","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1509","slug":"eip-7749","title":"Add wallet_signIntendedValidatorData method","authors":"Yamen Merhi, Patronum Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Yamen Merhi, Patronum Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7749.md","source_label":"EIP 7749","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7749.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7749.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7749 (Add wallet_signIntendedValidatorData method). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7749","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7749","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7749","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1510","slug":"eip-7756","title":"EOF/EVM Trace Specification","authors":"Martin Holst Swende, Marius van der Wijden, Danno Ferrin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende, Marius van der Wijden, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7756.md","source_label":"EIP 7756","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7756.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7756.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7756 (EOF/EVM Trace Specification). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7756","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7756","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7756","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1511","slug":"eip-7761","title":"EXTCODETYPE instruction","authors":"Andrei Maiboroda, Piotr Dobaczewski, Danno Ferrin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Andrei Maiboroda, Piotr Dobaczewski, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7761.md","source_label":"EIP 7761","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7761.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7761.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7761 (EXTCODETYPE instruction). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7761","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7761","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7761","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1512","slug":"eip-7762","title":"Increase MIN_BASE_FEE_PER_BLOB_GAS","authors":"Max Resnick, Davide Crapis, Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Max Resnick, Davide Crapis, Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7762.md","source_label":"EIP 7762","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7762.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7762.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7762 (Increase MIN_BASE_FEE_PER_BLOB_GAS). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7762","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7762","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7762","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1513","slug":"eip-7768","title":"No-Ether transactions with free-for-all tips","authors":"William Entriken","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7768.md","source_label":"EIP 7768","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7768.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7768.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7768 (No-Ether transactions with free-for-all tips). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7768","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7768","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7768","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1514","slug":"eip-7773","title":"Hardfork Meta - Glamsterdam","authors":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Nixo, Parithosh Jayanthi","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Nixo, Parithosh Jayanthi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7773.md","source_label":"EIP 7773","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7773.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7773.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7773 (Hardfork Meta - Glamsterdam). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7773","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7773","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7773","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1515","slug":"eip-7775","title":"BURN opcode","authors":"Dev Bear","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Dev Bear","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7775.md","source_label":"EIP 7775","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7775.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7775.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7775 (BURN opcode). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7775","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7775","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7775","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1516","slug":"eip-778","title":"Ethereum Node Records (ENR)","authors":"Felix Lange","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-778.md","source_label":"EIP 778","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-778.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-778.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 778 (Ethereum Node Records (ENR)). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-778","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-778","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-778","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1517","slug":"eip-7782","title":"Reduce Block Latency","authors":"Ben Adams, Dankrad Feist, Maria Inês Silva, Paul Harris","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ben Adams, Dankrad Feist, Maria Inês Silva, Paul Harris","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7782.md","source_label":"EIP 7782","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7782.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7782.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7782 (Reduce Block Latency). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7782","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7782","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7782","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1518","slug":"eip-7783","title":"Add Controlled Gas Limit Increase Strategy","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7783.md","source_label":"EIP 7783","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7783.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7783.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7783 (Add Controlled Gas Limit Increase Strategy). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7783","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7783","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7783","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1519","slug":"eip-7788","title":"Dynamic target blob count","authors":"Marc Harvey-Hill","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marc Harvey-Hill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7788.md","source_label":"EIP 7788","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7788.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7788.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7788 (Dynamic target blob count). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7788","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7788","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7788","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1520","slug":"eip-779","title":"\"Hardfork Meta: DAO Fork\"","authors":"Casey Detrio","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Casey Detrio","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-779.md","source_label":"EIP 779","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-779.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-779.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 779 (\"Hardfork Meta: DAO Fork\"). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-779","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-779","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-779","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1521","slug":"eip-7790","title":"Controlled Gas Limit Increase Guidelines","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo, Ben Adams","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo, Ben Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7790.md","source_label":"EIP 7790","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7790.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7790.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7790 (Controlled Gas Limit Increase Guidelines). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7790","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7790","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7790","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1522","slug":"eip-7791","title":"GAS2ETH opcode","authors":"Charles Cooper, pcaversaccio","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Charles Cooper, pcaversaccio","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7791.md","source_label":"EIP 7791","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7791.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7791.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7791 (GAS2ETH opcode). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7791","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7791","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7791","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1523","slug":"eip-7792","title":"Verifiable logs","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7792.md","source_label":"EIP 7792","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7792.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7792.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7792 (Verifiable logs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7792","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7792","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7792","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1524","slug":"eip-7793","title":"Conditional Transactions","authors":"Marc Harvey-Hill, Ahmad Bitar","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marc Harvey-Hill, Ahmad Bitar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7793.md","source_label":"EIP 7793","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7793.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7793.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7793 (Conditional Transactions). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7793","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7793","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7793","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1525","slug":"eip-7797","title":"Double speed for hash_tree_root","authors":"Etan Kissling","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7797.md","source_label":"EIP 7797","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7797.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7797.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7797 (Double speed for hash_tree_root). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7797","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7797","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7797","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1526","slug":"eip-7799","title":"System logs","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7799.md","source_label":"EIP 7799","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7799.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7799.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7799 (System logs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7799","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7799","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7799","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1527","slug":"eip-7801","title":"etha - Sharded Blocks Subprotocol","authors":"Ahmad Bitar, Giulio Rebuffo, Gary Schulte","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ahmad Bitar, Giulio Rebuffo, Gary Schulte","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7801.md","source_label":"EIP 7801","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7801.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7801.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7801 (etha - Sharded Blocks Subprotocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7801","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7801","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7801","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1528","slug":"eip-7804","title":"Withdrawal Credential Update Request","authors":"Lucas Saldanha, Mikhail Kalinin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Lucas Saldanha, Mikhail Kalinin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7804.md","source_label":"EIP 7804","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7804.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7804.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7804 (Withdrawal Credential Update Request). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7804","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7804","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7804","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1529","slug":"eip-7805","title":"Fork-choice enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL)","authors":"Thomas Thiery, Francesco D'Amato, Julian Ma, Barnabé Monnot, Terence Tsao, Jacob Kaufmann, Jihoon Song","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Thomas Thiery, Francesco D'Amato, Julian Ma, Barnabé Monnot, Terence Tsao, Jacob Kaufmann, Jihoon Song","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7805.md","source_label":"EIP 7805","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7805.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7805.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7805 (Fork-choice enforced Inclusion Lists (FOCIL)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7805","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7805","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7805","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1530","slug":"eip-7807","title":"SSZ execution blocks","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7807.md","source_label":"EIP 7807","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7807.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7807.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7807 (SSZ execution blocks). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7807","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7807","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7807","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1531","slug":"eip-7808","title":"Reserve Tx-Type Range for RIPs","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen, Yoav Weiss, Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen, Yoav Weiss, Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7808.md","source_label":"EIP 7808","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7808.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7808.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7808 (Reserve Tx-Type Range for RIPs). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7808","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7808","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7808","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1532","slug":"eip-7819","title":"SETDELEGATE instruction","authors":"Hadrien Croubois","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7819.md","source_label":"EIP 7819","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7819.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7819.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7819 (SETDELEGATE instruction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7819","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7819","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7819","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1533","slug":"eip-7830","title":"Contract size limit increase for EOF","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi, Danno Ferrin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7830.md","source_label":"EIP 7830","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7830.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7830.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7830 (Contract size limit increase for EOF). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7830","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7830","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7830","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1534","slug":"eip-7833","title":"Scheduled function calls","authors":"Keyvan Kambakhsh, Nobitex Labs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Keyvan Kambakhsh, Nobitex Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7833.md","source_label":"EIP 7833","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7833.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7833.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7833 (Scheduled function calls). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7833","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7833","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7833","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1535","slug":"eip-7848","title":"On-chain upgrade signaling","authors":"William Entriken","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7848.md","source_label":"EIP 7848","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7848.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7848.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7848 (On-chain upgrade signaling). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7848","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7848","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7848","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1536","slug":"eip-7851","title":"Code-Controlled EOA Delegation","authors":"Liyi Guo, Nicolas Consigny","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Liyi Guo, Nicolas Consigny","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7851.md","source_label":"EIP 7851","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7851.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7851.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7851 (Code-Controlled EOA Delegation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7851","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7851","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7851","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1537","slug":"eip-7862","title":"Delayed State Root","authors":"Charlie Noyes, Dan Robinson, Justin Drake, Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Charlie Noyes, Dan Robinson, Justin Drake, Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7862.md","source_label":"EIP 7862","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7862.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7862.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7862 (Delayed State Root). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7862","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7862","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7862","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1538","slug":"eip-7863","title":"Block-level Warming","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter, Jochem Brouwer, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter, Jochem Brouwer, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7863.md","source_label":"EIP 7863","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7863.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7863.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7863 (Block-level Warming). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7863","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7863","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7863","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1539","slug":"eip-7864","title":"Ethereum state using a unified binary tree","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Guillaume Ballet, Dankrad Feist, Ignacio Hagopian, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh, Danno Ferrin, Piper Merriam, Gottfried Herold","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Guillaume Ballet, Dankrad Feist, Ignacio Hagopian, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh, Danno Ferrin, Piper Merriam, Gottfried Herold","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7864.md","source_label":"EIP 7864","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7864.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7864.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7864 (Ethereum state using a unified binary tree). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7864","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7864","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7864","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1540","slug":"eip-7867","title":"Flow Control Wallet Call Capability","authors":"Sam Wilson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7867.md","source_label":"EIP 7867","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7867.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7867.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7867 (Flow Control Wallet Call Capability). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7867","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7867","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7867","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1541","slug":"eip-7872","title":"Max blob flag for local builders","authors":"Francesco D'Amato, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Toni Wahrstätter, Alex Stokes, Ben Adams, Gajinder Singh, Dustin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Toni Wahrstätter, Alex Stokes, Ben Adams, Gajinder Singh, Dustin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7872.md","source_label":"EIP 7872","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7872.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7872.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7872 (Max blob flag for local builders). The file's status is Review. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7872","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7872","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7872","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1542","slug":"eip-7873","title":"EOF - TXCREATE and InitcodeTransaction type","authors":"Piotr Dobaczewski, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi, Danno Ferrin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Piotr Dobaczewski, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica, Alex Beregszaszi, Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7873.md","source_label":"EIP 7873","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7873.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7873.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7873 (EOF - TXCREATE and InitcodeTransaction type). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7873","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7873","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7873","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1543","slug":"eip-7877","title":"Enhanced RETURN opcodes","authors":"Josh Weintraub","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Josh Weintraub","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7877.md","source_label":"EIP 7877","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7877.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7877.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7877 (Enhanced RETURN opcodes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7877","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7877","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7877","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1544","slug":"eip-7885","title":"Precompile for NTT operations","authors":"Renaud Dubois, Simon Masson, Yoon Hyoung Lee","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Renaud Dubois, Simon Masson, Yoon Hyoung Lee","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7885.md","source_label":"EIP 7885","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7885.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7885.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7885 (Precompile for NTT operations). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7885","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7885","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7885","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1545","slug":"eip-7886","title":"Delayed execution","authors":"Francesco D'Amato, Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato, Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7886.md","source_label":"EIP 7886","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7886.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7886.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7886 (Delayed execution). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7886","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7886","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7886","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1546","slug":"eip-7889","title":"Emit log on revert","authors":"Shoham Chakraborty, Alex Forshtat","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Shoham Chakraborty, Alex Forshtat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7889.md","source_label":"EIP 7889","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7889.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7889.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7889 (Emit log on revert). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7889","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7889","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7889","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1547","slug":"eip-7896","title":"ABI attachment in `wallet_sendCalls`","authors":"Francisco Giordano","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7896.md","source_label":"EIP 7896","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7896.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7896.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7896 (ABI attachment in `wallet_sendCalls`). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7896","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7896","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7896","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1548","slug":"eip-7898","title":"Uncouple execution payload from beacon block","authors":"Gajinder Singh","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7898.md","source_label":"EIP 7898","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7898.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7898.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7898 (Uncouple execution payload from beacon block). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7898","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7898","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7898","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1549","slug":"eip-7903","title":"Remove Initcode Size Limit","authors":"Charles Cooper","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7903.md","source_label":"EIP 7903","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7903.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7903.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7903 (Remove Initcode Size Limit). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7903","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7903","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7903","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1550","slug":"eip-7906","title":"Transaction Assertions via State Diff Opcode","authors":"Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson, Dror Tirosh, Yoav Weiss, Fredrik Svantes, Daniil Ankushin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson, Dror Tirosh, Yoav Weiss, Fredrik Svantes, Daniil Ankushin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7906.md","source_label":"EIP 7906","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7906.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7906.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7906 (Transaction Assertions via State Diff Opcode). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7906","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7906","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7906","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1551","slug":"eip-7907","title":"Meter Contract Code Size","authors":"Charles Cooper, Qi Zhou, Matt, Dragan Rakita, Ben Adams","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Charles Cooper, Qi Zhou, Matt, Dragan Rakita, Ben Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7907.md","source_label":"EIP 7907","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7907.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7907.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7907 (Meter Contract Code Size). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7907","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7907","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7907","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1552","slug":"eip-7911","title":"Scaling Ethereum with a Perceptron Tree ZKP","authors":"Ryo Ha, Khajiev Nizomjon","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ryo Ha, Khajiev Nizomjon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7911.md","source_label":"EIP 7911","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7911.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7911.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7911 (Scaling Ethereum with a Perceptron Tree ZKP). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7911","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7911","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7911","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1553","slug":"eip-7912","title":"Pragmatic stack manipulation tools","authors":"lightclient","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7912.md","source_label":"EIP 7912","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7912.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7912.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7912 (Pragmatic stack manipulation tools). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7912","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7912","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7912","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1554","slug":"eip-7915","title":"Adaptive mean reversion blob pricing","authors":"Anders Elowsson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7915.md","source_label":"EIP 7915","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7915.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7915.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7915 (Adaptive mean reversion blob pricing). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7915","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7915","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7915","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1555","slug":"eip-7919","title":"Pureth Meta","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7919.md","source_label":"EIP 7919","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7919.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7919.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7919 (Pureth Meta). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7919","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7919","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7919","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1556","slug":"eip-7921","title":"Skip `JUMPDEST` immediate argument check","authors":"William Morriss","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7921.md","source_label":"EIP 7921","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7921.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7921.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7921 (Skip `JUMPDEST` immediate argument check). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7921","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7921","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7921","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1557","slug":"eip-7922","title":"Dynamic exit queue rate limit","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin, Mike Neuder, Mallesh Pai","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin, Mike Neuder, Mallesh Pai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7922.md","source_label":"EIP 7922","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7922.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7922.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7922 (Dynamic exit queue rate limit). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7922","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7922","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7922","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1558","slug":"eip-7923","title":"Linear, Page-Based Memory Costing","authors":"Charles Cooper, Qi Zhou","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Charles Cooper, Qi Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7923.md","source_label":"EIP 7923","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7923.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7923.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7923 (Linear, Page-Based Memory Costing). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7923","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7923","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7923","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1559","slug":"eip-7927","title":"History Expiry Meta","authors":"Piper Merriam","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Piper Merriam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7927.md","source_label":"EIP 7927","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7927.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7927.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7927 (History Expiry Meta). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7927","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7927","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7927","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1560","slug":"eip-7932","title":"Secondary Signature Algorithms","authors":"James Kempton","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"James Kempton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7932.md","source_label":"EIP 7932","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7932.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7932.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7932 (Secondary Signature Algorithms). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7932","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7932","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7932","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1561","slug":"eip-7937","title":"EVM64 - 64-bit mode EVM opcodes","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7937.md","source_label":"EIP 7937","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7937.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7937.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7937 (EVM64 - 64-bit mode EVM opcodes). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7937","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7937","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7937","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1562","slug":"eip-7938","title":"Exponential Gas Limit Increase","authors":"Dankrad Feist","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7938.md","source_label":"EIP 7938","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7938.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7938.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7938 (Exponential Gas Limit Increase). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7938","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7938","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7938","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1563","slug":"eip-7940","title":"Ethereum Shah","authors":"Ameen Soleimani, Gregory Markou","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ameen Soleimani, Gregory Markou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7940.md","source_label":"EIP 7940","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7940.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7940.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7940 (Ethereum Shah). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7940","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7940","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7940","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1564","slug":"eip-7942","title":"Available Attestation","authors":"Mingfei Zhang, Rujia Li, Xueqian Lu, Sisi Duan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mingfei Zhang, Rujia Li, Xueqian Lu, Sisi Duan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7942.md","source_label":"EIP 7942","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7942.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7942.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7942 (Available Attestation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7942","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7942","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7942","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1565","slug":"eip-7949","title":"Genesis File Format","authors":"Justin Florentine, Jochem Brouwer, Barnabas Busa","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Justin Florentine, Jochem Brouwer, Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7949.md","source_label":"EIP 7949","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7949.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7949.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7949 (Genesis File Format). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7949","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7949","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7949","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1566","slug":"eip-7956","title":"Tx Ordering via Block-level Randomness","authors":"Aryaethn","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Aryaethn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7956.md","source_label":"EIP 7956","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7956.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7956.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7956 (Tx Ordering via Block-level Randomness). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7956","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7956","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7956","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1567","slug":"eip-7957","title":"EVM64 - EOF support","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7957.md","source_label":"EIP 7957","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7957.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7957.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7957 (EVM64 - EOF support). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7957","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7957","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7957","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1568","slug":"eip-7958","title":"EVM64 - Little endian opcodes","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7958.md","source_label":"EIP 7958","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7958.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7958.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7958 (EVM64 - Little endian opcodes). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7958","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7958","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7958","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1569","slug":"eip-7960","title":"EOF - Extended types section","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7960.md","source_label":"EIP 7960","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7960.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7960.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7960 (EOF - Extended types section). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7960","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7960","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7960","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1570","slug":"eip-7961","title":"EVM64 - EOF code section","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7961.md","source_label":"EIP 7961","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7961.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7961.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7961 (EVM64 - EOF code section). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7961","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7961","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7961","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1571","slug":"eip-7966","title":"eth_sendRawTransactionSync Method","authors":"Sam Battenally, Hai Nguyen, Thanh Nguyen, Loc Nguyen","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sam Battenally, Hai Nguyen, Thanh Nguyen, Loc Nguyen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7966.md","source_label":"EIP 7966","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7966.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7966.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7966 (eth_sendRawTransactionSync Method). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7966","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7966","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7966","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1572","slug":"eip-7971","title":"Hard Limits for Transient Storage","authors":"Charles Cooper, Ben Adams, Maria Silva, Jochem Brouwer","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Charles Cooper, Ben Adams, Maria Silva, Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7971.md","source_label":"EIP 7971","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7971.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7971.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7971 (Hard Limits for Transient Storage). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7971","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7971","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7971","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1573","slug":"eip-7973","title":"Warm Account Write Metering","authors":"Charles Cooper, Maria Silva, Ben Adams","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Charles Cooper, Maria Silva, Ben Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7973.md","source_label":"EIP 7973","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7973.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7973.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7973 (Warm Account Write Metering). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7973","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7973","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7973","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1574","slug":"eip-7979","title":"Call and Return Opcodes for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin, Martin Holst Swende, Brooklyn Zelenka, John Max Skaller","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Martin Holst Swende, Brooklyn Zelenka, John Max Skaller","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7979.md","source_label":"EIP 7979","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7979.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7979.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7979 (Call and Return Opcodes for the EVM). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7979","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7979","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7979","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1575","slug":"eip-7980","title":"Ed25519 transaction support","authors":"James Kempton","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"James Kempton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7980.md","source_label":"EIP 7980","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7980.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7980.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7980 (Ed25519 transaction support). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7980","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7980","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7980","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1576","slug":"eip-7998","title":"Turn `randao_reveal` into a VRF","authors":"Alberto La Rocca, Aryaethn","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Alberto La Rocca, Aryaethn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7998.md","source_label":"EIP 7998","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7998.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7998.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7998 (Turn `randao_reveal` into a VRF). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7998","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7998","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7998","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1577","slug":"eip-7999","title":"Unified multidimensional fee market","authors":"Anders Elowsson, Vitalik Buterin, Maria Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson, Vitalik Buterin, Maria Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7999.md","source_label":"EIP 7999","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-7999.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-7999.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 7999 (Unified multidimensional fee market). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7999","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7999","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7999","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1578","slug":"eip-8","title":"devp2p Forward Compatibility Requirements for Homestead","authors":"Felix Lange","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8.md","source_label":"EIP 8","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8 (devp2p Forward Compatibility Requirements for Homestead). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1579","slug":"eip-8007","title":"Glamsterdam Gas Repricings","authors":"Maria Silva, Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva, Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8007.md","source_label":"EIP 8007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8007.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8007.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8007 (Glamsterdam Gas Repricings). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8007","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8007","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8007","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1580","slug":"eip-8011","title":"Multidimensional Gas Metering","authors":"Maria Silva, Davide Crapis, Anders Elowsson, Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva, Davide Crapis, Anders Elowsson, Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8011.md","source_label":"EIP 8011","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8011.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8011.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8011 (Multidimensional Gas Metering). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8011","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8011","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8011","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1581","slug":"eip-8012","title":"Generalized consolidation requests","authors":"Potuz","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Potuz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8012.md","source_label":"EIP 8012","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8012.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8012.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8012 (Generalized consolidation requests). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8012","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8012","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8012","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1582","slug":"eip-8013","title":"Static relative jumps and calls for the EVM","authors":"Greg Colvin, Alex Beregszaszi, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Alex Beregszaszi, Andrei Maiboroda, Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8013.md","source_label":"EIP 8013","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8013.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8013.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8013 (Static relative jumps and calls for the EVM). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8013","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8013","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8013","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1583","slug":"eip-8015","title":"Remove `deposit` and `eth1data` fields","authors":"Terence, Etan Kissling","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Terence, Etan Kissling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8015.md","source_label":"EIP 8015","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8015.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8015.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8015 (Remove `deposit` and `eth1data` fields). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8015","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8015","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8015","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1584","slug":"eip-8016","title":"SSZ CompatibleUnion","authors":"Etan Kissling, Cayman","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Cayman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8016.md","source_label":"EIP 8016","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8016.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8016.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8016 (SSZ CompatibleUnion). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8016","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8016","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8016","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1585","slug":"eip-8025","title":"Optional Execution Proofs","authors":"Kevaundray Wedderburn, Justin Drake, Ignacio Hagopian, Han, Francesco Risitano, Cody Gunton","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kevaundray Wedderburn, Justin Drake, Ignacio Hagopian, Han, Francesco Risitano, Cody Gunton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8025.md","source_label":"EIP 8025","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8025.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8025.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8025 (Optional Execution Proofs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8025","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8025","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8025","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1586","slug":"eip-8030","title":"P256 algorithm support","authors":"James Kempton","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"James Kempton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8030.md","source_label":"EIP 8030","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8030.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8030.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8030 (P256 algorithm support). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8030","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8030","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8030","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1587","slug":"eip-8032","title":"Size-Based Storage Gas Pricing","authors":"Guillaume Ballet, Carlos Perez, Matan Prasma, Wei Han Ng","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet, Carlos Perez, Matan Prasma, Wei Han Ng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8032.md","source_label":"EIP 8032","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8032.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8032.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8032 (Size-Based Storage Gas Pricing). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8032","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8032","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8032","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1588","slug":"eip-8046","title":"Uniform price auction over inclusion lists","authors":"Anders Elowsson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8046.md","source_label":"EIP 8046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8046.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8046.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8046 (Uniform price auction over inclusion lists). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8046","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8046","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8046","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1589","slug":"eip-8051","title":"Precompile for ML-DSA signature verification","authors":"Renaud Dubois, Simon Masson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Renaud Dubois, Simon Masson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8051.md","source_label":"EIP 8051","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8051.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8051.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8051 (Precompile for ML-DSA signature verification). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8051","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8051","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8051","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1590","slug":"eip-8052","title":"Precompile for Falcon support","authors":"Renaud Dubois, Simon Masson, Antonio Sanso, Marius van der Wijden, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Zhenfei Zhang, Nicolas Consigny","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Renaud Dubois, Simon Masson, Antonio Sanso, Marius van der Wijden, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Zhenfei Zhang, Nicolas Consigny","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8052.md","source_label":"EIP 8052","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8052.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8052.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8052 (Precompile for Falcon support). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8052","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8052","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8052","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1591","slug":"eip-8053","title":"Milli-gas for High-precision Gas Metering","authors":"Maria Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8053.md","source_label":"EIP 8053","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8053.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8053.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8053 (Milli-gas for High-precision Gas Metering). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8053","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8053","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8053","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1592","slug":"eip-8057","title":"Inter-Block Temporal Locality Gas Discounts","authors":"Ben Adams, Toni Wahrstätter, Maria Inês Silva, Amirul Ashraf","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ben Adams, Toni Wahrstätter, Maria Inês Silva, Amirul Ashraf","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8057.md","source_label":"EIP 8057","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8057.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8057.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8057 (Inter-Block Temporal Locality Gas Discounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8057","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8057","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8057","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1593","slug":"eip-8058","title":"Contract Bytecode Deduplication Discount","authors":"Carlos Perez, Wei Han Ng, Guillaume Ballet","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Carlos Perez, Wei Han Ng, Guillaume Ballet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8058.md","source_label":"EIP 8058","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8058.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8058.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8058 (Contract Bytecode Deduplication Discount). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8058","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8058","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8058","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1594","slug":"eip-8059","title":"Gas Units Rebase for High-precision Metering","authors":"Maria Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8059.md","source_label":"EIP 8059","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8059.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8059.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8059 (Gas Units Rebase for High-precision Metering). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8059","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8059","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8059","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1595","slug":"eip-8062","title":"Add sweep withdrawal fee for 0x01 validators","authors":"Anders Elowsson, Toni Wahrstätter, Francesco D'Amato, Ben Adams, Maria Inês Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson, Toni Wahrstätter, Francesco D'Amato, Ben Adams, Maria Inês Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8062.md","source_label":"EIP 8062","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8062.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8062.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8062 (Add sweep withdrawal fee for 0x01 validators). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8062","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8062","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8062","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1596","slug":"eip-8068","title":"Neutral effective balance design","authors":"Anders Elowsson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8068.md","source_label":"EIP 8068","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8068.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8068.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8068 (Neutral effective balance design). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8068","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8068","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8068","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1597","slug":"eip-8071","title":"Prevent using consolidations as withdrawals","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin, Francesco D'Amato","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin, Francesco D'Amato","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8071.md","source_label":"EIP 8071","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8071.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8071.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8071 (Prevent using consolidations as withdrawals). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8071","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8071","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8071","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1598","slug":"eip-8072","title":"Transaction Inclusion Subscription","authors":"Łukasz Rozmej","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Łukasz Rozmej","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8072.md","source_label":"EIP 8072","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8072.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8072.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8072 (Transaction Inclusion Subscription). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8072","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8072","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8072","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1599","slug":"eip-8075","title":"Adaptive state cost to cap growth & scale L1","authors":"Anders Elowsson, Francesco D'Amato, Maria Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson, Francesco D'Amato, Maria Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8075.md","source_label":"EIP 8075","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8075.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8075.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8075 (Adaptive state cost to cap growth & scale L1). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8075","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8075","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8075","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1600","slug":"eip-8077","title":"eth/XX - announce transactions with nonce","authors":"Csaba Kiraly","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Csaba Kiraly","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8077.md","source_label":"EIP 8077","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8077.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8077.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8077 (eth/XX - announce transactions with nonce). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8077","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8077","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8077","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1601","slug":"eip-8079","title":"Native rollups","authors":"Luca Donno, Justin Drake","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Luca Donno, Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8079.md","source_label":"EIP 8079","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8079.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8079.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8079 (Native rollups). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8079","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8079","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8079","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1602","slug":"eip-8080","title":"Let exits use the consolidation queue","authors":"Francesco D'Amato","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8080.md","source_label":"EIP 8080","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8080.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8080.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8080 (Let exits use the consolidation queue). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8080","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8080","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8080","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1603","slug":"eip-8081","title":"Hardfork Meta - Hegotá","authors":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Nixo, Parithosh Jayanthi","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Tim Beiko, Alex Stokes, Ansgar Dietrichs, Nixo, Parithosh Jayanthi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8081.md","source_label":"EIP 8081","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8081.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8081.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8081 (Hardfork Meta - Hegotá). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8081","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8081","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8081","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1604","slug":"eip-8094","title":"eth/vhash - Blob-Aware Mempool","authors":"Csaba Kiraly","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Csaba Kiraly","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8094.md","source_label":"EIP 8094","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8094.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8094.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8094 (eth/vhash - Blob-Aware Mempool). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8094","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8094","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8094","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1605","slug":"eip-8096","title":"Increase Gas Cost of Point Evaluation","authors":"Marcin Sobczak, Kamil Chodoła, Marek Moraczyński","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marcin Sobczak, Kamil Chodoła, Marek Moraczyński","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8096.md","source_label":"EIP 8096","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8096.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8096.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8096 (Increase Gas Cost of Point Evaluation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8096","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8096","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8096","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1606","slug":"eip-8099","title":"MEVless Protocol","authors":"Lawliet Chan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Lawliet Chan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8099.md","source_label":"EIP 8099","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8099.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8099.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8099 (MEVless Protocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8099","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8099","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8099","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1607","slug":"eip-8101","title":"Payload Chunking with Chunk Access Lists","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter, Milos Stankovic, Jihoon Song, Bharath Vedartham, Raúl Kripalani","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter, Milos Stankovic, Jihoon Song, Bharath Vedartham, Raúl Kripalani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8101.md","source_label":"EIP 8101","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8101.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8101.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8101 (Payload Chunking with Chunk Access Lists). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8101","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8101","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8101","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1608","slug":"eip-8105","title":"Universal Enshrined Encrypted Mempool","authors":"Jannik Luhn","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jannik Luhn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8105.md","source_label":"EIP 8105","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8105.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8105.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8105 (Universal Enshrined Encrypted Mempool). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8105","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8105","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8105","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1609","slug":"eip-8115","title":"Batch priority fees at end of block","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8115.md","source_label":"EIP 8115","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8115.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8115.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8115 (Batch priority fees at end of block). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8115","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8115","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8115","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1610","slug":"eip-8116","title":"Replace cumulative receipt fields","authors":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Etan Kissling, Gajinder Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8116.md","source_label":"EIP 8116","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8116.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8116.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8116 (Replace cumulative receipt fields). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8116","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8116","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8116","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1611","slug":"eip-8120","title":"MLOAD8 and CALLDATALOAD8 Opcodes","authors":"Helkomine","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Helkomine","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8120.md","source_label":"EIP 8120","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8120.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8120.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8120 (MLOAD8 and CALLDATALOAD8 Opcodes). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8120","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8120","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8120","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1612","slug":"eip-8123","title":"RPC Method for Transaction Gas Limit Cap","authors":"Paul Razvan Berg","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Paul Razvan Berg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8123.md","source_label":"EIP 8123","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8123.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8123.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8123 (RPC Method for Transaction Gas Limit Cap). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8123","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8123","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8123","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1613","slug":"eip-8125","title":"Temporary Contract Storage","authors":"Wei Han Ng","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Wei Han Ng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8125.md","source_label":"EIP 8125","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8125.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8125.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8125 (Temporary Contract Storage). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8125","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8125","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8125","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1614","slug":"eip-8130","title":"Keystore Accounts","authors":"Chris Hunter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Chris Hunter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8130.md","source_label":"EIP 8130","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8130.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8130.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8130 (Keystore Accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8130","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8130","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8130","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1615","slug":"eip-8131","title":"Unified Transaction Content Floor","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8131.md","source_label":"EIP 8131","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8131.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8131.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8131 (Unified Transaction Content Floor). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8131","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8131","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8131","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1616","slug":"eip-8134","title":"Hardfork Meta - BPO1","authors":"Pooja Ranjan","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pooja Ranjan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8134.md","source_label":"EIP 8134","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8134.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8134.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8134 (Hardfork Meta - BPO1). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8134","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8134","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8134","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1617","slug":"eip-8135","title":"Hardfork Meta - BPO2","authors":"Pooja Ranjan","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pooja Ranjan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8135.md","source_label":"EIP 8135","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8135.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8135.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8135 (Hardfork Meta - BPO2). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8135","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8135","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8135","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1618","slug":"eip-8138","title":"Hardfork Meta - BPO3","authors":"Pooja Ranjan, Barnabas Busa","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pooja Ranjan, Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8138.md","source_label":"EIP 8138","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8138.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8138.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8138 (Hardfork Meta - BPO3). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8138","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8138","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8138","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1619","slug":"eip-8141","title":"Frame Transaction","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, lightclient, Felix Lange, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Derek Chiang, Toni Wahrstätter, Stavros Vlachakis","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, lightclient, Felix Lange, Yoav Weiss, Alex Forshtat, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Derek Chiang, Toni Wahrstätter, Stavros Vlachakis","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8141.md","source_label":"EIP 8141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8141.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8141.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8141 (Frame Transaction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8141","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8141","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8141","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1620","slug":"eip-8142","title":"Block-in-Blobs (BiB)","authors":"Kevaundray Wedderburn, Ignacio Hagopian, Jihoon Song, Francesco Risitano, Thomas Thiery, Toni Wahrstätter, Péter Garamvölgyi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Kevaundray Wedderburn, Ignacio Hagopian, Jihoon Song, Francesco Risitano, Thomas Thiery, Toni Wahrstätter, Péter Garamvölgyi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8142.md","source_label":"EIP 8142","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8142.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8142.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8142 (Block-in-Blobs (BiB)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8142","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8142","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8142","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1621","slug":"eip-8146","title":"Block Access List Sidecars","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter, Raúl Kripalani","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter, Raúl Kripalani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8146.md","source_label":"EIP 8146","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8146.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8146.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8146 (Block Access List Sidecars). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8146","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8146","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8146","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1622","slug":"eip-8148","title":"Custom sweep threshold for validators","authors":"Dmitry Gusakov, Dmitry Chernukhin, Greg Koumoutsos, Manu","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Dmitry Gusakov, Dmitry Chernukhin, Greg Koumoutsos, Manu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8148.md","source_label":"EIP 8148","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8148.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8148.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8148 (Custom sweep threshold for validators). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8148","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8148","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8148","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1623","slug":"eip-8149","title":"Multi KZG Point Evaluation Precompile","authors":"Chris Mata","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Chris Mata","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8149.md","source_label":"EIP 8149","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8149.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8149.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8149 (Multi KZG Point Evaluation Precompile). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8149","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8149","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8149","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1624","slug":"eip-8151","title":"Account Code Restricted ecRecover","authors":"Liyi Guo, Nicolas Consigny","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Liyi Guo, Nicolas Consigny","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8151.md","source_label":"EIP 8151","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8151.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8151.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8151 (Account Code Restricted ecRecover). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8151","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8151","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8151","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1625","slug":"eip-8164","title":"Native Key Delegation for EOAs","authors":"Gregory Markou, James Prestwich","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Gregory Markou, James Prestwich","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8164.md","source_label":"EIP 8164","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8164.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8164.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8164 (Native Key Delegation for EOAs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8164","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8164","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8164","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1626","slug":"eip-8173","title":"Foundations of EVM Control Flow","authors":"Greg Colvin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Greg Colvin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8173.md","source_label":"EIP 8173","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8173.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8173.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8173 (Foundations of EVM Control Flow). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8173","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8173","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8173","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1627","slug":"eip-8175","title":"Composable Transaction","authors":"Dragan Rakita","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Dragan Rakita","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8175.md","source_label":"EIP 8175","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8175.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8175.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8175 (Composable Transaction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8175","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8175","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8175","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1628","slug":"eip-8178","title":"Binary SSZ Transport for the Engine API","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8178.md","source_label":"EIP 8178","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8178.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8178.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8178 (Binary SSZ Transport for the Engine API). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8178","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8178","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8178","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1629","slug":"eip-8184","title":"LUCID encrypted mempool","authors":"Anders Elowsson, Justin Florentine, Julian Ma","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Anders Elowsson, Justin Florentine, Julian Ma","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8184.md","source_label":"EIP 8184","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8184.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8184.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8184 (LUCID encrypted mempool). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8184","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8184","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8184","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1630","slug":"eip-8188","title":"Last-Written Block for Accounts and Slots","authors":"Wei Han Ng, Amirul Ashraf, Guillaume Ballet, Maria Silva, Gary Rong, Carlos Perez, Jochem Brouwer","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Wei Han Ng, Amirul Ashraf, Guillaume Ballet, Maria Silva, Gary Rong, Carlos Perez, Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8188.md","source_label":"EIP 8188","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8188.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8188.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8188 (Last-Written Block for Accounts and Slots). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8188","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8188","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8188","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1631","slug":"eip-8197","title":"Cryptographically Agile Transactions","authors":"Danno Ferrin, Ron Kahat","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Danno Ferrin, Ron Kahat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8197.md","source_label":"EIP 8197","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8197.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8197.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8197 (Cryptographically Agile Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8197","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8197","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8197","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1632","slug":"eip-8198","title":"Quick Slots","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8198.md","source_label":"EIP 8198","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8198.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8198.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8198 (Quick Slots). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8198","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8198","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8198","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1633","slug":"eip-8200","title":"EVMification","authors":"Kevaundray Wedderburn","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Kevaundray Wedderburn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8200.md","source_label":"EIP 8200","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8200.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8200.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8200 (EVMification). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8200","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8200","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8200","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1634","slug":"eip-8202","title":"Scheme-Agile Transactions","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo, Ben Adams","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo, Ben Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8202.md","source_label":"EIP 8202","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8202.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8202.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8202 (Scheme-Agile Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8202","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8202","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8202","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1635","slug":"eip-8205","title":"Withdrawal credentials preregistration","authors":"George Avsetsin, Dmitry Gusakov, Greg Koumoutsos, Eugene Mamin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"George Avsetsin, Dmitry Gusakov, Greg Koumoutsos, Eugene Mamin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8205.md","source_label":"EIP 8205","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8205.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8205.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8205 (Withdrawal credentials preregistration). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8205","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8205","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8205","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1636","slug":"eip-8209","title":"Commit-Reveal Transaction Frames","authors":"Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Alex Forshtat, Shahaf Nacson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8209.md","source_label":"EIP 8209","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8209.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8209.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8209 (Commit-Reveal Transaction Frames). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8209","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8209","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8209","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1637","slug":"eip-8219","title":"Checked Arithmetic Opcodes","authors":"Hubert Ritzdorf","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Hubert Ritzdorf","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8219.md","source_label":"EIP 8219","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8219.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8219.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8219 (Checked Arithmetic Opcodes). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8219","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8219","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8219","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1638","slug":"eip-8222","title":"Lean Staking","authors":"Mohammad Jahanara, Pierre Daix-Moreux","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Mohammad Jahanara, Pierre Daix-Moreux","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8222.md","source_label":"EIP 8222","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8222.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8222.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8222 (Lean Staking). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8222","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8222","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8222","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1639","slug":"eip-8237","title":"Independent CL/EL Sync","authors":"M. Kalinin, Potuz, Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"M. Kalinin, Potuz, Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8237.md","source_label":"EIP 8237","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8237.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8237.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8237 (Independent CL/EL Sync). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8237","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8237","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8237","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1640","slug":"eip-8243","title":"Batching Attestations at Source","authors":"Raúl Kripalani, Toni Wahrstätter, Mikhail Kalinin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Raúl Kripalani, Toni Wahrstätter, Mikhail Kalinin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8243.md","source_label":"EIP 8243","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8243.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8243.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8243 (Batching Attestations at Source). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8243","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8243","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8243","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1641","slug":"eip-8247","title":"Ancestor-Indexed BALs","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8247.md","source_label":"EIP 8247","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8247.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8247.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8247 (Ancestor-Indexed BALs). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8247","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8247","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8247","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1642","slug":"eip-8250","title":"Keyed Nonces for Frame Transactions","authors":"Thomas Thiery, Toni Wahrstätter, lightclient, Vitalik Buterin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Thomas Thiery, Toni Wahrstätter, lightclient, Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8250.md","source_label":"EIP 8250","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8250.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8250.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8250 (Keyed Nonces for Frame Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8250","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8250","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8250","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1643","slug":"eip-8252","title":"Execution-Layer Reorg State Retention Window","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Jacek Sieka","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Jacek Sieka","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8252.md","source_label":"EIP 8252","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8252.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8252.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8252 (Execution-Layer Reorg State Retention Window). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8252","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8252","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8252","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1644","slug":"eip-8253","title":"Bump nonce of zero-nonce storage accounts","authors":"Jochem Brouwer","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8253.md","source_label":"EIP 8253","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8253.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8253.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8253 (Bump nonce of zero-nonce storage accounts). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8253","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8253","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8253","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1645","slug":"eip-8254","title":"Cap Deposit Requests Per Block","authors":"pk910, Barnabas Busa","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"pk910, Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8254.md","source_label":"EIP 8254","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8254.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8254.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8254 (Cap Deposit Requests Per Block). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8254","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8254","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8254","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1646","slug":"eip-8256","title":"Blob Streaming","authors":"Marios, Bharath, Francesco D'Amato, Julian Ma, Raúl Kripalani, Bosul Mun, Csaba Kiraly, Anders Elowsson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Marios, Bharath, Francesco D'Amato, Julian Ma, Raúl Kripalani, Bosul Mun, Csaba Kiraly, Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8256.md","source_label":"EIP 8256","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8256.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8256.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8256 (Blob Streaming). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8256","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8256","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8256","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1647","slug":"eip-8266","title":"Expiring Nonces for Frame Transactions","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter, lightclient","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter, lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8266.md","source_label":"EIP 8266","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8266.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8266.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8266 (Expiring Nonces for Frame Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8266","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8266","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8266","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1648","slug":"eip-8268","title":"Storage Roots in Block Access Lists","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter, Carlos Perez","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter, Carlos Perez","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8268.md","source_label":"EIP 8268","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8268.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8268.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8268 (Storage Roots in Block Access Lists). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8268","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8268","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8268","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1649","slug":"eip-8272","title":"Recent Roots for Frame Transactions","authors":"Thomas Thiery, Vitalik Buterin, Toni Wahrstätter, lightclient","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Thomas Thiery, Vitalik Buterin, Toni Wahrstätter, lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8272.md","source_label":"EIP 8272","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8272.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8272.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8272 (Recent Roots for Frame Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8272","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8272","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8272","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1650","slug":"eip-8279","title":"Block Access List Byte Floor","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8279.md","source_label":"EIP 8279","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8279.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8279.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8279 (Block Access List Byte Floor). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8279","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8279","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8279","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1651","slug":"eip-8282","title":"Builder Execution Requests","authors":"Cayman, Nico Flaig, Felix Lange, Justin Traglia","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Cayman, Nico Flaig, Felix Lange, Justin Traglia","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8282.md","source_label":"EIP 8282","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8282.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8282.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8282 (Builder Execution Requests). The file's status is Last Call. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8282","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8282","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8282","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1652","slug":"eip-8288","title":"In-mempool signature and proof aggregation","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Thomas Coratger","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Thomas Coratger","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8288.md","source_label":"EIP 8288","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8288.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8288.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8288 (In-mempool signature and proof aggregation). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8288","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8288","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8288","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1653","slug":"eip-8289","title":"Multi-block Access List Warming","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8289.md","source_label":"EIP 8289","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8289.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8289.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8289 (Multi-block Access List Warming). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8289","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8289","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8289","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1654","slug":"eip-8292","title":"Post-Quantum Attestation Aggregators","authors":"Anshal Shukla, Gajinder Singh, Parthasarathy Ramanujam, Guillaume Ballet, Shariq Naiyer, Kolby Moroz Liebl, Unnawut Leepaisalsuwanna, Tom Wambsgans, Thomas Coratger, Justin Drake","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Anshal Shukla, Gajinder Singh, Parthasarathy Ramanujam, Guillaume Ballet, Shariq Naiyer, Kolby Moroz Liebl, Unnawut Leepaisalsuwanna, Tom Wambsgans, Thomas Coratger, Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8292.md","source_label":"EIP 8292","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8292.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8292.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8292 (Post-Quantum Attestation Aggregators). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8292","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8292","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8292","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1655","slug":"eip-8295","title":"State Tiering by Periods","authors":"Wei Han Ng, Amirul Ashraf, Guillaume Ballet, Maria Silva, Gary Rong, Carlos Perez, Jochem Brouwer","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Wei Han Ng, Amirul Ashraf, Guillaume Ballet, Maria Silva, Gary Rong, Carlos Perez, Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8295.md","source_label":"EIP 8295","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8295.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8295.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8295 (State Tiering by Periods). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8295","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8295","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8295","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1656","slug":"eip-8296","title":"Fixed-Cutoff State Tiering","authors":"Wei Han Ng","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Wei Han Ng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8296.md","source_label":"EIP 8296","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8296.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8296.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8296 (Fixed-Cutoff State Tiering). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8296","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8296","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8296","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1657","slug":"eip-8297","title":"Partitioned Binary Tree","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Guillaume Ballet, Dankrad Feist, Ignacio Hagopian, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh, Danno Ferrin, Piper Merriam, Gottfried Herold et al.","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Guillaume Ballet, Dankrad Feist, Ignacio Hagopian, Kevaundray Wedderburn, Tanishq Jasoria, Gajinder Singh, Danno Ferrin, Piper Merriam, Gottfried Herold et al.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8297.md","source_label":"EIP 8297","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8297.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8297.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8297 (Partitioned Binary Tree). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8297","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8297","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8297","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1658","slug":"eip-8298","title":"SETCODEFROM Code Reuse Instruction","authors":"Liyi Guo, Ben Adams, Carlos Perez, Nicolas Consigny","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Liyi Guo, Ben Adams, Carlos Perez, Nicolas Consigny","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8298.md","source_label":"EIP 8298","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8298.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8298.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8298 (SETCODEFROM Code Reuse Instruction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8298","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8298","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8298","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1659","slug":"eip-8304","title":"Trustless log and transaction index","authors":"Zsolt Felföldi","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Zsolt Felföldi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8304.md","source_label":"EIP 8304","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8304.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8304.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8304 (Trustless log and transaction index). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8304","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8304","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8304","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1660","slug":"eip-8310","title":"Post-Quantum Keystore for Stateful Keys","authors":"Anshal Shukla, Benedikt Wagner, Gajinder Singh, Guillaume Ballet, Justin Drake, Kolby Moroz Liebl, Parthasarathy Ramanujam, Shariq Naiyer, Thomas Coratger, Unnawut Leepaisalsuwanna","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Anshal Shukla, Benedikt Wagner, Gajinder Singh, Guillaume Ballet, Justin Drake, Kolby Moroz Liebl, Parthasarathy Ramanujam, Shariq Naiyer, Thomas Coratger, Unnawut Leepaisalsuwanna","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8310.md","source_label":"EIP 8310","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8310.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8310.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8310 (Post-Quantum Keystore for Stateful Keys). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8310","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8310","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8310","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1661","slug":"eip-8311","title":"Increase Calldata Floor Cost to 96","authors":"Maria Silva, Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Maria Silva, Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8311.md","source_label":"EIP 8311","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8311.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8311.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8311 (Increase Calldata Floor Cost to 96). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8311","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8311","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8311","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1662","slug":"eip-8321","title":"Hash-Chain RANDAO","authors":"Kevaundray Wedderburn, Benedikt Wagner, Tom Wambsgans, Justin Drake, Thomas Coratger","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Kevaundray Wedderburn, Benedikt Wagner, Tom Wambsgans, Justin Drake, Thomas Coratger","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8321.md","source_label":"EIP 8321","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8321.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8321.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8321 (Hash-Chain RANDAO). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8321","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8321","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8321","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1663","slug":"eip-8333","title":"Align Checkpoint with Epoch Boundary Block","authors":"Cayman, Nico Flaig, Lodekeeper, twoeths","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Cayman, Nico Flaig, Lodekeeper, twoeths","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8333.md","source_label":"EIP 8333","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8333.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8333.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8333 (Align Checkpoint with Epoch Boundary Block). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8333","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8333","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8333","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1664","slug":"eip-8337","title":"Validated EVM Code","authors":"Greg Colvin, Martin Holst Swende, Brooklyn Zelenka, John Max Skaller","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Greg Colvin, Martin Holst Swende, Brooklyn Zelenka, John Max Skaller","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8337.md","source_label":"EIP 8337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8337.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8337.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8337 (Validated EVM Code). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1665","slug":"eip-8347","title":"Offline State Migration to the PBT","authors":"Carlos Perez, Maria Silva, Kevaundray Wedderburn","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Carlos Perez, Maria Silva, Kevaundray Wedderburn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8347.md","source_label":"EIP 8347","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8347.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8347.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8347 (Offline State Migration to the PBT). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8347","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8347","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8347","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1666","slug":"eip-8355","title":"Precompiles for ML-DSA Verification","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8355.md","source_label":"EIP 8355","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8355.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8355.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8355 (Precompiles for ML-DSA Verification). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8355","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8355","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8355","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1667","slug":"eip-8360","title":"TCREATE Opcode","authors":"Helkomine, abc-123-c, Milos, Peter Phillips","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Helkomine, abc-123-c, Milos, Peter Phillips","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8360.md","source_label":"EIP 8360","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8360.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8360.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8360 (TCREATE Opcode). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8360","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8360","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8360","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1668","slug":"eip-8363","title":"Tapered Issuance Burn","authors":"pintail, Jérôme de Tychey, dapplion, pa7x1, Ladislaus von Daniels, Justin Drake","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"pintail, Jérôme de Tychey, dapplion, pa7x1, Ladislaus von Daniels, Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8363.md","source_label":"EIP 8363","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8363.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8363.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8363 (Tapered Issuance Burn). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8363","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8363","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8363","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1669","slug":"eip-8365","title":"Disallow new 0x00 validators","authors":"NC, Kevaundray Wedderburn","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"NC, Kevaundray Wedderburn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8365.md","source_label":"EIP 8365","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8365.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8365.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8365 (Disallow new 0x00 validators). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8365","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8365","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8365","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1670","slug":"eip-8368","title":"CPSB Recalibration for New Gas Limit","authors":"Maria Silva, Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Maria Silva, Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8368.md","source_label":"EIP 8368","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8368.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8368.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8368 (CPSB Recalibration for New Gas Limit). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8368","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8368","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8368","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1671","slug":"eip-8369","title":"VOPS Profiles for FOCIL Eligibility","authors":"Thomas Thiery","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Thomas Thiery","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8369.md","source_label":"EIP 8369","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8369.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8369.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8369 (VOPS Profiles for FOCIL Eligibility). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8369","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8369","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8369","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1672","slug":"eip-8371","title":"RowDAS - Distributed Blob Reconstruction","authors":"Csaba Kiraly, Marco Munizaga","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Csaba Kiraly, Marco Munizaga","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8371.md","source_label":"EIP 8371","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8371.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8371.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8371 (RowDAS - Distributed Blob Reconstruction). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8371","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8371","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8371","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1673","slug":"eip-8372","title":"Normalized state gas limit","authors":"Anders Elowsson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8372.md","source_label":"EIP 8372","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8372.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8372.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8372 (Normalized state gas limit). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8372","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8372","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8372","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1674","slug":"eip-8379","title":"Top-up Sync","authors":"Jacek Sieka, Dustin, Tamaghna Choudhuri","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Jacek Sieka, Dustin, Tamaghna Choudhuri","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8379.md","source_label":"EIP 8379","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8379.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8379.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8379 (Top-up Sync). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8379","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8379","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8379","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1675","slug":"eip-8383","title":"Reduce CL Block Retention Window","authors":"Kevaundray Wedderburn","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Kevaundray Wedderburn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8383.md","source_label":"EIP 8383","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8383.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8383.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8383 (Reduce CL Block Retention Window). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8383","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8383","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8383","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1676","slug":"eip-8390","title":"Remove the Sync Committee","authors":"Lion","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Lion","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8390.md","source_label":"EIP 8390","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8390.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8390.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8390 (Remove the Sync Committee). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8390","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8390","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8390","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1677","slug":"eip-8411","title":"Fast Execution Payload Broadcast","authors":"Kamil Salakhiev, Csaba Kiraly, Potuz, Raúl Kripalani, Satyajit Das","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Kamil Salakhiev, Csaba Kiraly, Potuz, Raúl Kripalani, Satyajit Das","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-8411.md","source_label":"EIP 8411","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-8411.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-8411.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 8411 (Fast Execution Payload Broadcast). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8411","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8411","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8411","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1678","slug":"eip-858","title":"Reduce block reward and delay difficulty bomb","authors":"Carl Larson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Carl Larson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-858.md","source_label":"EIP 858","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-858.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-858.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 858 (Reduce block reward and delay difficulty bomb). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-858","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-858","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-858","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1679","slug":"eip-86","title":"Abstraction of transaction origin and signature","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-86.md","source_label":"EIP 86","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-86.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-86.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 86 (Abstraction of transaction origin and signature). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-86","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-86","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-86","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1680","slug":"eip-867","title":"Standardized Ethereum Recovery Proposals","authors":"Dan Phifer, James Levy, Reuben Youngblom","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Phifer, James Levy, Reuben Youngblom","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-867.md","source_label":"EIP 867","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-867.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-867.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 867 (Standardized Ethereum Recovery Proposals). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-867","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-867","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-867","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1681","slug":"eip-868","title":"Node Discovery v4 ENR Extension","authors":"Felix Lange","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-868.md","source_label":"EIP 868","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-868.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-868.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 868 (Node Discovery v4 ENR Extension). The file's status is Final. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-868","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-868","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-868","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1682","slug":"eip-908","title":"Reward clients for a sustainable network","authors":"James Ray, Micah Zoltu","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"James Ray, Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-908.md","source_label":"EIP 908","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-908.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-908.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 908 (Reward clients for a sustainable network). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-908","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-908","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-908","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1683","slug":"eip-969","title":"Modifications to ethash to invalidate existing dedicated hardware implementations","authors":"David Stanfill","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"David Stanfill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-969.md","source_label":"EIP 969","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-969.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-969.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 969 (Modifications to ethash to invalidate existing dedicated hardware implementations). The file's status is Stagnant. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-969","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-969","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-969","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1684","slug":"eip-999","title":"Restore Contract Code at 0x863DF6BFa4469f3ead0bE8f9F2AAE51c91A907b4","authors":"Afri Schoedon","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Afri Schoedon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-999.md","source_label":"EIP 999","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/eip-999.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/eip-999.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs","editorial_line":"A desk note on EIP 999 (Restore Contract Code at 0x863DF6BFa4469f3ead0bE8f9F2AAE51c91A907b4). The file's status is Withdrawn. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-999","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-999","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-999","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1685","slug":"bip-3","title":"Updated BIP Process","authors":"Murch","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Murch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0003.md","source_label":"BIP 3","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-3.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-3.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 3 (Updated BIP Process). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-3","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-3","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-3","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1686","slug":"bip-54","title":"Consensus Cleanup","authors":"Antoine Poinsot","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Antoine Poinsot","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0054.md","source_label":"BIP 54","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-54.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-54.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 54 (Consensus Cleanup). The file's status is Complete. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-54","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-54","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-54","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1687","slug":"bip-77","title":"Async Payjoin","authors":"Dan Gould","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Dan Gould","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0077.md","source_label":"BIP 77","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-77.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-77.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 77 (Async Payjoin). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-77","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-77","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-77","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1688","slug":"bip-95","title":"Testnet 5","authors":"Pol Espinasa","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pol Espinasa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0095.md","source_label":"BIP 95","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-95.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-95.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 95 (Testnet 5). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-95","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-95","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-95","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1689","slug":"bip-138","title":"Compact Encryption Scheme for Non-seed Wallet Data","authors":"Pyth","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pyth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0138.md","source_label":"BIP 138","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-138.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-138.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 138 (Compact Encryption Scheme for Non-seed Wallet Data). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-138","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-138","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-138","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1690","slug":"bip-332","title":"Stale Tip Relay","authors":"Anthony Towns","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Anthony Towns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0332.md","source_label":"BIP 332","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-332.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-332.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 332 (Stale Tip Relay). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-332","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-332","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-332","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1691","slug":"bip-346","title":"OP_TXHASH","authors":"Steven Roose","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Steven Roose","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0346.md","source_label":"BIP 346","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-346.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-346.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 346 (OP_TXHASH). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-346","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-346","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-346","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1692","slug":"bip-348","title":"CHECKSIGFROMSTACK","authors":"Brandon Black","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Brandon Black","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0348.md","source_label":"BIP 348","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-348.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-348.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 348 (CHECKSIGFROMSTACK). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-348","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-348","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-348","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1693","slug":"bip-349","title":"OP_INTERNALKEY","authors":"Brandon Black","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Brandon Black","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0349.md","source_label":"BIP 349","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-349.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-349.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 349 (OP_INTERNALKEY). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-349","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-349","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-349","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1694","slug":"bip-379","title":"Miniscript","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0379.md","source_label":"BIP 379","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-379.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-379.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 379 (Miniscript). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-379","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-379","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-379","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1695","slug":"bip-434","title":"Peer Feature Negotiation","authors":"Anthony Towns","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Anthony Towns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0434.md","source_label":"BIP 434","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-434.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-434.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 434 (Peer Feature Negotiation). The file's status is Complete. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-434","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-434","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-434","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1696","slug":"bip-442","title":"OP_PAIRCOMMIT","authors":"moonsettler","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"moonsettler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0442.md","source_label":"BIP 442","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-442.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-442.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 442 (OP_PAIRCOMMIT). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-442","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-442","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-442","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1697","slug":"bip-446","title":"OP_TEMPLATEHASH","authors":"Gregory Sanders","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Gregory Sanders","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0446.md","source_label":"BIP 446","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-446.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-446.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 446 (OP_TEMPLATEHASH). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-446","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-446","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-446","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1698","slug":"bip-448","title":"Taproot-native (Re)bindable Transactions","authors":"Gregory Sanders","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Gregory Sanders","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0448.md","source_label":"BIP 448","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-448.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-448.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 448 (Taproot-native (Re)bindable Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-448","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-448","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-448","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1699","slug":"bip-449","title":"OP_TWEAKADD - x-only key tweak addition","authors":"Jeremy Rubin","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Jeremy Rubin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0449.md","source_label":"BIP 449","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-449.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-449.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 449 (OP_TWEAKADD - x-only key tweak addition). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-449","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-449","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-449","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1700","slug":"bip-451","title":"Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol","authors":"bubb1es","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"bubb1es","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0451.md","source_label":"BIP 451","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-451.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-451.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 451 (Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-451","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-451","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-451","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1701","slug":"bip-461","title":"Deterministic ECDSA Signatures","authors":"Liam Gilligan","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Liam Gilligan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0461.md","source_label":"BIP 461","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-461.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-461.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 461 (Deterministic ECDSA Signatures). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-461","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-461","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-461","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1702","slug":"bip-1","title":"BIP Purpose and Guidelines","authors":"Amir Taaki","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Amir Taaki","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0001.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 1","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 1 (BIP Purpose and Guidelines). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1703","slug":"bip-2","title":"BIP process, revised","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 2","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-2.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-2.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 2 (BIP process, revised). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1704","slug":"bip-10","title":"Multi-Sig Transaction Distribution","authors":"Alan Reiner","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Alan Reiner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0010.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 10","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 10 (Multi-Sig Transaction Distribution). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-10","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-10","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-10","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1705","slug":"bip-12","title":"OP_EVAL","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0012.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 12","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 12 (OP_EVAL). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-12","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-12","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-12","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1706","slug":"bip-14","title":"Protocol Version and User Agent","authors":"Amir Taaki","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Amir Taaki","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0014.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 14","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 14 (Protocol Version and User Agent). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-14","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-14","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-14","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1707","slug":"bip-15","title":"Aliases","authors":"Amir Taaki","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Amir Taaki","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0015.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 15","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 15 (Aliases). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-15","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-15","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-15","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1708","slug":"bip-17","title":"OP_CHECKHASHVERIFY (CHV)","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0017.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 17","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-17.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-17.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 17 (OP_CHECKHASHVERIFY (CHV)). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-17","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-17","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-17","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1709","slug":"bip-19","title":"M-of-N Standard Transactions (Low SigOp)","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0019.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 19","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-19.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-19.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 19 (M-of-N Standard Transactions (Low SigOp)). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-19","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-19","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-19","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1710","slug":"bip-20","title":"URI Scheme","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0020.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 20","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-20.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-20.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 20 (URI Scheme). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-20","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-20","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-20","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1711","slug":"bip-21","title":"URI Scheme","authors":"Nils Schneider","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Nils Schneider","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0021.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 21","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 21 (URI Scheme). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-21","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-21","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-21","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1712","slug":"bip-32","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 32","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-32.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-32.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-32","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-32","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-32","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1713","slug":"bip-33","title":"Stratized Nodes","authors":"Amir Taaki","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Amir Taaki","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0033.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 33","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 33 (Stratized Nodes). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-33","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-33","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-33","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1714","slug":"bip-36","title":"Custom Services","authors":"Stefan Thomas","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Stefan Thomas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0036.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 36","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-36.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-36.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 36 (Custom Services). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-36","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-36","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-36","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1715","slug":"bip-39","title":"Mnemonic code for generating deterministic keys","authors":"Marek Palatinus","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Marek Palatinus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 39","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-39.md under MIT. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"MIT","licence_label":"MIT","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-39.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under MIT. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 39 (Mnemonic code for generating deterministic keys). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-39","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-39","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-39","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1716","slug":"bip-44","title":"Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Marek Palatinus","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Marek Palatinus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0044.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 44","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 44 (Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-44","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-44","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-44","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1717","slug":"bip-50","title":"March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0050.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 50","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-50.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-50.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 50 (March 2013 Chain Fork Post-Mortem). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-50","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-50","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-50","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1718","slug":"bip-52","title":"Durable, Low Energy Bitcoin PoW","authors":"Michael Dubrovsky","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Michael Dubrovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0052.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 52","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-52.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-52.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 52 (Durable, Low Energy Bitcoin PoW). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-52","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-52","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-52","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1719","slug":"bip-60","title":"Fixed Length \"version\" Message (Relay-Transactions Field)","authors":"Amir Taaki","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Amir Taaki","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0060.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 60","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-60.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-60.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 60 (Fixed Length \"version\" Message (Relay-Transactions Field)). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-60","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-60","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-60","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1720","slug":"bip-62","title":"Dealing with malleability","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0062.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 62","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-62.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-62.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 62 (Dealing with malleability). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-62","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-62","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-62","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1721","slug":"bip-64","title":"getutxo message","authors":"Mike Hearn","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Mike Hearn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0064.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 64","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 64 (getutxo message). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-64","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-64","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-64","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1722","slug":"bip-74","title":"Allow zero value OP_RETURN in Payment Protocol","authors":"Toby Padilla","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Toby Padilla","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0074.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 74","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-74.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-74.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 74 (Allow zero value OP_RETURN in Payment Protocol). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-74","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-74","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-74","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1723","slug":"bip-78","title":"A Simple Payjoin Proposal","authors":"Nicolas Dorier","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Nicolas Dorier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0078.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 78","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-78.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-78.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 78 (A Simple Payjoin Proposal). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-78","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-78","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-78","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1724","slug":"bip-79","title":"Bustapay :: a practical coinjoin protocol","authors":"Ryan Havar","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Ryan Havar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0079.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 79","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-79.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-79.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 79 (Bustapay :: a practical coinjoin protocol). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-79","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-79","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-79","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1725","slug":"bip-80","title":"Hierarchy for Non-Colored Voting Pool Deterministic Multisig Wallets","authors":"Justus Ranvier","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Justus Ranvier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0080.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 80","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-80.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-80.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 80 (Hierarchy for Non-Colored Voting Pool Deterministic Multisig Wallets). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-80","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-80","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-80","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1726","slug":"bip-81","title":"Hierarchy for Colored Voting Pool Deterministic Multisig Wallets","authors":"Justus Ranvier","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Justus Ranvier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0081.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 81","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-81.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-81.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 81 (Hierarchy for Colored Voting Pool Deterministic Multisig Wallets). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-81","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-81","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-81","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1727","slug":"bip-83","title":"Dynamic Hierarchical Deterministic Key Trees","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0083.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 83","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-83.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-83.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 83 (Dynamic Hierarchical Deterministic Key Trees). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-83","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-83","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-83","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1728","slug":"bip-99","title":"Motivation and deployment of consensus rule changes ([soft/hard]forks)","authors":"Jorge Timón","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Jorge Timón","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0099.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 99","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-99.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-99.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 99 (Motivation and deployment of consensus rule changes ([soft/hard]forks)). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-99","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-99","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-99","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1729","slug":"bip-100","title":"Dynamic maximum block size by miner vote","authors":"Jeff Garzik","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Jeff Garzik","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 100","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-100.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-100.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 100 (Dynamic maximum block size by miner vote). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-100","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-100","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-100","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1730","slug":"bip-101","title":"Increase maximum block size","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0101.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 101","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 101 (Increase maximum block size). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-101","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-101","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-101","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1731","slug":"bip-102","title":"Block size increase to 2MB","authors":"Jeff Garzik","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Jeff Garzik","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0102.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 102","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 102 (Block size increase to 2MB). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-102","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-102","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-102","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1732","slug":"bip-103","title":"Block size following technological growth","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0103.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 103","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-103.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-103.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 103 (Block size following technological growth). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-103","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-103","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-103","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1733","slug":"bip-104","title":"'Block75' - Max block size like difficulty","authors":"t.khan","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"t.khan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0104.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 104","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-104.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-104.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 104 ('Block75' - Max block size like difficulty). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-104","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-104","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-104","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1734","slug":"bip-105","title":"Consensus based block size retargeting algorithm","authors":"BtcDrak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"BtcDrak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0105.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 105","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-105.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-105.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 105 (Consensus based block size retargeting algorithm). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-105","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-105","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-105","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1735","slug":"bip-106","title":"Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap","authors":"Upal Chakraborty","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Upal Chakraborty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0106.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 106","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 106 (Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-106","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-106","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-106","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1736","slug":"bip-107","title":"Dynamic limit on the block size","authors":"Washington Y. Sanchez","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Washington Y. Sanchez","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0107.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 107","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-107.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-107.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 107 (Dynamic limit on the block size). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-107","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-107","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-107","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1737","slug":"bip-109","title":"Two million byte size limit with sigop and sighash limits","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0109.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 109","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-109.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-109.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 109 (Two million byte size limit with sigop and sighash limits). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-109","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-109","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-109","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1738","slug":"bip-110","title":"Reduced Data Temporary Softfork","authors":"Dathon Ohm","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Dathon Ohm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 110","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-110.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-110.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-110","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-110","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-110","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1739","slug":"bip-114","title":"Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0114.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 114","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-114.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-114.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 114 (Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-114","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-114","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-114","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1740","slug":"bip-115","title":"Generic anti-replay protection using Script","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0115.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 115","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-115.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-115.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 115 (Generic anti-replay protection using Script). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-115","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-115","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-115","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1741","slug":"bip-120","title":"Proof of Payment","authors":"Kalle Rosenbaum","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Kalle Rosenbaum","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0120.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 120","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 120 (Proof of Payment). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-120","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-120","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-120","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1742","slug":"bip-121","title":"Proof of Payment URI scheme","authors":"Kalle Rosenbaum","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Kalle Rosenbaum","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0121.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 121","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 121 (Proof of Payment URI scheme). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-121","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-121","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-121","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1743","slug":"bip-124","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Script Templates","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0124.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 124","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-124.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-124.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 124 (Hierarchical Deterministic Script Templates). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-124","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-124","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-124","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1744","slug":"bip-129","title":"Bitcoin Secure Multisig Setup (BSMS)","authors":"Hugo Nguyen","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Hugo Nguyen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0129.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 129","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-129.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-129.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 129 (Bitcoin Secure Multisig Setup (BSMS)). The file's status is Complete. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-129","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-129","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-129","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1745","slug":"bip-131","title":"\"Coalescing Transaction\" Specification (wildcard inputs)","authors":"Chris Priest","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Chris Priest","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0131.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 131","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-131.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-131.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 131 (\"Coalescing Transaction\" Specification (wildcard inputs)). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-131","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-131","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-131","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1746","slug":"bip-132","title":"Committee-based BIP Acceptance Process","authors":"Andy Chase","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Andy Chase","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0132.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 132","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-132.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-132.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 132 (Committee-based BIP Acceptance Process). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-132","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-132","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-132","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1747","slug":"bip-134","title":"Flexible Transactions","authors":"Tom Zander","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Tom Zander","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0134.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 134","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 134 (Flexible Transactions). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-134","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-134","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-134","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1748","slug":"bip-135","title":"Generalized version bits voting","authors":"Sancho Panza","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Sancho Panza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0135.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 135","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-135.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-135.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 135 (Generalized version bits voting). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-135","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-135","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-135","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1749","slug":"bip-140","title":"Normalized TXID","authors":"Christian Decker","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Christian Decker","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0140.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 140","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-140.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-140.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 140 (Normalized TXID). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-140","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-140","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-140","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1750","slug":"bip-141","title":"Segregated Witness (Consensus layer)","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-141.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-141.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 141 (Segregated Witness (Consensus layer)). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-141","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-141","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-141","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1751","slug":"bip-142","title":"Address Format for Segregated Witness","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0142.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 142","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-142.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-142.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 142 (Address Format for Segregated Witness). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-142","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-142","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-142","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1752","slug":"bip-146","title":"Dealing with signature encoding malleability","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0146.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 146","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-146.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-146.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 146 (Dealing with signature encoding malleability). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-146","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-146","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-146","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1753","slug":"bip-149","title":"Segregated Witness (second deployment)","authors":"Shaolin Fry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaolin Fry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0149.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 149","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-149.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-149.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 149 (Segregated Witness (second deployment)). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-149","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-149","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-149","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1754","slug":"bip-150","title":"Peer Authentication","authors":"Jonas Schnelli","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jonas Schnelli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0150.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 150","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-150.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-150.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 150 (Peer Authentication). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-150","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-150","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-150","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1755","slug":"bip-151","title":"Peer-to-Peer Communication Encryption","authors":"Jonas Schnelli","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jonas Schnelli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0151.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 151","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-151.md under PD. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"PD","licence_label":"PD","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-151.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under PD. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 151 (Peer-to-Peer Communication Encryption). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-151","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-151","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-151","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1756","slug":"bip-154","title":"Rate Limiting via peer specified challenges","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0154.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 154","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-154.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-154.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 154 (Rate Limiting via peer specified challenges). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-154","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-154","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-154","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1757","slug":"bip-156","title":"Dandelion - Privacy Enhancing Routing","authors":"Brad Denby","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Brad Denby","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0156.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 156","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-156.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-156.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 156 (Dandelion - Privacy Enhancing Routing). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-156","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-156","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-156","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1758","slug":"bip-171","title":"Currency/exchange rate information API","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0171.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 171","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-171.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-171.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 171 (Currency/exchange rate information API). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-171","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-171","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-171","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1759","slug":"bip-174","title":"Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction Format","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 174","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-174.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-174.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 174 (Partially Signed Bitcoin Transaction Format). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-174","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-174","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-174","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1760","slug":"bip-175","title":"Pay to Contract Protocol","authors":"Omar Shibli","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Omar Shibli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0175.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 175","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-175.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-175.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 175 (Pay to Contract Protocol). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-175","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-175","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-175","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1761","slug":"bip-177","title":"Redefine Bitcoin's Base Unit","authors":"John Carvalho","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"John Carvalho","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0177.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 177","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-177.md under CC0-1.0. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_label":"CC0-1.0","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-177.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under CC0-1.0. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 177 (Redefine Bitcoin's Base Unit). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-177","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-177","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-177","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1762","slug":"bip-180","title":"Block size/weight fraud proof","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0180.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 180","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-180.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-180.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 180 (Block size/weight fraud proof). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-180","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-180","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-180","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1763","slug":"bip-199","title":"Hashed Time-Locked Contract transactions","authors":"Sean Bowe","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Sean Bowe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0199.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 199","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-199.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-199.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 199 (Hashed Time-Locked Contract transactions). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-199","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-199","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-199","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1764","slug":"bip-324","title":"Version 2 P2P Encrypted Transport Protocol","authors":"Dhruv Mehta","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Dhruv Mehta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0324.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 324","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-324.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-324.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 324 (Version 2 P2P Encrypted Transport Protocol). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-324","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-324","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-324","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1765","slug":"bip-327","title":"MuSig2 for BIP340-compatible Multi-Signatures","authors":"Jonas Nick","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jonas Nick","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0327.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 327","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-327.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-327.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 327 (MuSig2 for BIP340-compatible Multi-Signatures). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-327","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-327","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-327","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1766","slug":"bip-337","title":"Compressed Transactions","authors":"Tom Briar","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tom Briar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0337.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-337.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-337.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 337 (Compressed Transactions). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1767","slug":"bip-338","title":"Disable transaction relay message","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0338.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 338","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-338.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-338.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 338 (Disable transaction relay message). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-338","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-338","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-338","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1768","slug":"bip-340","title":"Schnorr Signatures for secp256k1","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0340.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 340","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-340.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-340.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 340 (Schnorr Signatures for secp256k1). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-340","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-340","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-340","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1769","slug":"bip-341","title":"Taproot: SegWit version 1 spending rules","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 341","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-341.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-341.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 341 (Taproot: SegWit version 1 spending rules). The file's status is Deployed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-341","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-341","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-341","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1770","slug":"bip-343","title":"Mandatory activation of taproot deployment","authors":"Shinobius","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Shinobius","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0343.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 343","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-343.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-343.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 343 (Mandatory activation of taproot deployment). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-343","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-343","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-343","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1771","slug":"bip-345","title":"OP_VAULT","authors":"James O'Beirne","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"James O'Beirne","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0345.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 345","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-345.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-345.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 345 (OP_VAULT). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-345","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-345","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-345","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1772","slug":"bip-351","title":"Private Payments","authors":"Alfred Hodler","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alfred Hodler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0351.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 351","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-351.md under MIT. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"MIT","licence_label":"MIT","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-351.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under MIT. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 351 (Private Payments). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-351","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-351","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-351","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1773","slug":"bip-391","title":"Binary Output Descriptors","authors":"SeedHammer","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"SeedHammer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0391.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 391","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-391.md under BSD-2-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-2-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-2-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-391.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-2-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 391 (Binary Output Descriptors). The file's status is Closed. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-391","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-391","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-391","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1774","slug":"bip-440","title":"Varops Budget For Script Runtime Constraint","authors":"Rusty Russell","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Rusty Russell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0440.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 440","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-440.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-440.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 440 (Varops Budget For Script Runtime Constraint). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-440","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-440","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-440","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-1775","slug":"bip-441","title":"Restoration of disabled script (Tapleaf 0xC2)","authors":"Rusty Russell","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Rusty Russell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0441.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 441","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Licensed for redistribution","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"The upstream file is mirrored at /primary/bip-441.md under BSD-3-Clause. The canonical file remains the source URL. The desk study is separate.","licence":"BSD-3-Clause","licence_label":"BSD-3-Clause","full_text":"https://blockchainlab.com/primary/bip-441.md","full_text_reason":"Mirrored from the upstream file under BSD-3-Clause. Desk wording is not part of that licence and is not a training grant.","repository":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips","editorial_line":"A desk note on BIP 441 (Restoration of disabled script (Tapleaf 0xC2)). The file's status is Draft. The note records the text. It does not measure who runs it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-441","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-441","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-441","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"}]}